Scientists find surprising sex reversal in Australian birds
A study of five common Australian species, including kookaburras, magpies and lorikeets, found around six percent of birds had the chromosomes of one sex but the reproductive organs of another.
The findings indicated a surprisingly high number of birds had reversed their sex after birth, said researchers from the University of the Sunshine Coast.
"This indicates that sex determination in wild birds is more fluid than we thought, and can persist into adulthood," said study co-author Dominique Potvin.
The study performed DNA tests on almost 500 birds.
The overwhelming majority of sex reversals involved genetically female birds growing male gonads.
"We also discovered a genetically male kookaburra who was reproductively active with large follicles and a distended oviduct, indicating recent egg production," said Potvin.
Sex reversal is well known in certain species of reptile and fish but is thought to be rare in wild birds and mammals.
Scientists have documented how pollutants and even warm temperatures can trigger sex reversal in frogs.
The cause of sex reversal in wild birds was not clear, the University of the Sunshine Coast study said.
But it could be due to environmental factors, such as hormone-disrupting chemicals building up in wild areas.
"Understanding how and why sex reversal occurs is vital for conservation and for improving the accuracy of bird research," added Potvin.
The study was published this week in peer-reviewed journal Biology Letters.
sft/tc
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
43 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Diabetes Discovery Reduces 'Life Threatening' Complication Risk
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The discovery of a new biological pathway may explain why people with type 2 diabetes are twice as prone to dangerous blood clots—putting them at risk of heart attack and stroke. This is the conclusion of researchers from the University of Sydney, who say their findings may pave the way for new treatments that reduce this danger. "People with type 2 diabetes have a higher risk of heart attacks and strokes. Part of the reason for this is that their platelets are hyper-reactive," paper author and hematologist professor Freda Passam told Newsweek. Platelets are small cell fragments found in our blood that form clots to help stop bleeding. The high levels of blood sugar seen in diabetes, however, cause biochemical changes that make them "stickier", Passam explained, so they can clot when not needed to. The hematologist continued: "Drugs like aspirin prevent platelets from clotting, but are three times less effective in people with type 2 diabetes. Understanding why platelets are more active in diabetes opens the door to develop drugs that target this newly discovered pathway." In their study, the team found that the levels of a protein called "SEC61B" is significantly increased in the platelets—the tiny blood cells that help form clots—of people with type 2 diabetes. The protein appears to disrupt calcium balance inside platelets, making them more likely to clump together and form clots, the researchers explained. The researchers found that blocking SEC61B activity with an antibiotic called anisomycin reduced platelet clumping in both human samples and animal models. Smiling woman checking her blood sugar levels. Smiling woman checking her blood sugar levels. JLco -Around 1 in 10 Americans (more than 38 million people) live with diabetes, of which 90–95 percent have type 2, which occurs when insulin doesn't work properly or there's not enough of it. While type 2 diabetes typically develops in people aged 45 and over, children, teens and young adults are increasingly developing the condition as well. "People living with type 2 diabetes are vulnerable to increased risk of blood clots," Passam said in a statement. "These exciting findings identify a whole new way to reduce this risk and help prevent life-threatening complications like heart attack and stroke." In their study, the team analyzed both human and mouse platelets, discovering that SEC61B contributes to calcium leakage from the platelets' stores, making the cell fragments more reactive. The Australia-based researchers noted that the condition is "more prevalent in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and in rural and regional communities." "Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death in this group, partly due to the heightened activity of platelets—the tiny blood cells that help form clots," they explained. "This heightened platelet sensitivity to clotting also makes traditional anti-coagulant treatments less effective in people with type 2 diabetes, limiting the options to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease." Treatments targeting SEC61B are still in early stages. However, the researchers believe pre-clinical trials in animals could begin within 1–2 years, with potential therapies for patients likely to be available in the next decade. Do you have a tip on a health story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question type 2 diabetes? Let us know via health@ Reference Kong, Y. X., Rehan, R., Moreno, C. L., Madsen, S., Zhang, Y., Zhao, H., Qi, M., Houlahan, C., Cartland, S. P., Robertshaw, D., Trang, V., Ong, F. J. L., Liu, M., Cheng, E., Alwis, I., Dupuy, A., Cielesh, M., Cooke, K. C., Potter, M., Stӧckli, J., Morahan, G., Kalev-Zylinska, M., Rondina, M. T., Schulman, S., Yang, J., Neely, G. G., Schoenwaelder, S., Jackson, S., James, D., Kavurma, M. M., Hocking, S., Twigg, S. M., Weaver, J., Larance, M., & Passam, F. H. (2025). SEC61B regulates calcium flux and platelet hyperreactivity in diabetes. Journal of Clinical Investigation.
Gizmodo
an hour ago
- Gizmodo
Scientists Identify a New Glitch in Human Thinking
Good news, everyone! Scientists at the University of California, Berkeley, have coined a new term to describe our brains being dumb. In a recent study, they provide evidence for a distinct but common kind of cognitive bias—one that makes us reluctant to take the easier path in life if it means retracing our steps. The researchers have named the bias the 'doubling-back aversion.' In several experiments, they found that people often refuse to choose a more efficient solution or route if it requires them to double back on the progress already made. The findings suggest that people's subjective fear of adding more to their workload and their hesitance to wipe the slate clean contribute to this bias, the researchers say. 'Participants' aversion to feeling their past efforts were a waste encouraged them to pursue less efficient means,' they wrote in their paper, published this May in Psychological Science. The 12 cognitive biases that prevent you from being rational Psychologists have detailed all sorts of biases related to digging our feet in when faced with important new information. People tend to stick to the status quo in choosing dinner at a favorite restaurant, for example, even when someone recommends a potentially tastier option. There's also the sunk cost fallacy, or the reluctance to veer off a disastrous path and choose another simply because they've spent so much time or resources pursuing it. The researchers argue that their newly named bias is certainly a close cousin to the sunk cost fallacy and similar biases, but that it ultimately describes a unique type of cognitive pitfall. In their paper, they provide the example of someone whose flight from San Francisco to New York becomes massively delayed early on, leaving them stuck in Los Angeles. In one scenario, the traveler can get home three hours earlier than their current itinerary if they accept the airline's offer of a new flight that first stops in Denver; in the second, the person is instead offered a flight that will also shave three hours off, but they'll first have to travel back to San Francisco. Despite both flights saving the same amount of time, people are more likely to refuse the one that requires going back to their earlier destination, the paper explains (some people might even refuse the Denver flight, but that would be an example of the status quo bias and/or sunk cost fallacy at work, they note). To test their hypothesis, the researchers ran four different types of experiments. The experiments collectively involved more than 2,500 adults, some of whom were UC Berkeley students and others who were volunteers recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk. In one test, people were asked to walk along different paths in virtual reality; another asked people to recite as many words starting with the same letter as possible. Across the various tests, the researchers found that people routinely exhibited this aversion. This Is What Your Brain Looks Like When You Solve a Problem In one experiment where people had to recite words starting with 'G,' for instance, everyone was asked midway through if they wanted to stay with the same letter or switch to reciting words starting with 'T' (a likely easier letter). In the control condition, this decision was framed as staying on the same task, simply with a new letter, but in the other, people were asked if they wanted to throw out the work they had done so far and start over on a new task. Importantly, the volunteers were also given progress bars for the task, allowing them to see they would perform the same amount of work no matter the choice (though again, 'T' would be easier). About 75% of participants made the choice to switch in the control condition, but only 25% did the same when the switch was presented as needing to double back. 'When I was analyzing these results, I was like, 'Oh, is there a mistake? How can there be such a big difference?'' said lead author Kristine Cho, a behavioral marketing PhD student at UC Berkely's Haas School of Business, in a statement to the Association for Psychological Science, publishers of the study. Other researchers will have to confirm the team's findings, of course. And there are still plenty of questions to answer about this aversion, including how often we fall for it and whether it's more likely to happen in some scenarios than others. But for now, it's oddly comforting to know that there's another thing I can possibly blame for my occasional stubbornness to take the faster subway train home.
CBS News
2 hours ago
- CBS News
62-year-old fish caught in Lake Superior thought to be oldest-ever lake trout discovered
Researchers say that a lake trout recently captured in Lake Superior is believed to be the oldest-known specimen of its species ever caught in the Great Lakes, estimated to be 62 years old. The fish was collected at Klondike Reef in autumn 2023 by researchers with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, along with multiple universities and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. According to the DNR, one of the fish specimens collected may not have tipped any physical records scales, weighing in under 5 pounds and measuring just over 2 feet in length, but it certainly qualifies as the oldest fish ever documented among the five Great Lakes. The fish is believed to have hatched in 1961, long before a man walked on the moon, long before the first known test-tube baby, and even before President John F. Kennedy was assassinated. DNR officials said, with some whimsical logic, that if the fish were to have gone through human schooling, it would have graduated the same year as former president Barack Obama and Princess Diana of Wales. A typical lake trout in Lake Superior is thought to be roughly 25 to 30 years old. Prior to this new discovery, the oldest trout reported in the lake was estimated to have reached 42 years of age. Researchers determined the age of the fish by counting the number of "rings" visible on the fish's otolith, or "ear stone," which grows through the years of a fish's life. The Michigan DNR said that staffers have taken to calling the fish "Mary Catherine," as Mary was among the most common names given to baby girls the year the trout was born. Officials say that they take samples of fish to track population health, and the discovery of Mary Catherine indicates that lake trout are doing well in Lake Superior.
