Hundreds of Black Hole 'Missing Links' May Have Been Discovered in New Survey
Lurking at the centers of dwarf galaxies speckled throughout space, astronomers have found 2,444 active black holes, slurping up matter from material around them. And, even more amazingly, 298 of these appear to be that elusive beast, the black hole of intermediate mass – long considered a missing link between stellar-mass black holes and supermassive behemoths.
This is nearly triple the number of previously known intermediate mass black hole (IMBH) candidates, representing the largest haul to date – a discovery that has huge implications for our understanding of how black holes get to masses equivalent to millions or billions of Suns.
"The statistical sample of dwarf active galactic nucleus candidates," the researchers write, "will be invaluable for addressing several key questions related to galaxy evolution on the smallest scales, including accretion modes in low-mass galaxies and the co-evolution of galaxies and their central black holes."
Supermassive black holes can be found at the centers of all large, well-formed galaxies. They're the nuclei around which galaxies revolve, and their masses are tremendous. The supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, for example, is 4.3 million times the mass of the Sun. That's on the low end of the mass scale; these beasts can reach masses that are tens of billions of solar masses.
We don't know how these black holes grow so big. Current theoretical models propose that one pathway is growth via accretion and mergers, growing with their galaxies; but our current technology doesn't allow us to see the "seeds" of these black holes in the early Universe. They are simply too small and too dim.
What we can do, however, is look for equivalent small galaxies with small black holes in the local Universe. And, using the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), an instrument designed to survey the Universe, this is what a team led by astronomer Ragadeepika Pucha of the University of Utah has done.
In its first year of operations, the terrestrial observatory collected observations of 114,496 dwarf galaxies – in high enough detail that the astronomers could zoom in and study their centers closely, looking for signs of black holes that are actively feeding, known as an active galactic nucleus.
"When a black hole at the center of a galaxy starts feeding, it unleashes a tremendous amount of energy into its surroundings, transforming into what we call an active galactic nucleus," Pucha says. "This dramatic activity serves as a beacon, allowing us to identify hidden black holes in these small galaxies."
The number of active galactic nuclei they identified in dwarf galaxies – 2,444 – represented 2.1 percent of the total dwarf galaxy sample. That's a huge number, nearly four times higher than the fraction found in previous surveys.
This means that there are likely way more low-mass supermassive black holes out there than we had been able to account for based on previous data.
The observations were so detailed that the team was able to use them to try to calculate the masses of the black holes they were looking at. From these calculations, the researchers identified nearly 300 IMBH candidates, sitting between around 100 and 100,000 times the mass of the Sun.
Black holes in this mass regime are highly sought by astronomers, because they're shockingly rare. We know that a massive, dying star can produce a black hole, but the upper mass for these single-star objects is a few tens of solar masses. What we don't have is a good sample of objects that explain how these (relatively) tiny black holes can grow to supermassive size.
We do know that black holes can merge to produce bigger black holes. A really solid sampling of IMBH in that mass gap would go a long way towards helping solve at least part of the mystery, giving us a pile of evidence that the process can, eventually, produce some absolute black hole units.
The team's new haul may just give us this sampling. Previously, only around 100 to 150 IMBH candidates had been identified. The work of Pucha and her colleagues gives us 151 confident candidates, and 147 tentative candidates. At the very least, it seems to have more than doubled the previous catalogue.
And already it's toppling our expectations. Only 70 of the IMBH candidates they found were in dwarf galaxies. The rest were hanging out in normal galaxies. This suggests that the coevolution of black holes and galaxies may not be as simple as we thought.
And that's just from DESI's early data. There is so much more out there waiting to be discovered, and so many questions yet to answer.
"For example, is there any relationship between the mechanisms of black hole formation and the types of galaxies they inhabit?" Pucha says. "Our wealth of new candidates will help us delve deeper into these mysteries, enriching our understanding of black holes and their pivotal role in galaxy evolution."
The research has been published in The Astrophysical Journal.
'Missing' Planet to Join a Rare Cosmic Lineup This Week
'Dead' Galaxy Cluster Is Making Stars Again And Astronomers Don't Know Why
Odds of 'City Killer' Asteroid Impact in 2032 Now Even Higher, Says NASA
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
2 days ago
- USA Today
A peculiar supernova prompts new theories about the cosmos
Scientists think a gigantic dying star tried to swallow a black hole. It didn't end well for the star, a new study says. A new discovery about what happens when a supernova – an exploding star – and a black hole collide could change the way scientists understand the lives and deaths of stars. The finding was the first time astrophysicists have observed a giant star exploding as the result, they believe, of its interaction with a dense black hole. The supernova was triggered by the intense gravitational stress of trying to "swallow" the black hole up, the study's authors say. The phenomenon may happen more than scientists realize, and new tools to observe supernova explosions could reveal other instances of black holes sparking supernovas, according to the lead study author. "If that is much more common, then it would transform the way we think about how stars explode," said Alex Gagliano, lead author of the study and fellow at the National Science Foundation Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Fundamental Interactions. One of the coolest parts of the discovery is that it was made possible by the use of artificial intelligence, or AI, Gagliano said. AI helped flag a star behaving unusually early on, which allowed the team to closely monitor as a surprising event unfolded. The study, published in the Astrophysical Journal, was conducted by a team led by the Center for Astrophysics, a collaboration between Harvard and the Smithsonian, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. It was part of the Young Supernova Experiment, which hopes to discover thousands of new cosmic explosions. What is a supernova? A black hole? A supernova is the spectacular explosion of a gigantic dying star. Stars – giant balls of gas – all have a life cycle, which can range from millions to trillions of years, according to NASA. When a huge star, several times the mass of the Sun, runs out of its nuclear fuel at its center, gravity's force takes over and it suddenly collapses, creating shock waves that cause the outer part of the star to explode into a supernova. A supernova typically leaves behind a very dense core. The very largest supernovas leave behind black holes, infamous for their great mystery. Black holes are points in the universe where gravity is so strong that nothing, not even light, can get out, NASA says. Their gravity is so strong because matter is squeezed into a tiny space. Because no light can escape, black holes are invisible, but scientists can spot evidence of them when they suck in matter and gas, which glow as they near the black hole. Sometimes black holes are observed to have companion stars, stars that orbit around them. That's the interaction researchers zeroed in on in this new discovery. The mystery of black holes: What's at the center of a black hole? Scientists have a sobering answer. Why is this exploding star so special? The discovery of the supernova dubbed SN 2023zkd was so unusual because it put together pieces of a puzzle that had never been seen together before, Gagliano said. Usually, a supernova explosion gets brighter over a period of a week or two before reaching its peak and then gets dimmer, he said. At first, SN 2023zkd looked like a typical supernova explosion, just a sudden peak of brightness. But it dimmed at an unusually slow rate afterward, causing an AI program to flag it for further study. Scientists watched its decline for months, and then came a very strange behavior: It began to brighten again in a second peak. To understand this, the researchers looked back at old archival data and discovered that before its first blast, the star had been slowly brightening for a period of about four years, an incredibly uncommon sight. All these factors combined pointed to one likely explanation. About 730 million light-years from Earth, SN 2023zkd had been a star locked in an orbital dance with a black hole, and as they gradually got closer to one another, the black hole pulled at the star's material, causing the gradually increasing glow, Gagliano said. At the moment of the explosion, the star and black hole became so close that the star couldn't survive anymore, he said. The extreme gravitational stress from the black hole caused the supernova explosion. The second peak of brightness happened when the explosion itself collided with a disc-like cloud of dust and gas leftover from the interaction between the star and the black hole. "It's been known for a long time that the majority of stars have companions that interact with them at some point during their lives... but we never really thought that this interaction played a leading role in driving the death of a star," Gagliano said. "That is something that is very new and exciting and I think will force us to revisit how we think about simulating the end of a star." How AI is helping astrophysicists make new discoveries The explosion was first discovered in July 2023, after the research team was alerted to unusually slow dimming of the glow of a supernova. The alert came from an AI program designed to scan the sky for all the supernovas and each morning report on any unusual activity. The alert allowed the researchers to continue to observe the supernova and see as it shockingly began to brighten again, indicating a second explosion. More: Black holes caught devouring massive stars in biggest explosion since Big Bang Were it not for the AI program, the initial explosion may have just looked observationally like many other supernovas and scientists would never have looked back to see its slow brightening and deduced that it was interacting with a black hole, Gagliano said. AI's role in sifting through mountains of data that human researchers can't and flagging anomalies is growing in several scientific fields, from medicine to astrophysics, Gagliano said. "One of the only reasons that we were able to make this discovery and understand how scientifically interesting it was was through the combination of researchers in machine learning and in astrophysics," he said.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Scientists Discover What Appears to Be the Largest Black Hole in the Universe, So Heavy That It Completely Bends the Light Around It Into a Giant Ring
Astronomers have discovered what could be the largest black hole ever detected. With a mass of 36 billion times that of our Sun, its gravity is so powerful that it bends the light of an entire galaxy behind it into a near-perfect circle called an Einstein ring, effectively reducing a realm with trillions of stars of its own into an astrophysical fashion accessory. It's 10,000 times as heavy as our Milky Way's own central black hole, and is nigh unto breaking the universe's theoretical upper limit. If anything ever warranted being called a cosmic monster, it's this. "This is amongst the top ten most massive black holes ever discovered, and quite possibly the most massive," Thomas Collett, a professor of astrophysics at the University of Portsmouth and coauthor of a new study about the giant in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, said in a statement about the work. Other detections of similar sized objects, Collett noted, have generally come with uncertainties too large to be definitive. This not-super but ultramassive black hole lurks in the center of the famous Cosmic Horseshoe galaxy, which itself ranks among the most massive ever spotted. The galaxy is considered a fossil group, which formed from other large galaxies — and their constituent supermassive black holes — collapsing together. "So we're seeing the end state of galaxy formation and the end state of black hole formation," Collet said. It's no exaggeration to say, then, that we're literally witnessing a black hole's final form. Located some five billion light years away, the Cosmic Horseshoe is so named due to its gravitational lensing effect, a phenomenon in which the light of a background galaxy is warped by the gravity of a foreground one. Lensing is common throughout the cosmos, and it can be a fortuitous tool for astronomers, acting like a magnifying glass that allows them to observe distant objects whose light would otherwise be too faint to examine. But in this case, the huge foreground galaxy and its companion in the background happen to be in almost perfect alignment with our Earthly perspective, bending the light into an incomplete ring. Astronomers have long suspected that there was a black hole at the heart of the Cosmic Horseshoe, but have never been able to spot — let alone measure — it. One of the reasons why is its extreme distance, at billions of light years away. But the even more impressive hurdle that's been overcome is that it's a "dormant" black hole that's no longer accreting matter, according to Carlos Melo, lead author from the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul in Brazil. "Typically, for such remote systems, black hole mass measurements are only possible when the black hole is active," Melo said. "But those accretion-based estimates often come with significant uncertainties." When a black hole devours significant amounts of matter, the infalling material gets heated up and radiates huge amounts of energy and light, forming what's known as an active galactic nucleus. (The brightest of these are called quasars.) But this detection "relied purely on [the black hole's] immense gravitational pull and the effect it has on its surroundings," Melo said. Their method involved a combination of lensing and what's known as stellar kinematics, which allows astronomers to infer a black hole's mass by studying the velocity of stars trapped in the surrounding galaxy. "What is particularly exciting is that this method allows us to detect and measure the mass of these hidden ultramassive black holes across the universe, even when they are completely silent," Melo said. And its size is no coincidence. There's a reason, the astronomers argue, that we're finding this ultramassive rarity in one of the heaviest galaxies on record, and not in one of relatively unremarkable size like our Milky Way, which hosts a comparatively puny black hole of 4.3 million solar masses. "We think the size of both is intimately linked," Collet said, "because when galaxies grow, they can funnel matter down onto the central black hole." That may seem like an obvious conclusion to draw, but how supermassive black holes attain their enormous sizes remains one of the great mysteries of cosmology. Some have been spotted so early on in the universe's history that they physically shouldn't exist, not having enough time to accrete the mass they possess. If it formed from galactic mergers, it provides a strong clue of at least one mechanism that can spawn these colossal objects. More on black holes: Bizarre "Infinity Galaxy" Could Hold the Secrets of Supermassive Black Holes Solve the daily Crossword
The Hill
3 days ago
- The Hill
Semaglutides may shrink muscle size, strength: Study
New research suggests popular weight loss drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy may affect more than just fat, raising questions about muscle strength and organ size after significant weight loss. University of Utah scientists studied semaglutide, the active ingredient in weight loss medications, in mice. In the study, published in the journal Cell Metabolism, researchers revealed 'unexpected effects,' highlighting that lean mass, or body weight that isn't fat, dropped about 10 percent. Most of the loss came from non-muscle tissues, particularly the liver, which shrank by nearly half. Some skeletal muscles lost around 6 percent of their size, while others remained unchanged. Despite relatively small changes in muscle size, certain muscles became weaker. Researchers said this could be especially concerning for adults over 60, who already face higher risks of muscle loss and reduced mobility. 'The loss of physical function is a strong predictor of not just quality of life but longevity,' said Katsu Funai, the senior author on the study. The findings challenge the assumption that lean mass loss comes mainly from skeletal muscle. Instead, they point to changes in metabolically active organs, such as the liver, which can shrink during healthy weight loss without harming function. 'It's unlikely that the observed lean mass loss represents a serious adverse effect,' said Takuya Karasawa, co-first author on the study. Still, scientists emphasize that further human studies are necessary to determine whether similar effects occur in humans and whether they pose health risks. 'There remains a significant need for validation in humans, especially concerning muscle strength,' Karasawa said. They also suggest that future clinical trials should track not only lean mass but also muscle strength and physical function, especially as more weight loss drugs enter the market. 'There are many additional weight loss drugs that are in clinical trials and coming out in the next three to five years,' Funai said. 'But with all those clinical trials, if they're interested in measuring lean mass loss, they need to consider physical function.'
