logo
Reba's Law resurrected after expiring in legislative committee

Reba's Law resurrected after expiring in legislative committee

Yahoo15-04-2025

Assemblymember Brittney Miller. (Photo: Richard Bednarski/Nevada Current)
Legislation that could land animal abusers in prison for as long as ten years passed out of the Assembly Judiciary Committee late Monday after it appeared to die last week without a vote before the Legislature's first deadline.
'Amendments come and go and change at rapid speed as we approach the deadline,' the committee's chairperson, Assemblywoman Brittany Miller said during Monday's work session, indicating her internal polling of committee members last week, as amendments were crafted in the final hours, did not bode well for the measure. 'At no time was there anyone who doesn't want to address the heinous crimes and acts of animal cruelty.'
Miller said lawmakers 'don't always have time to process' amendments, adding the committee was able to obtain a waiver allowing the Assembly Judiciary to vote Assembly Bill 381 out of committee. The bill, Reba's Law, was 'able to be resurrected,' Miller said, resulting in a 'much more intense, robust bill than we had before.'
The measure is named for Reba, a bulldog who died of heat stroke days after she was found in a sealed tote behind a business last summer.
An amendment from the Nevada District Attorneys Association eliminated provisions that would have allowed for the prosecution of individuals who allow the abuse of an animal.
The amendment also removes language requiring permission from the animal's owner or a veterinarian to euthanize an animal. It instead requires a peace officer to forfeit the animal to a local government if the owner does not request a hearing within a certain time frame, or cannot be found within five business days. The local government must then decide whether to euthanize the animal or transfer ownership to a rescue organization, shelter or individual.
Causing the death of an animal would be deemed a category B felony, and could land offenders in prison for one to ten years and a fine of not more than $10,000.
Clark County District Attorney Steve Wolfson complained last year he needed stiffer penalties to impose against animal abusers than those allowed by law. However, a review of cases prosecuted by Wolfson indicates he rarely seeks prison time, even in egregious cases.
Lynn Whatford, a Clark County resident who cared for community cats in her neighborhood, spent much of the last year seeking justice for a colony of two dozen cats she says disappeared one by one. She suspects her neighbor killed them.
Nevada Voters for Animals founder Gina Greisen told lawmakers that Wolfson declined to prosecute the case after Whatford discovered a trapped cat left in her neighbor's yard without protection from the sun and a high temperature of 114 degrees on July 25, the day the cat likely died. A veterinarian's post mortem examination noted 'it is clear (the cat) experienced extreme physical suffering in an inescapable situation, and that heat stroke is the likely cause of death in this case.'
Whatford complained to Clark County Animal Control for months that the cats were disappearing and that she heard cries coming from her neighbor's yard.
'Animal Control told me I needed proof, yet the officer couldn't access my neighbor's property to get the proof. Animal Control referred me to Metro, but the detective wouldn't do anything until I had proof,' Whatford said during an interview in September.
Greisen testified in support of the measure, but warned that without proper training and resources for police and animal control officers, stricter penalties will do little to help stem abuse and neglect.
Las Vegas justice activist Leslie Turner testified in opposition and said the measure is 'just another way to funnel more people into the criminal legal system,' and does nothing to address the causes of cruelty, including 'mental health struggles, childhood trauma, cycles of violence, economic instability.'
A one to ten year sentence, she noted, exceeds the one to six year sentence for child abuse. 'How can we justify punishing someone more harshly for harming an animal than for harming a child? What does this say about our priorities?' she asked in written testimony, adding lawmakers should instead invest in 'education, early intervention, and community-based mental health resources.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

House won't override DeSantis' ‘free kill' repeal veto
House won't override DeSantis' ‘free kill' repeal veto

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

House won't override DeSantis' ‘free kill' repeal veto

A trio of flashing billboards less than two miles from the Florida Capitol is slamming Gov. Ron DeSantis for vetoing the "free kill" bill on medical malpractice. (Photo credit: Christine Sexton/Florida Phoenix) House Speaker Daniel Perez said Thursday the chamber will try again next year to pass a repeal of the 'free kill' statute following Gov. Ron DeSantis' veto of the proposal. DeSantis on May 29 vetoed the Legislature's attempt to remove the bar on parents of adult children and the adult children of single parents from suing hospitals and physicians for non-economic damages for the deaths of loved ones. The governor said repealing 'free kill' would increase health care costs for Floridians and make it harder to keep physicians in the state. 'Of course, the governor has in his right the power to veto this bill, and he chose to do so,' Perez told reporters. 'I disagree with the veto, and we will be bringing that bill back next year for a continued conversation.' Lawmakers passed HB 6017 with bipartisan support. Repealing the ban on suits to recover non-economic damages is one of the perennial arguments in Tallahassee, as business interests and medical groups oppose the move. Perez said he remains opposed to placing caps on the pain-and-suffering damages, which is something that DeSantis said could make him support the repeal in the future, along with caps on attorneys' fees. The family members barred from suing for pain-and-suffering damages can recover economic damages, such as lost wages, medical bills, and funeral costs. 'I don't think that we should determine how much a person's life is worth when someone negligently ended it,' Perez said. The Senate also rejected a bid to cap the damages at $1 million on April 30. Florida, for now, remains the only state banning the recovery of pain-and-suffering damages for parents of adult children and adult children of single parents. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

A Kentucky school board member should resign for calling for political violence
A Kentucky school board member should resign for calling for political violence

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

A Kentucky school board member should resign for calling for political violence

As a proud graduate of Lloyd Memorial High School (Class of 2005), I completed my entire K-12 education in the Erlanger-Elsmere School District, a journey that instilled in me the discipline and values that shaped my path. That foundation propelled me to graduate from Northern Kentucky University, earn a Juris Doctor from Salmon P. Chase College of Law, and return to serve as state representative for this district, which includes the Erlanger-Elsmere Independent School District. In November 2024, I was honored to win reelection with 62% of the vote as a Republican in what some call a "purple district," a testament to our community's trust in my leadership to prioritize education and unity. My legislative work − serving on the House Education Committee, supporting and voting for legislation to address early childhood reading, and improving how mathematics is taught − reflects my deep commitment to this district. However, recent events involving inflammatory rhetoric and criminal behavior from public figures like James Comey and local School Board Chair Jeffrey Miller threaten the values we hold dear. This threat hits close to home with Miller, who has served on the Erlanger-Elsmere Board of Education since his election in 2016, bringing shame to our shared district through both his words and actions. In a social media post, Miller expressed conditional support for the NRA if "these psychos were just once the victims of a mass shooting," adding, "please shoot (R)Republicans." This reckless call for political violence is an attack on the parents of the students he is responsible for protecting, as Republicans like myself make up the largest political affiliation in this district − approximately 55% of registered voters in Kenton County, which includes Erlanger and Elsmere, as of 2024. My recent election win with 62% of the vote in a politically mixed area underscores this community's values, which Miller's words directly undermine. Schools should be safe havens, yet his rhetoric risks normalizing harm. Ironically, since Republicans took control of the General Assembly in 2017, we have increased Support Education Excellence in Kentucky (SEEK) funding in every budget to better support our schools. Perhaps Miller's violent rhetoric stems from resentment toward Republicans for funding education, but such a stance is indefensible. On May 15, former FBI Director James Comey posted an Instagram image of seashells arranged as "8647," interpreted by some as a coded call to "eliminate" President Donald Trump (the 47th president), since "86" can mean "to get rid of" or even "to kill." The post, deleted after backlash, prompted a Secret Service investigation. More: Secret Service investigating ex-FBI Director James Comey's '8647' Instagram post Comey claimed no violent intent, but his history with Trump, who fired Comey in 2017, and the current climate, where 38% of Americans believe political violence is sometimes justified (per a 2022 American Psychological Association study), made the post inflammatory. Comey's post, though ambiguous, was reckless for a former FBI director, given the potential for misinterpretation in a tense political environment. Even more troubling is Miller's criminal behavior while serving on the school board. On Sept. 24, 2017, while serving on the board, Miller was arrested and charged with operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol/drugs and possession of drug paraphernalia. The citation details a disturbing scene: Miller was observed swerving on I-275 near the 81-mile marker, driving erratically, and showing clear signs of impairment − slurred speech, bloodshot eyes, and failing field sobriety tests. Drug paraphernalia was found in his front pocket. He was so intoxicated that he almost struck a police cruiser. This behavior from a school board member, entrusted with the safety and education of our children, is indefensible. Under the Erlanger-Elsmere school district's policies, students caught with drugs face severe consequences, including suspension or expulsion. If our children are held to such standards, why should Miller not be held accountable for his actions? His role demands a higher standard, not an exception. Adding to the district's woes, Miller has presided over a decline in academic performance since first being elected to the board in 2016, with the district now ranking 161 out of 172 school districts in the state, according to Public School Review (2024, September 18). For the 2023-24 school year, only 24% of elementary students are proficient or distinguished in math and 31% in reading (state averages: math 42%, reading 47%); for middle school, it's 26% in math and 35% in reading (state averages: math 39%, reading 45%); and at the high school level, 28% in math and 36% in reading (state averages: math 42%, reading 45%). These figures fall significantly below state averages across all levels, showing a clear gap in educational outcomes. Miller appears more interested in divisiveness than lifting our children up, and he has spent so much time trying to clean up his act after his arrest that he has forgotten to prioritize critical areas like mathematics proficiency, leaving our students to suffer the consequences of his misplaced focus. This is despite increased SEEK funding and Superintendent Chad Molley's $160,000 salary, which is in the top 37% statewide. Both Comey's and Miller's actions highlight the danger of reckless behavior from public figures. Comey's post jeopardizes national discourse, while Miller's call for violence against Republicans and his drug-related arrest while on the school board erode the trust and unity needed in education. His failure to prioritize academic improvement only compounds the issue. Accountability is essential. For Comey, the Secret Service investigation will determine legal consequences, but his clarification falls short of the responsibility his role demands. Miller must apologize and resign to restore trust in the Erlanger-Elsmere Independent School District, and the board should focus on improving academic outcomes rather than tolerating divisive and criminal behavior. As someone who has fought for this district's students, I urge the community to reject political violence and demand better leadership. Our schools and democracy depend on it. Republican Steve Doan represents the 69th District, which encompasses parts of Boone and Kenton counties, in the Kentucky House of Representatives. This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: KY school board chair should resign over violent comments | Opinion

Maine Republicans, gun rights groups try to force hearing on 'red flag' proposal
Maine Republicans, gun rights groups try to force hearing on 'red flag' proposal

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Maine Republicans, gun rights groups try to force hearing on 'red flag' proposal

Jun. 5—AUGUSTA — Republicans and gun rights groups are ramping up pressure on Democrats to hold a public hearing on a so-called red flag proposal that's headed for a statewide vote in November. Republican lawmakers are accusing the majority of violating state law by refusing to hold the hearing because it will undermine their campaign to pass the law. If approved by voters, the citizens initiative would make it easier for family members to have firearms temporarily taken away from people who are in crisis and may pose a danger to themselves or others. Sen. Trey Stewart, R-Presque Isle, said at a press conference Thursday that if Democrats don't reverse course and hold a hearing, Republicans will try to force the issue through a series of floor votes. And the National Rifle Association said Thursday that it will join a planned lawsuit over legislative Democrats' refusal to hold a public hearing. Stewart said Senate Republicans plan to offer a flurry of proposals to put Democrats on the record as opposing a chance for the public to weigh in. "It doesn't matter how you break this one down," Stewart said. "There needs to be a hearing. It's abundantly clear they're in violation of Maine law. Once again, (we're) giving them an opportunity to do the right things here. But if by today that is not the case (and) that has not yet happened, you're going to see a flurry of orders put forward by Republicans in the Senate." Democrats, who control both chambers and control committees that conduct public hearings, say they don't need to hold a hearing because the question will be decided by voters. Gun safety groups collected signatures to force a fall referendum on the red flag law, which would allow family members to directly petition a court to temporarily confiscate firearms. Maine currently has what is known as a yellow flag law, which was negotiated by Gov. Janet Mills, gun rights groups and gun safety groups. It can only be initiated by police and requires a mental health evaluation before a court petition can be filed to confiscate a person's firearms. A state law requires that a public hearing be held on statewide referendum questions, unless that hearing is waived by a two-thirds vote of the Legislature. And hearings have been routinely held for other referendum questions, including a recent hearing on a referendum to enact a voter ID requirement and additional restrictions on absentee voting. Lawmakers have three options when receiving a qualified citizens initiative: Enact it without changes, send it to voters, or send it to voters with a competing measure. Democrats have made clear this initiative will be sent to voters without an effort to pass it in the Legislature. Sen. Anne Carney, D-Cape Elizabeth, who co-chairs the Judiciary Committee, said she believes a state law requiring a hearing conflicts with the state Constitution, which doesn't mention the need for a public hearing. And since lawmakers have signaled they don't plan to enact the proposal, a hearing isn't necessary. Carney also noted last week that a hearing on a similar red flag proposal was held last session. But opponents of the referendum are clamoring for a hearing. The Sportsmen's Alliance of Maine issued an action alert this week, arguing that Democrats don't want to hold a hearing because it will highlight opposition, including from Gov. Janet Mills and other Democratic lawmakers. Mills came out against a red flag bill proposed last session, but the bill was never brought forward for a floor vote after an hours-long public hearing that drew a divided crowd. "Under Maine law, all ballot initiatives MUST receive a public hearing before going to the Maine voters," SAM's alert states. "But Judiciary Chairs and Maine Gun Safety Coalition allies are blocking that hearing. Why? "Because Michael Bloomberg and the progressive gun-control lobby know it could END their campaign. This is because a massive bipartisan coalition of Mainers, including Governor Janet Mills, law enforcement, and lawmakers, will discuss the dangerous and potentially deadly realities of this extreme law." Aids more Mills did not respond to a question about whether Mills would personally testify before the committee, which would be a rare and dramatic moment, or if her administration would testify on her behalf, which usually occurs. This story will be updated. Copy the Story Link

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store