Car culture is the problem, not roadside dining
From Boo Jia Cher
It is a welcome sign that Kuala Lumpur's mayor, Maimunah Sharif, is taking the city's pedestrian experience seriously. Her latest move for a task force to regulate alfresco dining and reclaim pedestrian spaces marks a rare show of political will in a city that has long neglected pedestrians.
But let us be clear: this must only be the beginning.
Regulating hawkers and removing plastic chairs is a start, but it is a modest intervention when the larger crisis is one of systemic car dominance.
What good are clear pavements if the rest of the city remains a hostile, fractured landscape for pedestrians?
The car problem
Jalan Tun Sambanthan in Brickfields is often celebrated as a high-footfall heritage corridor and a key artery adjacent to KL Sentral. Yet, despite its vibrant surroundings and walkable neighbourhood, the road itself feels more like a chaotic, multi-lane thoroughfare dominated by speeding vehicles that undermine the area's potential.
If the Kuala Lumpur City Hall is serious about creating a walkable city, it must confront the real obstacle: the priority given to cars. The danger to pedestrians and the degradation of public space are primarily the result of excessive space allocated to private vehicles.
Shrink traffic lanes
Instead of cracking down on small vendors, why not redesign streets by expanding sidewalks and reducing traffic lanes? Wider walking areas benefit everyone, creating safe, comfortable, and dignified spaces.
These changes would also give room for street food culture to thrive, without compromising accessibility. We shouldn't have to choose between walkability and vibrancy. Thoughtful design can accommodate both.
What about illegal parking?
A plastic chair and table can be moved easily, but a two-ton pickup truck parked on a pavement blocks pedestrians for hours. Illegal parking is rampant, from cars on zebra crossings to motorcycles clogging five-foot ways.
The enforcement imbalance is glaring: why target street vendors but tolerate vehicles that render walkways unusable?
DBKL should adopt technology-driven solutions, like the 'Report Illegal Parking' app in Seoul, South Korea, which lets citizens document violations with real-time alerts to enforcement.
A Malaysian equivalent, an 'Aduan' app, could crowdsource reports, tagging licence plates and dispatching officers efficiently.
Pedestrian crossings
Walkability is about continuity. Across KL, pedestrians are routinely forced to dangerously cross extremely wide roads with no street-level crossings.
The junction of Jalan Hang Tuah and Jalan Pudu, in front of Lalaport, is a glaring example of infrastructural insanity: a vast sea of asphalt, along with an underpass for cars, built for speed, not pedestrian safety and dignity.
Tourists and locals alike are seen dashing across lanes of moving traffic, not for thrill, but because the nearest overhead bridges are a 10-minute detour. If jaywalking is endemic, perhaps the city has failed, not the pedestrian.
Streets need life, not just order
A walkable city must also feel safe, vibrant, and human, especially at night. A dim, empty pavement next to a busy road is reluctantly walkable, even if it's physically clear.
Ironically, the very alfresco dining setups being targeted can enhance safety by putting more 'eyes on the street.' The problem thus isn't street activity, it's poor design that fails to balance vibrancy with accessibility.
Good lighting helps, but people are what make streets feel alive. That means shops, vendors, families, street performers, diners. Safety comes from thoughtful design, not sterile uniformity.
Cities like Tokyo and Copenhagen use traffic-calming features (narrower lanes, trees, reduced speed limits) to create streets where walking feels natural and pleasant. KL must learn from these examples.
A radical mindset shift
Mayor Maimunah's efforts are commendable, but KL needs a fundamental redesign. Cities like Amsterdam and Barcelona transformed by deprioritising cars: the former through cycling infrastructure, the latter via 'superblocks' that restrict through-traffic in neighbourhoods.
What's delaying KL's car-free zone in Bukit Bintang or a congestion charge like that of London and Singapore? Why do we sneer at the poor migrant struggling to cross a road while wowing at Porsche drivers?
Walking shouldn't be an act of defiance or helplessness; it should be a safe, dignified choice for everyone, rich or poor.
The mayor herself should walk the talk—literally. She should join a walking audit team every month, traversing the city from one end to the other to personally inspect the state of our walkways. Feel every cracked curb, every missing crossing, and every stretch where a pedestrian risks their life.
Boo Jia Cher is an FMT reader.
The views expressed are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
High Court dismisses committal bid by former KL Tower operator against govt, individuals, orders RM25,000 payment
KUALA LUMPUR, June 9 — The High Court here today dismissed the former operator of Kuala Lumpur Tower's leave application to commence committal proceedings against seven individuals and the government. The former operator, Menara Kuala Lumpur Sdn Bhd, and its parent, Hydroshoppe Sdn Bhd, are seeking contempt of court action against the eight for allegedly disrupting the administration of justice amid ongoing legal proceedings. Judge Roz Mawar Rozain, who rejected the application, ordered the two companies to pay RM25,000 to the respondents, including Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil. — Bernama MORE TO COME
Malaysian Reserve
an hour ago
- Malaysian Reserve
Nobody is above the law, says High Court
Anwar filed his application on May 23, asking whether a sitting PM has limited immunity from civil lawsuits under Articles 39, 40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution by FARAH SOLHI THE Kuala Lumpur (KL) High Court's dismissal of Prime Minister (PM) Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's application to refer a constitutional question to the Federal Court — specifically on procedural immunity from civil liabilities — strongly affirms that no one is above the law. Judge Roz Mawar Rozain ruled that Anwar's claim of being deprived of personal liberty, based on the assertion that the suit filed against him was vexatious and politically motivated, is untenable. In delivering her brief judgement on June 4, the judge held that none of the Federal Constitution articles cited in Anwar's application gave rise to any real, substantial or justiciable constitutional questions. Roz Mawar said Anwar had not demonstrated that he is being denied legal protection afforded to others, or that any legal provisions operate unequally against him. 'The questions posed are speculative (and) not necessary for the disposal of this case, nor do they concern the interpretation or validity of any constitutional provision. 'From a judicial perspective, the proposed questions do not appear to meet the threshold of genuine constitutional controversy,' she said, while also awarded former research assistant Mohammed Yusoff Rawther RM20,000 in costs. Anwar also questions whether courts are constitutionally required to protect public officials from lawsuits when no crime is proven (pic: Media Mulia) Roz Mawar further ruled that constitutional supremacy demands all persons, including public office holders, be equally subject to the rule of law, and that not every question touching or quoting the Federal Constitution warrants referral, as the Federal Court is not a forum for speculative advisory opinions. She added that Anwar's affirmed readiness to proceed with the trial, as submitted by his counsels during the application hear- ing on June 3, indicated no evidence that the suit impairs his ability to perform his constitutional duties. The trial will proceed as scheduled on June 16, as the court found no special circumstances warranting a postponement. Constitutional Questions Raised in Anwar's Application Anwar filed his application on May 23, questioning whether a sitting PM has qualified immunity from civil suits under Articles 39, 40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution. This pertains to alleged private acts committed prior to his appointment, where the continuation of such litigation, he argued, would impair the effective discharge of his executive functions and undermine the constitutional separation of powers. Anwar also questioned whether the High Court's decision to allow the civil suit, based on private allegations but pursued in a political context, would violate the constitutional guarantee of equality before the law under Article 8(1) which relates to the fundamental rights to equal treatment. Anwar also questioned, under Article 5(1), whether a sitting PM should be protected from lawsuits that are politically motivated or poorly timed, particularly if they relate to actions taken before assuming office, lack clear legal merit, but could damage reputation and hinder the ability to govern. He further raised the issue of whether courts are constitutionally required to shield public officials from such lawsuits when no crime has been proven. In response, Roz Mawar said Article 5(1) does not extend to mere inconvenience, reputational risks or constitutional burden arising from civil proceedings, noting that Anwar's rights were not violated as he remains at liberty, with no restrictions on his movement or legal capacity. 'The act requiring a defendant to respond to a claim, however politically sensitive, does not implicate Article 5(1), and no precedent has extended its ambit to encompass exposure to civil litigation,' she said. She also found Anwar's questions regarding Article 8(1) to be without merit, saying that the provision serves as a shield, not a sword for immunity, it guarantees equal legal treatment, not exemption from the law, as established in precedent cases. 'The defendant has not shown any discriminatory conduct by the courts or the law. The plaintiff's (Yusoff Rawther's) suit was filed under the same procedural and substantive law applicable to all Malaysians and foreigners alike in this country,' she added. Roz Mawar said while Article 39, which pertains to executive authority, is a structural allocation of powers and does not confer any personal immunity on the PM or Cabinet ministers. It does not suggest, either expressly or implicitly, that executive authority includes protection against personal civil liability. She also said Anwar's arguments contending Article 43 were flawed, as no immunity is implied under the said article. This provision, she added, pertains solely to appointments and tenure, and does not prescribe or imply immunity from judicial proceedings. 'No clause in Article 43 shields a sitting PM from accountability for private acts committed prior to assuming office,' she said, adding that constitutional silence does not equate to immunity. The judge also said that the mind map produced by Anwar's legal team, intended to illustrate their theory of constructive harm to the office, has no textual or jurisprudential basis, nor does any provision in the Constitution imply immunity for the PM from civil litigation. 'The defendant's legal team could not clearly anchor this proposed doctrine to any particular article or legal test. The argument, at best, may be rooted in policy concerns rather than constitutional law,' she said. While Article 39, which pertains to executive authority, is a structural allocation of powers, it does not confer any personal immunity on the PM or Cabinet ministers Is Seeking Immunity a Violation of Constitutional Rights? Senior lawyer Datuk Seri Rajan Navaratnam said every individual, including the sitting PM, who feels aggrieved is entitled to approach the courts for determination of a subject matter. However, there are certain limitations to matters raised, as courts are bound by precedent decisions and administration of justice is subject to specific rules and procedures. 'It is for the courts to determine whether such an action (of raising legal questions) has merit or otherwise. 'Article 8 of the Constitution states that all persons are equal before the law and are entitled to equal protection of the law. In other words, no one is above or exempt from the legal framework,' he told The Malaysian Reserve (TMR). However, the Constitution does not afford immunity from court proceedings to any individual, except under Article 183, which provides that no action can be initiated against the Yang diPertuan Agong or a State Ruler without the consent of the Attorney General (AG). Therefore, it can be said that even Article 183 does not provide absolute immunity, as the discretion lies with the AG. Meanwhile, senior lawyer Datuk Seri Dr Jahabardeen Mohamed Yunoos, affirming Rajan's view, said there are various legal mechanisms in place to weed out frivolous suits and those that attempt to abuse the judicial process. He noted that the law does accord certain forms of immunity, but these are limited — primarily to judges or individuals acting in a judicial capacity, as stipulated under Section 14 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964. This provision states that judges and others performing judicial functions cannot be sued for actions taken in the course of their duties, even if those actions exceeded their authority, provided they genuinely believed they had such authority at the time. Yusoff Rawther (centre) is currently under police detention after being charged under Section 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 for allegedly trafficking 305g of cannabis What's Next? Anwar's counsel, Datuk Seri K Rajasegaran told TMR on June 5 that they have filed a notice of appeal to the Appellate Court immediately following the High Court's decision. However, he confirmed that his team is still awaiting a date or case management notice from the Appellate Court. He added that they will file a notice of urgency together with an application to stay (postpone) the High Court's proceedings. Pending any decision by the higher courts, the High Court will proceed with the matter, following Roz Mawar's dismissal of Rajasegaran's oral application for postponement on June 4. Yusoff Rawther filed a suit against Anwar in July 2021, claiming he was sexually assaulted by the latter on Oct 2, 2018, at Anwar's residence. He made a statutory declaration and lodged a police report regarding the incident in 2019. However, he was later accused of attempting to damage the PM's political career and reputation through the police report. The plaintiff, who was Anwar's research assistant, stated in his affidavits that the allegations had affected his mental health. He is seeking general, aggravated and exemplary damages, along with interest, costs and other relief the court deems appropriate. Yusoff Rawther is currently under police detention after being charged under Section 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 for allegedly trafficking 305g of cannabis found in his vehicle near the mosque at the police contingent headquarters on Sept 6, 2024. He was also charged under Section 36(1) of the Firearms Act 1960 for possession of two imitation firearms. The High Court is scheduled to deliver its decision at the end of the prosecution case on his charges on June 12. This article first appeared in The Malaysian Reserve weekly print edition
Free Malaysia Today
3 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
PM offers condolences, directs aid for UPSI students in bus-MPV crash
Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said the tragic incident should serve as a reminder about road safety. PETALING JAYA : Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim has conveyed his condolences to the families of those who died in a crash involving an MPV and a bus carrying students from Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris early this morning. 'Our heartfelt condolences go out to the families of the victims. We pray that you will be granted strength and resilience in facing this immense hardship,' Anwar said in a Facebook post. The prime minister also said he had instructed the higher education ministry to channel assistance to the families of the students involved. 'Heartbreaking tragedies like this, which occur far too often, must serve as a reminder to us all to always remain cautious and never rush to reach our destinations. Your lives are far too precious,' he said. Higher education minister Zambry Abdul Kadir said in a Facebook post that the ministry was ready to give the necessary assistance. He said further updates would be provided in due course. Bernama reported that at least 15 people were killed in the collision which took place on the Gerik-Jeli East West Highway, near Tasik Banding. It is understood that the bus had been travelling from Jerteh, Terengganu, to Tanjung Malim, Perak. A total of 48 victims were involved. Of these, 13 died at the scene and two at the hospital. Four others were injured. UPSI deputy vice-chancellor (student affairs and alumni) Norkhalid Salimin said most of the passengers on the bus were students returning to campus after the Aidiladha break. Machang MP Wan Ahmad Fayhsal Wan Ahmad Kamal called for a comprehensive investigation into the crash, including the drivers' qualifications, the condition of the vehicles, and their maintenance records. 'If negligence is found, action must be taken without compromise. Enough is enough. 'We cannot allow tragedy after tragedy to pass without learning from them. Their lives must not be reduced to mere statistics,' he said in a Facebook post.
