Legislature restores some protection for historic districts after backlash from Miami Beach
The state Senate and House had passed companion versions of the legislation that Beach officials and preservationists said would have had devastating consequences, allowing developers to freely demolish historic buildings without interference from local government or any meaningful review. Live Local allows developers to override local limits on height and density if they set aside apartments in a project for so-called 'workforce' housing.
The new language, incorporated into both versions of the legislation before final approval, specifies that developers submitting Live Local projects must still meet requirements in a local jurisdiction's comprehensive development plan, which guides what kinds of construction and intensity are allowed, as well as other local development regulations.
According to Miami Beach Commissioner Alex Fernandez, who led the city's effort to protect its extensive historic districts from the worst impacts of the expanded Live Local Act, that means its planning and zoning officials can block demolition of a historic building or reject a developer's application if it doesn't conform to a broad range of local rules, including historic preservation criteria and those governing architectural character.
The new language, proposed by Democratic Sen. Shevrin Jones and GOP Rep. Ileana Garcia, also allows the city to require developers whose projects pass comprehensive plan and zoning muster to preserve or replicate historic building facades, Fernandez said. The original bills were filed by GOP Sen. Alexis Calatayud and GOP Rep. Vicki Lopez, who agreed to the concessions.
The Beach, however, continues to strongly oppose the expansion because it grants developers a significantly greater right to build big by overriding caps on height and density, still posing a significant risk to Miami Beach's cityscape and its historic buildings and districts, Fernandez said. It would bring skyscrapers to low-scale city neighborhoods where heights have historically been capped at about three or four stories, including some historic districts.
The expansion also effectively removes the ability of city boards, including the Historic Preservation Board, to hold public hearings on Live Local projects across most of the city, because it requires that all review must take place administratively, behind closed doors.
'The fire hasn't been put out, but the blaze has been contained,' Fernandez said in an interview.
The city will urge Gov. Ron DeSantis to veto the expansion, he added.
Fernandez outlined his understanding of the Jones and Garcia amendments, which he said came out of conversations with Calatayud, in a public letter to her.
The final version of the bills, SB 1730 and HB 943, passed 37-0 in the Senate and, subsequently, 105-0 in the House.
Still questions about scope
The precise contours and impact on historic districts and city neighborhoods across the state, and what powers local officials retain over Live Local applications, likely won't be entirely clear until they begin reviewing proposals and negotiating with developers. Some observers say it's also likely to produce litigation as local authorities and developers joust over what's allowed.
Early Live Local submissions in Miami-Dade and Broward counties, many of which would bring outscaled height and density to established low-scale neighborhoods, have generated furious public pushback and official resistance. So far, no Live Local project has broken ground in Miami-Dade even as its legislative champions goose its provisions to overcome legal and political obstacles.
Critics have said the act is weighted heavily in developers' favor while doing little to address the state's critical need for truly affordable housing.
Live Local, originally passed in 2023 and amended last year, has applied only in areas of counties and municipalities zoned for commercial, mixed-use or industrial uses. Under the law, developers can submit projects that are taller and more dense that allowed by local zoning if they set aside 40 percent of apartments for renters making up to 120 percent of local median household income -- a level currently set at $96,000 in Miami-Dade County. Live Local developers also get major breaks on property taxes.
This year's legislation significantly expands the definition of commercial areas to include any that allow lodging and restaurants. Beach officials say that means it would now cover practically all of the city with the exception of single-family neighborhoods.
Previously, Live Local applied only in commercial corridors like Alton Road, Collins and Washington avenues and Ocean Drive, but the city retained the ability to review and deny demolition permits for buildings designated as historic individually or listed as significant or contributing properties in historic districts.
Versions of the Live Local expansion bills passed by both the House and Senate before the last-minute amendments would have fully stripped the city of that power, Fernandez and other city officials said.
Nearly 'Doom of Art Deco'
Fernandez had called the expansion 'the doom of Art Deco' after Lopez, the House bill sponsor, this week stripped from it protections she had agreed to that would have exempted historic districts established before 2000, which includes much of South Beach.
Because the Live Local law already in place allows developers to build to the maximum height allowed by a local jurisdiction within a mile of a property, the expansion would potentially result in the replacement of predominantly two- and three-story buildings in Miami Beach's famed Art Deco District with towers of up to 500 feet, or about 50 stories.
The Shevrin and Garcia amendments reduced that radious to three-quarters of a mile, a provision that could lower some allowed Live Local heights but that Fernandez called insignificant.
City officials believe the legislation is being pushed by developers looking to redevelop South Beach and other neighborhoods where preservation laws and other zoning rules have limited the height and scale of what they can build.
The Live Local expansion represents the third effort by the legislature to open the door to demolition of historically and architecturally significant buildings across the state.
In 2023, a so-called resiliency law that purports to promote redevelopment better suited to meet rising seas and storm surge because of climate change would have had a similar bulldozer effect across Florida, but was significantly scaled back after a statewide uproar. That newer version, passed last year, still leaves significant stretches of Miami Beach's Atlantic shoreline, including some of its most prominent hotels of the 1940s and 1950s, vulnerable to demolition without city interference.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Los Angeles Times
4 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Nation's capital awaits Trump's next move as federal takeover threat looms
WASHINGTON — Around 2 a.m., noisy revelers emerging from clubs and bars packed the sidewalks of U Street in Washington, many of them seeking a late-night slice or falafel. A robust but not unusual contingent of city police cruisers lingered around the edges of the crowds. At other late-night hot spots, nearly identical scenes unfolded. What wasn't apparent in Friday's earliest hours: any sort of security lockdown by a multiagency flood of uniformed federal law enforcement officers. That's what President Trump had promised Thursday, starting at midnight, in the administration's latest move to impose its will on the nation's capital. In short, that law enforcement surge to take control of the District of Columbia's streets did not appear to unfold on schedule. A two-hour city tour, starting around 1 a.m. Friday, revealed no overt or visible law enforcement presence other than members of the Metropolitan Police Department, the city's police force. That might change in the coming evenings as Trump puts into action his long-standing plans to 'take over' a capital city he has repeatedly slammed as unsafe, filthy and badly run. According to his declaration last week, the security lockdown will run for seven days, 'with the option to extend as needed.' In an online post Saturday, the Republican president said the Democratic-led city would soon be one of the country's safest and he announced a White House news conference for Monday, though he offered no details. On Friday night, a White House official said Thursday night's operations included arrests for possession of two stolen firearms, suspected fentanyl and marijuana. The official was not authorized to speak publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. The official said more than 120 members of various federal agencies — the Secret Service, the FBI and the U.S. Marshals Service — were to be on duty Friday night, upping the complement of federal officers involved. 'This is the first step in stopping the violent crime that has been plaguing the streets of Washington, D.C.,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement. Mayor Muriel Bowser, who publicly faced off against Trump in 2020 when he called in a massive federal law enforcement response to disperse crowds of protesters denouncing police brutality and racial profiling, has not said a public word since Trump's declaration. The Metropolitan Police Department has gone similarly silent. The catalyst for this latest round of takeover drama was an assault Aug. 3 during an attempted carjacking on a high-profile member of the White House's government-slashing team known as the Department of Government Efficiency, formerly headed by Elon Musk. Police arrested two 15-year-olds and were seeking others. Trump quickly renewed his calls for the federal government to seize control. 'If D.C. doesn't get its act together, and quickly, we will have no choice but to take Federal control of the City, and run this City how it should be run, and put criminals on notice that they're not going to get away with it anymore,' Trump wrote in a post on his social media site. He later told reporters he was considering a range of alternatives, including repealing Washington's limited 'home rule' autonomy and 'bringing in the National Guard, maybe very quickly,' as he did in Los Angeles in response to protests over his administration's immigration crackdown. The threats come at a time when Bowser's government can tout a reduction in the number of homicides and carjackings, both of which surged in 2023. The number of carjackings overall dropped significantly in 2024, from 957 to just under 500, and is on track to decline again this year, with fewer than 200 recorded so far. The proportion of juveniles arrested on suspicion of carjacking, though, has remained above 50%, and Bowser's government has taken steps to rein in a recent phenomenon of rowdy teenagers causing disarray and disturbances in public spaces. Emergency legislation passed by the D.C. Council this summer imposed tighter youth curfew restrictions and empowered Police Chief Pamela Smith to declare temporary juvenile curfew zones for four days at a time. In those areas, a gathering of nine or more people younger than 18 is unlawful after 8 p.m. Trump is within his powers in deploying federal law enforcement assets on D.C. streets. He could deploy the National Guard, although that is not one of the dozen participating agencies listed in his declaration. The first Trump administration called in the National Guard during Black Lives Matter protests in 2020 and again on Jan. 6, 2021, when his supporters overran the Capitol in a failed attempt to overturn his election defeat. Further steps, including taking over the Police Department, would require a declaration of emergency. Legal experts believe that would most likely be challenged in court. Such an approach would fit the general pattern of Trump's second term in office, when he has declared states of emergency on issues ranging from border protection to economic tariffs. In many cases, he moved forward while the courts sorted it out. Imposing a full federal takeover of Washington would require a congressional repeal of the Home Rule Act of 1973. It's a step that Trump said his administration's lawyers are examining. That law was specific to Washington, not other communities in the United States that have their own home rule powers but generally retain representation in their state legislatures, said Monica Hopkins, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of the District of Columbia. Signed into law by President Nixon, the measure allowed D.C. residents to elect their own mayor, council and local commissioners. The district had been previously run by federally appointed commissioners and members of Congress, some of whom balked at having to deal with potholes and other details of running a city of 700,000 residents. So far, Trump's criticisms of Washington can be felt most directly in the actions of the National Park Service, which controls large pieces of land throughout the capital. In Trump's current administration, the agency has stepped up its clearing of homeless encampments on Park Service land and recently carried out a series of arrests of people smoking marijuana in public parks. The agency said last week that a statue of a Confederate military leader that was toppled by protesters in 2020 would be restored and replaced, in line with an executive order. Khalil and Whitehurst write for the Associated Press. AP writers Mike Pesoli, Michael Kunzelman and Michelle L. Price contributed to this report.


Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
There's a 'profound question' surrounding Joe Biden and the autopen, says Newt Gingrich
Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich weighs in on the issue of former President Joe Biden and the autopen on 'Life, Liberty & Levin.'
![[LIVE 08/11 at 10:30AM ET] Planned Census Recount Could Remake America](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimg.theepochtimes.com%2Fassets%2Fuploads%2F2025%2F08%2F10%2Fid5899490-081125_REC.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Epoch Times
3 hours ago
- Epoch Times
[LIVE 08/11 at 10:30AM ET] Planned Census Recount Could Remake America
President Donald Trump has ordered a new census that does not count illegal immigrants, and this could drastically remake the United States as we know it. The move could shift anywhere from 20 to 40 House seats from Democrats to Republicans, as well as give a more accurate estimate of the number of illegal immigrants in the cou...