Mango airline's business rescue plan faces setback as court ruling is challenged
Image: File
The business rescue practitioner (BRP) of grounded low-cost airline Mango is challenging the Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg, judgment declaring the plan to save the state-owned company unimplementable.
BRP Sipho Sono has filed an application for leave to appeal Judge Denise Fisher's ruling handed down last month.
Judge Fisher found that the plan, stripped of its complexity, amounts to nothing more than the confiscation of creditors' claims to be transferred by Sono to an investor who pays no value for them or the shares.
She ordered: 'The compulsory cession contained in clause 6.2.6 of the business rescue plan is declared to be invalid and of no force and effect. It is declared that the business rescue plan cannot be implemented'.
Judge Fisher said Sono's opposition to Aviation Co-ordination Services' (ACS's) application was unmeritorious.
ACS, which provided security-related services such as baggage and cargo screening services, baggage reconciliation and check-in services, hauled Mango and Sono to court over the plan to save the subsidiary of South African Airways.
The company is one of the creditors owed about R2.91 billion by Mango before it was placed under business rescue in July 2021 and is owed over R23.3 million.
ACS complained that its estimated settlement would translate roughly to R44,300 per R1m, a return which it described as negligible, if not nominal.
Sono has indicated that there are sufficient funds to pay a dividend of more than the 4.43 cents to each rand owed, as estimated in the business rescue plan.
In the challenge to Judge Fisher's judgment, Sono stated that the court's findings that a business rescue plan cannot provide for an involuntary cession against non-acceding creditors was made as a principle that is far-reaching and has implications that extend beyond the present dispute and constitute a compelling reason why leave to appeal should be granted.
'The decision involves a question of law which is important, as the decision is of general application, affecting all business rescue plans that entail an involuntary cession, including against non-acceding creditors, which is a common feature of business rescue plans,' he explained.
Mango and Sono want to be granted leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal and believe there are reasonable prospects of success.
Sono defended the appeal, asserting his right to pursue litigation if he reasonably believes that a favourable outcome for Mango will benefit all affected parties.
'The BRP will continue to act and take such steps as he reasonably believes are in the best interests of all affected persons, notwithstanding the various threats made by ACS and its legal representatives, which are regrettable, inflammatory, and achieve no legitimate purpose,' he added.
According to Sono, ACS's intentions remain unclear but on the face of it, it would seem that the company prefers a situation where the potential investor withdraws and Mango is wound up.
'It is not clear why such an outcome would be favourable to ACS, who during the height of Mango's operations generated approximately R70m per annum in revenue,' he added.
[email protected]
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
a day ago
- Daily Maverick
Why punish the children of 2025 for the apartheid sins of their parents?
Bidvest's recent handling of its bursary scheme deeply unsettles me. The company has a bursary programme for students from grades 4 to 12. The bursary covers school fees, stationery, school uniforms and assistance with extra classes. Full-time employees earning less than R15,300 per month before deductions may apply. However, the programme is only for black, coloured or Indian employees. White employees' children are explicitly excluded. It reminds me of the day I was chased out of the post office because the child in me was too naïve to see the 'whites only' notice. The door for coloured people was at the back. It also reminded me of the time when I had to wait for the train as a student at the University of the Western Cape, but couldn't sit on the bench that had the words 'for whites only' written on it. I vowed to myself that I would do everything in my power to prevent any child from being hurt like that again. If it hadn't been for a good Samaritan who took care of me when I was a poor student so that I could receive a bursary, I would not be in the position to write this article today. In its defence, Bidvest states that the trust was established in 2003 as part of a corporate social investment structure that formed part of a consortium for black economic empowerment. They further argue that in accordance with the principles and philosophy of the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act 53 of 2003, the trust was established with the sole purpose of uplifting historically disadvantaged individuals who are employees of the Bidvest Group. It has been in operation for 22 years and has been very successful in changing the lives of their employees and their families, states a release from the company's communications firm. With regards to the success of the programme, I will not argue, and I want to give Bidvest credit for the fact that 22 years ago it was indeed important to uplift historically disadvantaged black people. However, this is not what is being discussed here. On its website, the company states that they want to make a meaningful 'impact on society' in a way that is 'innovative' and that the company is 'influenced by the context within which it operates'. They want to do this in a 'unique and resilient' way within an adaptable structure. The board members of Bidvest will agree with me that the circumstances today look significantly different than 22 years ago. After 30 years of a democratic order, the playing field is completely different. Today you find poor children across a wide spectrum of South African society. It is no longer restricted to just black children. As vice-dean at the University of Stellenbosch's Faculty of Education, it was my task to administer bursaries. I am also involved in the Foundation for Empowerment through Afrikaans (Stigting vir Bemagtiging deur Afrikaans, SBA) Honours programme and Rapport's education bursary fund. Over the past 20 years I have seen how our financial landscape has changed. Poverty knows – unlike 22 years ago – no colour. Students who are dependent on bursaries have increased among all families. Therefore, no student should be disadvantaged. The only criterion should be whether the child qualifies for the bursary and whether or not their parents can afford their studies. Also, the context in which the company currently operates differs from when the bursary scheme was established. Today, all employees can progress to the boardroom. I would really like to know how Bidvest looks its staff in the eye knowing that the company has failed to help all the needy children. What impact does this have on healthy relationships in the boardroom when employees who earn the same do not receive equal treatment? I acknowledge the terms of the trust that was established 22 years ago, but surely a company that prides itself on being adaptable and innovative could have made a plan to start a new bursary scheme from which all its employees can benefit? Nelson Mandela once said: 'Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.' These words of Madiba emphasise the transformative potential of education and highlight the critical role that education plays in promoting social, economic and political change. It is time for all of us – including Bidvest – to act on Madiba's words. Therefore, I could not remain silent when Bidvest ran a bursary programme 'only for black, coloured and Indian' children. It brings back all the pain and sorrow of the past. Children of 2025 had no part in South Africa's apartheid past. Why punish them for the sins of their forefathers? All children have dreams. All children are born in innocence. It is adults who raise children to be racists. After 30 years of democracy, it's time for us to banish words like whites, blacks, coloureds and Indians from our vocabulary. They do not belong in a democratic dispensation. According to their website, Bidvest deems all forms of discrimination based on race as illegal and they will not tolerate it. Furthermore, the company says: 'We do the right thing, even when no one else is looking.'
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
City of Joburg must reassess Sandton City's R10bn market value, rules High Court
The Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg, has ruled that the City of Joburg must redetermine the value of the Sandton City shopping mall. Image: File The City of Joburg must conduct a new valuation of Sandton City following the Gauteng High Court in Johannesburg which set aside its determination of the country's fourth biggest shopping mall's more than R10.1 billion market value. Sandton City, which is owned by the Liberty Group and property investment company Pareto Limited, successfully challenged the municipality's valuation of the five plots of land of the nearly 137,000-square metre Sandton City, which includes a shopping centre, office blocks and a hotel. The owners of the mall objected to its valuation by the City of Joburg's municipal valuer Piet Eloff, who dismissed their objection and the Valuation Appeal Board also dismissed the appeal. In terms of the Municipal Property Rates Act (MPRA), the board is empowered to hear and decide appeals against the decisions of a municipal valuer concerning objections to matters reflected in, or omitted from the municipality's valuation roll in the area for which it was established. Liberty and Pareto approached the high court to review and set aside the board's February 2023 decision and have the matter adjudicated upon afresh by a differently constituted board. In their papers filed in court, the companies state that the board's determination of the market value of the property was irrational and consequently of no force and effect and that in making its determination, ignored the provisions of the MPRA. In addition, they argued that the board, in making its determination, valued the property as a group, placing a single value on the erven (plots of land) which comprised it and not on each of its individual components, thereby acting in contravention several sections of the MPRA - a contention the companies later abandoned. They also accused the board of betraying a bias adverse to the owners, thereby vitiating (invalidating) its determination. According to the municipality's former assistant municipal valuer, identified as HJP Fouche, he determined the market value of the property from an analysis of the income derived from properties comparable to it and then drawing the mean from that analysis. 'We use the provable method or the comparable method, meaning that we look at rentals that have been concluded and thus comparable to this property being valued and we use that market information to determine a rental range which we then apply to the property and obviously, this rental range was documented in the market report for the municipality,' he explained. Acting Judge Gerald Farber found that Fouche, in order to arrive at the market value of the property, used information embodied in the unregistered leases, which burdened the property. 'It is clear that the board accepted the evidence of Fouche without any proper analysis thereof … The board has fallen far short of its obligations to determine the matter so as to bring about fair administrative justice,' the acting judge stated. Acting Judge Farber upheld Liberty and Pareto's review and set aside the board's determination. The matter was remitted for hearing afresh to a differently constituted valuation appeal board of the City of Johannesburg. The costs of the review proceedings are to be paid by the first, second and third respondents (board, municipal valuer Piet Eloff and Fouche), jointly and severally, the one paying the other to be absolved, read the judgment handed down on July 4. The city has chosen to abide the judgment. [email protected]
eNCA
2 days ago
- eNCA
Hunters benefit rural communities
POTCHEFSTROOM - Hunting tourism contributes more than R44-billion to South Africa's economy. A study by North-West University shows that both local and international trophy hunting have recovered since the Covid-19 pandemic and are now playing a key role in the economy. The benefits go beyond tourism, reaching sectors like agriculture, trade, transport, accommodation, and personal services. Professor Peet van der Merwe, a tourism management lecturer at North-West University, says hunting tourism fits well in rural areas where there are few economic opportunities and it contributes significantly to wildlife conservation and local development.
