
US citizens and legal immigrants would be swept up in GOP drive to keep ‘illegal aliens' from getting government benefits
House Republicans are touting that their sweeping tax and spending cuts package would kick many 'illegal immigrants' off federal assistance, fulfilling one of President Donald Trump's top priorities.
House Speaker Mike Johnson has repeatedly emphasized that the bill would stop 1.4 million 'illegal aliens' from accessing Medicaid. The tax portion of the package has a section on 'removing taxpayer benefits from illegal immigrants.' And the House Agriculture Committee crafted a provision to restrict food stamp eligibility for 'illegal aliens.'
However, undocumented immigrants in the US won't be as heavily affected by the legislation since they already can't access nearly all federal government assistance programs, experts say. Those more in danger of losing some benefits are millions of legal immigrants, as well as children who are citizens but whose parents may be undocumented or have various legal statuses.
'It's part of a campaign of misinformation,' said Tanya Broder, senior counsel of health and economic justice at the National Immigration Law Center. 'This bill would deny eligibility to lawfully residing immigrants who have authorization to live and work in the US and who pay taxes that support the services that we all depend on.'
The legislation, which is now in the Senate, where it may be changed, would greatly limit the categories of legal immigrants who can qualify for a variety of federal benefits, including the child tax credit, food stamps, Affordable Care Act subsidies and Medicare. It also takes aim at states that provide Medicaid-like coverage to undocumented immigrants with their own funds.
Currently, immigrants' eligibility for federal benefits depends on their status, of which there are many categories. Among those authorized to be in the US, certain groups can qualify right away, others must wait several years. Some immigrant children and pregnant women can access Medicaid sooner if states opt to allow them. But immigrants with other legal statuses do not qualify for any public assistance. (All of them must also meet the other eligibility criteria for the benefit programs, including income limits.)
Undocumented immigrants generally only qualify for what's known as Emergency Medicaid, which reimburses hospitals for the emergency care they are required to provide. These patients would have to be eligible for Medicaid were it not for their immigration status. Separately, some states provide health coverage to certain undocumented immigrants, most commonly children, using only state funds.
At least one advocate for tighter controls on immigration thinks the House GOP bill misses the mark. Taking away benefits from immigrants already in the US does not address the underlying problem of illegal immigration, said Steven Camarota, director of research at the Center for Immigration Studies.
'This bill nibbles around the edges,' said Camarota. 'Will it have that much of an effect? That's the question.'
The proposed changes could have devastating consequences for vulnerable immigrant communities, particularly those who rely on public benefits to survive, said Beatriz Ortiz, a senior staff attorney at the International Rescue Committee. Prior to joining IRC, Ortiz worked at Ayuda, where she represented immigrants as a staff attorney.
'If you don't give people the possibility … the tools, they won't have a dignified life,' Ortiz said.
One of the most consequential changes involves the child tax credit, which House Republicans want to temporarily boost to $2,500 per child, from $2,000. Under the bill, a child's parents would have to have Social Security numbers, in addition to the child.
Currently, families can receive the credit if the parents file their tax returns with an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number, or ITIN, which is used by some legal and undocumented immigrants — as long as the child has a Social Security number.
This provision could leave about 2 million children ineligible for the child tax credit, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation, which analyzed the bill. The Center for Migration Studies estimates the number is closer to 4.5 million children who are US citizens or lawful permanent residents, otherwise known as green card holders.
'It singles out and disadvantages US citizen children because of their parents' immigration status,' said Shelby Gonzales, vice president for immigration policy at the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, noting that research shows the credit has a positive impact on children's health, educational attainment and, eventually, earnings. 'That's really alarming.'
Similarly, the 'Trump accounts' that the legislation would create would require both parents to have Social Security numbers to be eligible to claim the $1,000 federal contribution for their US-born citizen babies.
Fewer immigrants would be eligible for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the formal name for food stamps, if the House bill becomes law. Refugees, people approved for asylum, domestic violence victims and survivors of labor or sex trafficking would no longer qualify. Only citizens, green card holders, certain Cuban parolees and migrants from certain Pacific Ocean island nations would be able to receive food stamps.
Between 120,000 and 250,000 people would lose access to this food assistance over the next decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Families with citizen children would also feel the pinch – even if the kids would continue to qualify, the household would receive less assistance each month if the parents are no longer eligible.
Gloria, who fled gang violence in El Salvador in 2010 hoping for safety in the US, worries that she could lose a portion of the food stamps that she and her five children, who are citizens, depend on. The family receives a total of $900 a month in benefits.
'I'm about to have a baby; I'm a single mom. If this president decided to take it away, I would be very affected. I live off the SNAP benefits,' said Gloria, who lives in Washington DC and has a T-visa, a protection for trafficking survivors.
Gloria, who asked that CNN not use her full name for fear of retribution, said she was trafficked by her own mother and aunt in Maryland — forced to work at a carpet factory, sleep on the floor and hand over all her wages under threats of deportation from her own family until she finally escaped.
Gloria recently earned her GED, is studying to become a medical assistant and is also learning English. Still, she says she needs continued support to achieve her goals and become fully self-sufficient.
One asylum recipient from Egypt, who asked to be identified only as H.E. so as not to jeopardize his immigration status, told CNN that he depends on food stamps.
'If I lose those benefits, it's going to be bad,' said H.E., who lives in a shelter in Virginia, is unemployed and has been diagnosed with bipolar disorder.
The package would also block many legal immigrants from receiving Affordable Care Act premium subsidies and Medicare coverage, making it harder for them to obtain health coverage from both the government and private insurers.
Under the bill, asylees, refugees, temporary protected status holders and victims of domestic violence or sex trafficking, among others, would no longer be eligible for Obamacare subsidies or Medicare, even if they worked in the US for the 10-plus years it takes for senior citizens to qualify for the latter program.
One million more people would be uninsured in 2034 if these immigrants lost access to the Affordable Care Act subsidies, according to CBO estimates.
As for Medicaid, which House Republicans have targeted for steep spending cuts, the bill would not alter immigrants' eligibility for the federal program. However, it would levy steep penalties on states that have opted to expand coverage that's similar to Medicaid to a broader array of non-citizens, including undocumented immigrants, using their own funds. Some 14 states plus the District of Columbia cover at least some undocumented residents through these initiatives.
The House bill would cut the share of federal matching funds these states receive for covering low-income adults under Medicaid expansion to 80%, from 90%, which would double states' costs.
How states would react would likely vary, but experts fear that many would have to limit or end their programs covering undocumented residents. The CBO expects this provision would result in 1.4 million more people being uninsured in 2034 – the figure that Johnson often cites, even though these folks are not enrolled in the federal Medicaid program.
The penalty could also hit the states that cover immigrant children and pregnant women with certain legal statuses – including those with temporary protected status and student visas – through a separate state Children's Health Insurance Program. Some 21 states have opted to do so for children and six for pregnant women.
But since the penalty only applies to states that have expanded Medicaid, Pennsylvania and West Virginia would be hit, for instance, but not Florida or Texas, said Leonardo Cuello, research professor for the Center for Children and Families at Georgetown University. Most states would not be able to afford to continue these optional programs.
'The states are going to have a huge incentive to drop their coverage because the alternative is a massive increase in spending,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
People Are Absolutely Dragging JD Vance For His "Cringe" Tweet About "Les Mis"
Vice President JD Vance and his wife, Usha Vance, joined President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump for a performance of Les Misérables at the Kennedy Center on Wednesday evening. Many found it ironic, given that the musical is about an uprising against abusive authority figures. But just before the show, Vance wanted to make it very clear he had no idea what it was about. The vice president posted: @JDVance / Via In a follow-up tweet, the vice president added: 'That's apparently a different thing called Sweeney Todd.' @JDVance / Via Twitter: @JDVance Given that Les Misérables is one of the most enduring and widely performed modern musicals ― and that it's based on what's considered one of the most important novels of the 19th century ― not many people are buying Vance's ignorance. And they let him know on X: @DSAOrangeCounty / Via @SonnyBunch / Via @alex_shephard / Via Related: The Internet Is Having A Field Day Over Marjorie Taylor Greene's Tweet About Homeschooling With An Altered Map @CanadianKobzar / Via @Biedersam / Via @realStevenWalk / Via @AttalAurelia / Via Related: A NSFW Float Depicting Donald Trump's "MAGA" Penis Was Just Paraded Around Germany, And It' LauraBedrossian / Via @Richard_Vixen / Via @jaredlipof / Via @taylorttt / Via @dwaldenwrites / Via @StatisticUrban / Via @mccue / Via @Letterb0xed / Via @The_Wireman / Via This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: JD Vance Shared The Most Bizarre Tweet Of Him Serving "Food" As Donald Trump's Housewife Also in In the News: This Senator's Clap Back Fully Gagged An MSNBC Anchor, And The Clip Is Going Viral Also in In the News: AOC's Viral Response About A Potential Presidential Run Has Everyone Watching, And I'm Honestly Living For It
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Britain ready to implement US tariff deal, trade minister says
LONDON (Reuters) -Britain is ready to implement its side of a tariff deal with the United States and is hopeful for a proclamation from U.S. President Donald Trump to put the agreement into effect in the coming days, trade minister Jonathan Reynolds said on Thursday. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Trump on May 8 agreed to reduce tariffs on UK imports of cars and steel to the U.S., with Britain agreeing to lower tariffs on beef and ethanol, but implementation of the deal has been delayed. Reynolds met U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Tuesday and discussed the implementation of the deal. Asked on Thursday if there would be an update by the end of the week, Reynolds said he was "very hopeful". "We're ready to go, and as soon as the president and the White House are ready to go on their side, we'll implement (our) part of the deal," Reynolds told reporters. Reynolds said he would issue a government order known as a statutory instrument to implement the changes to reciprocal tariffs. Officials said that the update on implementation was likely to come early next week. One of the details to be ironed out before the deal can be implemented is steel quotas. Reynolds added that he wanted to make sure the tariff reductions applied to every bit of the UK steel industry, as the U.S. finalises quotas that will place supply chain requirements on British steel exports to the United States. The bioethanol industry has warned its future is under threat, with Associated British Foods deciding on the fate of a plant later this month. Reynolds acknowledged the deal could increase competition but said the industry was already struggling. "We are very sensitive to the ethanol issue... (but) they're losing a lot of money already," Reynolds said, adding regulatory tweaks could help, but that for financial support: "any intervention I make has to be a clear route to profitability." "So there are much wider issues for these partners than just the U.S. trade deal." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Buzz Feed
19 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
19 US Military Members Share Thoughts On Donald Trump
Recently, we asked active and reserve US military members and veterans to share their honest thoughts on Donald Trump and the Trump administration, and they got incredibly candid. Amid Veterans Affairs layoffs, jeopardizing America's relationship with long-standing allies like Canada, and even using the military as a backdrop for Trump's political rallies, here's how veterans and US military members are responding: "Nine-year veteran here. I think Trump is using executive orders to bypass checks and balances among the three branches. Trump's actions make it look like he thinks he is above the law, which is similar to every other dictator in history. It's sad that the judicial and legislative branches don't have more backbone to defend the Constitution against this clown." —Anonymous "I served for over 23 years before retiring. I'm now realizing I may have to pick up arms again because there are too many idiots in the country and in the US military." "I've been Active Duty for 13 years. The way the military has evolved over the years — with all the DEI stuff — has been hard to deal with. I'm glad to see it gone, as I believe that service should be merit-based for promotion. I also like the fact that we project strength now." "I retired from the USAF. I served during the Cold War, when we kept Russia at arm's length because we knew they couldn't be trusted. Two of my sons served; my daughter-in-law is serving in the Air Force, and my son-in-law is in the Army. I have discouraged two grandsons and three strangers from joining the military, and THAT hurts my heart. I never thought I'd do that. A dangerous man is in charge. God help us." —magicalsquid60 "He's the worst president in my lifetime. Him calling veterans 'suckers and losers' says it all!" "I'm a veteran and physician. I just hope that active military members remember that their oath is to the Constitution, not a wannabe dictator. I'm glad I'm at the end of my life, but I feel bad for my son and the younger generations who will suffer for Trump's megalomania. He and his puppets break the Constitution with impunity. And, as a physician, I'm appalled at RFK Jr. being the Secretary of Health." "I believe this country — effectively a plutocracy — is rapidly becoming an oligarchy. Politics aside, I'm mostly dependent on Social Security retirement, VA disability, and subsidized housing, so I'm quite apprehensive about the current administration's attack on all three of those programs. Every day, it seems like we're reverting back to the '50s." "I'm currently serving in the Army Reserve and spent 10 years on active duty. The majority of people I work with are glad Trump won, and so am I. As soldiers, we pray for peace while preparing for war. Finally, someone is in charge who will keep us out of war. Strong men make peace while weak ones start wars." —Anonymous "I have 30 years of active and reserve duty, primarily during the Cold War. We didn't have Trump and the MAGAs when I served, but I imagine that many in service now may agree with their policies. However, many civilians may not realize that military members have it drilled into them that the US military should not get involved in politics on a professional level. I cannot imagine any service member from my generation taking an active part in action against the American public based on orders coming down the Chain of Command. I don't think that aspect of military service has changed. For those afraid that Trump has no guardrails left in his second term, I believe the military can keep him in check if he ever looks to them to support actions against the Constitution, regardless of his justifications. I want to believe that service members won't shrink from standing up to a dictator." "I'm an 80-year-old veteran, and I'm completely appalled by what Trump is committing. I am disgusted, and I feel like our democracy is on the verge of complete collapse." "Never in my life would I have thought I'd ever say the following: Trump, his entire administration, and the entire MAGA cult make me ashamed to be an American! I predict that Trump will declare himself to be the 'Leader of America' for life before the end of his current term. From an Air Force retiree, I fear another civil war is coming." "I voted for President Trump twice and have served a total of 26 years: 16 active and 10 reserve. At 69 years old, I have no regrets serving all that time or voting for him. I'd do it again, actually." —Anonymous "I'm a veteran. I voted for Trump the first time, but I didn't vote for him the last. He's doing exactly what I thought he would do: be a bully. He talks to our allies the way he should be talking to Putin and his thugs. To me, Trump is disgusting and an embarrassment to our great country. Everything he says is a lie. I don't blame our allies for fighting back; Trump is poison to good people, and I'll be glad when he disappears from office." "I'm a 23-year retiree, and I'm embarrassed that I ever served. I feel like I wasted my life in the military. Politicians only care about politicians. I've been shit on by both sides of the aisle, but Republicans have clearly painted veterans to be 'entitled' individuals. We get treated like shit under President Trump." "I'm a Cold War vet, and there is absolutely nothing that the current administration can do to convince me that they are not compromised by Russian agents. Today's military leaders need to make sure that their troops know the difference between an illegal order and a lawful one! I see no reason to trust our current political leaders." —edgynugget757 "As a retiree and veteran, I think Trump is doing a great job, and I hope he keeps it up. For those who say they took an oath to defend the Constitution from foreign and domestic enemies, where were you during the last presidency? Now that was a real clown show. The world was laughing at the United States because of the stumbling, bumbling moron. I don't know any service member who supported Joe Biden or his pathetic Vice President." "I served in the US Army for 33 years under President Reagan, all the way through President Obama. The former Soviet Union has been our enemy since the end of WWII, yet Trump gives them aid and comfort. He pardoned those who partook in an insurrection, and he totally disregards his oath to support the Constitution. I believe he will go down as one of the worst presidents the United States has ever had. I am thankful that I do not currently serve, because I would find it very difficult to obey his orders. I am sad to say that I am extremely disappointed in the American voters for electing a convicted felon, and a person so unworthy to lead this country and represent us on a world stage." "After giving the Air Force four years of my life for my country, I am now ashamed to be an American! Having turned on our most important allies and treating our fellow Americans like numbers by terminating their jobs without can anyone respect a moron like the one we have in charge now? I fear for the future of my grandchildren and can only hope we can last until he is replaced! The sooner, the better!" Lastly: "It appears Trump is consolidating power by forcing qualified people out of their positions and placing MAGA puppets in their stead. As a veteran, I've not seen anything like this in my life. I weep for my country. Trump pardoned January 6 rioters, including those convicted of violent assaults, which undermines the accountability of justice and emboldens extremists to an alarming degree. Our oath was to the Constitution — how do we defend against an unlawful order from this country's leader when he pardons those who have attacked the Capitol? Follow the money. Trump is laying waste to our country while playing golf. I can only pray that our resilience as Americans will get us through the next four years. Stand up!" —purplephone528 If you're an active duty or reserve US military member or a veteran, what are your thoughts on Trump's presidency so far? Let us know in the comments, or you can anonymously voice your thoughts using the form below.