logo
Judge denies TikTok's request to dismiss Utah's case alleging sexual exploitation of children

Judge denies TikTok's request to dismiss Utah's case alleging sexual exploitation of children

Yahoo22-02-2025
A judge on Friday denied TikTok's request to dismiss a case filed by Utah over allegations the company knowingly profits off child sexual exploitation.
In the lawsuit, Utah Division of Consumer Protection vs. TikTok, filed in June 2024, the state alleges TikTok is aware its livestream feature allows young users to be sexually exploited, with the allegations based on internal studies and admissions by employees.
'TikTok's design tactics encourage and allow it to profit from crime and the sexual exploitation of children,' the suit states. 'These deceptive and unconscionable practices violate Utah's Consumer Sales Practices Act and harm Utah's consumers.'
TikTok tried to get the case dismissed, but on Friday, 3rd District Court Judge Coral Sanchez denied the request.
'Protecting Utah children from exploitation and the harms that TikTok knowingly inflicts upon them is one of my highest priorities as attorney general,' Utah Attorney General Derek Brown said in a press release, responding to news of the dismissal. 'I am grateful for the court's decision that allows Utah's lawsuit against TikTok to move forward, helping us protect young people from sexual exploitation. This decision will help me in my fight to protect and defend Utah children.'
About the case, a TikTok spokesperson previously said, 'TikTok has industry-leading policies and measures to help protect the safety and well-being of teens. Creators must be at least 18 years old before they can go LIVE, and their account must meet a follower requirement. We immediately revoke access to features if we find accounts that do not meet our age requirements.'
Over the past few years, attorneys general across the country have tried to address safety concerns associated with children and teens using social media platforms like TikTok and Snapchat. In a joint letter signed and sent in 2022 by 44 AGs to the two online platforms, the attorneys warned of 'online dangers including cyberbullying, drug use and sexual predation' that children are allegedly subjected to while using the apps.
Utah filed its first lawsuit against TikTok in October 2023. In that consumer protection suit, the state alleged TikTok was aware its social media app was addictive via features such as the algorithm and push notifications.
About that suit, a TikTok spokesperson previously said, 'TikTok has industry-leading safeguards for young people, including an automatic 60-minute time limit for users under 18 and parental controls for teen accounts. We will continue to work to keep our community safe by tackling industry-wide challenges.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why China Is Dunking On The Trump Administration's New TikTok Account
Why China Is Dunking On The Trump Administration's New TikTok Account

Forbes

time13 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Why China Is Dunking On The Trump Administration's New TikTok Account

As TikTok fast approaches another potential ban in the U.S., the Chinese government is refusing to let its algorithm be sold. Future Publishing via Getty Images As the Trump administration approaches the end of its third legally dubious extension of the TikTok sale-or-ban law, the Chinese Communist Party is making one thing very clear: the app's For You algorithm, developed by the app's Chinese parent company, ByteDance, will not be sold anytime soon. That's because last time ByteDance tried to sell the algorithm — under threat of a TikTok ban during President Trump's first term — the Chinese government changed its export rules at the last minute to prevent the company from making the sale. Today, the CCP reiterated its stance on a TikTok sale in an editorial in the state-owned media outlet China Daily. The editorial began by applauding the Trump White House for creating an official TikTok Account — and gloating at the inconsistency between the White House's actions and Congress's ban of TikTok for national security reasons last year. 'TikTok's appeal and effectiveness as a communication channel has not been lost on even the White House,' it opened. 'That the White House launched its own account on the app less than one month before the third extended deadline expires only serves to expose the hypocrisy of the U.S. side's alleged 'security' charges against TikTok.' Then, the editorial went on to remind readers that ByteDance, as a Chinese company, 'must comply with Chinese laws and regulations,' and that Chinese law 'prohibits the export of core technologies such as short video algorithms, drawing a red line for the TikTok transaction.' The editorial expressed hope that Trump would indefinitely extend his non-enforcement of the binding U.S. law that requires TikTok to be sold to a non-Chinese company or banned in the U.S. The Chinese government's stance does not necessarily mean that Trump and ByteDance will abandon efforts to make some kind of a deal. But it does mean that sale of the For You algorithm — which is core to TikTok's function and appeal — won't be on the table. TikTok has been planning for this eventuality. In May, Reuters reported that the company was working on creating a U.S.-only clone of the For You algorithm, which could be used in a potential separation of U.S. TikTok from the existing app. (It is unclear whether the Chinese government would take issue with TikTok launching a U.S. only algorithm, if that algorithm is based in whole or in part on the Chinese asset whose sale the CCP has barred.) In July, The Information reported that the company was working on a separate U.S. TikTok app, to be launched in early September, before Trump's impending September 17 deadline. If TikTok does proceed with launching a U.S.-only app, it will have to be powered by an algorithm of some kind. The Chinese government is suggesting that algorithm can't be ByteDance's trademark For You Page. The status of a clone algorithm is still up in the air, both technologically and legally. So TikTok may be — at least in the short-to-medium term — somewhat stuck. In the meantime, Trump may do what he has done before and grant yet another extension, allowing the company to continue operating in the U.S. in violation of binding U.S. law. But Trump's own Commerce Secretary, Howard Lutnick, has been singing a different tune, saying that TikTok will go dark in September unless the Chinese government approves a sale. Trump and the Chinese government might also agree to a non-sale sale: an agreement that allows functional Chinese control over TikTok to continue, but gives Trump the cosmetic win of closing a deal of some kind. Such a deal would likely violate the law that Congress passed last year — but the burden would fall on Congress and the courts to require compliance. As the third extension moves toward expiration, one of two things seems certain: either Trump will continue to flout the law and allow TikTok to remain under Chinese control, or TikTok will change — somewhat dramatically — because the tech that has defined it will be out of reach. More From Forbes Forbes With Trump's TikTok Ban On Hold, ByteDance Is Quietly Launching AI Apps By Emily Baker-White Forbes TikTokers Are Claiming Credit For Trump's Parade Attendance By Emily Baker-White Forbes Trump's Deadline For A TikTok Deal Is Almost Up. Here Are 5 Things To Watch By Emily Baker-White

The White House is on TikTok now, which is technically banned in the U.S.
The White House is on TikTok now, which is technically banned in the U.S.

TechCrunch

time2 hours ago

  • TechCrunch

The White House is on TikTok now, which is technically banned in the U.S.

The White House joined TikTok on Tuesday, where it's sharing video clips of President Donald Trump and his staff that attempt to portray them as a quick-witted, rebellious American leaders. These clips, edited together like a sizzle reel, show Trump declining phone calls from Congressmen and threatening lawsuits during a press conference. Another video boasts that Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt 'rips' a New York Times reporter after he asked a question at a press conference. Despite the app's legal battles, TikTok remains a vital way for political candidates and government offices to connect with constituents. But by operating this TikTok account, the White House appears to defy government guidelines, as federal employees were previously banned from using TikTok on government devices. Trump himself initiated the calls to ban TikTok nationally in 2020, citing the danger of the Chinese Communist Party potentially accessing American user data. But in his second term, the president has taken a different approach. While the Supreme Court upheld a law that bans TikTok if it is not sold to an American company, Trump has continually extended the sale deadline. TechCrunch has reached out to TikTok for comment. Reception to the White House videos has been decidedly mixed. As of Wednesday morning, each of the five videos that the White House has uploaded to TikTok have been spammed with negative comments, many of them referencing the president's friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, the financier and convicted child sex offender who died awaiting trial.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store