71 of 87 witnesses renege, murder accused acquitted
NEW DELHI: In a classic case of witnesses turning hostile, 71 of the 87 witnesses reneged from their statement, including a young boy who in 2011 witnessed his father being hacked to death, paving the way for acquittal of accused with Supreme Court on Friday ruling that conviction could not be held only on the basis of testimony of the police.
Setting aside the high court's conviction order in the murder case, the apex court sympathised with HC judges and said "We quite understand the consternation of the learned judges, in the cold-blooded murder of a person, carried out in front of his own son where the investigation though elaborate, it collapsed miserably at the trial, where the prosecution witnesses; all of them, turned hostile".
Operation Sindoor
PM Modi meets NSA, chiefs of armed forces amid spike in tensions with Pak
India's air defence systems shoot down Pak drones in J&K, Punjab & Rajasthan
Several airports in India to be closed till May 15 - check list
"We share consternation of learned judges but that is no reason for us to rely on the story scripted by investigating agency based on so-called voluntary statements and recoveries made, which prosecution failed to prove to have a nexus with the crime," SC said.
"We cannot but observe that the judgment of the high court reversing the order of acquittal of the trial court proceeds on mere surmises and conjectures relying wholly on the testimony of the investigating officers, who merely regurgitated the statements recorded under Section 161 (statement before police) and the voluntary statements of the accused," the bench said.
The court said that there were not even two views coming forth from the evidence and the only view that comes forth was that the prosecution completely failed to prove the allegations raised and charged against each of the accused, more by reason of all the witnesses paraded before court, at the trial, having turned hostile for reasons unknown.
"Whatever be the reason behind such hostility, it cannot result in a conviction, based on the testimony of the investigating officers, which is founded only on
Section 161 statements
and voluntary statements of accused," it said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 minutes ago
- First Post
'Tehran' star John Abraham: 'When you make films that aren't really secular and they find a massive audience...'
John added, 'They're impactful films, which is why they worked. But then you wonder what your responsibilities are as a producer, as a filmmaker, as an actor.' Actor John Abraham on Tuesday wrote a letter to Chief Justice B R Gavai, urging a review and modification of the recent Supreme Court directive ordering removal of street dogs from the Delhi NCR region. The letter came a day after the Supreme Court directed the authorities to permanently relocate all strays from streets to shelters 'at the earliest'. The 52-year-old, who was named the first honorary director of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) India, said dogs are not strays but rather part of the community and loved by many. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD His film Tehran is currently streaming on Zee5. And in an interview with The Indian Express, the actor said, 'What's very worrisome for me is that in the present political climate, when you make films that aren't really true to the grain of what's really secular, and they find a massive audience, that gets you thinking and worried. I'm not saying they're good or bad films.' John added, 'They're impactful films, which is why they worked. But then you wonder what your responsibilities are as a producer, as a filmmaker, as an actor. And I've chosen to take the path that's probably very real. I'm not right-wing. I'm not left-wing. I am apolitical in my views. I'll probably call myself a socialist capitalist. So I want to stick to the path that actually is true.' On his career I think my career is defined more by my failures than my successes. I believe the films that have stood out for me are the ones that have failed, be it Water, Kabul Express, No Smoking (2007), Madras Cafe, even The Diplomat. I have understood that where I have a voice is when I'm an outlier, when I make the kind of stuff I want to.
The Hindu
2 minutes ago
- The Hindu
West Bengal academics object to certain members of panel selecting V-Cs for 15 State universities
A section of academicians from West Bengal has questioned the presence of certain members in the selection panel for the appointment of Vice-Chancellors (V-C) to about 15 universities in the State. The academicians have objected to the participation in the panel of Ramesh Chandra, former V-C of Maharaja Surajmal Brij University, Bharatpur, Rajasthan, who is facing graft charges, and also retired Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officer S.K. Pattanayak, who is serving in the Raj Bhavan. Professor Chandra was recently removed by the Governor of Rajasthan for allegedly misusing his position and embezzling funds. He is part of the selection panel that's likely to select the V-C of the Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology, Kolkata, sources in the West Bengal Higher Education Department said. 'There are several serious allegations against Prof. Ramesh Chandra and those allegations are under investigation. We do not want such people to be part of the selection panel as it would undermine the whole process of selecting Vice-Chancellors,' Professor Subhradeep Maitra of Raiganj University in West Bengal's Uttar Dinajpur district said. 'It wasn't clear why Prof. Chandra was serving on the panel, or who he was representing,' Prof. Maitra said. In a related development, Manas Kabi, general secretary of the All Bengal Principals' Council, has written a letter to the Chief Justice of India Justice (retd.) U.U. Lalit, Chairperson of the selection panel. In the letter, Prof. Kabi said Mr. Pattanayak had been included in the list of experts in the selection committee, 'perhaps without being aware of the fact that he had retired as an official of Raj Bhavan [and is] serving the Hon'ble Chancellor since his retirement'. 'Now that the process has re-started, we humbly request you to review the suitability of Shri Pattanayak's inclusion in the Selection Committees for recommending candidates for the post of Vice-Chancellors in Sanskrit College and University and Netaji Subhas Open University. As a top ranking official, working for the Hon'ble Chancellor, his impartiality in the process remains open to question, since the Hon'ble Chief Minister and Hon'ble Chancellor have taken different positions regarding the choice of candidates as revealed in the Hon'ble Supreme Court Order dated 1st August 2025,' the letter stated. For the past several years the West Bengal government and the Raj Bhavan have been on a collision course over the appointment of V-Cs. A special leave petition was filed by the West Bengal government, challenging the June 2023 judgment of the Calcutta High Court, which had upheld the interim V-C appointments for State universities made by Governor C.V. Ananda Bose. In July 2024, the Supreme Court had intervened to resolve the ongoing stand-off between the State and the Governor by forming a search-cum-selection committee chaired by former CJI Lalit. Earlier this month, the Supreme Court modified its previous directions, and entrusted the former CJI and the selection committee headed by him with the responsibility of independently determining the most suitable candidates for appointment to the 15 universities. Vice-Chancellors to 17 out of 35 State universities have already been appointed in accordance with the Supreme Court's order, and the selection process for the remaining vacancies is likely to be held in the next few days.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 minutes ago
- First Post
India-China thaw: Are the Dragon and Elephant set to tango again?
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi is currently in India for border talks. Later this month, Prime Minister Narendra Modi will be visiting China. Do these visits signal a push towards normalising ties between the two countries? As Prime Minister Narendra Modi gears up to visit China, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi is in New Delhi between August 18 and 19. Are the two 'Asian Giants' actively working to mend their strained bilateral relations, signalling a push towards normalising ties and fostering greater stability between the two? A series of high-level bilateral engagements have been unfolding. Rebuilding bilateral relations which came under a major strain following the Galwan Valley clashes in June 2020. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD PM Modi is scheduled to attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit from August 31 to September 1, 2025, in Tianjin. He will also have a bilateral with Chinese President Xi Jinping. It will be PM Modi's sixth visit to China. Wang Yi is holding border talks with National Security Advisor (NSA) Ajit Doval. Both are the designated Special Representatives (SR) for the boundary talks between the two countries. This is the 24th round of the SR-level talks. Doval travelled to China in December last year and held the SR talks with Wang Yi. The two had last met in June during the 20th Meeting of the SCO Security Council Secretaries, and had underscored the need to promote overall India-China bilateral relations, including by fostering greater people-to-people ties. Wang will also hold talks with External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar. During the recent Operation Sindoor, India had accused China of providing real-time intelligence and substantial military support to Pakistan. But more recently, there has been a thaw. It started with the Modi-Xi bilateral meeting on the margins of the 16th Brics Summit in Kazan, Russia, in October 2024. Soon, the two sides had reached agreement on patrolling arrangements along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in Depsang and Demchok, clearing the last of the post-Galwan friction points. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and Jaishankar visited China in the last two months to attend the SCO meetings. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Other positives have been, Beijing allowing resumption of the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra, and New Delhi restarting the issuance of tourist visas to Chinese nationals. China confirmed close communication with India to resume direct flights, potentially ending a five-year suspension. The resumption of border trade after a five-year freeze, through designated trade points at Lipulekh Pass in Uttarakhand, Shipki La Pass in Himachal Pradesh, and Nathu La Pass in Sikkim. Trump's strong statements and discriminatory tariffs may have unwittingly achieved what once seemed improbable, a thaw in India-China relations, or at least the first signs of one. Historical Issues and Showdowns India and China have shared millennia of civilisational contact, linked by Buddhism and the Silk Road. Yet since the mid-20th century, the relationship has been dominated by territorial disputes and security concerns. The turning point came with China's annexation of Tibet in 1950, which created a disputed frontier. The 1962 Sino-Indian War left deep scars, followed by clashes at Nathu La and Cho La in 1967 and the Sumdorong Chu standoff in 1987. More recently, the Doklam standoff in 2017 and the Galwan Valley clash in 2020 underscored the fragility of peace along the 3,488-kilometre Line of Actual Control (LAC). STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD China's close strategic alignment with Pakistan remains a key irritant for India, particularly the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), which passes through Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (POK). Beijing's links with insurgent groups in India's Northeast and its assertiveness in the South China Sea add to mistrust. For China, Indian hospitality to the Tibetan exile community and growing participation in the Quad raise concerns. Despite recurring tensions, the two countries have sought economic cooperation. The relationship thus oscillates between confrontation and cautious engagement — a pattern often described as 'managed rivalry.' Modi-Xi Engagements The personal diplomacy between Modi and Xi has shaped the arc of ties over the past decade. Their first significant interaction was in Ahmedabad in 2014, when Modi hosted Xi in his hometown. A year later, Xi received Modi in Xi'an, marking a rare gesture of honour. The relationship soon faced headwinds. By 2016, China had vetoed India's attempts to list Jaish-e-Mohammad chief Masood Azhar as a global terrorist and blocked India's entry into the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG). Modi, in turn, raised India's objections to CPEC passing through POK. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Tensions peaked during the Doklam standoff of 2017, but the impasse ended diplomatically and paved the way for a reset. The Xiamen BRICS Summit later that year and the Wuhan 'informal summit' in 2018 re-established a personal rapport. At Wuhan, Modi and Xi directed their militaries to improve communication and avoid escalation — a step that temporarily stabilised the border. The 2019 Chennai informal summit saw the two leaders engage in a civilisational dialogue at Mahabalipuram, highlighting cultural connectivity. But Galwan in 2020 brought a major rupture, leading to a long freeze in high-level political contact. Only in October 2024 did the two leaders meet again in Kazan, Russia, on the margins of the BRICS Summit. That meeting produced agreement on disengagement at remaining flashpoints and a commitment to resume SR-level boundary talks. Modi's upcoming Tianjin visit thus builds on that fragile renewal. Confidence Building Measures Over the decades, India and China have negotiated several CBMs to manage tensions along the LAC. These agreements limit the size and proximity of military exercises near the border, mandate prior notification of significant troop movements, and establish flag-meetings and hotline links between commanders. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD They also cover cooperation against cross-border smuggling and provisions to address airspace violations or accidental incursions. Such mechanisms are designed to prevent misperceptions from spiralling into conflict. Yet CBMs are not infallible. Both sides have occasionally violated or interpreted them differently, leading to standoffs. Still, they provide an essential buffer in the absence of a final boundary settlement and remain the best available tools for reducing risk. Trade Deficit and Economic Ties Economics remains a paradoxical pillar of the relationship. In 2024-25, bilateral trade reached $127.7 billion, with India's exports at just $14.9 billion against imports of $127 billion — leaving a record trade deficit of $99.2 billion. India primarily exports raw materials such as petroleum products and iron ore, while importing large volumes of manufactured goods — especially electronics, telecom equipment, computer hardware, batteries, and solar modules. This imbalance underlines India's dependence on Chinese supply chains. Efforts are underway to diversify trade. Talks include expanded pharmaceutical exports from India to China, cooperation on rare earth magnets critical for high-tech industries, and renewed fertilizer exports, particularly urea. For India, reducing the deficit is not only an economic goal but also a strategic imperative tied to self-reliance campaigns such as Aatmanirbhar Bharat. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Dragon-Elephant Tango The idea of a 'Dragon-Elephant tango' captures the potential of cooperative relations between the two Asian giants. Stable ties could allow both countries to redirect resources from military build-ups toward development. Economically, complementarities are obvious: China dominates rare-earth production, APIs, and solar technology, while India offers a vast consumer market and a growing technology and pharmaceutical base. Collaboration could sustain growth in both economies. On the global stage, India and China together wield considerable weight in forums like BRICS, SCO, G20, and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. Coordinated positions could shape reforms in global trade and financial governance, reducing Western dominance. For such a tango to succeed, both sides must respect each other's strategic sensitivities: India's concerns over CPEC and China's anxieties about the Quad. Challenges Ahead Despite the thaw, challenges remain formidable. The boundary dispute is unresolved, with the LAC often contested. The Doklam and Galwan episodes reveal how quickly local incidents can escalate. The durability of CBMs is uncertain without a comprehensive settlement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD hina's 'all-weather' partnership with Pakistan complicates India's security calculus, especially with CPEC's passage through POK. India, meanwhile, is strengthening its partnerships through the Quad and Act East policy, signalling caution towards Chinese assertiveness in the Indo-Pacific. Water security is another concern, with China constructing dams on the upper reaches of the Brahmaputra. Though India receives most of the river's flow within its territory, Beijing's upstream projects are viewed as potential leverage. Economically, India must address its trade deficit and reduce over-dependence on Chinese imports. 'Vocal for Local' and diversification through forums such as BIMSTEC and deeper ties with ASEAN, Japan, Australia, and Europe are steps in this direction. Smaller South Asian neighbours, wary of Chinese debt-driven projects, are also open to closer ties with India. The broader rivalry is unlikely to disappear. But managing it effectively — through caution, diversification, and calibrated engagement — is essential. Way Forward India and China need to maintain open channels of communication through bilateral or regional cooperation like in Brics, SCO, etc. They need to rebuild the relations based on a threefold formula of mutual respect, mutual sensitivity and mutual interest. India must balance strategic caution with engagement, maintaining sovereignty while avoiding unnecessary escalation. In his book, The India Way: Strategies for an Uncertain World, Jaishankar argues that managing China is about realism, agility, and strategic clarity. In this context, it would be prudent for India to pursue a steady course of balancing engagement with deterrence, leveraging global partnerships, and asserting its interests without becoming a proxy in larger power rivalries. The writer is former Director General, Centre for Air Power Studies. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
