Trump slaps tariffs on key allies as global trade talks intensify
Through an executive order issued this week, Trump imposed new import duties ranging from 10 percent to 50 percent on goods from 69 trading partners, including Canada, Brazil, India, Taiwan, and Switzerland. The tariffs will take effect in seven days, just ahead of the August 1 deadline.
The measures include a 35 percent tariff on many Canadian goods, 50 percent for Brazil, 25 percent for India, and 20 percent for Taiwan. An exception has been granted for shipments already in transit. Goods from countries not listed will face a blanket 10 percent U.S. import tax, potentially more in the future, Trump indicated.
"Some trading partners, despite having engaged in negotiations, have offered terms that, in my judgment, do not sufficiently address imbalances," the executive order stated, adding some also failed to align with U.S. economic and national-security priorities.
Markets reacted with relative calm, a contrast to the selloff that followed Trump's earlier tariff threats in April. Still, stocks and equity futures edged lower in Asian trading.
The administration says additional trade deals are in the works as part of a broader strategy to close trade deficits and support U.S. manufacturing.
Canada was hit particularly hard. Trump raised tariffs on Canadian goods tied to fentanyl-related enforcement to 35 percent, up from 25 percent, claiming Ottawa had "failed to cooperate" on narcotics enforcement. "Canada has been very poorly led," Trump told reporters. Canada's government has not yet responded, but it previously contested the basis for such tariffs.
Mexico, meanwhile, received a reprieve. Trump granted a 90-day delay on new 30 percent tariffs for most Mexican non-automotive and non-metal goods covered by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), following a call with President Claudia Sheinbaum.
"We avoided the tariff increase announced for tomorrow," Sheinbaum posted on X, calling the call with Trump "very good." However, U.S. tariffs on Mexican steel, aluminum, copper, and non-USMCA-compliant autos remain in place.
India now faces a 25 percent tariff following stalled negotiations over agricultural market access. Trump also raised concerns about India's purchases of Russian oil. Talks are ongoing, but New Delhi has pledged to protect its farm sector. The news triggered backlash from India's opposition and a drop in the rupee.
Brazil was hit with a 50 percent tariff amid tensions over the prosecution of former President Jair Bolsonaro, a Trump ally. Still, specific sectors such as energy, aircraft, and orange juice were spared.
Commerce Department data showed that tariffs may already be driving up prices: home furnishings rose 1.3 percent in June, recreational goods 0.9 percent, and clothing and footwear 0.4 percent.
Meanwhile, Trump's legal justification, using the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act, faced tough questioning in federal court. Judges appeared skeptical that trade deficits and fentanyl enforcement constitute emergencies under the law.
Following preliminary progress in earlier talks, China now has until August 12 to finalize a broader tariff agreement with Washington.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
43 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Asian markets mostly gain after Wall St tumbles following poor US jobs report
BANGKOK (AP) — Shares in Asia advanced Monday after Wall Street had its worst day since May following the release of weak U.S. jobs data. Markets in Asia had already reacted on Friday to U.S. President Donald Trump's announcement late Thursday of sweeping tariffs on imports from many U.S. trading partners. The new import duties are set to take effect on Thursday. The signs of trouble on the U.S. economic horizon have raised hopes that the Federal Reserve may relent and cut interest rates, analysts said. Tokyo's Nikkei 225 index lost 1.2%, bouncing back from bigger losses, to 40,297.91. The Hang Seng in Hong Kong jumped 0.8% to 24,691.53, while the Shanghai Composite index climbed 0.6% to 3,580.84. In South Korea, the Kospi surged 1.2% to 3,155.64. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 was nearly unchanged at 8,662.50. Investors' worries about a weakening U.S. economy deepened after the latest report on job growth in the U.S. showed employers added just 73,000 jobs in July. That is sharply lower than economists expected. The Labor Department also reported that revisions shaved a stunning 258,000 jobs off May and June payrolls. 'The labor market, once a pillar of resilience, is now looking more like a late-cycle casualty, as soft data begin to replace soft landings in market discourse,' Stephen Innes of SPI Asset Management said in a commentary. U.S. futures edged 0.4% higher, however, early Monday. On Friday, the S&P 500 fell 1.6%, its biggest decline since May 21 and its fourth straight loss. It closed at 6,238.01, posting a 2.4% loss for the week. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 1.2% to 43,588.58, while the Nasdaq composite fell 2.2% to finish at 20,650.13. Internet retail giant Amazon fell 8.3%, despite reporting encouraging profit and sales for its most recent quarter. Technology behemoth Apple fell 2.5% after also beating Wall Street's profit and revenue forecasts. Both companies face tougher operating conditions because of tariffs, with Apple forecasting a $1.1 billion hit from the fees in the current quarter. Trump's decision to order the immediate firing of the head of the government agency that produces the monthly jobs figures raised concern over whether there might be interference in future data. The surprisingly weak hiring numbers led investors to step up their expectations the Fed will cut interest rates in September. The yield on the 10-year Treasury fell to 4.21% from 4.39% just before the hiring report was released. That's a big move for the bond market. The yield on the two-year Treasury, which more closely tracks expectations for Fed actions, plunged to 3.68% from 3.94% just prior to the report's release. The Fed has held rates steady since December. A cut in rates would give the job market and overall economy a boost, but it could also risk fueling inflation, which is hovering stubbornly above the central bank's 2% target. An update on Thursday for the Fed's preferred measure of inflation showed that prices ticked higher in June, rising to 2.6% from 2.4% in May. The Fed held rates steady again at its most recent meeting this week. Fed Chair Jerome Powell has been pressured by Trump to cut the benchmark rate, though that decision isn't his to make alone, but belongs to the 12 members of the Federal Open Market Committee. Businesses, investors and the Fed have been operating under a cloud of uncertainty from Trump's tariff policy. Companies have been warning investors that unpredictable policies, with some tariffs already in effect while others change or get extended, make it difficult to plan ahead. Walmart, Procter & Gamble and many others also have warned about import taxes raising costs, eating into profits and raising prices for consumers. In other dealings early Monday, U.S, benchmark crude oil bounced back to gain 22 cents to to $67.56 per barrel. Brent crude, the international standard, added 13 cents to $69.80 per barrel.
Canada News.Net
an hour ago
- Canada News.Net
White House pressure mounts as Trump clashes with Fed chair
WASHINGTON, D.C.: On August 1, President Donald Trump escalated his feud with Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, urging the central bank's board of governors to seize control from Powell if he refused to slash interest rates. The extraordinary demand made on Trump's Truth Social account underscored how aggressively the president has been pressuring the independent central bank to support his economic agenda. Trump denounced Powell as "stubborn," repeating months of verbal attacks against the Fed chief. Traditionally, the Federal Reserve operates free from partisan politics, with its mandate focused on price stability and maximum employment. However, Trump has been openly frustrated by Powell's refusal to move interest rates lower in the face of mounting economic headwinds. So far this year, Powell has resisted changing the Fed's benchmark overnight lending rate, which remains steady at an average of 4.33 percent. He has argued that policymakers need time to measure the economic effects of Trump's sweeping tariffs on foreign goods. In Powell's view, those tariffs could still ripple through inflation and broader financial conditions, making it too risky to act hastily. Trump, however, is demanding drastic action. "If Powell doesn't substantially lower rates, THE BOARD SHOULD ASSUME CONTROL, AND DO WHAT EVERYONE KNOWS HAS TO BE DONE!" he wrote. Interestingly, two Fed governors—Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, both appointed by Trump—have begun to echo part of the president's argument. In statements released August 1, the pair said that they see Trump's tariffs as essentially creating a one-time bump in prices, not a sustained inflationary threat. They added that the labor market appears to be cooling. As a result, they dissented at Wednesday's policy meeting, advocating for minor rate cuts, though not nearly as deep as Trump wants. Trump quickly celebrated their stance, calling their opposition "strong dissents," even as he continues to insist that the broader U.S. economy is thriving. His political calculus is clear: rate cuts would both ease borrowing costs for households and reduce federal debt servicing expenses, helping him head into the election claiming credit for strong growth. But fresh economic data complicates his narrative. The July jobs report showed only 73,000 new positions created, far below expectations. Meanwhile, earlier employment figures for May and June were revised downward to just 14,000 and 19,000, respectively—evidence that the economy is slowing more sharply than the White House has admitted. Trump insists inflation is not a concern, but the Fed's preferred measure currently runs at 2.6 percent annually, above the central bank's two percent target. Cutting rates by the three percentage points he is demanding would amount to an unprecedented shift. Economists warn such a steep move could flood the system with liquidity, driving up prices rather than containing them. The clash between Trump and Powell is not only economic but also constitutional. In May, the Supreme Court ruled that a president cannot dismiss a Fed chair merely over disagreements about policy. That decision forced the White House to explore other legal avenues, including whether Powell could be ousted "for cause" because of cost overruns tied to the Fed's US$2.5 billion headquarters renovation. For now, Powell remains secure in his post. His current term as chair runs until May 2026, after which Trump—if still in office—will be able to nominate a successor subject to Senate confirmation. Until then, the tug-of-war between the president's political demands and the Fed's cautious independence looks set to continue.
Canada News.Net
an hour ago
- Canada News.Net
US hiring falters in July as unemployment rate edges higher
WASHINGTON, D.C.: The U.S. labor market lost momentum in July, with job growth slowing more than expected and major downward revisions to prior months adding to concerns about the strength of the economy. The data has renewed speculation that the Federal Reserve may cut interest rates as soon as September. The Labor Department said on August 1 that nonfarm payrolls rose by just 73,000 last month, well below the 110,000 economists had forecast. June's job gain was revised down to 14,000, the weakest monthly increase in nearly five years. May's figures were also slashed, from 144,000 to just 19,000 jobs, resulting in a combined revision of 258,000 fewer jobs than previously reported. "The labor market is not rolling over, but it is badly wounded and may yet bring about a reversal in the U.S. economy's fortunes," said Christopher Rupkey, chief economist at FWDBONDS. "The door to a Fed rate cut in September just got opened a crack wider." July's hiring was once again concentrated in healthcare, which added 55,000 jobs. Social assistance roles increased by 18,000. However, federal government employment continued to decline, shedding another 12,000 jobs and bringing the total reduction to 84,000 since January. More cuts may be on the way following a Supreme Court ruling that gave the Trump administration the green light for broader federal layoffs, though some agencies have indicated they will hold off. The unemployment rate rose to 4.2 percent in July, up from 4.1 percent in June. The increase was attributed in part to declines in the volatile household employment measure and a continued, though slower, exodus from the labor force. Despite leaving interest rates unchanged earlier this week, the Federal Reserve may now have a more transparent case for easing. Fed Chair Jerome Powell described the labor market as "in balance" due to falling labor demand and supply, but he also acknowledged this shift could present a "downside risk." Uncertainty around trade policy is compounding the issue. On July 31, President Donald Trump imposed sweeping tariffs on dozens of countries, including a 35 percent duty on Canadian imports, contributing to concerns about rising inflation and policy-driven economic strain. Following the report, the dollar slipped, and U.S. Treasury yields dropped, as markets began to shift expectations back toward a possible rate cut in September. Earlier in the week, many had expected the Fed to delay easing until at least October. The Bureau of Labor Statistics noted that the May and June revisions were "larger than normal" but did not offer a specific reason, attributing the changes to late-arriving data and seasonal adjustment recalculations. In September, the Fed may receive further clarity when the BLS issues its annual benchmark revision, which could confirm that job growth over the past year was even weaker than payroll data had suggested. The labor market has also been affected by structural changes. Reduced immigration due to the Trump administration's crackdown has limited the labor supply, and an acceleration of baby boomer retirements is adding to the demographic pressure.
