Latest news with #federalassistance
Yahoo
07-07-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Trump's response to flooding in Texas reflects glaring inequality
The Trump administration's politicization of federal disaster aid was on display over the weekend. President Donald Trump's provision of disaster aid to help Texas respond to deadly flooding in Kerr County — the conservative-leaning region that helped elect GOP Rep. Chip Roy — was appropriately urgent. His approach to recent catastrophes in states led by Democrats? Not so much. The federal government should urgently provide all aid necessary to stricken areas. So there was nothing wrong with Trump's announcement that he had authorized a 'major disaster declaration' that will unlock federal funding for Texas. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem shared the announcement in a social media post, vowing that Texans will 'get the support they need as search efforts continue and recovery begins.' But Trump and his administration have taken a markedly different approach to federal assistance for various Democratic-led states — slashing, stalling or outright denying money for disaster aid, sometimes for nakedly political purposes. In fact, just hours before Trump's Texas aid announcement, the advisor he tapped to lead the U.S. government's response to deadly wildfires in Los Angeles County earlier this year, Ric Grenell, posted a political attack on California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat. Grenell said he had told Trump not to give aid to California unless the state meets certain political demands related to its water supply and forestation policies — essentially peddling Trump's false claims that the devastating fires stemmed from liberal policymaking. 'The fires will happen again. I've told DJT we shouldn't spend federal money on California if the problems aren't fixed first,' Grenell wrote on X on Sunday morning. Trump himself has said that California instituting a restrictive voter identification law is a 'condition' for him to administer more money, so he clearly doesn't think politicization of disaster aid is a problem — despite his lie-filled allegations about President Joe Biden's administration after Hurricane Helene last fall. Trump's administration also has denied a request from another Democrat, Washington state Gov. Bob Ferguson, to issue a major disaster declaration that would unlock funds to help his state recover from a bomb cyclone in November. The Federal Emergency Management Agency concluded that such a declaration is 'not warranted.' And the administration has denied North Carolina Democratic Gov. Josh Stein's request to get fully reimbursed for Helene cleanup, a move that could severely undermine the state's years-long recovery efforts. FEMA similarly determined that the request is 'not warranted.' The president has been outspoken about his goal of shutting down FEMA by the end of hurricane season and giving states a greater share of the financial burden of disaster recovery. In the meantime, the administration seems to be using the agency as a means to assist people and places seen as friendly to Trump — and to punish those that aren't. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
02-07-2025
- Yahoo
Drug operation results in 6 indictments in Clark County
Jul. 1—A large drug trafficking investigation in western Clark County involving nearby jurisdictions ended with six indictments in Clark County, the sheriff's office announced Tuesday. The investigation found a wide "network of traffickers" of multiple drugs including meth, oxycodone, benzodiazepine, MDMA and cocaine in Clark County and nearby areas. It completed Monday with the subsequent indictments. The Clark County Sheriff's Office began investigating in August 2022 after learning of "multiple drug trafficking incidents" in Park Layne and Crystal Lakes in western Clark County, the sheriff's office said in a release. Investigators found "a wider network of traffickers" in and outside of Clark County and brought in federal assistance, as well as the Ohio Narcotics Intelligence Center and Clark County prosecutor. Investigators completed multiple controlled buys and surveillance to get a "complete picture of the whole trafficking network and the interactions and contacts between the individuals involved," according to a release. The Clark County Sheriff's Office and Montgomery County Sheriff's Office — Harrison Twp. Division conducted a "warrant blitz" Saturday in Clark and Montgomery Counties to arrest six people on Grand Jury indictments. Five were arrested Saturday and one was arrested Monday in Clark County. One person, who is unnamed in the release, engaged in a four-hour standoff with the CCSO and special operations team but was arrested without injury to them or law enforcement. "As a result of this extensive operation, a significant threat to the health and safety of the Clark County community has been dismantled, and the personnel of the Sheriff's Office will continue to exert extraordinary efforts to ensure the safety and security of the citizens we serve‚" the sheriff's office said in the release. Six people were indicted on the following charges: — Michael Seals, 33, of Dayton: Engaging in pattern of corrupt activity (first-degree felony), four counts of aggravated trafficking in drugs (one first-degree felony, one second-degree felony and two fourth-degree felonies), four counts of aggravated possession of drugs (one first-degree felony, one second-degree felony, one fourth-degree felony and one fifth-degree felony). — Michelle Ratliff, 50, of Dayton: Engaging in pattern of corrupt activity (first-degree felony), aggravated trafficking in drugs (second-degree felony), aggravated possession of drugs (second-degree felony). — Jimmy Watkins, 48, of Medway: Engaging in pattern of corrupt activity (first-degree felony), aggravated trafficking in drugs (first-degree felony), two counts of aggravated possession of drugs (one first-degree felony and one fifth-degree felony). — William Wilkin, 57, of New Carlisle: Engaging in pattern of corrupt activity (first-degree felony), 10 counts of aggravated trafficking in drugs (six third-degree felonies, three fourth-degree felonies, one fifth degree felony), seven counts of aggravated possession of drugs (four third-degree felonies, three fifth degree felonies). — John Stumbo, 42, of Medway: Engaging in pattern of corrupt activity (first-degree felony), aggravated trafficking in drugs (fourth-degree felony), aggravated possession of drugs (fifth degree felony), two counts of having weapons under disability (third-degree felonies). — Jade Anderson, 26, of Springfield: Engaging in pattern of corrupt activity (first-degree felony), aggravated trafficking in drugs (second-degree felony), aggravated possession of drugs (second-degree felony).
CNN
11-06-2025
- Politics
- CNN
US citizens and legal immigrants would be swept up in GOP drive to keep ‘illegal aliens' from getting government benefits
House Republicans are touting that their sweeping tax and spending cuts package would kick many 'illegal immigrants' off federal assistance, fulfilling one of President Donald Trump's top priorities. House Speaker Mike Johnson has repeatedly emphasized that the bill would stop 1.4 million 'illegal aliens' from accessing Medicaid. The tax portion of the package has a section on 'removing taxpayer benefits from illegal immigrants.' And the House Agriculture Committee crafted a provision to restrict food stamp eligibility for 'illegal aliens.' However, undocumented immigrants in the US won't be as heavily affected by the legislation since they already can't access nearly all federal government assistance programs, experts say. Those more in danger of losing some benefits are millions of legal immigrants, as well as children who are citizens but whose parents may be undocumented or have various legal statuses. 'It's part of a campaign of misinformation,' said Tanya Broder, senior counsel of health and economic justice at the National Immigration Law Center. 'This bill would deny eligibility to lawfully residing immigrants who have authorization to live and work in the US and who pay taxes that support the services that we all depend on.' The legislation, which is now in the Senate, where it may be changed, would greatly limit the categories of legal immigrants who can qualify for a variety of federal benefits, including the child tax credit, food stamps, Affordable Care Act subsidies and Medicare. It also takes aim at states that provide Medicaid-like coverage to undocumented immigrants with their own funds. Currently, immigrants' eligibility for federal benefits depends on their status, of which there are many categories. Among those authorized to be in the US, certain groups can qualify right away, others must wait several years. Some immigrant children and pregnant women can access Medicaid sooner if states opt to allow them. But immigrants with other legal statuses do not qualify for any public assistance. (All of them must also meet the other eligibility criteria for the benefit programs, including income limits.) Undocumented immigrants generally only qualify for what's known as Emergency Medicaid, which reimburses hospitals for the emergency care they are required to provide. These patients would have to be eligible for Medicaid were it not for their immigration status. Separately, some states provide health coverage to certain undocumented immigrants, most commonly children, using only state funds. At least one advocate for tighter controls on immigration thinks the House GOP bill misses the mark. Taking away benefits from immigrants already in the US does not address the underlying problem of illegal immigration, said Steven Camarota, director of research at the Center for Immigration Studies. 'This bill nibbles around the edges,' said Camarota. 'Will it have that much of an effect? That's the question.' The proposed changes could have devastating consequences for vulnerable immigrant communities, particularly those who rely on public benefits to survive, said Beatriz Ortiz, a senior staff attorney at the International Rescue Committee. Prior to joining IRC, Ortiz worked at Ayuda, where she represented immigrants as a staff attorney. 'If you don't give people the possibility … the tools, they won't have a dignified life,' Ortiz said. One of the most consequential changes involves the child tax credit, which House Republicans want to temporarily boost to $2,500 per child, from $2,000. Under the bill, a child's parents would have to have Social Security numbers, in addition to the child. Currently, families can receive the credit if the parents file their tax returns with an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number, or ITIN, which is used by some legal and undocumented immigrants — as long as the child has a Social Security number. This provision could leave about 2 million children ineligible for the child tax credit, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation, which analyzed the bill. The Center for Migration Studies estimates the number is closer to 4.5 million children who are US citizens or lawful permanent residents, otherwise known as green card holders. 'It singles out and disadvantages US citizen children because of their parents' immigration status,' said Shelby Gonzales, vice president for immigration policy at the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, noting that research shows the credit has a positive impact on children's health, educational attainment and, eventually, earnings. 'That's really alarming.' Similarly, the 'Trump accounts' that the legislation would create would require both parents to have Social Security numbers to be eligible to claim the $1,000 federal contribution for their US-born citizen babies. Fewer immigrants would be eligible for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the formal name for food stamps, if the House bill becomes law. Refugees, people approved for asylum, domestic violence victims and survivors of labor or sex trafficking would no longer qualify. Only citizens, green card holders, certain Cuban parolees and migrants from certain Pacific Ocean island nations would be able to receive food stamps. Between 120,000 and 250,000 people would lose access to this food assistance over the next decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Families with citizen children would also feel the pinch – even if the kids would continue to qualify, the household would receive less assistance each month if the parents are no longer eligible. Gloria, who fled gang violence in El Salvador in 2010 hoping for safety in the US, worries that she could lose a portion of the food stamps that she and her five children, who are citizens, depend on. The family receives a total of $900 a month in benefits. 'I'm about to have a baby; I'm a single mom. If this president decided to take it away, I would be very affected. I live off the SNAP benefits,' said Gloria, who lives in Washington DC and has a T-visa, a protection for trafficking survivors. Gloria, who asked that CNN not use her full name for fear of retribution, said she was trafficked by her own mother and aunt in Maryland — forced to work at a carpet factory, sleep on the floor and hand over all her wages under threats of deportation from her own family until she finally escaped. Gloria recently earned her GED, is studying to become a medical assistant and is also learning English. Still, she says she needs continued support to achieve her goals and become fully self-sufficient. One asylum recipient from Egypt, who asked to be identified only as H.E. so as not to jeopardize his immigration status, told CNN that he depends on food stamps. 'If I lose those benefits, it's going to be bad,' said H.E., who lives in a shelter in Virginia, is unemployed and has been diagnosed with bipolar disorder. The package would also block many legal immigrants from receiving Affordable Care Act premium subsidies and Medicare coverage, making it harder for them to obtain health coverage from both the government and private insurers. Under the bill, asylees, refugees, temporary protected status holders and victims of domestic violence or sex trafficking, among others, would no longer be eligible for Obamacare subsidies or Medicare, even if they worked in the US for the 10-plus years it takes for senior citizens to qualify for the latter program. One million more people would be uninsured in 2034 if these immigrants lost access to the Affordable Care Act subsidies, according to CBO estimates. As for Medicaid, which House Republicans have targeted for steep spending cuts, the bill would not alter immigrants' eligibility for the federal program. However, it would levy steep penalties on states that have opted to expand coverage that's similar to Medicaid to a broader array of non-citizens, including undocumented immigrants, using their own funds. Some 14 states plus the District of Columbia cover at least some undocumented residents through these initiatives. The House bill would cut the share of federal matching funds these states receive for covering low-income adults under Medicaid expansion to 80%, from 90%, which would double states' costs. How states would react would likely vary, but experts fear that many would have to limit or end their programs covering undocumented residents. The CBO expects this provision would result in 1.4 million more people being uninsured in 2034 – the figure that Johnson often cites, even though these folks are not enrolled in the federal Medicaid program. The penalty could also hit the states that cover immigrant children and pregnant women with certain legal statuses – including those with temporary protected status and student visas – through a separate state Children's Health Insurance Program. Some 21 states have opted to do so for children and six for pregnant women. But since the penalty only applies to states that have expanded Medicaid, Pennsylvania and West Virginia would be hit, for instance, but not Florida or Texas, said Leonardo Cuello, research professor for the Center for Children and Families at Georgetown University. Most states would not be able to afford to continue these optional programs. 'The states are going to have a huge incentive to drop their coverage because the alternative is a massive increase in spending,' he said.
CNN
11-06-2025
- Politics
- CNN
US citizens and legal immigrants would be swept up in GOP drive to keep ‘illegal aliens' from getting government benefits
House Republicans are touting that their sweeping tax and spending cuts package would kick many 'illegal immigrants' off federal assistance, fulfilling one of President Donald Trump's top priorities. House Speaker Mike Johnson has repeatedly emphasized that the bill would stop 1.4 million 'illegal aliens' from accessing Medicaid. The tax portion of the package has a section on 'removing taxpayer benefits from illegal immigrants.' And the House Agriculture Committee crafted a provision to restrict food stamp eligibility for 'illegal aliens.' However, undocumented immigrants in the US won't be as heavily affected by the legislation since they already can't access nearly all federal government assistance programs, experts say. Those more in danger of losing some benefits are millions of legal immigrants, as well as children who are citizens but whose parents may be undocumented or have various legal statuses. 'It's part of a campaign of misinformation,' said Tanya Broder, senior counsel of health and economic justice at the National Immigration Law Center. 'This bill would deny eligibility to lawfully residing immigrants who have authorization to live and work in the US and who pay taxes that support the services that we all depend on.' The legislation, which is now in the Senate, where it may be changed, would greatly limit the categories of legal immigrants who can qualify for a variety of federal benefits, including the child tax credit, food stamps, Affordable Care Act subsidies and Medicare. It also takes aim at states that provide Medicaid-like coverage to undocumented immigrants with their own funds. Currently, immigrants' eligibility for federal benefits depends on their status, of which there are many categories. Among those authorized to be in the US, certain groups can qualify right away, others must wait several years. Some immigrant children and pregnant women can access Medicaid sooner if states opt to allow them. But immigrants with other legal statuses do not qualify for any public assistance. (All of them must also meet the other eligibility criteria for the benefit programs, including income limits.) Undocumented immigrants generally only qualify for what's known as Emergency Medicaid, which reimburses hospitals for the emergency care they are required to provide. These patients would have to be eligible for Medicaid were it not for their immigration status. Separately, some states provide health coverage to certain undocumented immigrants, most commonly children, using only state funds. At least one advocate for tighter controls on immigration thinks the House GOP bill misses the mark. Taking away benefits from immigrants already in the US does not address the underlying problem of illegal immigration, said Steven Camarota, director of research at the Center for Immigration Studies. 'This bill nibbles around the edges,' said Camarota. 'Will it have that much of an effect? That's the question.' The proposed changes could have devastating consequences for vulnerable immigrant communities, particularly those who rely on public benefits to survive, said Beatriz Ortiz, a senior staff attorney at the International Rescue Committee. Prior to joining IRC, Ortiz worked at Ayuda, where she represented immigrants as a staff attorney. 'If you don't give people the possibility … the tools, they won't have a dignified life,' Ortiz said. One of the most consequential changes involves the child tax credit, which House Republicans want to temporarily boost to $2,500 per child, from $2,000. Under the bill, a child's parents would have to have Social Security numbers, in addition to the child. Currently, families can receive the credit if the parents file their tax returns with an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number, or ITIN, which is used by some legal and undocumented immigrants — as long as the child has a Social Security number. This provision could leave about 2 million children ineligible for the child tax credit, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation, which analyzed the bill. The Center for Migration Studies estimates the number is closer to 4.5 million children who are US citizens or lawful permanent residents, otherwise known as green card holders. 'It singles out and disadvantages US citizen children because of their parents' immigration status,' said Shelby Gonzales, vice president for immigration policy at the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, noting that research shows the credit has a positive impact on children's health, educational attainment and, eventually, earnings. 'That's really alarming.' Similarly, the 'Trump accounts' that the legislation would create would require both parents to have Social Security numbers to be eligible to claim the $1,000 federal contribution for their US-born citizen babies. Fewer immigrants would be eligible for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the formal name for food stamps, if the House bill becomes law. Refugees, people approved for asylum, domestic violence victims and survivors of labor or sex trafficking would no longer qualify. Only citizens, green card holders, certain Cuban parolees and migrants from certain Pacific Ocean island nations would be able to receive food stamps. Between 120,000 and 250,000 people would lose access to this food assistance over the next decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Families with citizen children would also feel the pinch – even if the kids would continue to qualify, the household would receive less assistance each month if the parents are no longer eligible. Gloria, who fled gang violence in El Salvador in 2010 hoping for safety in the US, worries that she could lose a portion of the food stamps that she and her five children, who are citizens, depend on. The family receives a total of $900 a month in benefits. 'I'm about to have a baby; I'm a single mom. If this president decided to take it away, I would be very affected. I live off the SNAP benefits,' said Gloria, who lives in Washington DC and has a T-visa, a protection for trafficking survivors. Gloria, who asked that CNN not use her full name for fear of retribution, said she was trafficked by her own mother and aunt in Maryland — forced to work at a carpet factory, sleep on the floor and hand over all her wages under threats of deportation from her own family until she finally escaped. Gloria recently earned her GED, is studying to become a medical assistant and is also learning English. Still, she says she needs continued support to achieve her goals and become fully self-sufficient. One asylum recipient from Egypt, who asked to be identified only as H.E. so as not to jeopardize his immigration status, told CNN that he depends on food stamps. 'If I lose those benefits, it's going to be bad,' said H.E., who lives in a shelter in Virginia, is unemployed and has been diagnosed with bipolar disorder. The package would also block many legal immigrants from receiving Affordable Care Act premium subsidies and Medicare coverage, making it harder for them to obtain health coverage from both the government and private insurers. Under the bill, asylees, refugees, temporary protected status holders and victims of domestic violence or sex trafficking, among others, would no longer be eligible for Obamacare subsidies or Medicare, even if they worked in the US for the 10-plus years it takes for senior citizens to qualify for the latter program. One million more people would be uninsured in 2034 if these immigrants lost access to the Affordable Care Act subsidies, according to CBO estimates. As for Medicaid, which House Republicans have targeted for steep spending cuts, the bill would not alter immigrants' eligibility for the federal program. However, it would levy steep penalties on states that have opted to expand coverage that's similar to Medicaid to a broader array of non-citizens, including undocumented immigrants, using their own funds. Some 14 states plus the District of Columbia cover at least some undocumented residents through these initiatives. The House bill would cut the share of federal matching funds these states receive for covering low-income adults under Medicaid expansion to 80%, from 90%, which would double states' costs. How states would react would likely vary, but experts fear that many would have to limit or end their programs covering undocumented residents. The CBO expects this provision would result in 1.4 million more people being uninsured in 2034 – the figure that Johnson often cites, even though these folks are not enrolled in the federal Medicaid program. The penalty could also hit the states that cover immigrant children and pregnant women with certain legal statuses – including those with temporary protected status and student visas – through a separate state Children's Health Insurance Program. Some 21 states have opted to do so for children and six for pregnant women. But since the penalty only applies to states that have expanded Medicaid, Pennsylvania and West Virginia would be hit, for instance, but not Florida or Texas, said Leonardo Cuello, research professor for the Center for Children and Families at Georgetown University. Most states would not be able to afford to continue these optional programs. 'The states are going to have a huge incentive to drop their coverage because the alternative is a massive increase in spending,' he said.
CBC
03-06-2025
- Business
- CBC
'The sooner the better' for Churchill Falls projects, Hogan says after meeting with PM
Newfoundland and Labrador Premier John Hogan says the Churchill Falls memorandum of understanding holds up, but federal assistance would be "great." Hogan was in Saskatoon on Monday for the first ministers' meeting with Prime Minister Mark Carney. Nation-building infrastructure projects are on the minds of many, and Carney has said he intends to fast-track them. The Canadian Press reported last week that Quebec Premier François Legault is expected to ask the federal government to help fund transmission lines that will connect Newfoundland and Labrador and Quebec to power generated by projects along the Churchill River. A draft agreement signed in December says a new deal would cost Hydro-Quebec at least $33.8 billion. Hogan confirmed that he and Legault have been discussing that idea as he spoke to reporters before Monday's conference. "We're happy to talk about that and any assistance that can benefit Newfoundland and Labrador, our ratepayers and our taxpayers," he said. "But it is important to continue with the MOU. I want Newfoundlanders and Labradorians to know we're not taking our eye off that project right now." Hydro-Quebec will construct the required transmission in its province, and N.L. Hydro is set to construct about 340 kilometres of transmission lines in Labrador, according to a fact sheet from the provincial government. Whether or not the federal government pitches in to build those lines, Hogan says Newfoundland and Labrador is in good hands. "If there can be further assistance and further discussion to make the project better, great. But if not, the project is a good project," said Hogan. The Newfoundland and Labrador government says the proposed Churchill Falls deal will see the province earn $1 billion every year for the next 17 years. Newly minted Energy Minister Steve Crocker says the province has an important seat at the table when it comes to providing green energy. "Any investment in Churchill Falls would not only benefit Quebec, but it'd benefit Newfoundland and Labrador as well," said Crocker, speaking from the Energy NL conference Monday. The minister didn't say that the province is specifically asking for the federal government to finance the transmission lines, but said Newfoundland and Labrador is working with them to ensure its resources "will contribute greatly to nation building in Canada." In a news conference after the first ministers' meeting, Legault told reporters that he thinks the new Churchill Falls deal, and the proposed Gull Island generating station, is a project of national interest. Carney, speaking in French, said he fully agrees with the Quebec premier. The governments of Newfoundland and Labrador and Quebec plan to sign binding agreements by April 2026. The prime minister said the premiers and territorial leaders discussed several projects and the federal government will assess whether they can be fast-tracked over the next few months.
