Banks delay import payments
The price of local currency has started increasing gradually in both open and interbank markets
Listen to article
Commercial banks have once again started delaying import-related payments due to the limited availability of foreign currency, caused by major foreign debt repayments due before the end of June and the need to meet the reserves-related condition set by the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
The situation warrants that the central bank either completely stop purchasing foreign currency from the markets or drastically reduce it to improve the supply of dollars, according to background discussions with multiple bankers. The State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) on Saturday did not provide an official version on the matter.
Banking and market sources told The Express Tribune that some major and small banks were delaying import-related payments by two to three weeks, particularly in cases of open-account and contractual imports. The banks were also providing dollars for the clearance of letters of credit (LCs) to some major importers at rates higher than the interbank rate, they added.
Because of the situation, the spread between the interbank and open market has started widening, and a few banks have again been compelled to ration the provisioning of dollars. The interbank rate was over Rs282 to a dollar, while in the open market the dollar was available close to Rs285, said banking and currency market sources.
The situation is not as bad as the 2022 crisis, and it is high time that the central bank took notice to avoid any speculation in the market, said a senior executive of a private bank whose institution was also facing the challenge of ensuring sufficient dollar provision for import payments.
Concerned authorities said on condition of anonymity that the local currency did come under pressure in both open and interbank markets. However, they said that it was a temporary phenomenon and would end soon.
Pakistan State Oil (PSO) and Pak Arab Refinery Limited (PARCO) were also facing issues in getting the right price of the dollar for making payments against their imports. The sources said that PSO paid about Rs3 higher for its latest import payment compared to the previous contract. This would translate into a higher petrol price for consumers.
Pakistan is scheduled to make $2.4 billion in foreign commercial debt repayments to China next month, in addition to payments to some other multilateral lenders. The foreign exchange reserves stand at $11.5 billion, which is not enough to make these payments and at the same time retain reserves in double digits.
The IMF has also further tightened the end-June Net International Reserves (NIR) target to negative $7.5 billiona further tightening of $1.1 billion compared to the target agreed upon in September last year.
To meet these targets and foreign debt repayments, the central bank is still purchasing dollars from the market.
The end-March negative NIR target was $10.2 billion, which means the central bank needs an additional $2.7 billion cushion just to meet the end-June target, according to the IMF report.
Another senior executive at a bank said that export and remittance proceeds were sufficient to cover imports, but the challenge lay with the financial account, which was putting pressure on the exchange rate. He said the central bank should refrain from buying dollars for a few weeks to ease market conditions.
Representatives of the banking industry have already brought the issue of the emerging shortage of foreign currency to the attention of the central bank, according to those privy to the discussions.
Despite the IMF programme, Pakistan has not received enough foreign loans this time. Central Bank Governor Jameel Ahmad said a few months ago that the SBP had bought over $9 billion from the local market in 2024 to build reserves.
The SBP spokesperson did not respond to questions about the reasons behind the recent pressure on the rupee-dollar parity, or whether there was a backlog of about $1 billion in deferred import-related payments due to the dollar shortage.
He also did not respond to questions regarding the increasing spread between the interbank and open market rates or the strategy the central bank is adopting to address the situation.
The buying of dollars from the market has helped reduce foreign debt by $800 million during the first nine months of this fiscal year. A stable rupee has also played a major role in bringing down the inflation rate to low single digits. However, exporters complain that tight control over the dollar price is eroding their competitive edge, and they argue that market forces should be allowed to play their role.
There is also a seasonal increase in demand for foreign currency due to Hajj, which central bank authorities expect will now subside.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
37 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
The great myth of ‘crowding out'
Each time the conversation turns to Pakistan's credit-to-GDP, a familiar chorus follows: the sovereign is crowding out the private sector. Government borrowing is now over 70 percent of the banking sector liquidity, and is said to be absorbing all available capital, leaving none for entrepreneurs or exporters. Like 'value addition' or 'fiscal space,' crowding out has become an overused and underexamined refrain - repeated so often it now functions as a placeholder for serious thinking. The problem is not that the theory is always wrong. The problem is that it has flattened the debate into a single, self-reinforcing belief: that if the state would simply borrow less, banks would resume lending to the private sector. That assumption has been tested. And it failed. Over the past two decades, the state has repeatedly tried 'setting liquidity aside' for the private sector. The instrument of choice was the refinance scheme: liquidity created by the central bank and supplied to banks at zero or heavily concessional rates. These schemes were ostensibly meant to channel credit to sectors that markets overlooked: SMEs, exporters, housing, renewables. It worked, at least on the surface. Liquidity flowed, spreads narrowed, and targets were met. But none of it changed the basic credit calculus. Because banks still bore hundred percent of the credit risk,they predictably lent to the same credit profiles they always had: large corporates, familiar clients, and borrowers with collateral. Refinance simply made already-bankable clients cheaper to finance. It did not expand access. It did not alter risk appetite. Is it possible that bank's aversion to widening the credit net had little to do with access to liquidity, and more to do with their risk assessment? What refinance did achieve, quietly was monetary expansion. SBP injections inflated the money supply, bypassed budget scrutiny, and masked the true fiscal cost of subsidized lending. These schemes functioned as off-book quasi-fiscal operations, sold as developmental finance. The result: cheap credit for a few, inflation for the rest. Under the conditions of the ongoing IMF program, the façadeis being dismantled. Refinance is being pushed out of SBP and into the finance ministry. Subsidies will now be explicitly budgetedfor, and likely routed through developmental finance institutions such as the EXIM Bank. On paper, this improves transparency. The fiscal cost is now visible and subject to budgetary discipline. The inflationary impulse, while still present, is at least attached to real expenditure trade-offs. But cleaner optics do not guarantee better outcomes. Nothing about the shift from SBP to MoF alters banks' core behavior. Whether liquidity is created at the central bank or subsidized through the budget, the lending decision still rests with the bank, as does the credit risk. And most Pakistani firms still fail that test—not because they lack viability, but because they lack collateral, audited accounts, or institutional familiarity. That is the real constraint. Not liquidity. Not crowding out. Risk. And the data reflects it. Pakistan's private sector credit-to-GDP ratio has remained stuck under 15 percent for more than a decade, even during years such as 2022 when share of refinance climbed up to 20 percent of total private sector lending. In contrast, peer economies in South Asia and the broader middle-income cohort have steadily expanded credit penetration, without relying on artificial liquidity windows. The difference is not funding availability. It is system design. So no, crowding out is not the one-size-fit-all explanation for Pakistan's credit stagnation. The real story is institutional: a refusal to underwrite unfamiliar risk, a regulatory framework that punishes diversification, and a policy discourse that keeps prescribing liquidity for a problem rooted in risk. Until that changes, liquidity will continue to rotate around the same borrowers, even as the rest of the economy remains locked out.
Business Recorder
44 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
APTMA demands immediate removal of yarn, fabric from EFS
KARACHI: All Pakistan Textile Mills Association (APTMA) has urged the government to immediately remove yarn and fabric from the Export Facilitation Scheme (EFS), warning that their continued inclusion is jeopardising the domestic textile industry and distorting fair market competition. Addressing a press conference at APTMA House here on Tuesday, Kamran Arshad Chairman APTMA said that inclusion of Yarn and Fabric in the EFS has resulted in unfair market competition as the domestic industry products are paying 18 percent GST, while importers are enjoying tax-free and duty-free regime. He said that Pakistan Cotton Brokers Association (PCBA) and Pakistan Cotton Ginners Association (PCGA) and many other textile associations are supporting APTM's move. APTMA for removing yarn & fabric from ambit of EFS On the occasion, Naveed Ahmed, Chairman of APTMA Southern Zone, Khawaja Muhammad Zubair, Chairman PCBA and Dr Jassu Mal PCGA, Yasin Siddik former chairman APTMA, Asif Inam and others were also present. 'FY25 budget removed sales tax exemption on local inputs under EFS; however, imports are sales tax-free and duty-free. This move is directly hurting the domestic industry', Kamran Arshad He mentioned that some 18 percent sales tax on local inputs is refundable, but refunds are delayed, incomplete, and costly to process, especially disadvantageous to SMEs. Due to this disparity, over 120 spinning mills and 800 ginning factories have already shut down; looms are also closing and loom workers are protesting on streets in Faisalabad. SMEs are specifically disadvantaged as they have fewer channels for import and pay sales taxes at every stage. In addition, only 60 to 70 percent of refunds are issued, while the rest are stuck in manual processing with no progress in the last 4-5 years, he added. 'Due to cheap import of yarn and fabric, exporters strongly prefer imported inputs, resulting in disadvantageous local suppliers.' There is a massive $1.5 billion increase in import of only cotton, yarn and greige cloth compared to export growth of $1.4 billion in FY25. The import of these items rose from $2.19 billion in FY24 to $3.64 billion in FY25, he mentioned. Chairman APTMA said that subjecting local supplies to 18 percent sales tax while bestowing zero rating on imports is an anti-Pakistan policy that is bleeding the economy within. He informed that APTMA has pushed as much as it can for restoration of the EFS to its June 2024 position with sales tax zero-rating on local supplies. 'We have held meetings with the Minister Finance, Chairman and Members FBR, IMF representatives; however, the IMF has not agreed to restoration.' He said a high-level committee was also formed led by Ahsan Iqbal, Minister for Planning Development & Special Initiatives of Pakistan for negotiation with IMF; however, the meeting could not hold. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Buoyed projections?
Listen to article The government's projection of an exalted growth rate of 4.2% for the next fiscal year has made jaws drop. On what premise it is so confident is hard to guess, but the ground realities suggest a dismal picture. The beleaguered dispensation is pinning its hopes on tight monetary control and effective management of the economy – but that is no small task. All the projected targets for the ongoing fiscal year were missed as the economy achieved 2.68% growth as against the projected 3.6%. The agrarian sector merely posted 0.56% growth and the country is now on the verge of importing grains. So are the pathetic statistics with industry and other plum portfolios. The euphoria seems based on the sole achievement that the economy has swelled to $411 billion with a per capita income rise to $1,824. Likewise, the services, transport, storage, construction, information and communication sectors have managed moderate upward trends. All this seems to have encouraged the government to propose new growth targets of 4.4% in commodity-producing sectors; 4.5% in agriculture sector, 3.5% in LSM and 3% in mining. Inflation is being seen at 7.5%. But there is a surprising squeeze too that the government is eyeing: the construction sector which grew by 6.6% this year is targeted at only 3.8%. So is the case with electricity, gas and water supply sectors that are nourished by 29% this year, but are projected to grow by only 3.5% next year. This is untenable and what crosscurrents they will leave behind is another enigma of sorts. On the international front, there is a tight-walking for the government as the IMF is too inquisitive, having almost torpedoed the plans on crypto, and insisting on tax collection to be raised to Rs16 trillion. On the other hand, the Planning Commission says it has only left with Rs880 billion and only high-priority developmental projects will see the light of the day. The rare hope-line is the largesse of the ABD which has doled out $800 million to strengthen fiscal sustainability and improve public financial management programmes.
