
Trump struck Iran — but North Korea is a different story
Iran strike hardens Kim Jong-un's nuclear resolve, pushes Pyongyang deeper into China-Russia orbit, say experts
US President Donald Trump's decision to authorize airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities has been widely seen as reinforcing North Korea's long-held belief: that nuclear weapons are essential for regime survival.
The strike would further dim the already unfavorable prospects for nuclear dialogue with Washington and accelerate Pyongyang's push for deeper military cooperation with Russia.
Still, analysts in Seoul stressed that North Korea's case is fundamentally different from Iran's.
Not only does Pyongyang already possess nuclear weapons and advanced delivery systems, it also maintains a distinct rationale and motivation for nuclear armament — unlike Tehran, whose program is framed around deterrence and national pride, Pyongyang's is centered on the survival of the Kim regime.
One of the most significant differences, observers noted, is that the likelihood of Trump ordering a similar strike on North Korean nuclear facilities is considered extremely low.
A key reason lies in North Korea's counterstrike capabilities: intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of reaching the US mainland and massed artillery aimed at densely populated areas of Seoul.
Joung Kyeong-woon, a senior research fellow at the Seoul Defense Forum, pointed out that densely populated areas — including the Seoul metropolitan area and the city of Goyang — are well within range of North Korean artillery.
'The primary reason North Korea cannot be attacked lies in the fact that we are essentially held hostage by its artillery — far more easily usable than nuclear weapons,' Joung told The Korea Herald. "This reality was confirmed when South Korea opposed, and then-US President Clinton ultimately abandoned, the idea of a surgical strike."
Then-President Kim Young-sam opposed the US proposal to strike the Yongbyon nuclear facility during the 1994 nuclear crisis under the Clinton administration.
North Korea can launch immediate strikes on the densely populated South Korean capital and its vicinity using artillery systems such as 170mm self-propelled guns and 240mm multiple rocket launchers, in addition to missiles targeting South Korea, including nuclear-capable solid-fuel short-range missiles like the KN-23.
'Since then, North Korea has secured layered deterrence through its possession of various medium- and long-range ballistic missiles, in addition to nuclear weapons,' Joung said.
Joung further explained that North Korea's deeply fortified underground nuclear facilities are nearly impossible to neutralize.
'North Korea's key nuclear and missile facilities are located hundreds of meters underground, beneath solid bedrock in the mountainous regions of the country's northwest," Joung said. 'There are no existing weapons capable of directly destroying them — not even tactical nuclear weapons.'
Lim Eul-chul, a professor at Kyungnam University's Institute for Far Eastern Studies in Seoul, pointed out, 'North Korea's possession of nuclear weapons and second-strike capabilities are the biggest constraints on a US airstrike" against nuclear facilities in North Korea.
In April 2025, Gen. Xavier Bruson, the commander of US Forces Korea, testified before the House Armed Services Committee that the 'DPRK's chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons programs and formidable missile force (ballistic and cruise) pose a threat to the US homeland, US forces in the Indo-Pacific, and allied nations."
Pyongyang has formalized a preemptive, or first-use nuclear policy in accordance with the law on North Korea's policy on nuclear forces, promulgated in September 2022.
'This marks a shift from its previous stance of using nuclear weapons solely for defensive purposes, allowing their use also for repelling or retaliating against an enemy's invasion or signs of an impending attack,' Lim said.
The roles of Russia and China also set North Korea apart from Iran.
'Unlike the case of Iran, Russia is obligated to intervene automatically under the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership Treaty between North Korea and Russia," Lim said.
North Korean leader Kim Jong-un and Russian President Vladimir Putin signed the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership Treaty, which stipulates a mutual defense obligation, in June 2024, during Putin's visit to Pyongyang.
'China is likely to view a US airstrike on North Korea's nuclear facilities as a direct threat to stability on the Korean Peninsula and to security along the China–North Korea border," Lim added.
Leif-Eric Easley, professor of international studies at Ewha Womans University in Seoul, pointed out that 'China and Russia are better positioned to help Pyongyang than Tehran.'
'The North Korean case is very different," Easley said.
More importantly, experts in Seoul underscored that the US strike on Iran's nuclear facilities is likely to have far-reaching implications for North Korea — reinforcing Pyongyang's nuclear posture, deepening its distrust of Washington, and reshaping its approach to diplomacy and military cooperation.
Kim Dong-yub, a professor at the University of North Korean Studies in Seoul, pointed out that what matters to South Korea is 'the impact on the Korean Peninsula and how North Korea perceives the situation."
'North Korea is likely thinking that its choice was the right one following the US bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities. It will further solidify its belief that 'possessing nuclear weapons is the only means of survival' and will continue to maximize the legitimacy of its nuclear possession,' Kim said.
'Beyond the economic shock, this crisis is highly likely to trigger widespread security instability on the Korean Peninsula and lead to a fundamental shift in the strategic environment,' Kim added.
Lim said Trump's decision to strike Iranian nuclear facilities 'has a significant impact on North Korea's foreign policy.'
'North Korea will reinforce the legitimacy of its existing policy that prioritizes regime survival and nuclear weapons development, and expand military cooperation rooted in anti-Western solidarity — particularly with Russia and China,' Lim said.
'It will also shift further toward deepening skepticism of inter-Korean dialogue and negotiations with the United States.'
The US military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities will further deepen North Korea's distrust of the US — already hardened by Washington's withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal, or JCPOA, in 2018 and the breakdown of the 2019 North Korea–US summit in Hanoi during the first Trump administration.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Korea Herald
2 hours ago
- Korea Herald
45 S. Koreans in Israel evacuate to Egypt amid Israel-Iran conflict
Forty-five South Koreans, including one with US nationality, have escaped Israel and safely arrived in neighboring Egypt, amid heightening tensions from the armed conflict between Israel and Iran, Seoul's foreign ministry said Monday. They passed through the border via a land route on Monday afternoon (local time) by a government-chartered bus and were on their way to Cairo, the ministry said in a press release. The latest evacuation follows the escape of nearly 50 South Korean nationals and their Israeli family members from Tel Aviv to Jordan over the past week, with assistance from the government and the Korean community in Israel. Since the conflict began on June 13 with Israel's large-scale airstrikes on Iran, 56 South Koreans and their Iranian family members have also evacuated Tehran. The South Korean government has provided transportation and assistance to help evacuees pass through border checkpoints and purchase plane tickets to either return home or travel to a third country. The foreign ministry has raised the travel alert for both Israel and Iran to "Level 3," the second-highest advisory strongly recommending people leave the countries. (Yonhap)


Korea Herald
2 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Lee Jae Myung skipping NATO summit risks Seoul missing out on diplomatic opportunities, opposition says
President Lee Jae Myung's decision not to attend the upcoming summit of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization risks South Korea missing out on diplomatic and security opportunities, lawmakers with the opposition People Power Party said Monday. "This NATO summit would be a crucial opportunity to address the security and economic uncertainties caused by the recent Middle East crisis and to explore ways to coordinate joint efforts," People Power Party lawmakers said in a joint statement, asking the president to reconsider. The People Power Party lawmakers said that the president snubbing the NATO summit might send the wrong signal about which countries the new administration in South Korea deems more important. "The president being absent from the NATO summit could give the impression that South Korea is prioritizing China, Russia and North Korea over our allies and partners," they said. The presidential office said earlier that Lee would not be attending the NATO summit, citing "various domestic issues" and the "uncertainties caused by the situation in the Middle East," but added that Lee's top security aide, Wi Sung-lac, would be sent instead. The People Power Party lawmakers also asked the ruling Democratic Party of Korea to exercise "more diplomatic prudence" in its messages about the US. The US airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear sites sparked criticism of the US from some within the Democratic Party over the weekend, including six-term Rep. Choo Mi-ae. Choo said in a statement on Facebook that the US "crossed the Rubicon" with the bombing of the Iranian nuclear sites, which she said violated international laws barring the use of unilateral preemptive force. People Power Party Rep. Kim Gunn, a former nuclear envoy, said that the Democratic Party, as the ruling party should "coordinate its messages on sensitive diplomatic issues with the government." "Messages out of the ruling party that are not in sync with where the government stands could be wrongly perceived as the intentions and perceptions of the government," Kim said. People Power Party Rep. Lim Jong-deuk said, considering the unique security challenges facing South Korea, such as North Korea's dispatch of troops to Russia, Lee's opting out of the NATO summit was "deeply regrettable."


Korea Herald
5 hours ago
- Korea Herald
What to expect from three special probes targeting Yoon, wife
South Korea is set to begin an unprecedented trio of special counsel investigations into former President Yoon Suk Yeol, his wife Kim Keon Hee, and the death of a Marine during Yoon's term. With President Lee Jae Myung's approval of three special counsel bills on June 10, the probes mark a significant escalation in efforts to address allegations that the previous administration was shielded from scrutiny. Led by special prosecutors Cho Eun-suk, Min Joong-ki and Lee Myeong-hyeon, the probes are slated to begin as early as July after a mandatory 20-day preparation period ends on June 30. Nearly 600 personnel, including some 120 prosecutors, will be mobilized, making it the largest special counsel operation in South Korean history. While the prosecution and police previously conducted investigations into the same matters, critics, including then-opposition Democratic Party of Korea lawmakers, accused those probes of being superficial and biased in favor of the former presidential couple. Those earlier efforts took place when Yoon was suspended from duty but still in office, pending a Constitutional Court ruling. Unlike those probes, the special counsels operate independently from existing law enforcement and are designed to minimize political interference, aiming to restore public trust in state institutions. President Lee has framed the launch of the special counsels as a response to public demand for accountability and a reaffirmation of constitutional principles. The triple probes could reshape South Korea's political landscape, potentially deepening partisan divides or prompting broader legal and institutional reforms, depending on their outcomes. With the official launch of the special prosecutor investigation, previously separate investigations by the prosecution, police and the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials will be consolidated under a single investigative body. The three, citing their respective jurisdictions, once vied for control over the investigation into Yoon after his martial law declaration in December 2024. Though a joint investigative team was formed among the CIO, the Korean National Police Agency's National Office of Investigation, and the Defense Ministry, the prosecution was excluded. This divide drew criticism from many people, citing a lack of credibility and fairness. It was also considered to have provided Yoon with the grounds to reject interrogation by the CIO, and led to confusion between the prosecution and the CIO when calculating the then president's detention period, according to Lee Yun-je, a law professor at Myongji University. 'The special counsel bill allows the investigation team to bring all investigation records and evidence together in one place. The special prosecutor team is likely to gain momentum in investigating different allegations surrounding Yoon, with additional summonses for questioning or a search and seizure operation based on the records,' the professor added. Though Yoon was arrested by the CIO for interrogation in January, he remained silent and insisted that the CIO did not have jurisdiction to interrogate him. The ousted president was indicted by the prosecutors without investigation in late January. The police have also summoned Yoon for questioning three times since the Seoul Central District Court revoked his detention in mid-March. But the former president rejected the summons to appear for questioning over charges related to his short-lived martial law declaration. Two other independent counsel teams, tasked to probe suspicions against the former first lady and Yoon's alleged interference in the investigation into the death of Cpl. Chae Su-geun, will conduct their investigation in the single investigative body as well. Public access to probes Regular briefings on the investigation process will also be held. According to the Special Prosecutor Act, for the investigations of Yoon and his wife, the special prosecutor or assistant special prosecutor 'may brief the media on the investigation, excluding the details of the charges, to ensure the public's right to know." This will enable the special prosecutor teams to share the outcomes of certain case proceedings with the public, including summonses, searches and seizures, warrant requests, and others, similarly to the independent counsel probe into former President Park Geun-hye and her confidante Choi Soon-sil in 2016. The Seoul Central District Court originally held Yoon's criminal trial hearings behind closed doors, citing Article 57 of the Court Organization Act. This stipulates that hearings may be closed to the public by court decision if there is 'concern that they could compromise national security, public order or violate good morals.' However, the Special Prosecutor Act mandates that the trials and hearings for related cases must be public. It states that live broadcasting is permitted if a request is made by the special prosecutor or the defendant, unless there are special circumstances as well. All three special prosecutor bills stipulate that the cases, which were indicted or set to be taken over by the special counsels for continued prosecution, will proceed in non-military courts. This means that the criminal trials of high-ranking military officials on insurrection charges, which were previously held in military courts, will now be conducted in the district courts. Meanwhile, Yoon's criminal trial, which is currently being heard at the Seoul Central District Court, could be transferred to a different court. The Special Prosecutor Act allows the special prosecutor to merge ongoing cases with new related cases, which could be assigned to a different panel once Yoon is indicted on different criminal charges. According to the Special Prosecutor Act, the cases, which are indicted by the special prosecutors, shall be conducted promptly, taking precedence over other trials. To ensure swiftness in the trials, the district court and high court are required to deliver their verdicts in these cases within six months and three months, respectively.