Ofqual will ‘take action' if extra exam time given to private schools is unfair
Sir Ian Bauckham, chief regulator at Ofqual, said the regulator is doing 'extra work' as he is 'concerned' by the gap between private school and state school candidates being granted special exam access arrangements.
Data published by Ofqual in November showed that 30.1% of pupils in England were given 25% extra time to complete their GCSEs and A-level exams in the last academic year following a surge in exam access arrangements being granted.
I'm concerned by it, which is why we're doing this extra work
Sir Ian Bauckham, chief regulator at Ofqual
More than two in five (41.8%) of all candidates in independent centres – of which the majority are private schools – were granted 25% extra time in their exams in 2023/24, compared with 26.5% in non-selective state schools.
In an interview with Tes magazine, Sir Ian said he was 'surprised' when the divide was revealed in the recent Ofqual figures.
Sir Ian, who was confirmed as Ofqual's permanent chief regulator last week, said: 'If, when we dig into the figures and get under the surface, we find something is happening that isn't fair to all candidates, whatever school they're in, then we will take action.
'I'm concerned by it, which is why we're doing this extra work.'
He said any action taken would 'relate to awarding organisations' and would 'depend on what we find'.
Sir Ian told Tes: 'This involves complex work but could potentially see results from this analysis before the end of the year.'
It is obviously vital that there is no unfairness in the way that these rules are applied and it is absolutely right to look at any issue which raises concerns
Pepe Di'Iasio, Association of School and College Leaders
Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson asked Ofqual to look into the access arrangement data last year.
The total number of approved special access arrangements for GCSE, AS and A-level exams rose by 12.3% in the 2023/24 school year compared with the year before, Ofqual data has revealed.
Education leaders have suggested more pupils are seeking support after the Covid-19 pandemic due to a rise in young people with special educational needs and disabilities (Send) and mental health issues.
Requests for 25% extra time in exams was the most common approved access arrangement for pupils with learning difficulties or disabilities, followed by computer readers, scribes and speech recognition.
Pepe Di'Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), said: 'We fully support this review of extra time in exams.
'Extra time is an important mitigation for students with additional needs whose exam performance may otherwise be negatively affected.
'However, it is obviously vital that there is no unfairness in the way that these rules are applied and it is absolutely right to look at any issue which raises concerns.
'It's also essential that state schools are properly funded and resourced to have the capacity to identify and meet students' needs.
'Everyone in education would agree with the need to ensure that there is full confidence in the exam system.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
5 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Vladimir Putin health fears as dictator seen limping from plane before Donald Trump meeting
Vladimir Putin appeared to limp as he walked down the stairs of his presidential plane ahead of his meeting with Donald Trump in Alaska as they aim to work towards a peace plan Russian leader Vladimir Putin's health has come under scrutiny after he was seen limping during as he prepared to meet Donald Trump. The dictator was forced to take a pause halfway down the stairs of his presidential plane tonight before meeting the US President. It happened just before their crucial talks in Alaska, aimed at forging a peace plan for Ukraine. Rumours regarding Putin's health have been circulating for years, and his arrival in Anchorage will only add fuel to the fire. The 72-year-old seemed to wince as he walked along the red carpet to greet Mr Trump, where they eventually exchanged pleasantries and handshakes. It comes after Donald Trump's mental state 'clear to see' as lawmakers urged to 'act now'. Putin warns of nuclear war after unleashing another night of hell on Ukraine Earlier this year Ukrainian president Volodomyr Zelensky sparked speculation about the dictator's health after he claimed the Russian despot "will die soon". Rumours about the 72-year-old's health have swirled in recent years, with former intelligence chiefs and sources within Russia among those to have alleged he could be seriously - or even terminally - ill. Some commentators have claimed that his decision to invade Ukraine in 2022 was in part prompted by a growing sense of his own mortality, with the former KGB man said to have become increasingly concerned with cementing his legacy after becoming paranoid during the Covid pandemic. Here's everything we know about Putin's health: One of the leading theories about Putin's health is that he has a form of Parkinson's disease. Sir Richard Dearlove, a former head of MI6, said last year that ongoing concerns over the Russian president's health were likely down to the progressive disorder, which begins with shaking symptoms before leading reduced mobility and brain damage. Responding to a question about "how well or sick" the Kremlin leader is, the former MI6 boss responded: "I do not have a clear answer to that, but I have contacts and friends still in eastern Europe who think that there is something fundamentally wrong with him medically. But I'm not a clinician.' He added that it was "probably Parkinson's, which of course has different representations, different variations, different seriousness. But if the man is paranoid - and I think the murder of Navalny might suggest a certain paranoia - that is one of the symptoms." Many of the health rumours have been prompted by footage of the Russian president jittering and trembling involuntarily. The first reports of this began around 2022, and have persisted in the years as more videos have emerged of him twitching his arms and legs during televised appearances. Putin was seen shaking "uncontrollably" during a meeting with Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko in February, and at one point appeared to use his hand to try and stop his hand moving. In November, he appeared unable to control his movements while giving an hour-long speech at a podium in Kazakhstan. Visible spasms began in his left foot, before spreading to both legs and feet.
Business News Wales
12 hours ago
- Business News Wales
The Value of Early Resolution
Having been involved in industrial relations in some form for around 40 years, it's hard to identify a time when there has been so much political, economic and social focus on it, as there is currently. The Labour government has centred 'rebalancing power in the workplace' at the heart of its growth strategy with the comprehensive Employment Rights Bill introducing a new wave of rights for workers and regulations for trade unions. While employers have highlighted risks of increased costs, the direction of travel the government has committed to should provide an impetus for employers to get ahead of these risks by auditing their current employee relations systems and processes. Even without these new rights, there is an incredibly strong argument for managing workplace disagreements better. Analysis by Acas shows that the cost of workplace conflict to UK employers is estimated to stand at £28.5 billion, the equivalent of £1000 for every employee. Even before any new employment rights are brought in, that's a powerful case for improving how we resolve workplace level disputes. When workplace issues escalate and become formal disciplinary or grievance processes, costs, both financial and emotional, escalate significantly. Anyone who has been party to these processes will understand that these are far from pleasant experiences for managers or workers and the more it escalates, the more costly they become. It does seem to be the case that as escalation has become more prevalent, we've lost the skills to disagree well and resolve issues quickly and informally. Acas's 2025-25 Annual Report shows that it dealt with over 117,000 individual disputes, an increase of 13,000 on the previous year, with the figure the highest since the Covid pandemic. There's much evidence to support a better way of resolving conflict. New Acas research carried out by The Social Agency outlines a series of values and characteristics that can prevent issues escalating into costly and damaging formal processes. Because disagreement happens wherever there are human relationships it's critical that we're able to manage concerns as amicably as possible through early resolution conversations. Our research suggests that, while there is no single approach that works best and no one-size-fits-all solution, there are principles that consistently apply. Critically, informal resolution must be early, close to where the issue arose and voluntary. There are scenarios where a formal process is the right one, but there are many cases where a direct, honest and open conversation can lead to a satisfactory solution. The key goal is to create a space where people feel listened to, and their concerns heard and acted upon. Our research too showed that language mattered. The word 'conflict' itself can induce a defensiveness, and any talk of 'grievance' can trigger a sense that the conversation is not informal at all, but merely the first stage in that formal process. The type of conversation for early resolution is, and should be, very different from any formal process. Grievance or disciplinary investigations are ultimately about ascertaining facts and then making a judgement. Early resolution conversations should be about understanding ill-feelings, identifying the basis for those feelings and what will resolve the concern. That includes appreciating that different parties may see things differently. These types of conversation require different skills. Managers are often trained in leadership, managing performance, absence or development. Early resolution conversations require a range of skills we don't often talk about: empathy, compassion and emotional intelligence. Environmental or cultural factors can be an enabler or a barrier, too. For early resolution conversations to take place, let alone to work, there needs to be a level of trust. For workers to have confidence that they will be heard and issues resolved, they need to feel a sufficient level of psychological safety to raise issues in the first place. This level of trust can take a long time to gain and can be lost very quickly. Acas is there to help organisations resolve conflict when it emerges, and we also help employers to establish the culture and systems that prevent disputes arising in the first place. The case for trying to achieve it is overwhelming. Early resolution may not always be the right course, and it may not work, but where it does, there are huge financial savings as well as huge emotional gains to be made.
South Wales Guardian
13 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Housing asylum seekers in Essex hotel causing ‘very serious problem', court told
Epping Forest District Council is seeking an interim injunction stopping migrants from being accommodated at the Bell Hotel in Epping, which is owned by Somani Hotels Limited. It comes after a series of protests in recent weeks outside the hotel, after an asylum seeker was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. Barristers for the council claimed on Friday that Somani Hotels breached planning rules as the site is not being used for its intended purpose as a hotel, stating there was an 'overwhelming case for an injunction'. Somani Hotels is defending the claim, with its barristers telling the court in London that an injunction would cause asylum seekers 'hardship' and that the move would set 'a dangerous precedent that protests justify planning injunctions'. Opening the hearing in London, Philip Coppel KC, for the council, said: 'Epping Forest District Council comes to this court seeking an injunction because it has a very serious problem. 'It is a problem that is getting out of hand; it is a problem that is causing a great anxiety to those living in the district. 'The problem has arisen because of a breach of planning control by the defendant.' He continued: 'There is no agreement between (asylum seekers) and the hotel, they do not choose the duration of their stay… they do not choose the type of room. 'For them, the Bell Hotel is no more a hotel than a borstal to a young offender.' Mr Coppel told the court that the Bell Hotel had not been used as a hotel since the Covid-19 pandemic, and was now 'unrecognisable as a hotel, but for an old sign'. He added that Somani Hotels had not had 'the courage of conviction to seek a certificate of lawful use', which would have 'resolved the matter in its favour'. Mr Coppel also referenced the alleged sexual assault of a teenage girl by an asylum seeker who was placed in the hotel, which sparked a series of protests, and said several schools were in the nearby area. He said: 'Having this sort of thing go on in such a concentration of schools with no measures in place to stop a repetition is not acceptable.' He continued: 'It really could not be much worse than this.' In written submissions for the hearing, Mr Coppel said there was a 'preponderance of factors overwhelmingly in favour of granting an injunction'. He said these included removing 'the catalyst for violent protests in public places'. The barrister added: 'Allowing the status quo to continue is wholly unacceptable, providing a feeding ground for unrest.' He also told the court that the case has been brought against the hotel owner because it is the landowner, and had previously applied for planning permission. Piers Riley-Smith, representing Somani Hotels, told the court in written submissions that the Home Office's contracted service provider, Corporate Travel Management (North) Limited (CTM), should be involved in the case. He said that CTM should be included as it had 'booked the premises and manages and organises the movement and stay of asylum seekers', adding that the injunction bid should be delayed to a later date. He continued that the alleged planning breach was 'not flagrant', and that the 'defendant has not resumed the use knowing it is in breach of planning control and hiding the use from the council'. The barrister told the court that the hotel previously housed asylum seekers from May 2020 to March 2021, and from October 2022 to April 2024, and that the council 'never instigated any formal enforcement proceedings against this use'. He also said that while the company did apply for planning permission for a 'temporary change of use' in February 2023, this was a 'pragmatic attempt to address the claimant's concerns, rather than an acceptance that such a use required planning permission'. This application was later withdrawn as it had not been determined by April 2024, the barrister said. Asylum seekers then began being placed in the Bell Hotel again in April 2025, with Mr Riley-Smith stating that a planning application was not made 'having taken advice from the Home Office'. Mr Riley-Smith also said that the company accepted that since the Southport riots in summer 2024, 'where the perpetrator was mistaken to be an asylum seeker', and the alleged sexual assault in Epping, 'there has been public concern about the use as evidenced by highly publicised violent and disorderly protests'. He continued: 'However, the court should bear in mind – as recognised by the claimant – that these have spread far beyond locals who might have a genuine concern about their area to a wider group with more strategic national and ideological aims, but that does not necessarily mean the concerns are well-founded. 'Fears as to an increase of crime associated with asylum seekers or a danger to schools are common, but that does not make them well-founded.' The hearing before Mr Justice Eyre is due to conclude on Friday.
