Indian exporters eye options to mitigate Trump's tariff salvo
Indian exporters are scrambling for options to mitigate the fallout of US President Donald Trump's threatened tariff salvo against the world's most populous nation.
Many warn of dire job losses after Trump said he would double new import tariffs from 25 percent to 50 percent if India continues to buy Russian oil, in a bid to strip Moscow of revenue for its military offensive in Ukraine. 'At 50 percent tariff, no product from India can stand any competitive edge,' said economist Garima Kapoor from Elara Securities.
India, one of the world's largest crude oil importers, has until August 27 to find alternatives to replace around a third of its current oil supply from abroad.
While New Delhi is not an export powerhouse, it shipped goods worth about $87 billion to the United States in 2024.
That 50 percent levy now threatens to upend low-margin, labor-intensive industries ranging from gems and jewelry to textiles and seafood. The Global Trade Research Initiative estimates a potential 60 percent drop in US sales in 2025 in sectors such as garments.
Exporters say they are racing to fulfil orders before the deadline. 'Whatever we can ship before August 27, we are shipping,' said Vijay Kumar Agarwal, chairman of Creative Group.
The Mumbai-based textile and garment exporter has a nearly 80 percent exposure to the US market. But Agarwal warned that is merely triage. Shipping goods before the deadline 'doesn't solve' the problem, he said. 'If it doesn't get resolved, there will be chaos,' he said, adding that he's worried for the future of his 15,000 to 16,000 employees. 'It is a very gloomy situation... it will be an immense loss of business.' Talks to resolve the matter hinge on geopolitics, far from the reach of business.
Trump is set to meet Vladimir Putin on Friday, the first face-to-face meeting between the two countries' presidents since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. New Delhi, with longstanding ties with Moscow, is in a delicate situation.
Since Trump's tariff threats, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has spoken to both Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, urging a 'peaceful resolution' to the conflict. Meanwhile, the US tariff impact is already being felt in India.
Businesses say fresh orders from some US buyers have begun drying up—threatening millions of dollars in future business and the livelihoods of hundreds of thousands in the world's fifth biggest economy.
Among India's biggest apparel makers with global manufacturing operations, some are looking to move their US orders elsewhere.
Top exporter Pearl Global Industries has told Indian media that some of its US customers asked that orders be produced in lower-duty countries such as Vietnam or Bangladesh, where the company also has manufacturing facilities. Major apparel maker Gokaldas Exports told Bloomberg it may boost production in Ethiopia and Kenya, which have a 10 percent tariff.
Moody's recently warned that for India, the 'much wider tariff gap' may 'even reverse some of the gains made in recent years in attracting related investments'. India's gems and jewelry industry exported goods worth more than $10 billion last year and employs hundreds of thousands of people. 'Nothing is happening now, everything is at a standstill, new orders have been put on hold,' Ajesh Mehta from D Navinchandra Exports told AFP.
'We expect up to 150,000 to 200,000 workers to be impacted.' Gems, and other expensive non-essential items, are vulnerable. 'A 10 percent tariff was absorbable - 25 percent is not, let alone this 50 percent,' Mehta added.
'At the end of the day, we deal in luxury products. When the cost goes up beyond a point, customers will cut back.' Seafood exporters, who have been told by some US buyers to hold shipments, are hoping for new customers.
'We are looking to diversify our markets,' says Alex Ninan, who is a partner at the Baby Marine Group. 'The United States is totally out right now. We will have to push our products to alternative markets, such as China, Japan... Russia is another market we are really looking into.' Ninan, however, warns that is far from simple. 'You can't create a market all of a sudden,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
What will the Putin-Trump meeting mean for the war in Ukraine?
High-stakes summit in Alaska ends without ceasefire deal. The much-anticipated summit between the leaders of Russia and United States concluded without a deal to end the war in Ukraine. Despite this, US President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin say 'great progress' was made at 'constructive' talks in Alaska. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was not invited. Instead, after a lengthy phone call with President Trump, he's heading to the White House on Monday. So, were ceasefire options discussed behind closed doors? Could an end to the war finally be in sight? And what does the summit mean for Russian-American relations? Presenter: Adrian Finighan Guests: Andrei Fedorov – Former deputy foreign minister of Russia Thomas Pickering – Former US ambassador to Russia and the United Nations Oleksiy Goncharenko – Politician and member of the Ukrainian parliament
Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
European leaders to shore up Ukraine's Zelenskyy for DC talks with Trump
European leaders will join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during his visit to Washington, DC, seeking an end to the Russia-Ukraine war, after United States President Donald Trump dropped both his push for a ceasefire and the threat of punitive actions against Russia following his Alaska summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Securing a ceasefire in Ukraine, more than three years after Russia's invasion, had been one of Trump's core demands before Friday's Alaska summit, to which Ukraine and its European allies were not invited. Special US envoy Steve Witkoff said on Sunday that Putin agreed at the summit with Trump to allow the US and European allies to offer Ukraine a security guarantee resembling NATO's collective defence mandate as part of an eventual deal to end the 3 1/2-year war. 'We were able to win the following concession: That the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in NATO,' he said on the CNN news programme State of the Union. Witkoff said it was the first time he had heard Putin agree to that. Ukraine's Zelenskyy, speaking in Brussels on Sunday after meeting European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, said the current front lines of the war should be the basis for peace talks. 'We need real negotiations, which means we can start where the front line is now,' Zelenskyy said, adding that European leaders support this and reiterating his long-held position that it was necessary to establish a ceasefire in order to then negotiate a final deal. But after the summit on Friday with Putin yielded no clear breakthrough, Trump ruled out an immediate ceasefire – a move that aligns with Putin, who has long argued for negotiations on a final peace deal. According to a New York Times report, after his meeting with Putin, the US president also told European leaders that he had offered to support a plan to end the war that involved Ukraine giving up parts of its territory to Russia. Ukraine and its European allies have criticised Putin's stance as a way to buy time and press Russia's battlefield advances, and they have expressed unease over Trump's land swap proposal from the outset. In an effort to try show a firm, united front to the US president in White House talks on Monday, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, Finland's President Alexander Stubb, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and von der Leyen will accompany Zelenskyy to Washington, DC. 'The talks will address, among other things, security guarantees, territorial issues, and continued support for Ukraine in its defence against Russian aggression,' the German government said in a statement about the trip to the US capital. 'This includes maintaining pressure on sanctions.' Ahead of the visit, von der Leyen said on X that she would welcome Zelenskyy for a meeting in Brussels on Sunday, which other European leaders would join by video, before accompanying the Ukrainian leader on his US trip at his 'request' and with 'other European leaders'. This afternoon, I will welcome @ZelenskyyUa in Brussels. Together, we will participate in the Coalition of Willing VTC. At the request of President Zelenskyy, I will join the meeting with President Trump and other European leaders in the White House tomorrow. — Ursula von der Leyen (@vonderleyen) August 17, 2025 Strength and safety in numbers appear to be factors in the group visit, with memories still fresh about the hostile reception Zelenskyy received in February from Trump and US Vice-President JD Vance in a public White House dressing-down, castigating the Ukrainian leader as being ungrateful and 'disrespectful'. No land swaps While Zelenskyy has welcomed Trump's efforts to end the war, in a post on social media on Saturday, he warned that 'it may take a lot of effort to get Russia to have the will to implement far greater – peaceful coexistence with its neighbors for decades'. The Ukrainian president has also repeatedly reiterated that Kyiv will not swap any of its land to attain a ceasefire. Ukraine's constitution forbids the ceding of territory. According to Zelenskyy, Putin has asked that Russia be handed over all of Ukraine's eastern Donetsk region, a third of which Kyiv still holds. In exchange, Russian forces would halt their offensive in the Black Sea port region of Kherson and Zaporizhia in southern Ukraine, where the main cities are still under Ukrainian control. Earlier this month, the Ukrainian president said that 'Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier' and pointed out that he doesn't have the authority to sign off on land swaps. He said that changing Ukraine's 1991 borders runs counter to the country's constitution. Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and has been gradually advancing for months. In his statement after the Alaska summit, Putin signalled no movement in Russia's long-held demands, which also include a veto on Kyiv's desired membership in the NATO alliance. He also warned Ukraine and its European allies not to 'create any obstacles' and 'that they will not attempt to disrupt the emerging progress through provocation or behind-the-scenes intrigue'. Trilateral summit in the works? The diplomatic focus now switches to Zelenskyy's talks at the White House on Monday with the European leaders in tow. In an interview with broadcaster Fox News after his sit-down with Putin, Trump had suggested that the onus was now on Zelenskyy to secure a peace deal as they work towards an eventual trilateral summit with Putin. 'It's really up to President Zelenskyy to get it done,' Trump said. European powers, however, want to help set up a trilateral meeting between Trump, Putin and Zelenskyy to make sure Ukraine has a seat at the table to shape its future. They also want security guarantees for Ukraine with US involvement, and the ability to crank up pressure on Moscow if needed. 'They will spell out what they consider essential in terms of security guarantees: what they can do themselves, what falls to the coalition of volunteers, and also what they expect from the United States,' a European government official told the Reuters news agency. 'Indeed, they expect a very robust commitment.'
Al Jazeera
7 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
The Alaska summit was a spectacular distraction
Say you are the president of the United States and the relationship with a significant chunk of your political base has become less than blissfully harmonious. What do you do? Well, one option is to stage a summit, accompanied by much fanfare, with the president of Russia, ostensibly in order to end that country's war in Ukraine. And this is precisely the manoeuvre that was pulled by US President Donald Trump, who on Friday rolled out the red carpet in Alaska for his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin. The short-lived encounter was ultimately anticlimactic, with Trump offering the incisive assessment that 'There's no deal until there's a deal.' Fox News reported that Trump had rated the much-anticipated meeting with Putin a '10' out of 10 and that he particularly 'appreciated the Russian president's comments when he claimed he would not have invaded Ukraine had Trump won the 2020 presidency'. Fox went on to add that neither head of state had bothered to specify the 'reasoning behind these comments'. At any rate, the no-deal talks constituted a convenient distraction from current intra-MAGA strife, which owes to a couple of factors. There is, for example, the matter of the files relating to the late Jeffrey Epstein, the financier and convicted sex offender who died in prison in 2019. When US Attorney General Pam Bondi briefed Trump in May on the Justice Department's review of the content of the so-called 'Epstein files', she reportedly informed the president that his name appeared therein. Despite having pledged while on the campaign trail to declassify the Epstein files, Trump changed tack earlier this year and angrily dismissed the investigation as a 'hoax'. He went as far as to insult many of his Republican followers as 'stupid' and 'foolish' for continuing to insist that the Epstein details be released. On July 12, the president took to social media with his signature preference for manic capitalisation to berate those demanding declassification: 'We have a PERFECT Administration, THE TALK OF THE WORLD, and 'selfish people' are trying to hurt it, all over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein.' And yet this is not the only headache facing the 'PERFECT Administration' from within Trump's own MAGA base, many of whose prominent members have become vocally critical of Israel's genocide in the Gaza Strip, which Trump persists in aiding and abetting. The genocide, which will mark its two-year anniversary in October, has officially killed nearly 62,000 Palestinians thus far – although the true death toll is undoubtedly many times higher. Apparently, Israel's behaviour was entirely palatable to much of the US political establishment when it simply consisted of unending massacres, slaughtered and mutilated babies, bombed hospitals, and razed neighbourhoods. Now that mass starvation has been visibly added to the genocidal mix, however, Israel seems to have crossed a red line even among formerly staunch devotees. As per Gaza's Ministry of Health, the death toll from malnutrition has hit 251, including 108 children. Images of skeletal Palestinians have flooded the internet, and the United Nations World Food Programme has categorised food shortage in Gaza as 'catastrophic'. Furthermore, according to the UN, the Israeli military has killed at least 1,760 Palestinians since late May alone, as they sought aid, including at sites run by the nefarious so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). Backed by the US and Israel, the GHF has not only served Israel's plans for mass displacement and forced eviction of Palestinians; the aid distribution hubs have also functioned as a sort of one-stop shop for indiscriminate killing – which, after all, is the whole point of genocide. And while Trump has intermittently chided Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the disagreeable optics of the whole spectacle, it has not been sufficient to appease the scrutiny of the likes of right-wing US Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a traditional ally of the president known for such antics as wearing a hat imprinted with the words 'Trump Was Right About Everything!' In a social media post last month, Greene – a leading figure in Trump's MAGA movement – was unexpectedly explicit in her condemnation of 'the genocide, humanitarian crisis, and starvation happening in Gaza'. Other MAGA fixtures like far-right influencer Laura Loomer – a self-defined 'proud Islamophobe' and general bona fide sociopath – wasted no time in responding to Greene's post: 'There is no genocide in Gaza.' Anyway, political tensions and infighting were at least temporarily removed from the spotlight by the Trump-Putin extravaganza in Alaska. It's hardly the first time the old art of distraction has come in handy – Trump's pal, Netanyahu, is the master of this trade. His commitment to waging genocide in Gaza has more than a little to do with his desire to stave off domestic opposition and avoid dealing with the assorted corruption charges in which he is presently embroiled. And while the Alaskan red-carpet stunt provided little to write home about, distraction may yet prevail as folks ponder what the hell that was all about. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
