Putin Pushing Russian Troops Into Deadlier Advances During Peace Talks
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Russia is throwing troops into operations but its advances are slowing amid high losses, however Vladimir Putin is ignoring these diminishing returns as he looks for battlefield gains to pressure Ukraine in ceasefire talks, says the Institute for the Study of War.
The Washington, D.C. think tank said so far this year, an average 99 Russian troops were being lost for every square kilometer of territory gained—much higher than the 59 casualties per square kilometer from between last September and December.
Newsweek has contacted the Russian defense ministry for comment.
Russia's President Vladimir Putin tours the Museum of the Great Patriotic War, also known as the Victory Museum, at Poklonnaya Hill in western Moscow on April 30, 2025.
Russia's President Vladimir Putin tours the Museum of the Great Patriotic War, also known as the Victory Museum, at Poklonnaya Hill in western Moscow on April 30, 2025.Why it matters
The ISW said the troop numbers Moscow is throwing into attacks show that, regardless of U.S.-led peace talks and President Donald Trump's ambition for a peace deal, Putin is still committed to seizing all of Ukraine and undermining NATO.
Although Trump can point to a minerals deal with Ukraine struck this week, the U.S. has warned that it would walk away if peace negotiations did not bear fruit soon.
However, the ISW assessment shows that Kyiv's forces are effectively fending off Russian attacks and one military expert has told Newsweek that the Ukrainian front line is not about to collapse, thanks in part to Kyiv's drone capabilities.
What to know
Russia's front line gains have slowed in 2025 while enduring losses even greater than in the final four months of 2024, according to the ISW's Friday update.
It calculated that so far this year, citing Ukraine's figures of personnel losses, Russia had gained 1,627 square kilometers (628 square miles) in Ukraine and Russia's Kursk oblast where Kyiv staged an incursion last August at a cost 160,600 casualties—or 99 per square kilometer.
By comparison, between September and December 2024, Russian forces gained an estimated 2,949 square kilometers (1,138 square miles) at the cost of 174,935 casualties, or an average of 59 casualties per square kilometer taken.
The think tank said the high numbers reflect how Russia is deploying "low quality" troops to front line units that hindered complex operations to make quick advances. But it also showed Putin wanted to leverage further battlefield, pressure Ukraine in ceasefire and peace negotiations and force Ukraine's collapse.
This gives the U.S. the opportunity to leverage Russia's vulnerabilities for a stronger negotiating position against Putin, according to the ISW.
The think tank noted how U.S. Vice President JD Vance's comments on Fox News that the war will not end soon suggest the Trump administration is considering stepping back from intensified mediation efforts to end the war.
This week, the Financial Times reported that European and Ukrainian officials feared Trump was on the brink of walking away from peace negotiations and may use minor progress in talks as an "excuse" to say his job is done.
Zev Faintuch, head of research and intelligence at security firm Global Guardian, told Newsweek that the U.S. walking away would hurt Ukraine less than one might expect, at least in the short to medium turn.
He said Ukraine's front isn't about to collapse and its domestic drone production and its drone corps have shown that the situation is less desperate in the short-term than it may appear. Kyiv's European allies will be able to step in with many in-demand munitions and with intelligence sharing, he added.
However, what Ukraine stands to lose are missiles, specifically long-range precision strike and surface-to-air missiles which would make defending the skies of the major cities more difficult and allow Russia to have more efficient supply lines closer to the front, said Faintuch.
What people are saying
Institute for the Study of War (ISW) on Friday: "Russian forces are currently sustaining a higher casualty rate per square kilometer gained than in Fall 2024."
U.S. Vice President JD Vance told Fox News Friday "It's not going to end any time soon" and it's "going to be up to the Russians and Ukrainians now that each side knows what the other's terms for peace are."
Zev Faintuch, senior intelligence analyst at security firm Global Guardian: "The Ukrainian front isn't about to collapse. Ukraine's indigenous drone production and its drone corps have time and time again shown analysts the situation is less desperate in the short-term than it may appear."
What happens next
With a deal in Ukraine seemingly no closer, senior U.S. officials remain skeptical Putin has eased his intransigence even if there is a peace deal may resume the war and try to seize more Ukrainian territory, CNN reported.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
23 minutes ago
- Politico
Inside Trump world's reaction to the Zelenskyy reset
3. Trump offered to go straight to a trilateral meeting. The senior administration official told POLITICO that when Trump called Putin to offer his presence at a meeting between Zelenskyy and the Russian leader, Putin said, 'You don't have to come. I want to see him one on one.' Trump's team 'started working on that,' the official said. 'Steve Witkoff has the assignment to get it figured [out].' 4. Alaska paved the way for the 'security guarantees' discussion. If there was any concern within the administration about how the Putin meeting in Anchorage went down, Monday all but evaporated it. 'After Alaska, we were excited that Putin was at least talking and there were signs we could negotiate,' a second senior administration official told POLITICO. One of those signs came on the topic of security guarantees: Putin was 'engaging on a conversation about security guarantees instead of, 'Nyet, nyet, nyet,' this second official said. 'If Alaska was not successful and Putin didn't give us a little bit of an opening, we wouldn't have [had] the Europeans at the White House.' Of Putin: 'He'll drive a hard bargain, but that opening is huge.' 5. Those security guarantees could be a sticking point internationally. It remains unclear just how big a commitment the U.S. has on the line here. 'We haven't even started [that discussion] other than a commitment,' the first senior administration official told POLITICO. 'The question is, 'Who participates to what percentage?' But the president did commit that we would be a part of it. No specifics. And then he said he would also help it get organized. And he alone could sell that to Putin. I don't think Putin would pay any attention to the others, and I'm not sure the others would do it without him.' 6. And those same guarantees could be a problem for Trump domestically. Does the administration have a red line when it comes to committing U.S. troops to keep a peace in Ukraine? 'I don't think there's a red line,' the first senior official told POLITICO. 'So I think it just kind of remains to be seen. [President Trump] would like the Europeans to step up. But I think if the last piece of the puzzle was for a period of time to be a part of a peacekeeping force, I think he would do it.' Meanwhile, as European leaders arrived at the White House, MAGA coalition minder Steve Bannon took to his influential 'War Room' podcast to warn about the U.S. security guarantees in Ukraine. 'I'm just lost how the United States offering an Article 5 commitment for a security guarantee to Ukraine is a win for the United States,' Bannon said on his show Monday morning . 'President Trump has done more than enough to bring the parties together,' Bannon told POLITICO late Monday night. 'Once again, this is a European problem; we have all the leverage here. If we don't fund this, it stops happening. The only way this goes forward — the only way this continues every day — is American money and American arms. The Europeans don't have enough either military hardware and/or financial wherewithal.' Bannon said he hopes Trump 'eventually stops listening to the [Sens.] Lindsey Grahams and Tom Cottons and the Mitch McConnells, and realizes that there can't be any guarantee here from the United States, because that's going to inextricably link us to this conflict.' In a Truth Social post on Monday about the next steps, Trump said 'Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, are coordinating with Russia and Ukraine.' That callout was striking. 'That's the first time JD and Marco have been dragged into a big foreign policy issue together,' the second senior administration official told POLITICO. 'If it's JD and Marco and Witkoff, who gets the credit and who gets the blame if it fails? This could be the first test of 2028.' Like this content? Consider signing up for POLITICO's Playbook newsletter.
New York Post
24 minutes ago
- New York Post
Putin and Zelensky could meet within next two weeks thanks to Trump's attempts to end brutal war
Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky could meet within the next two weeks thanks to President Trump's efforts to bring an end to the war, according to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Putin agreed to the potential meeting, which would take place at a location to be determined, during a phone call with the president on Monday, said Merz, who was among a delegation of European leaders who met with Trump and Zelensky in Washington to pledge their support for Ukraine. During a break in the discussions, Trump called Putin who 'agreed that there would be a meeting between the Russian president and the Ukrainian president within the next two weeks,' Merz told reporters. 4 Zelensky visited the White House for a meeting with Trump on Monday, August 18, 2025. 4 Vladimir Putin meets with Yury Slyusar on August 18, 2025. He traveled to Alaska on Friday, August 15, 2025, to meet with Trump. 4 Smoke rising over Kremenchuk, Ukraine, following a Russian attack. via REUTERS Trump proposed such a meeting so that peace negotiations could 'truly begin' three-and-a-half years since Russia's full scale invasion of Ukraine, added Merz. 4 Trump greets Zelensky at the White House on Monday, August 18, 2025. REUTERS However, the announcement about a possible meeting between the warring world leaders comes as Russia unleashed its largest drone attack on its neighbor this month Monday night, sparking concerns that Moscow is not ready for peace. With Post Wires
Business Insider
26 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Zelenskyy broke his MO and showed up at the White House in a suit. This is why — and how — you should dress up for big meetings, 2 stylists say.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, in a departure from his usual military garb, suited up for his meeting with President Donald Trump on Monday. Since the start of the Russian invasion, Zelenskyy switched out formal suits for military outfits, including cargo pants and crew-neck T-shirts. He previously said he would wear these clothes until the war ended. The Ukrainian president's last outfit at a White House meeting — a long-sleeved black shirt with a mandarin collar in February — wasn't well received by some Republicans. But on Monday, he arrived at the White House in an all-black suit — no tie — for his meeting with Trump and European leaders. Trump was quick to comment on the new look. When a right-wing journalist who previously criticized Zelenskyy told the leader that he looked "fabulous" in the suit, Trump added, "I said the same thing." Whether in politics or the corporate world, showing up in the right outfit can make or break how a message is received. Fashion and image consultants told Business Insider that Zelenskyy's choice to suit up underscored that when the stakes are high, dressing formally can earn credibility and keep the focus where it belongs. The black suit was a calculated choice Zoë Hennessey, a Los Angeles-based fashion stylist, said Zelenskyy's upgraded look headed off criticism that might have overshadowed the purpose of his visit. "Trump and his aides clearly noticed the change, since they commented on it, and I imagine it helped Zelenskyy gain some favor," she said. "Sometimes you have to give people what they expect, even if it feels like a compromise," Hennessey said. Ann Vodicka, a Sydney-based image consultant, said that a suit broadcasts power. And black communicates strength, sophistication, and seriousness. "Zelensky's attire reinforced his message: He is to be taken seriously, and the meeting's importance cannot be overstated," Vodicka added. Dress to impress, not to stand out Hennessy said standing out and showing personality make sense in industries like fashion, entertainment, and the arts. However, most corporate environments still favor understated dressing, she said. "You can still look interesting and show a point of view, but it is usually better to stick to traditional dress conventions." Vodicka said workers have to balance blending in and standing out. "Dressing to blend in too much can make you appear forgettable, while dressing to stand out too much risks being seen as unprofessional or distracting," she said. She said a sweet spot is to express individuality through subtle details like a modern cut, a well-chosen accessory, or a color that suits you. What to wear for important meetings Vodicka said that in high-stakes meetings or interviews, how you dress has a powerful impact on how you feel and are perceived. She recommends trying to "match or slightly elevate the dress code." "Being underdressed can leave you feeling self-conscious and can distract others from your message," Vodicka said. She also advised prioritizing quality over quantity by investing in fewer high-quality pieces instead of many ill-fitting ones. Hennessy said dressing to impress was simple. Wear clothes that fit properly — nothing too tight or skimpy. The outfit should also be spotless and well-pressed, she said. She recommended wearing neutrals, which look polished and professional. "I would avoid dramatic prints and bright colors. It may feel a bit boring, but in certain situations, playing it safe often works best," she said.
