THE ADECCO GROUP Q2 2025 RESULTS
AD HOC ANNOUNCEMENT pursuant to Art. 53 Listing Rules of SIX Swiss Exchange
, /CNW/ --
HIGHLIGHTS
Further strong market share gains, Group +205 bps and Adecco +130 bps
Revenues €5.8 bn, +0.4 yoy, and +2% qoq with all GBUs improving sequentially
Adecco GBU +2% yoy, and +3% qoq, led by Americas +14% yoy, APAC +9% yoy
Akkodis GBU -6% yoy, and +2% qoq; LHH -1% yoy, and +4% qoq
Gross profit €1.1 bn, 18.9% gross margin, -50 bps yoy, reflecting business mix, firm pricing
2.5% EBITA margin excl. one-offs, -60 bps yoy: good cost discipline, agile capacity management and timing of FESCO JV income
Operating income €115 million, +6% yoy; Net income €58 million, +8% yoy
Basic EPS €0.35; Adjusted EPS €0.46
Strong LTM cash conversion at 98%. Operating cash flow €81 million, driven by working capital absorption for growth, and in line with normal seasonality
Denis Machuel, Adecco Group CEO, commented:
"We continued to gain share, outperforming a mixed market environment, while disciplined cost management improved our SG&A performance. Through stringent execution, we have seen clear improvement in Adecco France and Adecco US, two of our largest markets, and our rigorous turnaround plan in Akkodis Germany is well underway.
"We have the right strategy and team in place to maintain our positive performance momentum. Our ambitious innovation strategy, including pioneering generative and agentic AI, is gaining traction and will support our positive performance momentum in the quarters ahead."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
2 days ago
- CTV News
Thousands of young Torontonians struggling to find work were surveyed about their experiences. Here is what they said
A young person checks out postings on a job board in this undated photo. Toronto's young people are struggling to gain access to meaningful, gainful employment, say those behind a city-wide postcard initiative that surveyed more than 7,000 students. Today, youth, community, and civic leaders gathered at Toronto City Hall to officially launch the Toronto Youth Employment Postcard Report, which is the culmination of a year-long campaign that has mobilized youth from every city ward and close to 100 sector partners. Those behind the initiative say their efforts helped secure Toronto City Council's approval this past February of a motion to create 10,000 additional youth jobs by the summer of 2026 through a Toronto Youth Employment Program. The push continues for this program to come to fruition. The youth-driven policy document, which was developed by The Neighbourhood Group Community Services in collaboration with youth leaders, reiterates their calls for 'bold investments in youth employment as a pathway to address both economic insecurity and rising youth violence.' 'The need for such a Toronto youth employment program has been a growing concern among the youth in our city for many years,' Laura Vu, the Toronto Youth Cabinet's equity and employment lead, said during a news conference. 'Throughout my involvement with this campaign, I have had the opportunity to engage with young people across the city on their experiences with employment. We collected thousands of postcards, each detailing a young person's challenges and barriers towards employment, but also their hopes and dreams.' Laura Vu, Toronto Youth Caninet equity and employment lead Laura Vu, the Toronto Youth Cabinet's equity and employment lead, speaks during the Aug. 7 launch of the Toronto Youth Employment Postcard report. Ontario's unemployment rate among those 15 to 24 years old hit 15.8 per cent in June, which was approximately double the overall unemployment rate in the province, according to Statistics Canada data. Vu said among the personal experiences shared in the postcard campaign, several participants outlined the challenges they've faced in securing a job with many applications made and few responses received. Heather McDonald, the CEO and president of United Way Greater Toronto, said young people want to work and employers across the city need talent. 'When we connect to those two things, the whole city benefits, and without a deliberate workforce development strategy, we risk a generation of lost opportunities. Graduates will step into a market they're not prepared for. Roles will take longer to fill, and every sector will suffer,' she said. 'A paid meaningful job means a path to financial independence, help for your family, a path to education, a path to future. And many of these students linked work to skills, confidence and direction and they called for a summer youth employment program to make those opportunities real. Heather McDonald, CEO and president of United Way Greater Toronto Heather McDonald, the CEO and president of United Way Greater Toronto, speaks during the Aug. 7 launch of the Toronto Youth Employment Postcard report. McDonald also noted that youth surveyed expressed experiencing 'barriers, identity-based hurdles like age or race or both, a lack of experience, job shortages, logistics like transit.' Scarborough Southwest Coun. Parthu Kandavel, who introduced the 10,000 youth jobs motion late last year, said there is a clear 'relationship between the spike in youth gun violence and the lack of employment.' 'Employment provides belonging. It provides meaning. It provides purpose,' he said. 'Just yesterday, in Scarborough, not too far from my ward, a 14-year-old was involved in the shooting that shut down a busy Lawrence Avenue at the height of rush hour.' Scarborough Southwest Coun. Parthi Kandavel Scarborough Southwest Coun. Parthi Kandavel speaks during an Aug. 7 news conference at Toronto City Hall. Toronto City Council set to revisit the 10,000 youth jobs motion this fall. Statistics Canada has said that they youth unemployment rate remains significantly above the pre-pandemic average of 10.8 per cent recorded between 2017 and 2019. Last month, the Canadian National Exhibition said that it received 54,000 online applications for 5,000 temporary positions. 'This isn't about a lack of effort,' says Ontario NDP MPP Two Ontario NDP MPPs say young people in this province are 'ready to work, but the government is failing them.' 'This isn't about a lack of effort,' University-Rosedale MPP Jessica Bell said in an Aug. 7 news release. 'Were hearing from young people who are applying for hundreds of jobs and never hearing back. They want to work and contribute, but can't find real pathways into steady jobs, they're being left behind.' Bell serves as the party's shadow minister for finance and the treasure board. In the release, Waterloo MPP Catherine Fife said Ontario's next generation deserves the same opportunities to build a future like their parents did, adding what's needed is a youth employment strategy that sets young people up for success. 'The future of our province depends on it,' said Fife, who is the Ontario NDP's the shadow minister for economic development, job creation, and trade. 'Young people are doing everything they can to build a future, but they keep hitting wall after wall. They are dealing with unaffordable housing, rising costs, cuts to education and training, and now they can't even find work.' Calling the situation 'frustrating,' she said the youth unemployment reality in Ontario is a 'sign that something is seriously wrong.' 'This is a crisis. If no action is taken, there is a huge risk of losing a generation of true potential. Ontario needs to step up with affordable housing, rent control, investment in training and education, and better access to good jobs,' Fife said. 'Young people are not asking for handouts. They are asking for a fair change. It's time this government listened.'
Globe and Mail
3 days ago
- Globe and Mail
Judge sides with Mobilicity investors, orders Ottawa to repay hundreds of millions of dollars
An Ontario judge has sided with the original investors of a former independent mobile provider in a court battle that has lasted for more than a decade, ordering the federal government to repay hundreds of millions of dollars for unexpectedly altering its spectrum policy and causing them losses. Justice Peter Osborne of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice ruled Wednesday that Ottawa committed negligence and negligent misrepresentation when it induced Quadrangle Group LLC and Obelysk Media Inc. to invest hundreds of millions of dollars in Mobilicity in 2008, only to change the rules for the resale of the startup's wireless licences in 2013. Justice Osborne also ruled that the government wrongfully interfered with the sale of Mobilicity's spectrum assets, the invisible radio waves that carry wireless signals, when it extended what was supposed to be a five-year moratorium on new entrant spectrum transfers to incumbents. In doing so, the judge said, the then-Harper government quashed proposed purchase offers by Telus Corp. T-T when Mobilicity was operating under court protection from its creditors. (Mobilicity was eventually sold to Rogers Communications Inc. for a lower price.) Rita Trichur: Wheels of justice grind slowly for Mobilicity's initial investors The lengthy and complex trial, which relied on 10 fact witnesses and five expert witnesses, underlines the question of investors' rights in the face of changing policy frameworks. The case also reinforces governments' 'duty of care' to ensure that their regulatory actions do not lead to unreasonable harm business interests. The decision contributes to continuing debates over the effectiveness of Canada's telecom competition policy and the degree to which the government should put its finger on the scale when it comes to commercial matters. 'At its core, this action is about the transferability of spectrum licenses. But significantly, it is also about the extraordinary and unusual conduct of Government officials with respect to the Mobilicity spectrum licenses in particular,' Justice Osborne said in his decision. Obelysk welcomed the decision in a statement, saying the plaintiffs are reviewing the details and will continue to pursue all appropriate remedies to recover their losses. While the judge did not specify the total damages, Jonathan Lisus, the lead lawyer for the investors, said the parties had calculated the amount at more than $500-million. The case represents a rare instance of a government being found in breach of private law duty of care, Mr. Lisus said. Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada spokesperson Andréa Daigle said in an e-mail that the government has taken note of the court's decision and will review its finding carefully. 'As the decision remains subject to appeal, it would be inappropriate to comment further at this time,' she said. David Berman: The question now facing telecom investors: Why bother? The origins of the dispute date back to 2006, when the government approached Canadian businessman John Bitove about investing in a new wireless venture, according to the lawsuit filed in 2014. In order to increase competition, the government decided to set aside a portion of wireless licences in a forthcoming auction for new market entrants. Mr. Bitove, who ultimately became the majority owner of Obelysk, and New York-based private equity firm Quadrangle Group LLC eventually did invest. They purchased spectrum licences worth $243-million in the 2008 auction. Notably, they alleged that they did so under the understanding that, if Mobilicity were to fail, they could sell the licences – typically a telecom's most valuable asset – to an incumbent to recoup their investment after a five-year period, mitigating their risk. But in 2013, the government retroactively altered the rules governing spectrum transfers, arguing that new entrant spectrum was never meant to fall into the hands of incumbent carriers. By taking away the company's ability to sell to incumbents including Telus, Justice Osborne said that the government caused a material and immediate devaluation of the value of Mobilicity's licences. Industry Canada, which regulates spectrum auctions, maintained during legal proceedings that it did nothing unlawful, and provided the investors no assurances that spectrum transfers would be approved in their favour after the five-year moratorium. But Justice Obsborne said there was overwhelming evidence that the plaintiffs understood the opposite, and said that if this was not the case, that the government had a duty to correct their understanding but did not do so. The judge rejected the government's view that it could alter the transferability attributes 'at any time it saw fit' and avoid liability to the plaintiffs. 'The actions of the Government were capricious, and they were inconsistent with the expectations which were in turn based on the representations made,' he said. 'Those representations were relied on by the investors who, as noted, did spend billions of dollars under the assumption that the rules would be respected.' Canadian telecoms boost wireless prices, giving lift to sagging stocks Furthermore, Justice Osborne found that Industry Canada later interfered in a bidding war for Mobilicity, which was struggling financially, disrupting Telus's efforts to acquire the company's spectrum. Telus and Mobilicity had been engaged in talks for the sale of the company before the policy change, so the companies decided to go forward and seek approval, despite concerns that the regulator would not allow it. Justice Osborne said the regulator interfered by threatening in 2014 that Telus would be excluded from future spectrum actions if it continued to pursue Mobilicity licences, and by 'unnecessarily, but intentionally, inappropriately, and for tactical purposes,' withholding the release of a response on a proposed licence transfer to Telus, 'at the specific request and with the direct involvement of the Minister's political staff,' the judge found. The regulator eventually made an exception to its policy to allow Rogers Communications Inc. RCI-B-T to purchase Mobilicity and its wireless licences as part of a spectrum swap in 2015. Rogers paid $465-million, which was $82-million less than Telus's highest bid at the time. By effectively removing Telus as one of the two bidders, the government prematurely and 'surreptitiously' terminated what was otherwise a competitive bidding process, and ultimately reduced the value of the licences, Justice Osborne ruled. The government will be required to repay the shareholders for their initial investments in Mobilicity after the sale in 2015, plus prejudgment interest.
Globe and Mail
3 days ago
- Globe and Mail
Super Group Reports Financial Results for Second Quarter of 2025
Super Group (SGHC) Limited (NYSE: SGHC) ('SGHC', the "Company" or 'Super Group'), the parent company of Betway, a leading online sports betting and gaming business, and Spin, the multi-brand online casino, today announced its second quarter 2025 unaudited consolidated financial results. Neal Menashe, Chief Executive Officer of Super Group, commented: 'We had a Super first half of 2025, driven by a record-breaking second quarter. The quarter's success was fueled by strong execution across our key markets, a full calendar of global sporting events, increased deposits, high customer retention, and margin expansion. While our decision to exit the U.S. was difficult, we believe that this step demonstrates our commitment to capital efficiency and long-term profitability. With continued focus on scaling our technology globally, Super Group should be even better positioned for sustained, profitable growth.' Alinda van Wyk, Chief Financial Officer of Super Group, stated: 'Q2 marked the strongest quarterly financial performance in Super Group's history, with revenue up 30% year-over-year and Adjusted EBITDA up 78% year-over-year to $157 million, delivering a healthy 27% margin. These results underscore our scalable, cost-efficient operating model and controlled marketing spend. We ended the quarter with $393 million in unrestricted cash and zero debt, and returned $20 million to shareholders, bringing our 12-month capital returns to $166 million. Driven by our continued focus on core markets, we are raising our full-year Adjusted EBITDA guidance and remain confident in delivering long-term value to our shareholders.' Financial Highlights: Revenue increased by 30% to $579.4 million for the second quarter of 2025 from $446.5 million in the same period of the prior year, driven by growth from the Africa, Europe and North America markets partially offset by declines from the LATAM, Middle East and Asia-Pacific markets. Profit before tax was $38.8 million for the second quarter of 2025 and includes a non-cash charge of $63.9 million related to the impairment of Digital Gaming Corporation Limited ("DGC")' iGaming related assets and $22.6 million relating to onerous contracts. By comparison, profit before tax for the second quarter of 2024 was $22.1 million and included a non-cash charge of $39.6 million related to the impairment of DGC's sportsbook assets. Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, increased by 78% to $156.7 million for the second quarter of 2025 compared to $88.2 million in the second quarter of 2024. Monthly Active Customers increased by 21% to 5.5 million for the second quarter of 2025 compared to 4.5 million in the second quarter of 2024. Balance Sheet: Total Assets: $1.1 billion; Total Liabilities: $454.4 million; Total Equity: $662.3 million. Cash and cash equivalents was $393.0 million as of June 30, 2025 compared to $388.0 million at December 31, 2024. Dividends of $20.2 million was paid during the quarter, bringing the 12-month capital returns to $166 million. Guidance 2025 Super Group is raising its full-year Group Adjusted EBITDA guidance to $470-$480 million. Ex-U.S. Adjusted EBITDA is now expected to be between $500-$510 million, up from greater than $480 million compared to prior guidance. U.S. Adjusted EBITDA is expected to be a loss of $30 million, excluding one-off cost of U.S. exit. Interim Financial Statements: The Group intends to publish a condensed set of interim accounts for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and comparative period by the end of August 2025, which will include a condensed Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income, condensed statement of Financial Position, condensed Statement of Changes in Equity, condensed Statement of Cash Flows and relevant notes. Revenue by Geographical Region for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2025 in $ millions: Betway Spin Total Africa and Middle East 225 4 229 Asia-Pacific 9 28 37 Europe 81 28 109 North America 37 162 199 South/Latin America 3 2 5 Total revenue 355 224 579 % % % Africa and Middle East 63 % 2 % 40 % Asia-Pacific 3 % 13 % 6 % Europe 23 % 12 % 19 % North America 10 % 72 % 34 % South/Latin America 1 % 1 % 1 % Revenue by Geographical Region for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2024 in $ millions*: Betway Spin Total Africa and Middle East 164 1 165 Asia-Pacific 7 33 40 Europe 49 23 72 North America 41 120 161 South/Latin America 4 5 9 Total revenue 265 182 447 % % % Africa and Middle East 62 % 1 % 37 % Asia-Pacific 3 % 18 % 9 % Europe 18 % 13 % 16 % North America 15 % 65 % 36 % South/Latin America 2 % 3 % 2 % * The Group has adopted a change in presentation currency from Euros to USD at January 1, 2025. Accordingly, the comparative table has been re-presented retrospectively as outlined under the change in presentation currency note. Revenue by Geographical Region for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 in $ millions: Betway Spin Total Africa and Middle East 426 6 432 Asia-Pacific 14 56 70 Europe 151 53 204 North America 76 304 380 South/Latin America 6 4 10 Total revenue 673 423 1,096 % % % Africa and Middle East 63 % 1 % 39 % Asia-Pacific 3 % 13 % 6 % Europe 22 % 13 % 19 % North America 11 % 72 % 35 % South/Latin America 1 % 1 % 1 % Revenue by Geographical Region for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 in $ millions: Betway Spin Total Africa and Middle East 316 1 317 Asia-Pacific 16 62 78 Europe 90 43 133 North America 76 238 314 South/Latin America 8 8 16 Total revenue 506 352 858 % % % Africa and Middle East 62 % 0 % 37 % Asia-Pacific 3 % 18 % 9 % Europe 18 % 12 % 15 % North America 15 % 68 % 37 % South/Latin America 2 % 2 % 2 % Revenue by product line for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2025 in $ millions: Betway Spin Total Online casino 1 230 224 454 Sports betting 1 116 — 116 Brand licensing 2 8 — 8 Other 3 1 — 1 Total revenue 355 224 579 Revenue by product line for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2024 in $ millions: Betway Spin Total Online casino 1 166 182 348 Sports betting 1 91 — 91 Brand licensing 2 6 — 6 Other 3 2 — 2 Total revenue 265 182 447 Revenue by product line for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 in $ millions: Betway Spin Total Online casino 1 436 423 859 Sports betting 1 222 — 222 Brand licensing 2 12 — 12 Other 3 3 — 3 Total revenue 673 423 1,096 Revenue by product line for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 in $ millions *: Betway Spin Total Online casino 1 318 351 669 Sports betting 1 170 — 170 Brand licensing 2 12 — 12 Other 3 6 1 7 Total revenue 506 352 858 1 Sports betting and online casino revenues are not within the scope of IFRS 15 'Revenue from Contracts with Customers' and are treated as derivatives under IFRS 9 'Financial Instruments'. 2 Brand licensing revenues are within the scope of IFRS 15 'Revenue from Contracts with Customers'. 3 Other relates to profit share, royalties and outsource fees from external customers. * The Group has adopted a change in presentation currency from Euros to USD at January 1, 2025. Accordingly, the comparative table has been re-presented retrospectively as outlined under the change in presentation currency note. Non-GAAP Financial Information This press release includes non-GAAP financial information not presented in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards ('IFRS') as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA ex-US, Adjusted EBITDA US are non-GAAP company-specific performance measures that Super Group ("the Group") uses to supplement the Company's results presented in accordance with IFRS. EBITDA is defined as profit before depreciation, amortization, finance income, finance expense and income tax expense. Adjusted EBITDA is EBITDA adjusted for RSU expense, change in fair value of options, unrealized foreign exchange, gain on disposal of business and other adjustments. Adjusted EBITDA ex-US is Adjusted EBITDA relating to the rest of the Group, excluding Digital Gaming Corporation ('DGC'). Adjusted EBITDA US is Adjusted EBITDA relating to DGC. Super Group believes that these non-GAAP measures are useful in evaluating the Company's operating performance as they provide additional perspective on the financial performance of our core business, are similar to measures reported by the Company's public competitors and are regularly used by securities analysts, institutional investors and other interested parties in analyzing operating performance and prospects. Management does not consider these non-GAAP measures in isolation or as an alternative to financial measures determined in accordance with IFRS. The principal limitation of these non-GAAP financial measures is that they exclude significant expenses that are required by IFRS to be recorded in Super Group's financial statements. In order to compensate for these limitations, management presents non-GAAP financial measures together with IFRS results. Non-GAAP measures should be considered in addition to results and guidance prepared in accordance with IFRS, but should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, IFRS results. Reconciliation tables of the most comparable IFRS financial measure to the non-GAAP financial measures used in this press release, and supplemental materials are included below. Super Group urges investors to review the reconciliation and not to rely on any single financial measure to evaluate its business. In addition, other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate similarly named non-GAAP measures differently than we do, which limits their usefulness in comparing our financial results with theirs. for the Three Months Ended June 30: Three Months Ended June 30 Six Months Ended June 30 2025 $m 2024 * $m 2025 $m 2024 * $m Profit before taxation 39 22 127 75 Finance income (3 ) (3 ) (5 ) (6 ) Finance expense 2 1 4 3 Depreciation and amortization expense 19 23 37 45 EBITDA 57 43 163 117 Change in fair value of options — — — 14 RSU expense 3 3 9 7 Unrealized foreign exchange 4 2 2 5 Impairment of assets 66 40 66 40 US iGaming closure 23 — 23 — Market closure — — — — Gain on disposal of business — — — (44 ) Other adjustments 1 4 — 5 — Adjusted EBITDA 157 88 268 139 Adjusted EBITDA, ex-US 162 106 283 181 Adjusted EBITDA, US (5 ) (18 ) (15 ) (42 ) 1 Other adjustments in 2025 mainly relates to Sportsbook acquisition related costs. * The Group has adopted a change in presentation currency from Euros to USD at January 1, 2025. Accordingly, the comparative table has been re-presented retrospectively as outlined under the change in presentation currency note. Webcast Details The Company will host a webcast at 7:45 a.m. ET tomorrow to discuss the second quarter 2025 financial results. Participants may access the live webcast and supplemental earnings presentation on the events & presentations page of the Super Group Investor Relations website at: About Super Group (SGHC) Limited Super Group (SGHC) Limited is the holding company for leading global online sports betting and gaming businesses: Betway, a premier online sports betting brand, and Spin, a multi-brand online casino offering. The Group is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE ticker: SGHC) and is licensed in multiple jurisdictions, with leading positions in key markets throughout Europe, the Americas and Africa. The Group's sports betting and online gaming offerings are underpinned by its scale and leading technology, enabling fast and effective entry into new markets. Its proprietary marketing and data analytics engine empowers it to responsibly provide a unique and personalized customer experience. Super Group has been ranked number 6 in the EGR Power 50 for the last three years. For more information, visit Forward-Looking Statements Certain statements made in this press release are 'forward looking statements' within the meaning of the 'safe harbor' provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, Super Group's intention to pay a dividend, including the expected timing of such dividend, expectations and projections of market opportunity, growth and profitability. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words 'believe,' 'project,' 'expect,' 'anticipate,' 'estimate,' 'intend,' 'strategy,' 'future,' 'opportunity,' 'plan,' 'pipeline,' 'possible,' 'may,' 'should,' 'will,' 'would,' 'will be,' 'will continue,' 'will likely result,' and similar expressions, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. Forward-looking statements are predictions, projections and other statements about future events that are based on current expectations and assumptions and, as a result, are subject to risks and uncertainties. Many factors could cause actual future events to differ materially from the forward-looking statements in this press release, including but not limited to: (i) the ability to implement business plans, forecasts and other expectations, and identify and realize additional opportunities; (ii) changes in the competitive and regulated industries in which Super Group operates; (iii) variations in operating performance across competitors; (iv) changes in laws and regulations affecting Super Group's business; (v) Super Group's inability to meet or exceed its financial projections; (vi) changes in general economic conditions; (vii) changes in domestic and foreign business, market, financial, political and legal conditions, including abrupt or unexpected changes in interest rates or increases in inflation or inflationary expectations and reductions in discretionary consumer spending; (viii) the ability of Super Group's customers to deposit funds in order to participate in Super Group's gaming products; (ix) Super Group's ability, and the ability of Super Group's key executives, certain employees, significant shareholders or other applicable individuals, to comply with regulatory requirements or successfully obtain a license or permit required in a particular regulated jurisdiction, or maintain, renew or expand existing licenses; (x) the effectiveness of technological solutions Super Group has in place to block customers in certain jurisdictions, including jurisdictions where Super Group's business is illegal, or which are sanctioned by countries in which Super Group operates from accessing its offerings; (xi) Super Group's ability to restrict and manage betting limits at the individual customer level based on individual customer profiles and risk level to the enterprise; (xii) Super Group's ability to protect or enforce its intellectual property rights, the confidentiality of its trade secrets and confidential information, or the costs involved in protecting or enforcing Super Group's intellectual property rights and confidential information, and Super Group's ability to obtain new licenses and maintain, renew or expand existing licenses to use the intellectual property of third parties; (xiii) compliance with applicable data protection and privacy laws in Super Group's collection, storage and use, including sharing and international transfers, of personal data; (xiv) failures, errors, defects or disruptions in Super Group's information technology and other systems and platforms; (xv) Super Group's ability to develop new products, services, and solutions, bring them to market in a timely manner, and make enhancements to its platform; (xvi) Super Group's ability to maintain and grow its market share, including its ability to enter new markets and acquire and retain paying customers; (xvii) the success, including win or hold rates, of existing and future online betting and gaming products; (xiii) competition within the broader entertainment industry; (xix) Super Group's reliance on strategic relationships with land based casinos, sports teams, event planners, local licensing partners and advertisers; (xx) events or media coverage relating to, or the popularity of, online betting and gaming industry; (xxi) trading, liability management and pricing risk related to Super Group's participation in the sports betting and gaming industry; (xxii) accessibility to the services of banks, credit card issuers and payment processing services providers due to the nature of Super Group's business; (xxiii) the regulatory approvals related to proposed acquisitions and the integration of the acquired businesses; and (xxiv) other risks and uncertainties indicated from time to time for Super Group including those under the heading 'Risk Factors' in our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on April 3, 2025, and in Super Group's other filings with the SEC. The foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive. You should carefully consider the foregoing factors and the other risks and uncertainties described in other documents filed or that may be filed by Super Group from time to time with the SEC. These filings identify and address other important risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events and results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements, and Super Group assumes no obligation and does not intend to update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by law. Super Group does not give any assurance, representation or warranty that it will achieve its expectations in any specified time frame or at all.
