
Trump signs order aiming to cut some U.S. drug prices to match lower ones abroad
President Donald Trump on Monday revived a controversial policy that aims to slash drug costs by tying the prices of some medicine in the U.S. to the significantly lower ones abroad.
Trump signed an executive order including several different actions to renew that effort, known as the 'most favored nation' policy. He did not refer to specific nations, but signaled that he would target other developed countries because 'there are some countries that need some additional help, and that's fine.'
'Basically, what we're doing is equalizing,' Trump said during a press event on Monday. 'We are going to pay the lowest price there is in the world. We will get whoever is paying the lowest price, that's the price that we're going to get.'
White House officials did not disclose which medications the order will apply to, but said it will impact the commercial market as well as Medicare and Medicaid. They said Monday's announcement will be broader than a similar policy that Trump tried to push during his first term, which only applied to Medicare Part B drugs.
Officials added that the administration will have a particular focus on drugs that have the 'largest disparities and largest expenditures,' which could include popular weight loss and diabetes treatments called GLP-1 drugs.
It's unclear how effective the policy will be at lowering costs for patients. In a social media post on Monday, Trump claimed drug prices will be cut by '59%, PLUS!'
But Trump during the press event claimed drug prices may fall even more, between 59% and 80%, or 'I guess even 90%.'
Some Wall Street analysts and other experts also questioned whether the policy can be implemented.
In a note on Monday, JPMorgan analysts called the policy 'challenging to practically implement' because it would likely require congressional approval and could run into legal hurdles.
It is Trump's latest effort to try to rein in U.S. prescription drug prices, which are two to three times higher on average than those in other developed nations – and up to 10 times more than in certain countries, according to the Rand Corp., a public policy think tank.
In a statement on Monday, the pharmaceutical industry's biggest lobbying group, PhRMA, lauded Trump for taking aim at other nations 'not paying their fair share.'
Still, PhRMA's CEO Stephen Ubl said 'importing foreign prices from socialist countries would be a bad deal for American patients and workers' because it would hurt the industry's ability to bring them new treatments. Some experts have said the order could face challenges from the pharmaceutical industry in court. Read More Generic platinum chemotherapy shortages did not increase deaths
Despite the order, shares of U.S. drugmakers rose Monday. Merck 's stock added more than 4%, while Pfizer and Amgen climbed more than 2%
AARP, which advocates for older Americans, thanked Trump for issuing the order in a statement on Monday.
'For too long, big drug companies have been ripping off America's seniors—charging the highest prices in the world for lifesaving prescriptions, padding their profits at the expense of American lives, and forcing older adults to skip medications they can't afford,' AARP's chief advocacy and engagement officer Nancy LeaMond said in the statement. How Trump's drug pricing order will work
President Donald Trump, joined by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., speaks during a press conference in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on May 12, 2025, in Washington, DC.
Andrew Harnik | Getty Images
Part of the order takes aim at nations abroad, which have more power to negotiate down drug prices with pharmaceutical companies.
'Starting today, the United States will no longer subsidize the health care of foreign countries, which is what we were doing,' Trump said, adding the U.S. 'will no longer tolerate profiteering and price gouging from Big Pharma.'
He added that 'it was really the countries that forced Big Pharma to do things that, frankly, I'm not sure they really felt comfortable doing.'
The order directs the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and the Department of Commerce to crack down on 'unreasonable and discriminatory policies' in foreign countries that 'suppress' drug prices abroad, the officials said.
'We are going to be working to make sure that countries aren't being unfair in their negotiations with pharmaceutical companies, right?' one official said. Drugmakers are 'constantly complaining' about being put 'in an untenable situation when in these negotiations' because those companies typically have to broker drug discounts with entire countries, the official added.
Unlike the U.S., several foreign countries offer universal health coverage where the government is the sole payer, giving it significant leverage to negotiate or set drug prices.
White House officials said they expect drugmakers to provide discounts across the board to 'reciprocate' the actions the Trump administration is taking to address prices abroad.
Trump's order also directs the secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services to establish a pathway for U.S. patients to buy their drugs directly from manufacturers at most favored nation prices, bypassing middlemen.
'We're going to cut out the middlemen and facilitate the direct sale of drugs at the most favorite nation price, directly to the American citizen,' Trump said.
Within 30 days, the secretary will also have to set clear targets for price reductions across all markets in the U.S., according to the officials. That will open up a round of negotiations between HHS and the pharmaceutical industry, officials said, not providing exact details on the nature of those talks.
If 'adequate progress' is not made toward those price targets, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. will impose the most favored nation pricing on drugs through rulemaking.
The order also directs the Food and Drug Administration to consider expanding imports from other developed nations beyond Canada. Trump signed a separate executive order in April directing the FDA to improve the process by which states can apply to import lower-cost drugs from Canada, among other actions intended to lower drug prices.
Monday's order also directs the Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission to aggressively enforce 'anti-competitive actions' that keep prices high in the U.S.
The Department of Commerce will also consider export restrictions that 'fuel and enable that low pricing abroad.' The effects on patients, companies
Drugmakers have argued that the most favored nation policy would hurt their profits and ultimately, their ability to research and develop new medicines.
White House officials contended that pharmaceutical companies will continue to make money after the price cuts if they realize that the U.S. 'alone is not going to pay for innovation' and if they increase prices abroad to get additional revenue there.
Drugmakers 'should pursue deals where they get financially rewarded commensurate the value that they are providing to other nations, health systems,' one official said.
'Other countries should pay research and development, too. It's for their benefit,' Trump added on Monday.
The industry also lobbied against similar Trump plans during his first term. He tried to push the policy through in the final months of that term, but a federal judge halted the effort following a lawsuit from the pharmaceutical industry. The Biden administration then rescinded that policy. Read More Understanding metabolites underlying eye development
White House officials initially pressed congressional Republicans to include a most favored nation provision in the major reconciliation bill they plan to pass in the coming months, but the policy would have specifically targeted Medicaid drug costs, Politico reported earlier this month. Several GOP members opposed that measure.
The industry's largest trade group, PhRMA, estimated that Trump's Medicaid proposal could cost drugmakers as much as $1 trillion over a decade.
Some health policy experts have said a most favored nation drug policy may not be effective at lowering medication costs.
For example, USC experts said the policy 'can't undo the basic economics of the global drug marketplace,' where 70% of pharmaceutical profits worldwide come from the U.S.
'Facing a choice between deep cuts in their U.S. pricing or the loss of weakly profitable overseas markets, we can expect many firms to pull out from overseas markets at their earliest opportunity,' experts said in a report in April.
That will leave Americans paying the same amount for medications, drugmakers with lower profits and future generations of patients with less innovation, they said.
'In sum, everyone loses,' the experts said.
Even if the drug industry pushes back on Trump's executive order in court, his administration still has another tool to push down drug prices: Medicare drug price negotiations.
It's a key provision of the Inflation Reduction Act that gives Medicare the power to negotiate certain prescription drug prices with manufacturers for the first time in history.
Trump last month proposed a change to that policy that drugmakers have long sought. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle could be receptive to the idea, which proposes changing rules that differentiate between small-molecule drugs and biologic medicines.
Trump last week said he plans to announce tariffs on medicines imported into the U.S. within the next two weeks. Those planned levies aim to boost domestic drug manufacturing.
Drugmakers, including Eli Lilly and Pfizer , are pushing back on those potential duties. Some companies have questioned whether the tariffs are necessary, given that several of them have already announced new U.S. manufacturing and research and development investments since Trump took office.
Still, Trump last week doubled down on efforts to reshore drug manufacturing. He signed an executive order that streamlines the path for drugmakers to build new production sites.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump both booed and cheered attending Les Misérables at Kennedy Center
President Donald Trump was greeted with boos, as well as cheers, and chants of 'USA!' as he took his seat for the opening night of Les Misérables at the Kennedy Center on Wednesday. It's the first time Trump has attended a show at the venue since he fired the Kennedy Center's leadership, putting MAGA loyalist Richard Grenell in charge of the famed performing arts institution and naming himself chairman of the board. He promised to scrap 'woke' programming that aligned with what he called leftist ideology, which includes drag shows and 'anti-American propaganda,' the president wrote on Truth Social. The move upset some of the center's patrons and performers, and it was reported that several cast members planned to skip the show in protest of his attendance on Wednesday. When one group of ticket holders found out that Trump, Vance and their wives, Melania and Usha, would be in attendance, they donated their tickets to a group of drag performers, according to Qommittee, as reported by Houston Public Media. Videos posted on social media show the drag performers being cheered before Trump arrived. Other videos showed the president taking his seat to a combination of boos and cheers from the audience. When Trump walked the red carpet with first lady Melania Trump ahead of the show, he said he was not bothered by the reported boycott. 'I couldn't care less, honestly, I couldn't,' Trump said. 'All I do is run the country well. The economic numbers you saw them today, they're setting records. We took $88 billion in tariffs in two months, far beyond what anybody expected. There's no inflation. People are happy. People are wealthy. The country is getting back to strength again. That's what I care about.' Trump also spoke about his plans for the Kennedy Center, whose board he replaced with loyalists, some of whom were in attendance Wednesday, including Usha Vance, Attorney General Pam Bondi and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles. 'We want to bring it back, and we want to bring it back better than ever,' Trump said from the red carpet. 'As you know it needs a little help from the standpoint of age and fitness, but it's going to be fantastic.' Trump has previously proclaimed his love for Les Misérables, telling Fox News: 'I love the songs; I love the play. I think it's great.' He has played the musical's rebellion anthem, 'Do You Here the People Sing?' at past events and rallies. The story revolves around revolution in France, and has been a massive smash for decades. Trump also suggested that 'we may extend' the show's run. Currently, Les Misérables is slated to run at the Kennedy Center through July 13. The political drama at the center comes just two months after audience members booed the Vances and they took their upper-level seats at the National Symphony Orchestra. Back in 2016, incoming vice president Mike Pence was booed when he attended a production of Hamilton with his family. Pence acknowledged that he heard 'a few boos" and "some cheers" and told his kids at the time, 'that's what freedom sounds like.' The ethnically diverse cast of the popular and sold-out musical, which tells the story of America's Founding Fathers, asked Pence not to leave the venue before he listened to what they wanted to say – which was that people were worried that Trump would 'not protect them.' While Trump demanded an apology from the cast at the time and called the show "overrated", Pence told Fox News at the time that he, his daughter and cousins "really enjoyed the show".
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' could affect oil and gas
MIDLAND, Texas (KMID/KPEJ) – President Trump's 'Big, beautiful bill' could pass by July 4th bringing tax cuts, border security, and a boost for Permian Basin jobs. Representative August Pfluger has championed several provisions in the bill to help the oil and gas industry. Energy provisions: Expedited LNG Exports (Section 41003) — Expedites approvals by deeming applications to non-free trade countries 'in the public interest' upon payment of a $1 million fee, eliminating a previously lengthy review process. This streamlining preserves existing legal and regulatory authorities while potentially reducing approval timelines from years to months. Natural Gas Permitting Reform (Section 41005) — Creates a voluntary expedited permitting pathway with guaranteed timelines, requiring agencies to complete reviews within one year of fee payment ($10M or 1% of project cost). If review deadlines are missed, applications are automatically approved, and legal challenges are limited. Strategic Petroleum Reserve Funding (Section 41008) — Provides a $2 billion appropriation for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), including $218 million for cavern repairs, $1.32 billion for oil purchases, and directs the remaining funds to reverse prior mandated sales. This targeted investment strengthens U.S. energy security and reserve readiness. Environmental Provisions: Air Pollution Monitoring Limitation (Section 42105) — Repeals and rescinds unobligated funds from IRA Section 60105, which had allocated $281.5 million to the EPA for expanding air quality monitoring networks. This reduces the EPA's ability to identify new non-attainment zones, limiting additional regulatory burdens. Methane Emissions Program Delay (Section 42113) — Extends the timeline for the Methane Emissions Reduction Program charges by an additional 10 years. Healthcare provisions: Affordable Care Act Exchange Reforms (Section 44201) — Amends the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) definition of 'lawfully present' to exclude Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients. This change counters the Biden Administration's May 2024 rule, which expanded ACA eligibility to include DACA recipients, a move with potential legal and financial implications. For more information on this legislative package, visit: Text – H.R.1 – 119th Congress (2025-2026): One Big Beautiful Bill Act | | Library of Congress Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
LAPD Chief Shuts Down Trump Claim About City Needing National Guard
Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell sharply countered President Donald Trump's claims that the city was at a point of needing National Guard support, emphasizing Wednesday that protests were 'nowhere near' that level. McDonnell's remarks come after Trump cited the police chief as validating the White House's decision to send in troops to address largely peaceful immigration enforcement protests. 'If we weren't there, if we didn't bring in the National Guard and the Marines, you would probably have a city that was burning to the ground,' Trump baselessly stated while attending a performance of Les Misérables at the Kennedy Center Wednesday evening.'You would have had a big problem there, if we weren't – in fact, the police chief said so much if you look at what his statements were. He said we're very lucky to have had them.' When asked by CNN's Kaitlan Collins if Trump had correctly described his position, McDonnell disputed the president's statements. 'No, we were not in a position to request the National Guard,' he said. 'We're nowhere near a level where we would be reaching out to the governor for National Guard at this stage. And my hope is that things are going in the right direction now and that we wouldn't have had to have done that, or we won't either.' California's state and local leaders have vocally opposed Trump's decision to deploy 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles in response to protests that began this past weekend, emphasizing that they're not needed and will only sow chaos. Trump has bypassed state leaders, however, and made the rare move of sending in members of the military without the approval of California Gov. Gavin Newsom. McDonnell told CNN that the role of these troops is 'still not clear' to the LAPD, describing them as a 'support entity to protect federal employees and facilities.' In the last week, both National Guard troops and Marines have been authorized to temporarily detain civilians, a move that has murky legal footing since they're largely barred from engaging in law enforcement activity unless the president invokes the Insurrection Act.