logo
Police ‘avoided grooming gang investigations over racism fears'

Police ‘avoided grooming gang investigations over racism fears'

Telegraph5 hours ago

Police avoided pursuing child sex grooming gangs for fear of being viewed as racist, a report has found.
Even though there was evidence that a disproportionate number of Asian men had been responsible for grooming gangs, their role was covered up by successive governments and authorities over concerns about raising community tensions, Baroness Casey's review found.
The report found that flawed data had been used repeatedly to dismiss claims about Asian grooming gangs as sensationalised, biased or untrue, while an institutional view persisted that there was an overwhelming problem with white perpetrators when 'that can't be proved'.
Lady Casey pointed to a culture of denial under which governments, police, local authorities and other institutions had avoided the ethnicity issue 'for fear of appearing racist, raising community tensions or causing community cohesion problems'.
The data hunt
Lady Casey was commissioned to establish the scale of grooming gangs, officially termed group-based child sexual exploitation. But she said that instead she found a 'confusing picture of inconsistently applied definitions and data sets' across police, local councils, health and criminal justice.
The report estimated that around 500,000 children a year were likely to experience child sexual abuse, with police recording some 100,000 offences in 2024. Of these, an estimated 17,100 were flagged as child sexual exploitation. The only figure for gang grooming came from a new police database which totalled just 700. Lady Casey said it was 'highly unlikely' that this accurately reflected the true scale of grooming gangs.
'It is a failure of public policy over many years that there remains such limited, reliable data in this area,' said her report.
'We found that the ethnicity of perpetrators is shied away from and is still not recorded for two-thirds of perpetrators, so we are unable to provide any accurate assessment from the nationally collected data.'
Despite the lack of a full picture, however, Lady Casey said there was enough evidence available in data from three police forces, local reviews and high profile prosecutions to show 'disproportionate numbers of men from Asian ethnic backgrounds amongst suspects for group-based child sexual exploitation.'
Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, accepted her recommendation for the compulsory collection of ethnicity and nationality data for all suspects in child sex abuse and criminal exploitation cases.
Denial and cover-up
Lady Casey said the 'appalling' lack of data on ethnicity in crime recording was a ' major failing ' over the past decade and amounted to a culture of denial and cover-up.
'Questions about ethnicity have been asked but dodged for years. Child sexual exploitation is horrendous whoever commits it, but there have been enough convictions across the country of groups of men from Asian ethnic backgrounds to have warranted closer examination,' she said.
'Instead of examination, we have seen obfuscation. In a vacuum, incomplete and unreliable data is used to suit the ends of those presenting it. The system claims there is an overwhelming problem with White perpetrators when that can't be proved.
'This does no one any favours at all, and least of all those in the Asian, Pakistani or Muslim communities who needlessly suffer as those with malicious intent use this obfuscation to sow and spread hatred.'
She revealed that police forces had told her local councils would discourage officers from publicising successful convictions of grooming gangs 'due to fear of raising tensions', even though this was a well-established method for encouraging other victims to come forward.
'Instead of examining whether there is disproportionality in ethnicity or cultural factors at play in certain types of offending, we found many examples of organisations avoiding the topic altogether for fear of appearing racist, raising community tensions or causing community cohesion problems,' she said.
Adultification of victims
Lady Casey also expressed concern about the 'ambivalent' attitude of agencies and society towards adolescent girls who were judged as adults because of the way their life in care had forced them to 'grow up before their time.'
'Nevertheless, they cannot consent to their own abuse – they remain children. One effect of this is that children are still criminalised for offences they committed while being groomed,' the report said.
'Adults who were victims of abuse as children, are still fighting today to be believed and there is palpable frustration that the organisations, their leaders or sometimes the individuals working for them, are so rarely held to account for wrongdoing.'
Her recommendation – accepted by the Government – will mean the criminal convictions of victims of child sexual exploitation will be reviewed and quashed in cases where it is found they were 'criminalised instead of protected.'
Age of consent
Despite the age of consent being 16, Lady Casey found too many examples of child sex abuse criminal cases being dropped or downgraded from rape to lesser charges where a 13 or 15 year-old had been 'in love' with or had 'consented' to sex with the perpetrator.
This was because of a 'grey area' in the law where, although any sexual activity with those aged 13 to 15 was unlawful, the decision on whether to charge and which offence to charge with was left open to interpretation.
This was usually aimed at avoiding criminalising someone who reasonably believed a child was older than they were, or criminalising relationships between teenagers. In practice this nuance in law was being used to the benefit of much older men who had groomed underage children for sex.
Her proposed law change, accepted by the Government, will mean that adult men who groom and have sex with those aged 13 to 15 receive mandatory charges of rape, mirroring the approach taken in countries such as France.
Taxis
A lack of national consistency on taxi licencing has led to abusers gaining a licence in areas of the country with less stringent rules. The report said this allowed men to continue the abuse of children.
Local authorities issued taxi licences in line with statutory guidance but in some areas, especially those that had recognised problems of child sexual exploitation, local authorities went beyond this statutory guidance to provide additional protection for children.
However, they were being hindered by a lack of stringency elsewhere in the country and legal loopholes which meant drivers could apply for a licence anywhere in the country and then operate in another area.
Lady Casey called for the Department for Transport to close this loophole immediately and introduce more rigorous standards.
The inquiries
Lady Casey admitted she started her review without believing a national inquiry was necessary but was persuaded when she found only one area was 'getting on' with setting up a local inquiry into child-grooming gangs. Another local inquiry had faltered because of the lack of statutory powers.
It means a new national inquiry, lasting three years, will be set up to co-ordinate a series of targeted local investigations focused on areas where there have been grooming gang cover-ups.
Overseen by a new independent commission, they will have full statutory inquiry powers to compel witnesses to attend.
The new commission will draw on criminal investigations including a new nationwide probe by the National Crime Agency (NCA) and submissions from victims and witnesses. This will enable it to 'review cases of failures or obstruction by statutory services' to identify areas where local inquiries should be set up.
The NCA's nationwide operation will target people who have sexually exploited children, and follow up on an estimated more than 1,000 cold cases where no one was convicted.
We've heard it all before, says Rotherham victim
A victim of child sexual exploitation at the hands of grooming gangs has said the Government must finally act to tackle the scandal.
Sammy Woodhouse, a survivor of a Rotherham grooming gang, who now campaigns for the rights of victims, said: 'I of course welcome anything that is going to tackle this problem but I have heard all these promises before. I feel I am living in Groundhog Day. Reports come out, politicians jump up and say how terrible it is and how things must change.
'And then nothing does. We are still waiting for recommendations from IICSA to be implemented.
'Also this is going to be Labour investigating Labour because lots of this was happening under their councils.
'The issue about data on ethnicity not being collected was something we exposed years ago but nothing was done
'I also want to hear more details about the recommendation that victims should have their criminal convictions cancelled because there are thousands of girls who have been criminalised so that needs to be cleared up.
'I haven't seen anything yet about abusers losing parental rights to children who are born as a result of rape and that is something I have been campaigning on so I would like to see that cleared up.
'I won't rest until every council and every police force in the country has been investigated for their part in this scandal.'
Ms Woodhouse was sexually abused as a 14-year-old by Arshid Hussain, the ringleader of a grooming gang.
She was subjected to abuse including rape, assaults and coercion with threats to kill her family, and became pregnant with Hussain's baby in 1999 when she was just 15.
She later waived her anonymity as a rape victim to expose the gang.
Hussain was imprisoned for 35 years, His brothers Banaras and Basharat were handed 19 years and 25 years respectively and their uncle, Qurban Ali was jailed for 10 years.
Ms Woodhouse has written a book, Just A Child, about how she became trapped in Rotherham's web of crime and sexual exploitation.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Welsh transport secretary reviews Raglan A40 junction
Welsh transport secretary reviews Raglan A40 junction

South Wales Argus

timean hour ago

  • South Wales Argus

Welsh transport secretary reviews Raglan A40 junction

Welsh Government cabinet secretary for transport and north Wales, Ken Skates, visited Monmouthshire to review the A40 junction at Raglan, following repeated calls for action from residents and politicians. The visit included a site inspection and a formal meeting with stakeholders in Raglan. South Wales East MS Laura Anne Jones described the meeting as 'really useful and productive,' and said: "It seems we can achieve some improvements over the next year – 'quick wins' – that will, until a more permanent solution is found, be of some comfort to the Raglan and surrounding areas community." Peter Fox, MS for Monmouth, said: "I am very happy to see the cabinet secretary here in my constituency, to listen to our concerns and to see the problem first hand." Monmouthshire County Council said it welcomed the recent introduction of a 50mph speed limit, but believes further short-term measures are needed to improve safety. The council said: "While we are pleased to see our request for the 50mph on this stretch introduced, we believe implementing additional short-term measures could further support safety. "However, while average speeds have been reduced, compliance is not universal, and the South Wales Trunk Roads Agency has agreed to look at additional measures in the short term. "Monmouthshire County Council will continue to explore what measures within our control can also be implemented." The council said it remains 'committed' to working with partners including the Welsh Government on the situation.

Ignore 'hysteria' around Loch Lomond Flamingo Land, says developer
Ignore 'hysteria' around Loch Lomond Flamingo Land, says developer

Glasgow Times

timean hour ago

  • Glasgow Times

Ignore 'hysteria' around Loch Lomond Flamingo Land, says developer

Lomond Banks – owned by theme park operator Flamingo Land – has proposed to build more than 100 lodges, two hotels, a water park, monorail and parking spaces for more than 300 cars at the site, on the southern shores of the loch at Balloch, West Dunbartonshire. Last week, the Scottish Government took the decision to call in the application, which had been given the green light by a Government reporter despite heavy backlash from campaigners. The reporter elected to approve the application, subject to 49 conditions, despite the unanimous rejection of the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park authority and objections from the Woodland Trust, the National Trust for Scotland and the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (Sepa). Minister Ivan McKee had previously ruled out an intervention on the issue but, last week, said the decision was of 'national significance'. The decision came 24 hours before a motion tabled by Labour deputy leader Dame Jackie Baillie was due for a vote, with the motion passing unanimously. On Monday, Lomond Banks development director Jim Paterson said the firm was 'extremely disappointed' MSPs had voted last week to force the application to be called. 'We have engaged with the planning process in good faith, following every regulation and expectation set by the National Park and Scotland's new national planning framework,' he said. 'The land in question has been allocated for sustainable tourism development for decades, a fact acknowledged by the DPEA (Planning and Environmental Appeals Division) reporter. 'To have this long-established planning context disregarded at the 11th hour raises serious questions not only about the integrity and consistency of the Scottish planning system, but also about Scotland as an investment destination.' The director went on to urge ministers to back the proposals. 'We now call on all ministers, especially the planning minister, to uphold the integrity of the planning system,' he said. 'This process must remain impartial and evidence-led, not subjected to political opportunism or pressure campaigns built on misinformation. 'The rules must apply fairly and equally to all, or public trust in the system will be irreparably damaged. 'We urge the Scottish Government to see through the hysteria and consider not just the facts of this proposal, but the precedent it sets for all future investment in Scotland.' Paterson accused opponents of the development – spearheaded by Scottish Green MSP Ross Greer – of a 'sensationalist and misleading campaign' full of 'mistruths and inaccuracies'. Contrary to the 150,000 people who signed a petition to halt the plans, and the 50,000 who wrote to the Scottish Government to intervene, Paterson claimed the project has 'strong local support'. 'Anyone genuinely interested in the views of the Scottish people need only look at the widespread positive engagement on social media and elsewhere, reflecting a clear desire for sustainable, year-round economic activity and job creation,' he said. According to a study commissioned by Lomond Banks, 200 jobs would be created in the area, 80 full-time and 120 part-time or seasonal, though the study suggested a net of just 61 jobs would result from the £43.5 million development. Paterson also took issue with the description of Flamingo Land as a 'Yorkshire company'. 'Flamingo Land is a Scottish-registered business, incorporated in 1973, and all taxable profits are retained within Scotland,' he said. The company is registered at an address in Uddingston, South Lanarkshire, but its key site is in Yorkshire, with all three of the firm's active directors on Companies House being based south of the border. Greer accused the developer of being 'desperate', adding that the company 'have treated the people of Balloch with complete contempt' and claiming multiple surveys have shown local opposition to the plans. 'Flamingo Land would rather throw accusations around than address the many, many ways in which their mega-resort would be a disaster for the National Park,' he said. 'The evidence all points one way – the Scottish Government must reject this application and save Loch Lomond.'

Poll suggests support for better end-of-life care over assisted dying Bill
Poll suggests support for better end-of-life care over assisted dying Bill

South Wales Argus

timean hour ago

  • South Wales Argus

Poll suggests support for better end-of-life care over assisted dying Bill

The polling, commissioned by a group opposed to assisted dying being legalised, 'blows apart the arguments that the public are desperate' for a change in the law, a campaigner claimed. Bill sponsor Kim Leadbeater said last week that MPs should not have to choose between supporting assisted dying or palliative care as it is not an 'either/or' conversation for dying people. She said palliative care and assisted dying 'can and do work side by side to give terminally-ill patients the care and choice they deserve in their final days', and urged MPs to support 'all options available to terminally ill people'. An amendment to the Bill, requiring the Health Secretary to publish an assessment of the availability, quality and distribution of palliative and end-of-life care one year after the Bill passing into law, could be voted on on Friday. Friday is also set to be the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill's third reading stage, which is likely to see the overall Bill voted on for the first time since November's historic yes vote, when a majority of 55 supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales. The latest polling, commissioned by Care Not Killing and carried out by British Polling Council member Whitestone, saw 2,089 UK adults surveyed online between May 30 and June 1. Respondents, who are said to have been weighted to be a representative sample, were told of concerns raised by the Royal Colleges of Physicians and Psychiatrists and the Association for Palliative Medicine about the Bill in its current form as well as opposition from disability campaigners. Campaigners gathered in Parliament Square earlier this month (James Manning/PA) In this context, they were asked about replacing the Bill with a plan to improve and invest in palliative care – to which 69% agreed, and about a Royal Commission being set up to consider and make recommendations for a holistic end-of-life and palliative care service – with which 61% agreed. Almost two thirds (65%) said the Government's priority should be sorting out palliative and social care before changing the law – down very slightly from 66% last year. Gordon Macdonald, chief executive of Care Not Killing, said: 'This major new poll blows apart the arguments that the public are desperate for a so-called assisted dying law. 'The public want the Government and MPs to focus on fixing the NHS and palliative care which they know are broken. After all one in four Brits who would benefit from palliative care aren't currently receiving it, while in many places services are piecemeal, part-time or facing cuts.' Former prime minister Gordon Brown (Lucy North/PA) It comes as former prime minister Gordon Brown repeated his opposition to assisted dying. Writing in the Guardian, he said: 'It has become clear that whatever views people hold on the principle, passing the terminally ill adults (end of life) bill into law would privilege the legal right to assisted dying without guaranteeing anything approaching an equivalent right to high-quality palliative care for those close to death.' He said MP's personal preferences 'cannot be separated off from the duties they have as members of a community to ensure that the way we treat the dying reflects the values of a decent, compassionate country'. He added: 'That should mean upholding the role of the medical professions as care-givers, and exclusively care-givers; avoiding the possibility of private profiteering by legal-medical consortiums which might well commercialise assisted dying as a lucrative business; safeguarding vulnerable people about whose fate the royal medical colleges have all expressed concern; preventing unacceptable coercive pressures that can be brought to bear on disabled people, and those who are incapacitated or mentally stressed; and thus showing that as a society we value life above death.' Dozens of Labour MPs called for Friday's overall vote to be delayed, asking for more time to scrutinise a Bill they brand as 'perhaps the most consequential piece of legislation that has appeared before the House in generations'. Writing to Commons leader Lucy Powell, they said: 'We implore you as the Leader of the House to allocate more Parliamentary time to the scrutiny of this Bill, the valid concerns that members have about its implementation, and the consequences it could have on vulnerable populations.' A Government spokesperson said: 'This Bill has been brought as a Private Members' Bill. The amount of time for debate is therefore a matter for the House.' Labour MP Kim Leadbeater is the sponsor of the Bill (Jordan Pettitt/PA) The Bill's sponsor, Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, has repeatedly stated that her proposed legislation has been strengthened since it was first introduced last year, insisting it is subject to robust safeguards. Medical staff are among some of the MPs who back the Bill. As it stands, the proposed legislation would allow terminally-ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill and any amendments, meaning they decide according to their conscience rather than along party lines. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer voted in favour of the Bill last year, but said the Government remains neutral on the issue. Both Health Secretary Wes Streeting and Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood voted against.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store