India should avoid hasty trade deal under US pressure, as it may not survive next US political shift: GTRI
The report warned that entering into a trade agreement under duress could lead to 'irreversible consequences,' particularly when such deals may not survive a change in the US political landscape.
'India should stay the course and avoid trading away core sectors like agriculture. A hasty deal under pressure could have irreversible consequences, especially when such agreements may not survive the next shift in US politics,' the report stated.
GTRI noted that Trump's aggressive trade threats are losing credibility. Despite over three months of sustained pressure, only two countries, the United Kingdom and Vietnam, have agreed to the US's 'one-sided trade terms.' Other nations, including Japan, South Korea, the European Union, and Australia, have resisted the demands.
These demands are part of what GTRI described as MASALA deals, Mutually Agreed Settlements Achieved through Leveraged Arm-twisting.
These agreements typically require other countries to cut tariffs without reciprocal concessions from the US, commit to guaranteed purchases of American goods, and still leave room for Washington to impose additional tariffs in the future, the report said.
Due to limited success in pushing these terms, the Trump administration has adopted punitive measures. On July 7, it announced 25 per cent tariffs on imports from Japan and South Korea. Just days later, on July 12, it threatened 30 per cent tariffs on products from the EU and Mexico, even while talks are still ongoing with these nations.
The GTRI report urged India to recognize that it is not the only country facing such pressure. The US is currently in trade negotiations with over 20 countries and seeking concessions from more than 90.
However, most are pushing back, recognizing that these MASALA deals are politically driven and offer no lasting certainty in international trade. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
24 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
India's balancing act in a polarised world
The recent NATO Summit in The Hague witnessed the new dawn of realism, prominently led by United States President Donald Trump and followed silently by most European partners. With a commitment to 'invest 5 per cent of GDP annually towards defence — and security-related spending by 2025', it is clear that NATO is concerned about the US' security and economic Spain has taken a tough stance by announcing to spend only 2.1% of its GDP on military, followed closely by Belgium seeking 'maximum flexibility' in meeting NATO's revised spending target. Experts point out how the 2025 NATO Declaration bluntly made no mention of 'protection and preserving the rules-based international order as laid down by the UN Charter' — a norm noticed in earlier declarations. Although security-related issues are embedded within the NATO discourse, diplomatic endeavours need to factor in aspects of inclusive growth, shared prosperity, and collective multilateral order — an element noticed in its previous iterations.A look at global outlay on defence reflects a steady increase in spending capacities of the nations. For instance, in 2024, military spending globally rose by 9.4% in real terms, amounting to $2,718 billion. This also happens to mark the tenth consecutive year of an increased global defence budget. The US, China, and Russia top the list, with India in fourth position, as per the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) Military Expenditure India, its defence capabilities are gradually expanding by way of industrial reforms, modernising armed forces, and strengthening the native defence production to meet not only its domestic needs but also for bolstering exports. Spending almost 2.3% of its GDP on defence, India allocated about $75 billion in its Union Budget geopolitical strife across the globe, including in its own backyard with terrorist strikes in Pahalgam in April, has perceptibly compelled New Delhi to focus its energies on enhancing self-reliance in military preparedness. Yet technological innovations, R&D development, and leveraging investment towards military infrastructure depend largely on a nation's fiscal framework and its strategic cordial, yet careful, stance away from a NATO membership is rooted in its historical foreign policy of non-alignment and maintaining its strategic autonomy. Instead of depending on any military alliance to aid its external security, India chooses to safeguard its borders flexibly, depending on the fast-changing regional and global in the face of increased global defence spending, development is naturally experiencing a stress test at the international scale. Talks of climate adaptation, building health resilience, energy transition and ensuring holistic sustainable development are gradually coming under intense strain. As such, Agenda 2030 appears to be in a tensions have visibly created ruptures in the global security architecture resulting in a fractured community. Real needs of the vulnerable, such as access to clean energy, nutritious food, and good health is a pivotal target for a majority of the low-income and least-developed countries. But at the same time, securing one's territorial integrity, sovereignty, and maintaining strategic autonomy is heavily reliant on cutting-edge military equipment and defence multilateral forums like the G20 and BRICS pushing forward the socio-economic development agenda of the Global South and attempting to establish a counterforce to the existing Western institutions, ensuring smooth international order is a persistent challenge. In this sense, threats by Trump to impose extra tariffs on the BRICS countries yet again underscore the economic realism aimed at capturing the currency market in global supply by both NATO and non-NATO countries alike, global spending trends on defence possibly enforce the reprioritisation of security over development. Yet it's a catch-22 situation. As one of the prominent partners and fastest-growing economies in the world, the big question remains — is India ready to deal with the economic trade-offs associated with welfare and larger developmental targets and defence spending?Swati Prabhu is Associate Fellow at the Observer Research Foundation.
Mint
24 minutes ago
- Mint
American voters react to the way Donald Trump is handling the Jeffrey Epstein files; 63% of them feel...
American voters aren't very pleased with the way US President Donald Trump has dealt with the investigative review of the federal case against the notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, and a poll shows exactly how many. The White House on Monday dismissed the long-swirling conspiracy theories surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, saying that he never had a 'client list' of powerful associates allegedly implicated in his crimes. Epstein, a onetime acquaintance of Trump in the 1990s and early 2000s, was associated with Hollywood celebrities, business titans and British royalty. According to a Quinnipiac University national survey, as many as 63% of Americans disliked the Trump administration's approach to the Epstein probe. Just 17% approved of the administration's actions in the Epstein matter, while said 20% they were undecided. A whopping 83% of Democrats also disapprove of the president's handling of the Epstein files, while 2% approve. The White House memo said that after a comprehensive 'systematic' review of over 300 gigabytes of data, authorities found no incriminating client list and no indication that Epstein had blackmailed powerful individuals. It also reaffirmed the FBI's long-standing conclusion that Epstein died by suicide in his New York jail cell in 2019, not as a result of foul play. The two-page memo was unsigned but bore FBI and Department of Justice letterhead. 'There was … no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions,' the memo noted. 'We did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.' Epstein harmed more than 'one thousand victims,' according to the DOJ-FBI memo, many of whom were allegedly trafficked to his home in the US Virgin Islands. Social media users and the American voters have questioned the 66-year-old's association with influential figures like Microsoft founder Bill Gates, former President Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew. They also questioned the odd circumstances of Epstein's demise, including guards falling asleep and cameras outside of his cell not functioning, inside New York City's Metropolitan Correctional Centre almost six years ago. Even former attorneys and medical examiners theorized that Epstein may not have committed suicide. Bureau Deputy Director Dan Bongino also had a public falling out with Attorney General Pam Bondi and threatened to quit over the report's meagre findings. The Quinnipiac survey found that a majority of US voters (53%) disapprove of Bondi's job performance, while 32% approve. FBI Director Kash Patel's numbers were better: 36% of voters approved of his job performance, but 47% disapproved. A slightly lower 41% disapprove of Bongino, and 34% approve of the job he's doing.
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Oil up as demand expectations, economic data lift sentiment
Oil prices rose on Thursday, reversing declines in the previous three sessions, buoyed by stronger-than-expected economic data from the world's top oil consumers and signs of easing trade tensions . Brent crude futures rose 8 cents, or 0.1 per cent, to $68.60 a barrel at 0630 GMT. US West Texas Intermediate crude futures were up 16 cents, or 0.2 per cent, at $66.54. Both benchmarks fell more than 0.2 per cent in the previous session. US President Donald Trump has said letters notifying smaller countries of their US tariff rates would go out soon, and said on Wednesday that he would probably put a blanket 10 per cent or 15 per cent tariff on smaller countries. New agreements with Indonesia and Vietnam were announced this week. Trump also offered renewed optimism about prospects of a deal with Beijing on illicit drugs and hinted that a trade deal with India was very close, while an agreement could possibly be reached with Europe as well. "Trump softened tones on China and proposed lower tariff rates on smaller countries, which are seen as positive developments in the global trade outlooks," said independent analyst Tina Teng. "China's better-than-expected economic data and the US's larger-than-expected oil inventory draw have both been bullish factors for oil prices." US crude inventories fell by 3.9 million barrels to 422.2 million barrels last week, the Energy Information Administration said on Wednesday, a steeper decline than forecast for a 552,000-barrel draw, suggesting stronger refinery activity, tighter supply, and increased demand. However, larger-than-expected builds in gasoline and diesel inventories capped price gains. This raised concerns of weakening demand from summer travel, ANZ analysts said in a note on Thursday. The latest snapshot of the US economy by the central bank, released on Wednesday, showed activity picked up in recent weeks. However, the outlook was "neutral to slightly pessimistic" as businesses reported that higher import tariffs were putting upward pressure on prices. Meanwhile, China data showed growth slowed in the second quarter, but not by as much as previously feared, in part because of front-loading to beat US tariffs, easing fears over the state of the world's largest crude importer's economy. Data also showed that China's June crude oil throughput was up 8.5 per cent from a year ago, implying stronger fuel demand. "Support has come from the positive news pertaining to some easing of trade tensions between China and the US with President Trump lifting the ban on the sale of AI chips to China along with the announcement of a trade deal with Indonesia," said John Paisie, president of Stratas Advisors.
