The moment a Tesla Cybertruck owner discovers his car is not the boat Elon Musk said it would be.
Ah, the Tesla Cybertruck. It's the electric pickup that was built to look good on Mars but struggles to cope with conditions here on Earth.
We've seen no end of Cybertruck design fails since the vehicle's release in late 2023, from parts flying off on the road to an inability to handle snow. Perhaps, it shouldn't be surprising, then, that the edgy-looking EV isn't quite as amphibious as Elon Musk once suggested it would be.
One driver seems to have confused the Cybertruck with James Bond's Lotus Esprit S1, which we recently included in our pick of the most iconic car designs of all time. The California Highway Patrol Truckee Instagram account has posted images of a stranded Cybertruck at the edge of a lake with a reminder to users that 'Wade Mode isn't Submarine Mode.'
This may seem less a design fail and more a failure of common sense. But, as outlandish as it may seem, Elon Musk did suggest as shortly ago as 2022 that the Cybertruck would "be waterproof enough to serve as a boat so it can cross rivers, lakes and even seas that aren't too choppy".
That was a bold claim from the CEO of a company that historically had problems just keeping the rain out of its cars. It's strange way of phrasing it too. A Gortex jack is very waterproof, but that doesn't make it a boat.
Based on what Musk wrote in the tweet above, we could assume that while the Cybertruck might not serve to sail around Cape Horn, it would at least be able to cross a shallow lake. Musk suggested it would be able to cross the 360 metres of water between SpaceX's Starbase and South Padre Island in Texas.
Alas, while the Cybertruck did come to market with a 'Wade Mode', it seems this isn't the Boat Mode we were promised. The feature is supposed to lift the suspension and temporarily pressurise the battery to allow a shallow water crossing, but that doesn't help with mud.
Perhaps it's best not to believe everything that Elon Musk writes on X. For Cybertruck's total antithesis, check out the Slate Truck. Its cheap price, no-nonsense design and almost infinite customisability make it everything the Cybertruck isn't.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Apple's budget-friendly iPhone 17 just tipped for 3 big upgrades
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Apple's mainline iPhone 17 series is expected to launch in a few short weeks, and all four models will be fairly expensive. But if you wait a few months, the budget-friendly iPhone 17e should launch next spring with several welcome upgrades. Rumors indicate that Apple plans to make the 'e' series of iPhones an annual release beginning with this year's iPhone 16e. This week regular leaker Digital Chat Station posted on Weibo about the iPhone 17e revealing a number of specs. Some are familiar but three upgrades stuck out to us: A19 chip Design change Dynamic Island When the iPhone SE became the 'e' series, it breathed new life into a model that was several years out of date. If Apple moves to an annual release schedule, it needs to justify regular upgrades. So, the A19 chip isn't too surprising. The iPhone 17e needs to keep up with Apple Intelligence upgrades and iOS changes from generation to generation, so a more powerful chip is welcome and necessary. The A19 is rumored to be the first 2nm TSMC chip to feature in any phone, and should bring major performance and power efficiency upgrades over the A18 chip powering the iPhone 16e The 16e also features a notch instead of Dynamic Island, so losing it would make the 17e feel more like a modern iPhone. DCS mentions that the industrial design has 'changed significantly.' It's not clear what they mean by this, and it's not elucidated in responses to comments under the post. Presumably, this isn't about the Dynamic Island, but it's something to keep an eye out for. Expect the iPhone 17e to look a lot like its predecessor Some other iPhone 17e specs reported by DCS include things that are currently available in the iPhone 16e. Those include a 6.1-inch OLED display and the same 60Hz refresh rate. It will also have a 48MP single rear camera, 12MP front-facing camera and Face ID. Current rumors have the iPhone 17e launching in May of 2026, a few months later than the late February release of the iPhone 16e. What we don't know right now is how much cheaper the iPhone 17e will be than the flagship iPhone 17 line. With the ongoing rollercoaster that is President Trump's tariffs, the price next year could be the same $599 as the 16e or significantly higher. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button. More from Tom's Guide Apple Watch Ultra 3 needs these 3 improvements to make it a must-buy upgrade The Rise of Samsung: Why Apple Is Losing Ground in the Smartphone War Massive Apple leak just revealed 10 new products — Apple Watch 11, new Apple TV, new iPad mini and more
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
SpaceX's Starship faces 10th test after previous flights end in explosions
SpaceX's Starship is about to face its 10th test flight following explosions on previous launches. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has promised that the world's most powerful rocket and spacecraft will one day take humans to Mars and beyond. But leading up to its 10th launch, scheduled for Sunday at 7:30 p.m. ET, Starship has yet to achieve all its mission goals. And the last three flight tests, plus a static engine test in June, ended in explosions. "We now have serious questions whether the architecture of Starship is in fact feasible or not," said Olivier de Weck, the Apollo Program professor of Astronautics and Engineering Systems at MIT and editor-in-chief of the Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets. "I'm much, much less concerned about the Super Heavy booster. But the upper stage, the Starship itself, I'm starting to have some serious doubts about whether they'll be able to make it work. Certainly, with the payload that they have in mind." Starship's 10th flight test will lift off from SpaceX's Starbase launch site in the Rio Grande Valley of Texas. The company has yet to successfully launch and land the stainless-steel spacecraft, which is being engineered to be fully reusable and would be able to carry up to 100 people to deep space destinations. MORE: In 9th flight test, SpaceX's Starship experiences 'rapid unscheduled disassembly' Can Musk achieve his vision? During a presentation in May, Musk shared his vision for how Starship will eventually make humans multiplanetary, something he said is necessary to ensure the survival of humanity. "Progress is measured by the timeline to establishing a self-sustaining civilization on Mars. That's how we're gauging our progress here at Starbase," Musk said. "Rapidly reusable reliable rockets is the key." De Weck agrees that aiming for a human presence on Mars is a worthwhile endeavor, but he thinks it will take decades to land astronauts on the Mars surface and return them to Earth. He said while Starship's Super Heavy booster, the first stage that lifts the spacecraft into orbit, has been "pretty successful," he questions the design of the Starship itself, and its ability to carry humans into space safely. De Weck said the company is facing challenges with convergence, an engineering concept where the goal is for all the vehicle's systems to function correctly together. "Convergence means that with every test, every launch you do, the prior problems that you saw on the prior launch have been addressed," explained de Weck. "The problem that SpaceX has right now with Starship is every launch that they do, yes, they address the battles, so to speak, from the prior launch, but now the fix that they made causes new problems that didn't show up on the prior launch." De Weck described the process as playing "Whac-A-Mole," where each fix causes new problems that weren't an issue in earlier configurations. This has been a challenge for the company in previous test flights. Musk has acknowledged the challenges of his endeavor, writing on X that "There is a reason no fully reusable rocket has been built - it's an insanely hard problem. Moreover, it must be rapidly & completely reusable (like an airplane). This is the only way to make life multiplanetary." MORE: How Elon Musk's SpaceX may take over a corner of the Texas coast Problems with previous test flights In mid-June, a Starship exploded on the launch pad during a pre-flight engine test. SpaceX determined that "the vehicle was in the process of loading cryogenic propellant for a six-engine static fire when a sudden energetic event resulted in the complete loss of Starship and damage to the immediate area surrounding the stand." An analysis by the company found that the likely cause was the failure of a pressurized tank that stores gaseous nitrogen for the ship's environmental control system, which triggered the explosion. That explosion occurred less than a month after test flight nine ended prematurely when the "Starship experienced a rapid unscheduled disassembly" due to several mechanical failures minutes into the flight, according to SpaceX. The company also lost the first stage heavy booster during the test after it appeared to explode while splashing down in the Gulf. SpaceX blames "higher than predicted forces on the booster structure" for the loss. Test flight eight in March ended after what SpaceX described as a "hardware failure" with one of the upper-stage Raptor engines, leading to fuel igniting where it shouldn't have. The company believes the vehicle then automatically self-destructed. Debris was spotted across South Florida and the Atlantic, prompting temporary ground stops at nearby airports. A similar failure occurred in January 2025 during Startship's seventh flight test when stronger-than-expected vibrations caused a propellant leak, explosion and the loss of the spacecraft. In a post-incident report, SpaceX said it has made "hardware and operational changes" to improve the reliability of Starship and the Super Heavy booster during the next mission. "Each launch is about learning more and more about what's needed to make life multiplanetary and to improve Starship to the point where it can be taking ultimately hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people to Mars," Musk said during his address in May. MORE: SpaceX loses another Starship in latest launch, with debris seen streaking across the sky Can 'agile engineering' solve Starship's challenges? SpaceX has achieved significant technical milestones with each flight test, however. The company returned the Super Heavy booster to Earth on two occasions, catching it with giant robotic "chopsticks" attached to the launch tower and reused one of them from a previous launch. Flight test nine also demonstrated the vehicle's suborbital trajectory by reaching suborbital space before mechanical failures ended the mission. And with each subsequent mission, SpaceX makes upgrades and changes to the booster and spacecraft based on the learnings. Despite the setbacks, the company's test schedule has remained aggressive, with launches often just months apart. That pace is central to SpaceX's iterative engineering process, which de Weck describes as "rapid prototyping or agile engineering." "We'll find problems, we'll test it rapidly, and we'll fix it as we go. And we gradually approach a perfect product. That does not work as well for safety-critical systems and where the cost of failure is high," de Weck said. For flight ten, de Weck says the most important thing to watch is what happens after booster separation during the midstage of the mission. "I want to see a proper ignition of those engines, the Raptor engines on the upper stage, and then a coasting phase, a cruise phase without any explosions, premature engine shutdowns, and just a relatively clean reentry," he said. Even with another mid-phase failure, however, de Weck doesn't believe that SpaceX would end the program or go back to the drawing board for a new design. "I think they're going to keep going at least until 15, 16, 17 flights. I don't see them abandoning anything before 20 flights," de Weck said. As for Musk, his vision is a day when SpaceX is manufacturing two to three Starships a day and sending Starships to the Moon and Mars on a daily, if not hourly basis. "We could be out there among the stars making science fiction no longer fiction," said Musk. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Two Months Into Tesla's Robotaxi Launch: Where Does It Stand Now?
Two months after Tesla TSLA rolled out its first commercial robotaxi service in Austin, the big question is—how's it really going? Tesla CEO Elon Musk bets the company's future on autonomous vehicles, pitching robotaxis as the next growth engine. The launch in Austin on June 22 marked a milestone, with paying customers riding in Model Y vehicles monitored by safety drivers and remote operators. In the initial days of the rollout, videos quickly surfaced showing Tesla vehicles braking abruptly, creeping into intersections, or violating traffic rules. Passengers described some rides as confusing. Having said that, management reassured on the second-quarter earnings call that robotaxis in Austin logged over 7,000 miles without major safety incidents. Tesla has also begun testing in the San Francisco Bay Area—though regulators there prevent it from using the 'robotaxi' name. Notably, in Austin, the safety monitor sits in the passenger seat but in the Bay Area, regulations still require one in the driver's seat. Critics, including former Waymo CEO John Krafcik, argue that as long as Tesla vehicles rely on in-car safety monitors, they're not truly robotaxis at all. Tesla, however, points to data suggesting that its Full Self-Driving (FSD) system is statistically safer—10 times so, according to management—than human drivers. The shift to the FSD Version 12 has already boosted subscription adoption by 45%. Musk is promising even more with Version 14, which he teased yesterday. New vehicles can now drive themselves off the assembly line, with direct-to-customer autonomous deliveries planned by year-end in select regions. Also, Tesla aims to extend the robotaxi service to reach half of the U.S. population by the end of 2025, pending regulatory approvals. It plans to expand to other U.S. cities like Nevada, Arizona and Florida after obtaining necessary permits and approvals. Meanwhile, service coverage in Austin is set to grow more than tenfold. Still, the road ahead isn't without hazards. Lawsuits accusing Tesla of overstating FSD's safety, regulatory hurdles in key markets, and technical hiccups highlight the long journey before Musk's bold vision of a nationwide robotaxi fleet becomes a reality. Plus, Tesla is lagging behind early movers in the robotaxi space like Alphabet's GOOGL Waymo and Baidu BIDU. TSLA's Competitors in the Robotaxi Space Alphabet's Waymo is Tesla's toughest rival in the robotaxi race. Waymo already runs fully driverless Level 4 services in Phoenix, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Austin and Atlanta, delivering around 250,000 paid rides every week. Backed by Alphabet's $5 billion multi-year investment and partnerships with Hyundai, Uber and Zeekr, Waymo has both scale and strategic muscle. With expansion underway to cities such as Miami and Washington D.C, Waymo is setting the standard that Tesla must catch up to. Baidu is a major force in the robotaxi industry, though its efforts are concentrated mainly in China. Its autonomous driving program, Apollo Go, is already running fully driverless robotaxi services across 16 cities globally and has completed more than 14 million rides as of August 2025. Baidu is also fast-tracking Apollo Go's global expansion through high-profile partnerships with Uber and Lyft. Investor Takeaway After two months, Tesla's robotaxi push is still in the early innings. The company shows tangible progress and expansion potential but remains behind leaders like Waymo and Baidu. With regulatory battles and skepticism ahead, investing in this vision is less about today's revenues and more about Tesla's ability to eventually deliver on Musk's bold promise. The Zacks Rundown on TSLA Stock Shares of Tesla have lost around 20% year to date compared with the industry's decline of 16%. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research From a valuation standpoint, TSLA trades at a forward price-to-sales ratio of 10.12, above the industry and its own 5-year average. It carries a Value Score of D. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The Zacks Consensus Estimate for TSLA's earnings has been southbound over the past 60 days. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Tesla stock currently carries a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) : Free Stock Analysis Report Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) : Free Stock Analysis Report Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
