logo
Doctor Recounts Tiananmen Tragedy and the Medical Aid That Was Blocked by the CCP

Doctor Recounts Tiananmen Tragedy and the Medical Aid That Was Blocked by the CCP

Epoch Times03-06-2025
It's been over 35 years, but that hasn't stopped 85-year-old Huang Chen-ya from remembering how much Hong Kongers 'deeply loved' China.
A former Hong Kong legislator and neurologist, Huang was a leading figure in the city's medical community in 1989.
The first thing he did when news broke of the Tiananmen Square Massacre on June 4, 1989 was contact major hospitals in Beijing.
'As a doctor, what I was most concerned about was whether I could do anything to help the people who had been killed or injured,' he told a rally marking the 36th anniversary of the Massacre, held in Ashfield, Sydney, on June 1.
'I called every major emergency relief centre, and the frontline doctors who answered were all extremely anxious, saying they had run out of everything …' Huang said. 'All the major emergency hospitals in Beijing—every frontline doctor I spoke to—gave me the same response.'
Candles at a candlelight vigil mourning the victims of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre in Washington on June 2, 2023.
Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times
He was prepping emergency medical aid to be airlifted from Hong Kong to Beijing, but it needed to be agreed upon by hospital leadership.
'When we reached the higher levels, each director immediately changed their tone and said that this matter wasn't as serious as it seemed, that Beijing could handle it on its own, and didn't need any outside help,' he said.
'The Tiananmen Square Massacre is not just a tragedy for the Chinese, not just for ethnic Chinese, not just for Asians—it's a shared shame and trauma for all of humanity,' he said.
The Massacre was a watershed moment for both Australia and China.
For China and its people, hopes of democracy were instantly extinguished, while for Australia, 42,000 Chinese people were granted permanent residency—including students, doctors, academics, and artists—another addition to the evolving fabric of Australian society.
Staying Awake All Night in Sorrow
Li Yuanhua, then a lecturer at China's Capital Normal University in Beijing, said he had gone home, admitting he was afraid of walking out.
'I was very sad after I got home,' he said.
Li waited at home while gunshots rang through the night like firecrackers on New Year's Eve.
He didn't sleep that night, figuring that the students at Tiananmen Square had met with misfortune.
'I took a small stool and sat at the doorstep, shedding tears silently.'
Flowers were presented to the Goddess of Democracy statue before a forum marking the 36th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre, held at Ashfield Uniting Church in Sydney on June 1, 2025. (Cindy Li/The Epoch Times)
Student Finds Out the Truth Overseas
Wiki Chan, a student doing his PhD degree, is one of many Chinese students who learn about the full extent of the Chinese Communist Party's dark history once overseas.
'I think we still need to remember history—both the good and the bad should be brought to light for people to understand,' he told The Epoch Times at a photo exhibition at the University of Sydney on May 30, commemorating June 4.
It's Chan's first time seeing such a large-scale formal photo exhibition.
'History exists as it is. You can have your own subjective opinions, but hiding the negative parts is wrong—it's extremely evil. Especially when it comes to the suppression of voices calling for human rights and freedom. It actually exposes that regime's own lack of confidence,' he said.
A banner was displayed at a Tiananmen Square massacre photo exhibition held in the University of Sydney on May 30, 2025.
Cindy Li/The Epoch Times
Labor Urged to See CCP's Nature
Li, now an Australian citizen, said the late Labor Prime Minister Bob Hawke's decision to approve 42,000 permanent residency visas for Chinese students was a good decision in response to the Massacre.
'He understands the destructive nature of this communist regime—its harmfulness, its brutality toward its own people … Out of his conscience, he made a decision from his position that, looking back today, we see as a truly noble and courageous act.
'I think today's Labor government should take a closer look at what the CCP has done throughout history. You really can't just listen to what the CCP says.'
Li referred to the CCP's deliberate obstruction when former Prime Minister Scott Morrison first called for an independent investigation into the origin of COVID-19 in 2020.
In response to Morrison's call, the CCP imposed trade restrictions and tariffs on Australian exports, including beef, barley, and coal, which were widely interpreted as economic retaliation.
The former Labor Australian prime minister Bob Hawke in Brisbane on Aug. 16, 2010.
William West/AFP/Getty Images
'The communist party, in reality, does not engage in normal dialogue with you. It only knows how to force you into submission, to bully you, and it wants you to kneel ... There is fundamentally no concept of equality,' Li said.
The former professor cited
the CCP's denial of Hong Kong's autonomous status, describing the Sino-British Joint Declaration as a '
Signed in 1984 by the UK and the CCP, the Sino-British Joint Declaration outlined the terms for ending British rule over Hong Kong after more than 150 years. It also guaranteed the city's rights and freedoms under the 'one country, two systems' framework.
'I think from Australia's perspective, if you view it from an economic standpoint: as the world's second-largest economy and our biggest trading partner, you will never truly understand it,' Li said.
'We should also examine it from a humanistic perspective, and not view it as a normal government or a normal political party. It is not; it is a devil, disguised as a normal entity.'
Related Stories
6/4/2020
6/4/2023
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘I am your voice': Trump relaunches on TikTok with White House account

time14 minutes ago

‘I am your voice': Trump relaunches on TikTok with White House account

Rally highlights, White House glamour shots and his signature moves. President Donald Trump made a surprise return to the popular video app TikTok with three montages posted to a new official @whitehouse account Tuesday night. "America we are BACK," the first post was captioned. Trump pledged "I am your voice" as the video played. The account isn't Trump's first foray with the Chinese-owned app. Both he and his 2024 rivals, President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, signed up for TikTok in an effort to reach the 170 million users the company claims it has in the U.S. Trump last posted to his 15 million-plus followers from his former account @realdonaldtrump on Election Day. Candidates especially hoped to court young voters on the platform. But TikTok has faced scrutiny from the U.S. government since Trump's first administration. In August 2020, he released an executive order calling for "aggressive action" against TikTok to protect national security. One Republican-introduced bill that became law in 2022 banned most federal employees from downloading the app on government devices. U.S. authorities have listed concerns about possibilities of stolen U.S. user data and a potentially manipulative and addictive algorithm. Trump threatened to ban the app in his first term, but has thrice in his second term delayed the enforcement of a 2024 bipartisan law requiring TikTok's Chinese-owned parent company, ByteDance, to sell it in the U.S. or be banned. In anticipation of the initial ban deadline, TikTok briefly left app stores in the U.S. the day before Trump's second inauguration and went dark for 14 hours. A pop-up message crediting him appeared when the app started working again, reading, "As a result of President Trump's efforts, TikTok is back in the U.S.!" TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew was among many tech leaders who Trump invited to his inauguration. The company offered various alternatives to divesting, including increased oversight and data protection. The latest pause on the ban is set to end on Sept. 17, though Trump repeatedly vowed to cut a deal for TikTok, even suggesting the sovereign wealth fund he created in February could be used to keep TikTok operating in the U.S. Despite security concerns, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement to ABC News that TikTok will be a powerful tool for the president. "The Trump administration is committed to communicating the historic successes President Trump has delivered to the American people with as many audiences and platforms as possible," Leavitt said. "President Trump's message dominated TikTok during his presidential campaign, and we're excited to build upon those successes and communicate in a way no other administration has before." Leavitt also appeared in a clip on the White House account. The account racked up more than 140,000 followers by Wednesday afternoon, still catching up to Trump's more than 10 million Truth Social followers and more than 108 million followers on his less frequently used X account.

India and China to explore border demarcation amid US tensions
India and China to explore border demarcation amid US tensions

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

India and China to explore border demarcation amid US tensions

India and China have agreed to explore demarcating their disputed border, a key move toward resolving decades-old territorial disputes as the neighbors look to recalibrate ties against the backdrop of strained India-U.S. relations. The two sides will set up an expert group to examine an interim arrangement for marking out border areas, India's Ministry of External Affairs said in a statement on Tuesday. The decision came as Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi wrapped up a two-day visit to India - his first in three years. A statement from the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that the expert group will "explore advancing boundary delimitation negotiations in areas where conditions are ripe," without specifying which ones. The world's two most-populous nations have clashed repeatedly over their disputed border in the past 70 years. Ties plunged sharply in 2020 after a deadly confrontation but have recently been on the mend, with efforts gaining urgency amid U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff policy. Experts on both sides said the decision to explore an initial border arrangement marks a major step in recalibrating ties. The idea offers a "way forward," said Josef Gregory Mahoney, a professor of international relations at Shanghai's East China Normal University. "It will lead to difficult questions about other border areas but help foster mechanisms and trust for resolving them." The decision comes as New Delhi pursues stronger engagement with China and fellow BRICS nations, against the backdrop of strained ties with Washington after Trump's 50% tariff. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is expected to meet President Xi Jinping when he visits China to attend a regional summit later this month, marking his first trip to the country in seven years. Wang - who was in Delhi partly to lay the groundwork for Modi's visit - also met with India's National Security Adviser Ajit Doval on Tuesday and the two officials expressed satisfaction with the progress on border talks. At a briefing on Wednesday, China's Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said the two sides reached "new common understandings" during Wang's trip, adding that the "hard-won results should be cherished." Beyond border talks, the two sides have also moved forward in other areas. Beijing has also loosened curbs on urea exports, New Delhi has reinstated tourist visas for Chinese nationals, while a growing number of Indian businesses have been seeking partnerships with Chinese companies for deals including technology transfers, Bloomberg News has reported. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

Panama deserves sanctions, not the Security Council presidency
Panama deserves sanctions, not the Security Council presidency

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Panama deserves sanctions, not the Security Council presidency

This month, Panama holds the rotating presidency of the U.N. Security Council — a position that confers moral authority, policy influence and global prestige as the representative 'face' of the Council. But given Panama's longstanding and conscious role in undermining sanctions on Iran, this honor is deeply wrong and misguided. In fact, Panama should not be elevated — it should be sanctioned. A country that enables Iran's sanctions evasion should not be rewarded with the symbolic leadership of the very body charged with upholding those sanctions. Despite its protestations, Panama is neither a champion of the rules-based international order nor a true ally to the U.S. Panama's acquiescence to Chinese 'Belt and Road Initiative' ambitions in controlling the Panama Canal is only the latest sign of Panamanian duplicity that place it squarely at odds with the values and objectives of the council. For years, Panama has allowed its flag — akin to a passport for ships — to be used by vessels transporting illicit Iranian oil, the key revenue stream for a regime that continues to defy international nuclear restrictions. Panama is not ignorant or unaware of this problem. In January 2024, a bipartisan group of 31 U.S. Senators led by Senators Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Bob Casey (D-Pa.) urged the Panama Maritime Authority to 'cooperate with the United States and conduct investigations into a significant number of ships registered in Panama which are alleged to transport Iranian oil in violation of U.S. sanctions…' They sought Panama's explicit commitment to investigate some '189 Panamanian-flagged vessels of concern,' constituting ' nearly half ' of all the vessels aiding Iran. Two months later, then-Special Envoy to Iran Abram Paley visited Panama 'to ensure that the vessel registry is not abused by entities seeking to evade our sanctions on Iran. … Iran and its affiliated groups are trying to evade sanctions here in Panama, they are trying to abuse the flag registration of ships.' According to analysis by our organization, United Against Nuclear Iran, of the 542 foreign-flagged vessels that have carried in excess of $200 billion worth of Iranian oil since 2020 (mainly to China), some 289 have at one stage or another flown the 100-year old Bandera de Panama. As of this week, we identify 116 vessels currently flying the Panamanian flag that are implicated in carrying Iranian oil. This has all occurred despite repeated warnings to Panama over the last five years about this behavior by our organization, which has been praised for producing ' the best public data we have.' This is more than an oversight — it is tantamount to complicity. At the same time, the Islamic Republic of Iran is a nemesis to the UN Security Council, repeatedly violating council resolutions stretching back to 2006, when Iran was instructed to suspend all enrichment-related activities. Since then, Tehran has violated resolutions relating to nuclear activities, arms embargos, ballistic missile testing, and a resolution endorsing the failed Iran nuclear deal. Most recently, a top Iranian advisor issued what sounded a lot like a personal threaten against the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog, Rafael Grossi, following years of stonewalling UN nuclear inspectors. Now, two decades and one moribund nuclear deal later, Iran is still insistent on enriching nuclear fuel to the threat of world security. Iran has never been interested in nuclear compliance. Today, with key nuclear sites severely degraded by Israel and the U.N. in last month's strikes, Iran has insisted it will never give up its 'inherent right' to enrichment. Efforts to reconstitute and to develop the missiles needed to carry nuclear warheads require money, which in Iran's case will come in large part from illicit oil sales moved by tankers — tankers that Panama helps shield from scrutiny. These 'Ghost Fleet' vessels engage in deceptive maritime practices designed to obscure the origin and destination of oil — actions that violate international norms and often amount to criminal conduct. They switch off transponders, manipulate automatic identification systems, and conduct dangerous ship-to-ship transfers in international waters. These actions form the backbone of Iran's sanctions-evasion playbook. And Panama plays along. The UN Security Council is the body tasked with upholding international peace and security, including through the enforcement of sanctions. It was the council that imposed multiple rounds of sanctions on Iran over its nuclear program. But the council's credibility suffers when one of its rotating presidents enables, with impunity, the very violations those sanctions were designed to deter. The world is entering a still-more-volatile phase in its dealings with Iran as it braces for renewed nuclear provocations. Now is the moment for the international community — embodied by the United Nations — to close ranks, not reward enablers of sanctions evasion. Thus, Panama's presidency at this critical juncture sends an unfortunate message to every regime looking to flout global norms. Panama has had ample time to reform its maritime registry. Yet Panama-flagged ghost tankers continue to offer the most critical economic lifeline for the Tehran regime. Until that changes, Panama should be sanctioned, not promoted to a leadership post at the United Nations.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store