U.S. pharma bets big on China to snap up potential blockbuster drugs
U.S. drugmakers are licensing molecules from China for potential new medicines at an accelerating pace, according to new data, betting they can turn upfront payments of as little as $80 million into multibillion-dollar treatments.
Through June, U.S. drugmakers have signed 14 deals potentially worth $18.3 billion to license drugs from China-based companies. That compares with just two such deals in the year-earlier period, according to data from GlobalData.
That increased pace is expected to continue as U.S. drugmakers look to rebuild pipelines of future products to replace $200 billion worth of medicines that will lose patent protection by the end of the decade, analysts, investors, a banker and a drug company executive said.
"They are finding very high-quality assets coming out of China and at prices that are much more affordable relative to perhaps the equivalent type of product that they might find in the United States," said Mizuho analyst Graig Suvannavejh.
The total cost of licensing agreements, including low upfront payments and subsequent larger payouts, averaged $84.8 billion in the U.S., compared with $31.3 billion in China over the past five years, according to GlobalData.
A licensing agreement grants a company the rights to develop, manufacture and commercialize another company's pharmaceutical products or technologies in exchange for future target-based, or "milestone," payments, while mitigating development risks.
China's share of global drug development is now nearly 30%, while the U.S. share of the world's research and development has slipped 1% to about 48%, according to pharmaceutical data provider Citeline's report in March.
Chinese companies have licensed experimental drugs to U.S. drugmakers that could be used for obesity, heart disease and cancer, reflecting abundant Chinese government investment in pharmaceutical and biotech research and development.
While small molecules, like oral drugs, have been the most commonly licensed, there has been a notable shift toward novel treatments such as targeted cancer therapies and first-in-class medicines, Jefferies analysts said in a note in May.
"Chinese biotechs are moving up the value chain by the day. They are ... challenging their Western peers," said Macquarie Capital analyst Tony Ren.
The growth is happening even as the U.S. and China have wrangled over tariffs and U.S. President Donald Trump pushes a made in America agenda.
That has cut into traditional mergers and acquisitions, which are down 20%, with only 50 such transactions so far this year, according to data from DealForma.com database.
Roughly a third of the assets that large pharmaceutical companies licensed in 2024 were from China, said Brian Gleason, head of biotech investment banking at Raymond James, who estimated such licensing deals would increase to between 40% and 50%.
"I think it's only accelerating," Gleason said.
The Trump administration is currently doing a national security investigation as it weighs if it will impose tariffs on the pharmaceutical sector.
But one health care analyst said licensing deals should continue because the yet to be marketed products are not impacted by tariffs.
"The law that gives the president the right to impose tariffs applies to goods. It explicitly excludes intellectual property," said Tim Opler, managing director in Stifel's global health care group.
In May, Pfizer spent $1.25 billion upfront for the right to license an experimental cancer drug from China's 3SBio. That is the largest such deal this year and could be worth up to $6 billion in payments to 3SBio if the drug is successful.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals in June paid $80 million upfront in a potential $2 billion deal for an experimental obesity drug from China's Hansoh Pharmaceuticals.
By licensing a drug in development, U.S. and European drugmakers get very quick access to a molecule which would take them longer and cost more to discover or design themselves, analysts say.
U.S.-based drug developer Nuvation Bio bought AnHeart Therapeutics in 2024, gaining access to the China-based company's experimental cancer drug taletrectinib, which received U.S. approval last week.
"We consider our presence in China not only a great avenue for R&D, but we also view it as an inside track on obtaining further assets to grow our company further and find new and better therapies to offer patients," Nuvation CEO David Hung said.
What makes China attractive, said EY analyst Arda Ural, "a fraction of the cost and then multiples of time."
Analysts have pointed to large drugmakers strategically securing rights to drugs at lower cost and running efficient early-stage trials in China to obtain important data, paving the way for global trials and potential earlier market entry.
"It's a little bit of a wakeup call to our industry," said Chen Yu, Managing Partner at U.S.-based health care investment firm TCGX.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Japan Times
2 hours ago
- Japan Times
SoftBank seeks to raise $4.9 billion in T-Mobile share sale
SoftBank Group is seeking to raise as much as $4.9 billion in an unregistered overnight block sale of T-Mobile U.S. shares, according to the terms of the deal. The Japanese technology giant is offering 21.5 million shares for $224 to $228 each, the terms show. The offering represents a discount of as much as 3% to T-Mobile US' Monday closing price of $230.99 per share, according to Bloomberg calculations. T-Mobile shares fell 3.5% to $222.99 each as of 6:56 p.m. on Monday in New York. They have climbed 4.7% in the year to date through Monday's close. Tokyo-listed SoftBank's shares have declined 7.5% in the year to date. The potential deal would be the biggest U.S. share sale since Toronto-Dominion Bank sold a $13.1 billion stake in brokerage firm Charles Schwab in February. Sales of new and existing shares in U.S.-listed companies reached $91.4 billion in the year to date, up from $75.9 billion in the same period a year ago, data compiled by Bloomberg show. The stake offered represents about 1.9% of T-Mobile's outstanding shares, according to Bloomberg calculations. SoftBank owned 85.4 million shares or 7.5% of T-Mobile as of March 31, according to its annual report. Deutsche Telekom is T-Mobile's largest shareholder with a 59% stake, according to a June 12 filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. SoftBank received its T-Mobile shares with the completion of the U.S. telecom company's $26.5 billion acquisition of Sprint in April 2020. Later that year, SoftBank substantially reduced its stake in T-Mobile via a $21 billion deal that helped pay for a record buyback of SoftBank's shares. Bank of America is working on the deal, the terms show.


Japan Times
3 hours ago
- Japan Times
Trump family launches branded mobile phone service in U.S.
U.S. President Donald Trump's family is getting into the mobile phone business with a Trump-branded service that will rely on existing wireless networks and hardware that is "made in America.' Trump's sons, Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr., unveiled the service, dubbed Trump Mobile, on Monday at Trump Tower in New York on the 10-year anniversary of their father's announcement that he would run in the 2016 presidential election. "We've partnered with some of the greatest people in the industry to make sure that real Americans get true value from their mobile carriers,' Trump Jr. said. He and Eric Trump are executive vice presidents at the Trump Organization. The service will use network capabilities from all three major U.S. carriers — T-Mobile U.S., Verizon Communications and AT&T, according to a statement. The family is also launching a Trump-branded mobile phone, the T1 — a "sleek gold' model that will be made in the U.S. and cost $499 This new business venture stands to escalate concerns over how the president's expanding business enterprises conflict with his government responsibilities. Unlike his predecessors, Trump didn't divest his wealth or move his assets into a blind trust with an independent overseer. His sprawling business empire is managed by two of his sons and operates in several areas that intersect with presidential policy. The Trump family, known for its real estate empire, luxury hotels and golf resorts, has expanded its interests throughout two presidencies to include digital media and cryptocurrencies. Some of the businesses have emerged to align ideologically with Trump's conservative base. For example, Trump founded Truth Social in 2022 as an alternative to Twitter. It now boasts millions of active users. A mobile company in particular would run headlong into Trump's trade agenda. Just last month, he threatened Apple with tariffs of at least 25% if it doesn't make its iPhones in the U.S. and signaled that he'd go after other device makers, including Samsung Electronics. It's unclear where Trump will source a significant volume of hardware fully made in the U.S. for a new device. Few — if any — of the world's major phone manufacturers assemble their devices at scale entirely within the country. The president also appoints the head of the Federal Communications Commission, which regulates wireless providers. Trump appointed Brendan Carr to lead the agency, and has recently encouraged the chairman to resolve a dispute with EchoStar over the buildout of its 5G network and the utilization of its wireless and satellite spectrum rights. EchoStar also owns the Boost Mobile network. Prohibitions Trump placed on his businesses in his first term to create an appearance of propriety, like forgoing new foreign deals, have been abandoned in his second. His empire has new projects overseas, including an 80-story Trump-branded skyscraper in Dubai with construction set to start in the fall and plans for branded hotels in Riyadh and Jeddah, plus a golf course in Qatar. The deals are all in countries with significant diplomatic, defense and commercial interests in the U.S. Unlike high ranking officials like Cabinet secretaries and agency heads, the president isn't required to divest assets under the U.S. law that aimed to reduce conflicts of interest in government. Since it was passed in 1978, every president voluntarily took steps to abide by its provisions, except for Trump. The flagship Trump Mobile offering, dubbed the 47 Plan, will offer unlimited talk and text with 20GB of high-speed internet for $47.45 a month. Subscribers will also receive benefits such as telemedicine access, roadside assistance through Drive America and protection services for devices, according to the announcement. A 250-seat customer service center will be set up in the U.S. to assist subscribers. Customers will be able to switch to the Trump Mobile network with their current phones, or connect with the new Android-based T1. Businesses that purchase network capacity from one of the big three U.S. wireless networks — known as Mobile Virtual Network Operators — are an increasingly hot category for reaching niche markets. The trio of actors who host the popular SmartLess podcast, Will Arnett, Jason Bateman and Sean Hayes, recently announced they are starting their own phone company on T-Mobile's network aimed at low-data-usage customers who'd like to save money on their bills each month. Actor Ryan Reynolds was also an investor and spokesperson for Mint Mobile, geared toward people who didn't yet have a wireless account and weren't going to use their phones as much. T-Mobile acquired the brand for $1.35 billion. DTTM Operations applied last week to use Trump's name and the term T1 for telecom services. The applications to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office cover mobile phones, cases, battery chargers and wireless telephone services, as well as, potentially, retail stores. T1 Mobile uses the Trump name and trademark, similar to other Trump-branded ventures. The Trump Organization isn't involved in designing, developing, manufacturing or distributing the cellular service, according to a release.

Japan Times
5 hours ago
- Japan Times
U.S. pharma bets big on China to snap up potential blockbuster drugs
U.S. drugmakers are licensing molecules from China for potential new medicines at an accelerating pace, according to new data, betting they can turn upfront payments of as little as $80 million into multibillion-dollar treatments. Through June, U.S. drugmakers have signed 14 deals potentially worth $18.3 billion to license drugs from China-based companies. That compares with just two such deals in the year-earlier period, according to data from GlobalData. That increased pace is expected to continue as U.S. drugmakers look to rebuild pipelines of future products to replace $200 billion worth of medicines that will lose patent protection by the end of the decade, analysts, investors, a banker and a drug company executive said. "They are finding very high-quality assets coming out of China and at prices that are much more affordable relative to perhaps the equivalent type of product that they might find in the United States," said Mizuho analyst Graig Suvannavejh. The total cost of licensing agreements, including low upfront payments and subsequent larger payouts, averaged $84.8 billion in the U.S., compared with $31.3 billion in China over the past five years, according to GlobalData. A licensing agreement grants a company the rights to develop, manufacture and commercialize another company's pharmaceutical products or technologies in exchange for future target-based, or "milestone," payments, while mitigating development risks. China's share of global drug development is now nearly 30%, while the U.S. share of the world's research and development has slipped 1% to about 48%, according to pharmaceutical data provider Citeline's report in March. Chinese companies have licensed experimental drugs to U.S. drugmakers that could be used for obesity, heart disease and cancer, reflecting abundant Chinese government investment in pharmaceutical and biotech research and development. While small molecules, like oral drugs, have been the most commonly licensed, there has been a notable shift toward novel treatments such as targeted cancer therapies and first-in-class medicines, Jefferies analysts said in a note in May. "Chinese biotechs are moving up the value chain by the day. They are ... challenging their Western peers," said Macquarie Capital analyst Tony Ren. The growth is happening even as the U.S. and China have wrangled over tariffs and U.S. President Donald Trump pushes a made in America agenda. That has cut into traditional mergers and acquisitions, which are down 20%, with only 50 such transactions so far this year, according to data from database. Roughly a third of the assets that large pharmaceutical companies licensed in 2024 were from China, said Brian Gleason, head of biotech investment banking at Raymond James, who estimated such licensing deals would increase to between 40% and 50%. "I think it's only accelerating," Gleason said. The Trump administration is currently doing a national security investigation as it weighs if it will impose tariffs on the pharmaceutical sector. But one health care analyst said licensing deals should continue because the yet to be marketed products are not impacted by tariffs. "The law that gives the president the right to impose tariffs applies to goods. It explicitly excludes intellectual property," said Tim Opler, managing director in Stifel's global health care group. In May, Pfizer spent $1.25 billion upfront for the right to license an experimental cancer drug from China's 3SBio. That is the largest such deal this year and could be worth up to $6 billion in payments to 3SBio if the drug is successful. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals in June paid $80 million upfront in a potential $2 billion deal for an experimental obesity drug from China's Hansoh Pharmaceuticals. By licensing a drug in development, U.S. and European drugmakers get very quick access to a molecule which would take them longer and cost more to discover or design themselves, analysts say. U.S.-based drug developer Nuvation Bio bought AnHeart Therapeutics in 2024, gaining access to the China-based company's experimental cancer drug taletrectinib, which received U.S. approval last week. "We consider our presence in China not only a great avenue for R&D, but we also view it as an inside track on obtaining further assets to grow our company further and find new and better therapies to offer patients," Nuvation CEO David Hung said. What makes China attractive, said EY analyst Arda Ural, "a fraction of the cost and then multiples of time." Analysts have pointed to large drugmakers strategically securing rights to drugs at lower cost and running efficient early-stage trials in China to obtain important data, paving the way for global trials and potential earlier market entry. "It's a little bit of a wakeup call to our industry," said Chen Yu, Managing Partner at U.S.-based health care investment firm TCGX.