
Assembly passes 5 bills, Sita temple ordinance
The speaker went through the motions of getting the bills passed swiftly, since no one from the opposition moved the amendments to the bills listed against their names.
Health minister Mangal Pandey, as in charge of the law department, moved the Bihar Hindu Religious Trust (Amendment) Ordinance, 2025, for its conversion into an Act. Earlier, the govt, by an ordinance, had decided to constitute a new trust to manage the Janaki temple, being reconstructed with new facilities and infrastructure, spread over 65 acres.
The five bills passed by the House are Bihar Municipality (Amendment) Bill, 2025, aimed at giving more autonomy to the chief counsellors and their deputies in municipalities; Bihar Special Survey and Settlement (Amendment) Bill, 2025, having bearing on conducting land surveys in revenue villages in designated urban bodies; Bihar Agriculture Land (Development of Land for Non-agricultural Purposes) (Amendment) Bill, 2025; Bihar Underground Pipeline (Amendment) Bill, 2025; and Bihar Goods and Services Tax (First Amendment) Bill, 2025.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fibre2Fashion
3 hours ago
- Fibre2Fashion
UK upper house concludes further examination of Employment Rights Bill
The UK House of Lords recently concluded its further examination of the Employment Rights Bill in report stage. The bill aims at updating and enhancing existing employment rights, making provision regarding pay and conditions in particular sectors, as well as undertaking reforms related to trade union matters and industrial action. The UK House of Lords has concluded its further examination of the Employment Rights Bill, which aims at updating and enhancing existing employment rights, making provision regarding pay and conditions in particular sectors, and making reforms on trade union matters and industrial action. Proposals around guaranteed hours could threaten the availability of local flexible part-time jobs, BRC observed. Major topics of the bill include zero hours contracts, fire and rehire, flexible working, unfair dismissal, an official release said. There were five divisions (votes) on proposed changes to the bill. Members agreed to two amendments on issues regarding giving new union members the choice whether or not to contribtue to a trade union's political fund and reinstating the 50-per cent voting threshold for trade union industrial action, and the democratic risk for lowering that percentage. A third vote, on removing a clause regarding trade union supervision of picket lines, was a tied result, and so under the procedures of the House, the change was not made. Two further amendments, on the inclusion of political expenditure in trade union annual returns and government powers to bring proceedings to employment tribunal on a worker's behalf, were voted on but disagreed to by members. The Third reading, a chance for members to make sure the eventual law is effective, workable and without loopholes, is scheduled for September 3. 'The House of Lords has listened to our concerns, putting forward positive, practical and pragmatic amendments to the Employment Rights Bill which would help to protect the availability of valuable, local, part-time and entry level jobs up and down the country,' Helen Dickinson, chief executive of the British Retail Consortium (BRC), said. 'To ignore these suggested changes when the bill returns to the [House of] Commons would undermine the government's own plans to get Britain working again as fewer flexible, part-time jobs will be available,' she said. 'Even with these amendments accepted, retailers remain worried about the consequences for jobs from other areas of the bill. The industry has lost 350,000 jobs over the past ten years, and current proposals around guaranteed hours in particular could threaten the availability of local flexible part-time jobs, which support so many people from so many backgrounds into work,' she added, calling for a much more strategic dialogue between employers, unions and the government, to collectively find solutions that will work for everyone. Fibre2Fashion News Desk (DS)


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
'Government must answer, be held accountable': Kiren Rijiju urges opposition not to stall Parliament; ‘disruptions hurt you more'
NEW DELHI: Parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju warned the opposition that frequent House disruptions undermine their "own role in democracy" by robbing them of the opportunity to question the government. His remarks came after the first week of the ongoing Monsoon Session, which was largely derailed by repeated protests from opposition MPs, who have been raising alarm over the Election Commission's ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise. Noting that "tough questions" don't get raised when the proceedings are disrupted, Rijiju said, "Let me tell you, officers are relieved when Parliament doesn't function because they escape the grilling. The government can be held accountable in Parliament. When the House runs, ministers face tough questions. When it adjourns within minutes, those questions don't even get raised. Opposition loses more than the government when Parliament is disrupted. " "Those who stall the House think they are damaging the government, but in truth, they are weakening their own role in a democracy. In any democracy, the government must answer to the people through Parliament. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pirates Climb Aboard Cargo Ship - Watch What The Captain Did Next Tips and Tricks Undo That is why allowing the House to run is essential for a functioning democracy." Rijiju added. He further contrasted the current state of frequent disruptions with the past, when leaders like Atal Bihari Vajpayee and LK Advani commanded such respect that MPs would "think twice" before speaking. "Back then, we would think twice before speaking because stalwarts were listening. Now disruptions begin on day one. Maybe social media has changed the game," PTI quoted him at the Sansad Ratna Awards. The opening week of Parliament's Monsoon Session was marked by high drama, political clashes with the surprise resignation of Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar over "health reasons". Moreover, 16-hour special discussion on Operation Sindoor has been scheduled for July 28 in the Lok Sabha and July 29 in the Rajya Sabha. Rijiju has also confirmed that the impeachment proceedings against Justice Yashwant Varma would begin soon, indicating a potentially explosive Week 2.


New Indian Express
4 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Opposition loses more than government when Parliament is disrupted: Kiren Rijiju
NEW DELHI: Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju on Saturday said that frequent disruptions in the House hurt the Opposition more, as they lose the crucial opportunity to hold the government accountable. The remarks came after the first week of the ongoing monsoon session was largely washed out due to repeated protests by Opposition MPs. Speaking at the Sansad Ratna Awards event organised by Prime Point Foundation, Rijiju recalled how bureaucrats sometimes express relief when Parliament is adjourned. "Let me tell you, officers are relieved when Parliament doesn't function because they escape the grilling. The government can be held accountable in Parliament. When the House runs, ministers face tough questions. When it adjourns within minutes, those questions don't even get raised. Opposition loses more than the government when Parliament is disrupted," he said. "Those who stall the House think they are damaging the government, but in truth, they are weakening their own role in a democracy," Rijiju added. Reinforcing the importance of parliamentary accountability, the minister said, "In any democracy, the government must answer to the people through Parliament. That is why allowing the House to run is essential for a functioning democracy." Reflecting on his journey in Parliament, Rijiju said he never considered Opposition MPs as adversaries. "We are all colleagues. Before 2014, most of my parliamentary career has been on the Opposition benches. Political rivalries may exist, but there is no enmity," he said.