
Hope Gas Morgantown pipeline suits: Landowners share their stories
Mar. 23—dbeard @dominionpost.com MORGANTOWN — Hope Gas continues to pursue 23 condemnation suits for rights of way for its Morgantown Connector Project.
The 30-mile pipeline is intended to increase natural gas supply to Morgantown. Hope filed 31 separate condemnation suits in Monongalia County Circuit Court, and eight of those have been settled and closed.
Not all of the remaining landowners are happy with their dealings with Hope and four of them approached The Dominion Post to tell their stories.
First, though, we again offered Hope a chance to comment on the progress on the project and the suits. Hope does not comment on active litigation but said, "We do understand the concerns of landowners and continue to work toward voluntary agreements."
Hope said, "American energy and infrastructure are important parts of West Virginia's future. This project will build connections allowing north-central West Virginia to access more local energy. Hope's Morgantown Connector is creating much needed system resiliency for the hospitals, businesses, and homes in Morgantown. This project is building critical infrastructure needed for the region's future growth and development.
"The project also offers immediate benefits to many people throughout the state, " Hope said. "Hope has a commitment to work with local contractors and suppliers on this project. Many of the dollars spent to build the Morgantown Connector will remain in the Mountain State. The project is also creating hundreds of local family-sustaining jobs for West Virginians and economic development opportunities for the Morgantown area."
Hope is asking the court to grant entry and easements in order to undertake construction of the project.
There are conditions. The landowner retains full right to own, use, enjoy and occupy the land that does not interfere with or is inconsistent with the rights of way and easements sought. But the landowner "shall not construct or permit to be constructed any house, structure or obstruction on, over or through said right of way that will interfere with the construction, maintenance or operation of the natural gas pipeline or appurtenances constructed therein."
In a number of cases, the court is holding Hope's petitions in abeyance pending Hope's provision of proposed fair market valuations of the properties in question.
In others, the court found that Hope is a West Virginia public service corporation that provides public services in the state and is authorized to exercise the right of eminent domain "to take private property for the public purpose stated ... upon payment of just compensation."
In this last group of cases, the court permits Hope to deposit with the court clerk the amount that Hope estimates as just compensation.
The Kerns case Ralph and Mary Jane Kerns have a farm along Sugar Grove Road west of Westover. Hope has deposited a bond in this case. Mary Jane told their story.
"Their contract's ridiculous, " she said. "Everything's for Hope. They're going to take our land, whether we want them to or not, that we've worked all of our life for. And at no fair price. ... They tie us up forever, and all we do is pay the taxes on the land that we can't possibly use. ... We've been here since 1968, and our grandfather was here before then."
Like others who spoke to The Dominion Post, the Kernses are concerned about the proximity of the line to homes. "The ramifications, God forbid, if this pipeline would explode, because it's a high-pressure one, are catastrophic, and it's all around our family."
While they don't care for Hope's offer, she said, "It's not really about the money, it's about taking our rights away."
The Six case George Six is one of several family members who have neighboring farms along W.Va. 7 totaling about 500 acres. They raise livestock on the farms.
One day, he said, they saw some flags and learned Hope surveyors were on their land. "They claimed that they had given us notice, but they had not given anyone notice — our neighbors or anyone — and decided that that was OK, just to go ahead and survey through. Well, me being a licensed surveyor, that's not the case. You just don't have that right."
So Hope representatives came and talked with them, saying they were planning a pipeline route. They let Hope go ahead, having long experience with pipelines under their land.
Hope told them, "Well, once we get our routing done, we'll come back and try and work out some details as to where we go and everything else, which was fine with us."
But Hope came back with a lowball offer, he said, and told them, "If you don't like it, we're going to use our right of condemnation."
The route was right through the middle of one of their properties that included a stream, Six said, cutting off access. Talks failed and the told the land man never to return. Hope filed its condemnation suit.
"We have tried to work a deal with Hope. any way that we could, and have been unsuccessful there." He's sold rights of way for eight times the amount Hope offered, he said.
One of his concerns is that the pipeline doesn't serve anybody along its route ; it's just a transmission line. "It's not going to benefit us as landowners."
The Sixes are in the timber business, he said. "We'll never have timber on our property. We will never be able to use that section of our property." But they'll keep paying property taxes on it.
"Some of the best building sites on the property they're going through, they're going right through the center of it. And we've asked them to just adjust the line and to work with us and all that. [But Hope says ] 'That's where it goes or else.' That's not right. That isn't right."
The Tennant case Marion Tennant lives in a hollow just outside Wadestown. We joined Tennant and his neighbor, Danny Thomas, for a tour of his property: the meadow where contractors were placing warning signs and unloading lumber that day for a bridge to cross his creek, and up onto the ridge behind his house where downed timber he'd like to sell, but won't be able too, lay thick along the route.
"They just dropped all the trees, " he said. "I'm 71 years old. I've lived here all my life. I grew up here. I wasn't interested in selling. And we didn't sell. They're putting their pipe in. They're going to maintain a 50-foot swath of our property that we have to pay tax on."
As with Six, Hope offered him the same low figure, and when he didn't accept, took it off the table for a far lower figure. "Now that's kicking the teeth brother. ... The property's been in my family for almost a hundred years. I wasn't interested in selling when people came to me."
Hope's timber cutting, he said, cut off all his access to harvesting it, including his timber on the other side of his ridge. Hope won't even move it to a spot where he can get to it. They just plan to burn it where it lies.
"They offered me less than $3, 000 for my timber. I've been informed that I've got one log up there that's worth $3, 000. I can't get to it. I don't have the equipment to get to it."
They want him to sign a waiver, he said, so they can come onto his other property and stack it. They will only move it 500 feet.
"They've never once came and sat down to negotiate a price. They just come in and said, 'We're going to put a high-pressure gas line through here. It's going to be a transmission line. It's going to feed Morgantown. Morgantown's low on gas."
The relationship with Hope got so bad he won't let their representative step off the easement. "You can go on this 75-foot easement here. I can't stop you because you've got that. But the rest of it, I own. Don't step on it. You're trespassing. From there, I'll call the law."
As with Six, he was never told Hope was surveying. "We found out through the grapevine why they were surveying. The surveyor showed up and all of a sudden you're seeing ribbons hanging." A coal mine longwall is going under his land and he thought that's what the ribbons were for.
We asked Tennant what kind of timber he's losing. He said walnut, oak, cherry, maple, poplar, locust. Trunks 16 inches to 24 inches across. "I've got a list of it."
He said, "It's time for me to just buckle down and fight. There's nothing I can do to stop it. And I can be a thorn in their side while it's going on."
Case background The Morgantown Connector Project will run a total 30 miles from Wadestown in western Monongalia County eastward to the edge of Morgantown and then northwest to site near Osage.
Hope wants to build the pipeline because it is experiencing a decline in supply capacity above its peak-day requirements. Also, Morgantown Energy Associates and other Morgantown-area customers want to increase their supply levels. In order to meet the demand, Hope proposed to enter into a 15-year contract with Columbia Gas for gas to be supplied to a new Hope-Columbia interconnection near Wadestown.
The pipeline is estimated to cost $177, 437, 169. Hope estimates that the project will generate about 600 jobs, which will make up about half the project cost. Other major costs are the 30 miles of pipeline and five measurement and regulation stations.
The new line would begin at Hope's interconnect with a Columbia Gas line near Wadestown. Using new and existing Hope right of way, it would run 25 miles to the Western edge of Morgantown to connect with other proposed Hope facilities (called Black Night) west of I-79 and Harmony Grove. Hope says about 5.5 miles of that right of way is in northern Marion County.
From Black Night, the line would use existing and new third-party rights of way to go five miles northwest of Granville to a station called Mineral northwest of Osage.
Hope is not proposing any rate hikes at this time for the pipeline but says it intends to recover costs in future base rate and purchased gas adjustment cases.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
25 minutes ago
- Newsweek
California Fourth Grader Detained By ICE Sparks Outrage
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A 9-year-old boy in California was detained by federal immigration agents at an immigration hearing. Martir Garcia Lara, a fourth-grader at Torrance Elementary School, was taken into custody along with his father on May 29 after reporting to federal authorities in downtown Los Angeles. They were transferred the next day to an immigration facility in Texas, where they are currently held pending deportation to Honduras. A spokesperson for ICE told Newsweek they remain in federal custody pending deportation to Honduras. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers wait to detain a person, Jan. 27, 2025, in Silver Spring, Md. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers wait to detain a person, Jan. 27, 2025, in Silver Spring, Md. Alex Brandon/AP Why It Matters The arrest comes amid a hardline crackdown on immigration by President Donald Trump's administration, which has vowed to deport millions of migrants without legal status. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has maintained under the second Trump administration that ICE does not arrest children. What To Know "Martir Garcia-Banegas, 50, illegally entered the United States July 10, 2021 with a family member, Martir Isaac Garcia Lara, 9," a spokesperson for ICE told Newsweek. On September 1, 2022, an immigration judge issued an order for the family to be removed to Honduras. Garcia appealed this decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals; however, the appeal was dismissed on August 11, 2023, according to ICE. After being detained by officials in Los Angeles, the father and son were transferred to the Dilley Immigration Processing Center in Dilley, Texas. The administration has taken an estimated 500 children into government custody since Trump returned to power, according to CNN. Courthouses nationwide have recently become focal points in the Trump administration's immigration enforcement efforts. Federal agents have been stationed to arrest individuals immediately after they appear before immigration judges. Many of these individuals have been in the U.S. for less than two years, and attorneys from the Department of Homeland Security often request that their deportation cases be dismissed. When a judge approves such a request, immigrants leaving the courtroom are sometimes taken into custody by plainclothes federal agents for expedited removal. What People Are Saying A spokesperson for ICE told Newsweek: "Parents, who are here illegally, can take control of their departure with the CBP Home App. The United States is offering aliens $1,000 and a free flight to self-deport now. We encourage every person here illegally to take advantage of this offer and reserve the chance to come back to the U.S. the right, legal way to live the American dream. If not, you will be arrested and deported without a chance to return." A spokesperson with Torrance Unified School District said in a statement: "It is our responsibility as a District to support the families of every student and connect them to resources and assistance for their continued education and healthy wellbeing, if, and when, a family requests it." What Happens Next Martir and his father will remain detained at a facility in southern Texas pending removal.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Palantir CEO Warns of AI Arms Race With China
Palantir (PLTR, Financials) CEO Alex Karp said Thursday that artificial intelligence poses serious risks and that the ongoing AI arms race will ultimately be won by either the United States or China. There are positive and negative consequences, and either we win or China will win, Karp told CNBC's Squawk on the Street. He emphasized that the U.S. currently holds an advantage due to corporate willingness to embrace new technologies, but said Western allies, particularly in Europe, are lagging behind and must learn from the U.S. approach. In the interview, Karp also addressed a recent New York Times report suggesting Palantir is assisting the Trump administration in gathering data on American citizens. He denied the claim, stating, We are not surveilling Americans. The Denver-based data analytics and AI software firm has gained 74% year to date as investors bet on the company's growing role in U.S. government contracts and defense applications. While the stock continues to outperform broader tech peers, Karp acknowledged investor concerns around its valuation. You don't like the price, exit, he said. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Trump admin ordered a coal power plant to stay on past retirement. Customers in 15 states will foot the bill
An aging coal power plant that was supposed to shutter last week will run throughout the summer at the order of President Donald Trump's Energy Sec. Chris Wright, a decision that could cost Midwest energy customers tens of millions of dollars. The last-minute federal order to keep the J.H. Campbell plant operating came as a surprise to Michigan officials, including the head of the state's Public Service Commission, given it was at the tail end of a multi-year retirement process that was approved in 2022. 'The grid operator hadn't asked for this, the utility hadn't asked for this, we as the state hadn't asked for this,' said Dan Scripps, chair of the Michigan Public Service Commission. 'We certainly didn't have any conversations with the (Energy Department) in advance of the order, or since.' Wright's May 23 emergency order cited concerns the Midwest could face a summer electricity shortage due to a lack of available coal, gas and nuclear plants that can provide stable baseload power. But Consumers Energy, the utility that owns the coal plant, told CNN in an email it already purchased another natural gas-fired power plant to carry the load when the coal plant went offline. Scripps said the cost to keep the over-60-year-old plant operating, even for 90 days, will be high, and customers in 15 states will foot the bill. 'I can say with a pretty high degree of confidence that we're looking at multiple tens of millions of dollars at the low end,' Scripps said. 'I think there's a range between there and the high end of getting close to $100 million.' It's unclear so far what that will mean for individual electricity bills, Scripps added, given the uncertainty about final cost. 'For years, American grid operators have warned decommissioning baseload power sources such as coal plants would jeopardize the reliability of our grid systems, which has raised alarm bells,' Energy Department spokesperson Ben Dietderich said in a statement. Dietderich didn't say whether the Energy Department had conducted a cost analysis before issuing the emergency order. It's unclear whether the department realized the company already had a plan to maintain baseload power after its closure. Wright issued another emergency order last week to keep a Pennsylvania power plant that runs on natural gas and oil open past its May 31 retirement date. Coal is the dirtiest fuel large plants still burn for electricity, and it's now the most expensive as renewable energy sources like solar have become increasingly cost-effective. Although natural gas is a fossil fuel and contributes significantly to warming the planet, it is still considered a cheaper and less-polluting option. Gas generates 43% of the country's electricity. Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel said she is considering legal action against the federal government. Nessel and energy experts said such an emergency order from the federal government is extremely rare and usually reserved for the aftermath of severe storms or natural disasters. 'This is a novel case for us,' Nessel said. 'We've not had to do this before.' She reiterated keeping the plant open would 'significantly' raise electricity rates, saying, 'The whole point of closing this plant down was to save money.' More electric utilities are retiring their coal plants because they are old and especially expensive to run. In 2021, the average coal-fired power plant was 45 years old, according to a report from the Energy Information Administration. The Energy Department's order didn't specify exactly how much the Michigan coal plant should run, saying it was requiring the utility to 'take all measures necessary to ensure that the Campbell Plant is available to operate.' Scripps and energy experts said that means the coal plant would likely run continuously at a lower level throughout the summer, or until Wright's order ends. Unlike gas plants, coal plants can't be easily turned on and off with the flip of a switch and take time to ramp up and come online. The Campbell plant is so old — it has been operating since 1962 — that Michigan energy regulators feared it could not physically turn back on once it was powered off. The utility will also have to buy more coal to keep it going. Consumers Energy said it has 'arranged for new shipments of coal to keep the plant operating.' A new report from think tank Energy Innovation found the cost of coal-fired power has grown faster than inflation in the last few years — collectively costing US consumers $6.2 billion more in 2024 than it would have cost in 2021. 'Even existing coal where it has fully depreciated and been paid off, the cost of coal is more than solar and storage at this point,' said Doug Lewin, a Texas based energy expert who authors the Texas Energy and Power Newsletter and host of the Energy Capital Podcast. Lewin covers the energy transition in deep red Texas, where power companies are building wind, solar and battery storage at an incredible pace. Of the significant amount of new electricity added to the Texas grid in the last four years, 92% has been wind, solar and storage, Lewin said. That has paid dividends, keeping energy prices relatively low and meeting the state's exploding power demand from air conditioning, data centers and big industry. 'All throughout the summer months, you're getting maximum solar output,' Lewin said. 'It's very well correlated to peak demand. For a place with massive AC load like Texas, it's fantastic.' Texas has also invested a lot in big batteries that can keep power flowing to the grid after the sun stops shining and the wind stops blowing. Energy Sec. Wright, however, has panned renewables, saying they are not a reliable replacement for fossil fuels. 'There is simply no physical way that wind, solar and batteries could replace the myriad uses of natural gas,' he said at Houston energy conference CERAWeek in March. 'I haven't even mentioned oil or coal yet.' • Trump EPA drafting a rule that would undo decades of progress on limiting pollution from power plants • The jobs and tax credits that could disappear if the 'big, beautiful' bill passes the Senate • A polluting, coal-fired power plant found the key to solving America's biggest clean energy challenge