New Zealand PM to discuss trade, tourism and security on first visit to China
Mr Luxon expects talks during his four-day visit to cover topics of security and defence. PHOTO: REUTERS
New Zealand PM to discuss trade, tourism and security on first visit to China
BEIJING/WELLINGTON - New Zealand's Prime Minister Christopher Luxon will visit China from June 17, looking to foster trade ties and woo tourists and students, although thorny issues of security and defence will figure on his agenda in meetings with top leaders.
Making his first visit to China since becoming prime minister in November 2023, Mr Luxon will arrive in the financial hub of Shanghai before heading to Beijing for meetings on June 20 with President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang, his office said.
"It's all part of our plan to grow our economy - creating more jobs, lifting wages, and putting more money in your back pocket," Mr Luxon said in an Instagram post as he set off.
The visit comes as Beijing's growing influence in the Pacific during the last few years has alarmed many Western nations whose traditionally stronger security foothold there is being challenged.
"There are a whole bunch of issues and challenges in the relationship," said Associate Professor Jason Young, director of the New Zealand Contemporary China Research Centre at Victoria University, while adding that both sides agree they have significant interests.
New Zealand aired concerns in February, for instance, when the Cook Islands, within its constitutional ambit, signed pacts, such as one on co-operation on the economy, infrastructure and seabed mining, with China, without consulting it first.
The presence of a Chinese People's Liberation Army Navy task force in the Tasman Sea and Chinese activity in the Pacific also pose challenges for the relationship, Assoc Prof Young added.
Significant interests
Trade and travel have proved less fractious areas for the two countries, however.
The first developed nation to sign a free trade deal with Beijing in 2008, New Zealand counts dairy, meat and wood products as its largest items of export to China.
Tourism and education are major services sectors.
The Pacific country's exports to China in 2024 stood at NZ$20.85 billion (S$16.21 billion), made up of NZ$17.75 billion in goods and NZ$3.1 billion in services, the foreign ministry says on its website.
Chinese tourists are the third-largest group of international visitors to New Zealand, though their numbers are still nearly a fifth lower than in 2019, before the Covid-19 pandemic, official data shows.
On the weekend, New Zealand said it would start in November a 12-month trial of visa waivers for Chinese passport holders arriving from Australia with visas valid for its neighbour, reciprocating China's visa-free policy for New Zealanders in 2024.
Mr Luxon, who has called China "a vital part" of his Pacific nation's economic story, has told domestic media that based on the "mature relationship" with Beijing, he expects talks during his four-day visit to cover topics of security and defence.
"The challenging global outlook makes it vital that we are sharing perspectives and engaging China on issues that matter to New Zealand," his office said in a statement last week.
The leaders of the two countries previously met on the sidelines of November's Apec summit in Peru, while Mr Li visited New Zealand in June 2024.
Wellington has historically taken a more conciliatory approach towards China than Australia or its other partners in the Five Eyes security arrangement.
But in recent years it has beome more vocal on issues such as human rights, the international rules-based order and potential militarisation of the Pacific.
In June 2023, then Prime Minister Chris Hipkins visited Beijing, prior to Mr Luxon. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Kremlin calls G-7 ‘useless', agrees with Trump that kicking out Russia was a mistake
Mr Trump said at a G-7 summit in Canada on June 16 that the G-8 had been wrong to kick out Russia in 2014 after it annexed Crimea from Ukraine. PHOTO: REUTERS MOSCOW - The Kremlin said on June 17 that US President Donald Trump was right to assert that it had been a big mistake to expel Russia from the Group of Eight in 2014, but that the G-7 was no longer significant for Russia and looked 'rather useless' now. Mr Trump said at a Group of Seven (G-7) summit in Canada on June 16 that the G-8 had been wrong to kick out Russia in 2014 after it annexed Crimea from Ukraine. 'This was a big mistake,' he said, adding he believed Russia would not have invaded Ukraine in 2022 had President Vladimir Putin not been ejected from the leaders' club. He said Mr Putin 'basically doesn't even speak to the people that threw him out, and I agree with him'. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters: 'We agree with President Trump: it was a big mistake then to exclude Russia from the G-8 format.' He said the G-7 had 'lost practical significance' for Russia, given the state of world affairs. 'Given the declining share of the G-7 countries in the global economy, given all the trends that are observed in the G-7 countries and, of course, against the background of, for example, such formats as the G-20, the G-7 looks dull and rather useless,' Mr Peskov said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Immigration raids in Los Angeles hit small business owners: ‘It's worse than Covid'
A third of California's workers are immigrants and 40 per cent of its entrepreneurs are foreign-born. PHOTO: REUTERS LOS ANGELES - Mr Juan Ibarra stands outside his fruit and vegetable outlet in Los Angeles' vast fresh produce market, the place in the city centre where Hispanic restauranteurs, street vendors and taco truck operators buy supplies every day.. On the morning of June 16 , the usually bustling market was largely empty. Since Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials began conducting immigration raids more than a week ago, including at a textile factory two blocks away, Mr Ibarra said business has virtually dried up. His street vendor customers are at home in hiding, while restaurant workers are too scared to travel to the market to pick up supplies. Most of the market's 300 workers who are in the US illegally have stopped showing up. Mr Ibarra, who pays US$8,500 (S$10,900) a month in rent for his outlet, which sells grapes, pineapples, melons, peaches, tomatoes and corn, usually takes in about US$2,000 on a normal day. Now, it's US$300, if he's lucky. Shortly before he spoke to Reuters, he had for the first time since the ICE raids began been forced to throw out rotten fruit. He has to pay a garbage company US$70 a pallet to do that. 'It's pretty much a ghost town,' Mr Ibarra said. 'It's almost Covid-like. People are scared. We can only last so long like this – a couple of months maybe.' Mr Ibarra, 32, who was born in the US to Mexican parents and is a US citizen, is not alone in seeing President Donald Trump's crackdown on immigrants in the country illegally devastate his small business. It is happening across Los Angeles and California, other business owners and experts say, and threatens to significantly damage the local economy. A third of California's workers are immigrants and 40 per cent of its entrepreneurs are foreign-born, according to the American Immigration Council. The Trump administration, concerned about the economic impacts of his mass deportation policy, shifted its focus in recent days, telling ICE to pause raids on farms, restaurants and hotels. The ICE raids triggered protests in Los Angeles, which prompted Mr Trump to send National Guard troops and US Marines into the city, against the wishes of California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom. Ms Abigail Jackson, a White House spokeswoman, said violent protesters in Los Angeles had created an unsafe environment for local businesses. 'It's the Democrat riots – not enforcement of federal immigration law – that is hurting small businesses,' Ms Jackson told Reuters. Restaurant slump The recent shift in focus by Mr Trump and ICE has been no help for Mr Pedro Jimenez, 62, who has run and owned a Mexican restaurant in a largely working class, Hispanic neighborhood in Los Angeles for 24 years. Many in his community are so scared of ICE they are staying home and have stopped frequenting his restaurant. Mr Jimenez, who crossed into the US illegally but received citizenship in 1987 after former Republican President Ronald Reagan signed legislation granting amnesty to many immigrants without legal status, said he is taking in US$7,000 a week less than he was two weeks ago. O n June 13 and 14, he closed at 5pm, rather than 9pm, because his restaurant was empty. 'This is really hurting everybody's business,' he said. 'It's terrible. It's worse than Covid.' Mr Andrew Selee, president of the non-partisan Migration Policy Institute, said the Trump administration began its immigration crackdown by focusing on people with criminal convictions. But that has shifted to workplace raids in the past two weeks, he said. 'They are targeting the hard working immigrants who are most integrated in American society,' Mr Selee said. 'The more immigration enforcement is indiscriminate and broad, rather than targeted, the more it disrupts the American economy in very real ways.' Across Los Angeles, immigrants described hunkering down, some even skipping work, to avoid immigration enforcement. Mr Luis, 45, a Guatemalan hot dog vendor who asked to be identified only by his first name for fear of being targeted by ICE, said he showed up this weekend at the Santa Fe Springs swap meet – a flea market and music event. He was told by others that ICE officers had just been there. He and other vendors without legal immigration status quickly left, he said. 'This has all been psychologically exhausting,' he said. 'I have to work to survive, but the rest of the time, I stay inside.' REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Navigating global headwinds and capital shifts in Asia Pacific
AS WE approach the second half of 2025, the investment landscape is facing a series of challenges and opportunities driven by global economic shifts, geopolitical tensions and structural changes. For investors in Asia Pacific, navigating this evolving environment requires a nuanced approach, balancing caution with strategic positioning to capitalise on selective opportunities. The global economy is grappling with headwinds, including a potential US economic slowdown, weakening Chinese growth and persistent geopolitical tensions. Amid these challenges, monetary easing is likely, with the Federal Reserve expected to cut rates to the 3.25 to 3.5 per cent range by June 2026. While this may provide some relief, it also highlights broader concerns about the strength of the US recovery and global demand. Where we see opportunities In light of these uncertainties, we have adopted a neutral risk stance across our portfolios. While regional equities present occasional trading opportunities driven by extremes in risk-reward or positive developments, we are cautious overall. US equity valuations remain high, and the risks of recession or stagflation could lead to prolonged market corrections. As a result, we maintain an overweight position in European equities, and focus on sectors with stronger defensive characteristics like global healthcare. Our sector strategy reflects the current macroeconomic environment. For the US, we are underweight in consumer sectors, industrials and materials due to concerns over an economic slowdown. Conversely, we are overweight in healthcare, financials and utilities, which offer relative stability. Recent additions have brought us to an overweight position in communication services, information technology and energy. From a currency perspective, the euro and yen are increasingly favoured as portfolio diversifiers, replacing the US dollar. The euro, in particular, benefits from sound fundamentals and attractive yields in investment-grade bonds, which we continue to favour despite tight spreads. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up China's slowing growth and rising risks China's economy, despite a strong start to the year with Q1 GDP growth of 5.4 per cent, faces significant challenges ahead. Growth projections for Q2 and Q3 have been revised down to 4 per cent and below, largely driven by the anticipated collapse of US-China trade and weakening global demand. The steep decline in new export orders, reflected in April's PMI, signals ongoing headwinds for China's export-oriented industries, including consumer electronics, tech hardware and apparel. These pressures are expected to weigh on employment and domestic sentiment, with additional risks stemming from rising geopolitical tensions and policy uncertainties. While we anticipate some easing of US tariffs, not all the damage to China's economy can be reversed. Domestically oriented sectors, such as toll roads, banks and real estate, may appear more resilient but are not immune to the broader slowdown. Chinese banks and property developers face mounting challenges, and while stimulus measures may offer limited reprieve, structural issues persist. Strategic repositioning in Asia Amid these challenges, certain markets in Apac stand out for their resilience and potential. Japan remains our highest conviction market, benefiting from low valuations, strong earnings recovery trends and higher share buybacks. The moderate rate-hike expectations in Japan have lifted a significant overhang, making its market more attractive. Subordinated debt from Japanese insurers, alongside Indonesian and Indian credit, offers compelling opportunities due to strong domestic fundamentals. Singapore and Malaysia are well-positioned to gain market share, while Thailand could benefit from potential deals. Singapore stands out with its unique economic zone with Johor, offering leverage in a multipolar world. Meanwhile, Indonesia faces challenges from external headwinds and domestic policy uncertainty. For equities, we favour domestic demand-oriented defensives such as utilities, staples, telecoms, Reits and healthcare in China, India, Japan and Korea. These sectors have demonstrated resilience during recent market volatility and offer protection against ongoing trade frictions. On the other hand, export-focused businesses face significant challenges due to rising trade uncertainties. In China, high-quality tech names with solid capital discipline present selective opportunities despite valuations near the higher end of their five-year range. The Chinese bond market also offers appeal, particularly USD-denominated bonds, which have outperformed in recent months. High-yield opportunities in Chinese properties remain attractive, as surviving names typically have proven access to capital markets and loans. However, investment-grade names in China are relatively expensive. Capital flow dynamics in Apac Two major trends are shaping the broader capital flow picture: the repatriation of emerging market (EM) capital from the US and the eventual return of US capital to global markets, particularly EMs. While the latter is expected to be a multi-year process, the repatriation of EM capital is already benefiting markets like Korea, which has significant ownership of US equities. India, meanwhile, is well-positioned to attract fresh diversification flows from the US, where it remains under-owned. Other markets in Asia, such as Singapore, the Philippines, and Vietnam, also stand to benefit. Singapore's trade-dependent economy is supported by market reforms, and its stocks often outperform during bear markets. Rate-sensitive real estate stocks, particularly Singapore-focused Reits, could gain from defensible domestic income streams. The Philippines, with its domestic consumption-driven economy and strengthening peso, is relatively well-positioned for a global trade slowdown. Vietnam, while facing complexities, could see catalysts for inflows through ongoing trade talks, a potential deal, and an upgrade from frontier to EM status. Asia in 2025: opportunity or risk? In the short term, market attention will remain focused on the risks posed by US tariff policy, a potential US recession and ongoing macroeconomic uncertainties. These factors contribute to a cautious sentiment among investors who are closely monitoring the evolving geopolitical landscape and its impact on global trade. The interplay between these elements will likely dictate market movements and investor confidence in the near future. However, the long-term outlook for Asia is more optimistic, as capital reallocation trends take shape. The region's economic resilience and growth potential are underpinned by several key factors. First, China's ability to address consumer confidence issues will play a pivotal role in sustaining its economic momentum. Measures to boost domestic consumption and stabilise the housing market are expected to be critical in this regard. Second, India's revival of private capital expenditure is expected to drive significant economic growth. The government's focus on infrastructure development and policy reforms aimed at improving the business environment are likely to attract both domestic and foreign investments. For investors, this underscores the importance of a selective and adaptable approach to navigating the region's evolving landscape. Identifying sectors and companies that are well-positioned to benefit from these macroeconomic trends will be crucial. Additionally, understanding the unique challenges and opportunities within each market will enable investors to make informed decisions and optimise their portfolios. Apac's investment landscape is undeniably complex, shaped by global headwinds, structural shifts and regional dynamics. While challenges persist, there are selective opportunities for investors who can navigate this environment with a strategic and flexible approach. The writer is chief investment officer Apac, DWS
