
The Future Of College Isn't Transactional
What if the best way to shape responsible, generous graduates isn't through contracts or debt—but through trust?
Last week, the college I lead, Hope College, celebrated a historic milestone: the first-ever graduating class of pay-it-forward students. Twenty young adults walked across the stage with a diploma in hand and zero tuition debt. But this wasn't just a financial experiment or a philanthropic gesture. It was a living, breathing demonstration of what can happen when education is rooted, not in transactional contracts but in trust, generosity, and hope.
When we first launched Hope Forward in 2021, we knew it would face scrutiny. The idea was simple enough: Students shouldn't have to pay tuition. Instead, each student should receive an education paid in full by someone else. In return, these students would commit to give back someday, but without any legal obligation to do so.
The concept is easy to understand. Many felt that it was also too idealistic to be practical. We heard every version of it:
These concerns were expected. For decades now, higher education has operated on this transactional logic. Students are conditioned to believe that debt is a necessary burden, a rite of passage even. We've come to see financial obligation as the only reliable path to commitment. And yet, paradoxically, the weight of that obligation often breeds anxiety, burnout, and disengagement. So despite the naysayers, we felt like the time had come to try something new. And so, we began with beta-testing.
Our first pay-it-forward cohort was small by design—twenty students who represented a wide range of socioeconomic, racial, geographic, and cultural backgrounds, all funded by a single anonymous donor. 30% of them came from overseas, and 20% of them were the first member of their family to attend college. But they weren't chosen because they looked good on paper; they were chosen based on a prompt - 'name an area of hopelessness you want to bring hope to.'
Over the past four years, this group has become a kind of living laboratory—not just for financial aid reform, but for cultural transformation. We had already started to notice interesting trends in terms of academic performance and engagement: Our Hope Forward students had a higher average GPA than the rest of their class - 10% higher. They also had higher-than-average participation in campus life, from student government to service organizations to peer mentoring roles. But it wasn't until after graduation that we were able to report on two of the most astounding outcomes.
The first outcome is related to retention. The graduation rate for this cohort was nearly 90% — well above national averages, and also above our own college's average graduation rate. But it's actually the second outcome – related to financial giving – which seems to be the most significant indicator yet that this model might actually work, perhaps better than we had ever dreamed.
Upon matriculation, every Hope Forward student signs a covenant, promising to give back to their alma mater every year for the rest of their lives, beginning the year after graduation. We call this a covenant instead of a contract because although it's not legally binding, it's still relationally binding. And we expected the students to treat it as such, and to take their obligation seriously.
What we did not expect was for students to stop seeing giving as an obligation altogether, but rather a privilege – something they couldn't wait to do. Yet that's exactly what seems to have happened. When Commencement arrived, 85% of this graduating class had already made a voluntary, financial gift to our college prior to graduation. One student even set up a recurring monthly donation. Not because he had to, or was expected to, but because he wanted to.
To state the obvious, this is simply unheard of in the world of higher education fundraising. The average alumni giving rate in the US is less than 8%, and that's after graduation. In terms of giving rates prior to graduation, the number falls so low as to be virtually non-existent. Who would ever want to make a donation to a college they are still attending?
But that dynamic is precisely what we've witnessed. And it's a trend that looks to be holding true for subsequent classes of Hope Forward students as well – looking at the next three graduating classes, 70% of those students have already made a gift as well.
All of that to say: in launching this new model, we got more than we bargained for. Pay-it-forward didn't just create financial relief; it created an entirely new culture—one where trust begets trust, and generosity multiplies. These students proved that generosity, once ignited, becomes self-replicating. That receiving freely leads to giving freely, as a matter of course. That hope is not a fragile dream, but a durable engine.
At the heart of Hope Forward is a radical claim: when people are trusted, they rise to the occasion. Trust isn't just a 'value' — it's a strategy. This represents a small but seismic shift, from scarcity to abundance, from contract to covenant, from debt to devotion.
Traditional financial models operate on enforcement. Hope Forward operates on formation. It forms students not just intellectually, but relationally and spiritually. It teaches them, from day one, that they belong to a story that is bigger than themselves—and that their response to receiving is to become givers in turn.
As one of these students put it recently, 'I don't 'deserve' my education: It's a gift given to me by someone I don't even know. It's grace. It could have been given to someone else. Our natural response to something given to us should be to share it.'
Behavioral science backs this up. People give more, not less, when they feel trusted. Psychology tells us that voluntary commitment is more powerful than coerced obligation. Neuroscience shows that generosity activates reward centers in the brain. Which is essentially what Jesus already tried to tell us a couple of millennia ago: 'It's more blessed to give than receive.' Turns out that's not some sort of moral standard to aspire to, but rather a basic law of human nature.
Hope Forward is still young, and we are still learning. But if this first cohort is any indication, we're learning in the right direction.
We're well aware that there's still a long road ahead, and we'll need to continue making adjustments as we grow. We'll need to measure more, listen more, and adapt as needed. Sustaining and scaling this model will require long-term vision, disciplined stewardship, and a generous community of supporters. But those supporters are growing. Because they see what's happening, and they want to be part of it. Which is why I'm confident that even as this model scales, its core purpose will remain intact: to educate students through generosity, and to invite them into lives marked by the same.
This is not just about how we fund college. It's about what kind of people we believe a college can shape. It's just the beginning. But already, the future feels different.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Evercore Highlights Amazon (AMZN) Grocery Strategy and Prime Stickiness
Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) ranks among the . Evercore ISI highlighted Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN)'s strategic actions in the grocery industry on August 13, reaffirming its Outperform rating and $280 price target on the company. The firm noted that by strengthening customer engagement through a high-frequency purchase category, Amazon's tighter integration of groceries into the Prime ecosystem raises customer lifetime value and stickiness. Amazon's $25 free delivery threshold, according to Evercore ISI, puts pressure on rivals like Walmart and Instacart to lower their prices. The approach is in line with Amazon's previously declared $4 billion commitment to use the country's current logistics infrastructure to extend its same-day and next-day delivery network to over 4,000 smaller and rural U.S. communities by 2026. According to Evercore's 13th Annual Amazon Survey, Prime Same-Day delivery multiplies the frequency of purchases, the expansion of categories, and the total amount spent by customers on Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN). The firm refers to this as 'Shipping Elasticity', which suggests that faster shipping results in more frequent and larger purchases. Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN), is an American multinational technology company that offers a wide range of commercial interests that include digital streaming, online advertising, e-commerce, cloud computing through Amazon Web Services (AWS), and artificial intelligence. While we acknowledge the potential of AMZN to grow, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an AI stock that is more promising than AMZN and that has 100x upside potential, check out our report about this cheapest AI stock. READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
KeyBanc Raises Dycom Industries (DY) Price Target to $295 on Telecom Growth
Dycom Industries, Inc. (NYSE:DY) is one of the best Russell 2000 stocks to buy now. On July 16, KeyBanc Capital Markets increased its price target for Dycom stock to $295, up from $255. The firm maintained its 'Overweight' rating on Dycom's shares, citing the company's strong sector positioning and the expectation that telecom infrastructure investments will remain high in the years to come. Photo by Scott Blake on Unsplash Specifically, KeyBanc highlighted Dycom's position at the start of a multi-year telecom investment expansion. Dycom, the analysts stated, has made robust private investments in fiber. Add to that the ongoing federal and state-funded rural broadband programs, as well as aggressive data center-led fiber builds. KeyBanc expects these initiatives to drive elevated spending in the industry for several years. The analysts also noted Dycom's national reach and scale in wireline construction. They stated that this fact gives the company an advantage in competing for contracts and capturing incremental growth opportunities. In that regard, KeyBanc noted that Dycom, as a 'telecom pure-play trading at approximately 11.3x FY27 estimates,' does not have its longer-than-usual growth cycle fully reflected in its current valuation. Dycom Industries, Inc. (NYSE:DY) is a specialty contracting company. It provides engineering, construction, maintenance, and installation services for telecommunications and utility infrastructure. The company operates across the United States, serving major telecommunications providers, cable operators, and utility companies through a network of field offices staffed by over 15,000 employees. While we acknowledge the potential of DY as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 Best Energy Stocks to Buy For the Long Term and Top 10 Industrial Stocks to Buy Amid Easing Tariff Uncertainties. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US budget deficit forecast $1 trillion higher over next decade, watchdog says
By David Lawder WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. federal budget deficits will be nearly $1 trillion higher over the next decade than projected in January by the Congressional Budget Office as a result of tax and spending legislation and tariffs, a budget watchdog said on Wednesday. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget's latest forecasts show a cumulative deficit of $22.7 trillion from fiscal 2026 to 2035, compared to the CBO's January forecast of $21.8 trillion, which was based on laws and policies that were in place before U.S. President Donald Trump took office in January. The CBO, Congress' non-partisan budget referee agency, said on Monday that it will not issue its customary mid-year budget update this year and will issue its next 10-year budget and economic outlook in early 2026, offering no explanation for the move. The CRFB, which advocates for deficit reduction, projected a $1.7 trillion deficit in fiscal 2025 or 5.6% of GDP, down slightly from $1.83 trillion in 2024 and the CBO's 2025 projection of $1.87 trillion in January. But it said deficits steadily rise over the decade, reaching $2.6 trillion or 5.9% of GDP by 2035. The new CRFB estimates include the budget effects of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act tax and spending bill, as well as Trump's tariffs that are currently in place. But like CBO, they do not include the dynamic economic effects on growth from these changes, a forecasting rule that has drawn criticism from the Trump administration. The group projects the tax cut and spending bill to increase deficits, including interest, by $4.6 trillion through 2035, adding another year to the CBO's $4.1 trillion cost estimate through 2034. But CRFB estimates that this will be offset by $3.4 trillion worth of extra import duty revenue over the next decade due to Trump's new tariffs that are currently in place. New rules restricting eligibility for health insurance subsidies will reduce deficits by another $100 billion through 2035, and Congress' rescission of prior funding to foreign aid, public broadcasting and other programs would save another $100 billion if sustained over a decade, CRFB said. Net interest payments on the national debt will total $14 trillion over the decade, CRFB projected, rising from nearly $1 trillion or 3.2% of GDP in 2025 to $1.8 trillion or 4.1% of GDP in 2035. TARIFF CHALLENGE The forecasts are based on legislative and tariff changes since January but keep CBO's economic forecasts unchanged. Under an alternative scenario forecast by CRFB, the budget picture looks far worse, boosting deficits nearly $7 trillion higher than the CBO baseline. This scenario would see a significant part of Trump's tariffs canceled if the Court of International Trade's ruling against many of Trump's new tariffs is upheld, cutting $2.4 trillion from revenues over a decade. The alternative scenario also assumes extension of a number of temporary tax cuts in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, including tax breaks on overtime, tips, Social Security income and car loan interest, higher state and local tax deduction allowances and full expensing of factory investments, adding $1.7 trillion to deficits over 10 years. CRFB's alternative scenario also ditches the CBO's projection of a decline in 10-year U.S. Treasury yields over the decade to about 3.8%. If that interest rate stays at the current level of about 4.3%, interest costs would grow by about $1.6 trillion through 2035, CRFB said. The total 2035 debt-to-GDP ratio would grow from 118% in the CBO January baseline to 120% under the CRFB's projected baseline scenario and 134% under the CRFB's alternative scenario. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data