Wait, Do Some Buffets Charge For Bringing In Babies?
However, the restaurant still tried to add on a full adult meal charge. Naturally, the internet did what it does best, and the outrage spread like wildfire. That story had dozens of replies, many from equally outraged parents. Most swore they'd walk out before paying a cent. Others chimed in with tales of their own buffet nightmare stories, including toddlers who were charged adult prices simply because they were taller than expected, or had a bigger appetite and dared to go up for seconds.
Read more: The Best And Worst Of Fast Food Mac And Cheese Ranked
Interestingly, some restaurants, particularly in the United Kingdom, base pricing on height instead of age, and that can be a problem if your toddler happens to be in the 95th percentile. So, if your 2-year-old is tall for their age, they could technically be considered "adult height," even if they're still munching on Goldfish crackers and playing with the salt shakers. In other cases, restaurants look at people's appetites. That means a 6-year-old who loves mashed potatoes and goes back for seconds might end up getting charged the same as a 30-year-old linebacker. But even then, charging for a newborn who isn't even old enough to sit up is excessive.
Some big buffet chains like Golden Corral have printed and posted age-based pricing. It usually reads as children under 3 eating for free, while those aged 4 to 12 pay discounted prices. This way, it's easier for parents and guardians to budget accordingly. Just remember to maintain a positive attitude, have a light meal before going, and steer clear of buffet salads!
When you go to smaller, independently owned buffets, the rules may become vague. Some restaurants charge a flat fee regardless of food consumed, and others hike the price if there's any food leftover on your plate. The logic is that the buffet is "all you can eat," not "all you plan to eat," and by entering the establishment, you're agreeing to the pricing.
Nonetheless, the majority of restaurants will not ask you to pay for a baby or a little kid who's not going to be eating. However, to avoid the awkward conversations at the checkout counter, it doesn't hurt to ask about a buffet's child policy before you sit down. You can also call ahead if you've never been there before. That way, if they attempt to charge for an infant, you're not caught off guard. Even if you're visiting the best buffet in your state, buffets are meant to be low-stress experiences: no frustrating menu decisions or waiting for the kitchen. You simply stack your plate and go. But nothing kills that experience faster than being handed a bill with a charge for someone who can't even hold a plate.
Read the original article on Chowhound.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Buzz Feed
7 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
16 Overlooked Issues That May Become Tomorrow's Crisis
We're living in strange, high-stakes times, and sometimes, it feels like the long-term risks we face don't always make headlines. So, when someone recently asked Reddit: "What is, in your opinion, the biggest silent threat the world is facing right now?" I was curious to see what people had to say. The responses were unsettling, surprisingly aligned, and deeply relevant. Here's what everyone shared: "The erosion of trust in information." "I don't know if it's technically the same thing or slightly different, but in a similar vein, the rejection of science and trained professionals." "Probably misinformation. Not just the fake news, but how easy it is to manipulate what people believe." —CheekyClair "Anti-intellectualism. By far one of the greatest threats to humanity and the world as we know it." "We're losing the lessons we learned after the world wars, and are slowly making the same mistakes again." "The disappearance of many pollinator species. We hear a lot about global warming, but the extinction of species is also super dangerous for life on earth." —oifghkoperWithout pollinators, we risk losing more than 80% of flowering plants that rely on them to reproduce, a loss that could trigger ripple effects up the food chain. Today, research suggests that more than 22% of native pollinators in North America are at risk of extinction due to habitat loss, pesticide use, and climate change. Planting native flowering plants can help support their survival. "Multiresistant bacteria." "Social media and its influence on the younger generations, especially." —tuhermosa "AI. I'm not kidding either." "Lack of empathy in favor of power and money." "Private equity buying housing. In 20 years, you'll either have to get land/property passed down to you through inheritance or rent property for the rest of your life." —Aggressive_Ruin759 "Propaganda. Information is becoming more and more centralized every day. The same megacorps own all the news networks, the same oligarchs own all of the social media platforms, and the same holding companies own all of traditional media. This makes it ludicrously easy to brainwash the masses, to mislead them, to 'steer' them." "Wealth inequality. It is the cause of many things mentioned here. After WW2, wealth inequality was at a low because most people in the west had lost a lot, if not everything, which created the role of the state as a provider for those in need. This was supported by a broad sense of community and camaraderie. Now, we're slowly moving toward the system (as was the case in most of our history) where the 1% owns everything." "Since the '80s, we've started moving to a system where individualism and personal accumulation of status and wealth are more important than societal and community support. As a result, it's become an everyone-for-themselves-and-fuck-the-rest system. As a result, wealth has started accumulating slowly at a select group of people who were able to make it (entrepreneurs, politicians) or had a head start (born into wealth). This has resulted in the top 1% class of people owning more wealth than the nation's entire middle class."—Rednavoguh "The wealth gap. The richest are on pace to become trillionaires within a decade, while the average American cannot afford to buy a home. A plan that's been in motion by the elites for some time." "Fascist/autocratic ideas fomenting among their supporters in online circles. Yes, the loudest of them are feeling emboldened to be more public with their views because they feel safe in their online spaces, but the algorithms are definitely providing fertile grounds for hateful tribalism." —mcclaneberg And lastly, "The perfect storm of climate change, infectious diseases, economic disparity, and the prosperity doctrine." What are your thoughts? Have any others to add? Let us know in the comments.
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
New Mom Says Her Partner Is Mad She Told Him She Doesn't Want His Parents Around ‘All the Time'
The mom confessed that she's starting to feel 'bitter' towards her partner's parents because of how much time they have with her babyNEED TO KNOW A mother is fed up with her partner's parents demanding to see her 8-month-old baby every day In a post on Reddit, the mom explained that they were initially only supposed to babysit the infant for four hours a day during the week 'I got irritated with my partner about it and it caused a disagreement,' she saidA new mom is calling time on her partner's parents' constant need to be around her 8-month-old baby. On Monday, July 28, the mother explained on Reddit's Am I the A------ forum that her future in-laws babysit for four hours each weekday while she and her partner go to work. She said that the arrangement has remained in place even though her partner is currently off work due to an injury. Despite seeing the infant five days a week, the mom revealed her partner's parents have also insisted on seeing the baby 'every' weekend. She recently missed out on bonding time with the tot as they enforced their plan to take the baby swimming. 'By the time I pick baby up from his parents' house after work, I get baby for 1-2 hours before baby goes to bed (I work 7:30 am - 5 pm),' the original poster (OP) said. 'Weekends are the only time I get more time with her.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. The mother said her partner's parents want an 'excessive' amount of time with their first grandchild. Her own parents only get to see the baby once a month because of how much time her future in-laws demand. Comparing the situation to her childhood, the OP recalled seeing one set of her grandparents every few months and the other once every 3-4 weeks. 'I feel like I don't get enough time every day with my baby (and on the weekends when I'm not working) and it's honestly making me feel bitter towards them and my partner,' she said. 'They're saving us money without having to pay for daycare, which I'm grateful for,' the mom continued. 'I just don't get why they insist on seeing her on the weekends too.' 'I got irritated with my partner about it and it caused a disagreement,' she said. 'He doesn't think it's excessive or anything, but that they just want to see their grandchild, even if it means less time as a family we spend together.' Having confessed that she doesn't 'f---ing get it,' the mom asked, 'AITA [am I the a------] for not wanting them around all the time?' Responses to the post agreed with the mother that her partner's parents were being unreasonable with the amount of time they expected with her baby. Related: Several commenters argued that her partner should speak to them about it. 'Your bf [boyfriend] is really happy to not have to care for his child on weekends, so off the baby goes to his mother/father,' one person said. 'He will not say no to his parents for that reason, more than likely." 'Simply tell your future ILs [in-laws] that you really appreciate the childcare they provide during the week but that you will no longer bother them when YOU are free and not working so that you can enjoy your child to the fullest,' the same person continued. 'NTA [not the a------]Deal directly with the ILs. Your bf needs to come to grips with parenthood before you marry, though,' they added. 'Be sure that he understands that he will need to be available for his child when he is off work.' Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Woman in Fight with Roommate Over Whether a Home Needs Both a Roomba and a Regular Vacuum
'Most of the time, it just bonks around like a lost toddler at IKEA until someone takes pity on it and turns it around,' the woman saidNEED TO KNOW A woman moved into a shared apartment with two roommates who agreed to share cleaning responsibilities However, she was left unimpressed when one of her roommates began using a Roomba instead of a regular vacuum cleaner 'It doesn't have a hose, can't clean corners or high surfaces, and doesn't work for any kind of mess,' she saidA woman who recently moved into an apartment in Boston with three other PhD students is unsure if she 'overstepped' after buying a vacuum cleaner without discussing it first. On Monday, July 28, the woman explained in a post on Reddit's "Am I The A--hole" forum that she is living with two other women in their mid-twenties, whom she didn't know before moving in. She said they all discussed splitting up the responsibility of keeping the apartment clean prior to the arrangement. However, she was unaware that the vacuum one of her roommates would be bringing was a Roomba. The woman said robot vacuums are ideal for light maintenance if used frequently, but are unsuitable for vacuuming the entire apartment. 'It doesn't have a hose, can't clean corners or high surfaces, and doesn't work for any kind of mess,' she explained. Complaining about her roommate, the woman continued, 'She also only wants to run it every other week, which doesn't really keep up with the dust and dirt of three people. 'The Roomba also hasn't mapped the apartment well due to its infrequent use,' she said. 'Most of the time, it just bonks around like a lost toddler at IKEA until someone takes pity on it and turns it around.' The woman said that when she tried to discuss her concerns with her roommate, the Roomba owner disagreed on the need to have a separate regular vacuum cleaner. In an attempt to avoid an argument, the woman said she bought her own regular vacuum that had a bag and an allergy filter to use in her bedroom and shared areas. 'When I brought it home, she was annoyed and said I had gone behind her back and broken our agreement,' the woman said of her roommate. 'I didn't see it that way, and shared that I'm not asking anyone else to use it or share costs. I just wanted to be able to clean the apartment to a level that works for me." 'Our other roommate said she doesn't really have a preference and doesn't care, so it seems like she is currently steering clear of this,' she continued. 'There's no blame or fault to be found in her at all; I totally understand why she might want to stay neutral." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. 'I don't want to be the problem roommate, but now I'm wondering if I overstepped. AITA [am I the a--hole?],' the woman asked. Responses to the post reassured the woman that her views on the Roomba were fair. One person said her roommate was 'acting like a child,' while another argued there should be no issue with the addition of the vacuum because the Roomba can still be used. 'This is absurd. You are allowed to buy whatever you want for your shared apartment. Roommate sounds like a problem now and future,' someone else chimed in. Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword