Donald Trump says US will levy 100% tariff on some chip imports
Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Wednesday the new tariff rate would apply to "all chips and semiconductors coming into the United States," but would not apply to companies that had made a commitment to manufacture in the United States or were in the process of doing so.
"If, for some reason, you say you're building and you don't build, then we go back and we add it up, it accumulates, and we charge you at a later date, you have to pay, and that's a guarantee," Trump added.
Stay up to date with the latest news. Follow KT on WhatsApp Channels.
The comments were not a formal tariff announcement, and Trump offered no further specifics.
It is not clear how many chips, or from which country, would be impacted by the new levy. Taiwanese chip contract manufacturer TSMC - which makes chips for most US companies - has factories in the country, so its big customers such as Nvidia are not likely to face increased tariff costs.
The AI chip giant has itself said it plans to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in US-made chips and electronics over the next four years. An Nvidia spokesperson declined to comment for this story.
"Large, cash-rich companies that can afford to build in America will be the ones to benefit the most. It's survival of the biggest," said Brian Jacobsen, chief economist at investment advisory firm Annex Wealth Management.
Congress created a $52.7 billion semiconductor manufacturing and research subsidy program in 2022. The Commerce Department under President Joe Biden last year convinced all five leading-edge semiconductor firms to locate chip factories in the U.S. as part of the program.
The department said the U.S. last year produced about 12% of semiconductor chips globally, down from 40% in 1990.
Any chip tariffs would likely target China, with whom Washington is still negotiating a trade deal.
"There's so much serious investment in the United States in chip production that much of the sector will be exempt," said Martin Chorzempa, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Since chips made in China won't be exempt, chips made by SMIC or Huawei would not be either, Chorzempa said, noting that chips from these companies entering the U.S. market were mostly incorporated into devices assembled in China.
"If these tariffs were applied without a component tariff, it might not make much difference," he said.
Chipmaking nations South Korea and Japan, as well as the European Union, have reached trade deals with the U.S., potentially giving them an advantage.
The EU said it agreed to a single 15% tariff rate for the vast majority of EU exports, including cars, chips and pharmaceuticals. South Korea and Japan said separately that US agreed not to give them worse tariff rates than other countries on chips, suggesting a 15% levy as well.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Trump has weaponised tariffs against friends and enemies
US President Donald Trump appears to be succeeding in coercing allies, partners and adversaries alike to rethink their traditional policies and comply with his administration over thorny issues. Russia and the US have agreed for their two leaders to meet next week – a move seen by Mr Trump's team as payoff for its sanctions threat if Moscow doesn't comply with its deadline to cease military operations against Ukraine. A US partner, India, is in a dilemma after Mr Trump announced plans to double tariffs on Indian exports to the US to 50 per cent if New Delhi continues to purchase Russian oil, despite western sanctions imposed on Moscow over its war in Ukraine. Brazil has also faced its share of weaponised US tariffs after Mr Trump expressed dissatisfaction with the prosecution of former president Jair Bolsonaro – a Trump ally who is accused of orchestrating a failed coup against the current establishment in Brasilia. Meanwhile, Iran is preparing for possible US sanctions aimed at encircling it with measures targeting China, and most likely, renewed military action to thwart any attempts to revive its nuclear programme. So the question now is: who has adapted to Mr Trump's threats, who has defied them, and who has buried its head in the sand? Even as Mr Trump is scheduled to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, the two countries' stands on Ukraine remain far apart. At best, an agreement could be reached to cease military operations and initiate peace talks between Moscow and Kyiv. The sanctions Mr Trump has threatened to impose on Russia – failing to agree to a ceasefire – could be far-reaching, perhaps amounting to a financial blockade. Oil sanctions have a significant impact on Russia, yet imposing sanctions on banks dealing with the country would mean that these banks will no longer be able to pay Moscow its oil revenues. This may have contributed to Russia reconsidering its position. India receives about 40 per cent of its oil imports from Russia, and along with China, the two Asian countries account for about 80 per cent of Russian oil exports. While China may find ways to circumvent US financial sanctions to continue purchasing Russian oil, India has begun to consider the possibility of halting or reducing oil imports from Russia. This would be a blow to the Russian economy, particularly since oil exports have dropped since the start of the year. India won't be able to replace its Russian oil imports with Iranian oil, since Tehran is also under western sanctions. Hence, the most probable alternative source will be the Gulf states. Imposing a 50 per cent tariff on all Indian exports to the US, on par with Chinese goods, means that Mr Trump makes few distinctions between friends and foes when it comes to his policies. The new tariffs on goods from dozens of countries came into effect on Thursday, signalling the US President's resolve to reshape global trade. Washington's position is that trade exchanges between the US and other countries have been unfair and needed rebalancing, and it's in no mood to compromise with other countries. Like with Russia, the US President has been inclined to turn the screws on Iran, too. He has given Tehran a deadline until the end of August to agree to a new nuclear deal with Washington. Bear in mind that Iran's leaders have categorically refused to compromise on their doctrine of projecting power using nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles and armed proxies. Iran has doubled down on its support for Hezbollah's right to retain arms in Lebanon. So far, the Trump administration hasn't imposed sanctions on Tehran for its intervention in sovereign countries; the latter's regional behaviour has so far remained outside the scope of the talks between Washington and Tehran. But this could change soon, not only because Iran is exposing itself by preventing Beirut from reclaiming its sovereignty, but also because it has been using its regional cards – including Hezbollah's influence in Lebanon – as bargaining chips in its negotiations with the US. However, the Lebanese Cabinet's recent decision to disarm Hezbollah was bold, pioneering and wise. In doing so, President Joseph Aoun, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, and perhaps to some extent Speaker of Parliament Nabih Berri, may have taken a decisive step towards reclaiming the state's sovereignty. This could explain why Israel hasn't gone all out in its most recent assault on Hezbollah. It might limit its actions to targeting the group's leadership and structure – if the latter continues to refuse to hand over its weapons to the state – rather than waging an all-out war spreading across Lebanon. Circling back to the Trump tariffs, it is noteworthy that the one country the US President hasn't issued punitive measures against is Israel, despite his periodic statements seeking an end to the war in Gaza. The tragedy of Gaza is that it has been a victim of players who view it through veils that obscure the full picture. Mr Trump does disservice to his own legacy when he pretends that merely providing food after Israel has used starvation as a weapon against innocents is sufficient. He does disservice to his own vision for securing a Middle Eastern 'Deal of the Century' through his blind allegiance to Israel's rejection of a Palestinian state. For its part, the Israeli government appears to no longer care about the remaining hostages in Hamas's custody. It seems ready to withdraw this leverage from the group at any cost, with new measures – including, perhaps, a reoccupation of Gaza. Mr Trump still views Israel's actions as a response to the horrific Hamas-led assault on October 7, 2023. He is, therefore, unlikely to ever impose sanctions on, or seek accountability from, Israel – no matter what crimes it commits in Gaza.
Khaleej Times
3 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Moscow strikes kill five in Ukraine, refinery hit in Russia
A new round of Moscow's shelling and drone attacks killed five people in Ukraine Sunday, authorities said, while Kyiv hit an oil refinery in Russia's Saratov region. There was no reduction in hostilities on the frontline, even as the United States and Russia agreed to hold a summit in a bid to resolve the conflict, which, so far doesn't include Ukraine. "Three people killed, one wounded in Zaporizhzhia region as a result of Russian shelling," Ukraine's national police said, adding that two more civilians died in the highly contested Donetsk region in the east. Meantime, three beachgoers were killed in the Black Sea coastal city of Odesa, after they tripped on a mine while swimming in a prohibited area, which was mined to fend off a potential Russian navy attack. The Ukrainian army claimed its drones had hit a large oil refinery in Russia's western Saratov region, almost 1,000 kilometres (600 miles) away from the front line. The Saratov governor, Roman Busargin, only gave a vague comment saying that "one of the industrial enterprises was damaged," adding that one person died as a result of the drone attack. Another woman died in Russia's region of Belgorod, often under Ukrainian fire due to its proximity to the frontline, the local governor said. Kyiv is trying to hamper Moscow's ability to fund the more than three-year war of attrition by attacking its oil and gas facilities, the key sources fuelling the state budget. Ukraine's military claimed to have taken back the village of Bezsalivka in the Sumy region from the Russian army, which has made significant recent gains. The focus of the Russian offensive is on eastern Ukraine, where it has stepped up gains in recent months against its less well-equipped opponents. Presidents Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump will meet in the US state of Alaska this Friday to try to resolve the grinding conflict, despite warnings from Ukraine and Europe that Kyiv must be part of negotiations.
Khaleej Times
6 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Colombian presidential candidate in critical condition again, say doctors
A Colombian presidential candidate shot at a campaign event in June has deteriorated to critical condition due to a new cerebral hemorrhage, doctors treating him said Saturday. Conservative Senator Miguel Uribe, 39, was speaking to supporters in the capital, Bogota, when a gunman shot him twice in the head and once in the knee. He has been in intensive care since then, and undergone multiple surgeries. In recent weeks his relatives had welcomed progress in his care. But now Uribe has been put back under deep sedation, the Santa Fe Foundation hospital said in a statement. Uribe needs "new neurosurgical procedures" after presenting with a hemorrhage in his central nervous system, the statement said. "His condition is critical." Authorities have arrested six suspects in the attack. They believe the 15-year-old shooter was a hired gun and that dissident members of the defunct FARC guerrilla group are behind the attack. The government of leftist President Gustavo Petro initiated peace talks with the dissident group in mid 2024 in Venezuela, but the talks made little progress and have since been suspended. Uribe was the favored candidate of the right for the 2026 presidential elections. The attack in June stunned Colombia and raised fears of a return to the country's bloody past of political, cartel and paramilitary violence.
