logo
SC refuses to entertain petition against Assam ‘pushing' back declared foreigners to Bangladesh

SC refuses to entertain petition against Assam ‘pushing' back declared foreigners to Bangladesh

Scroll.in02-06-2025
The Supreme Court on Monday refused to entertain a petition challenging the Assam government 'pushing' back to Bangladesh persons who have been declared foreigners by the Foreigners Tribunals in the state, Live Law reported.
A bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and SC Sharma was hearing a petition filed by the All BTC Minority Students Union, which claimed that the Bharatiya Janata Party government in the state was arbitrarily pushing Indian citizens to Bangladesh without following due process under the guise of deporting undocumented migrants.
'Why are you not going to the Gauhati High Court?' PTI quoted the bench as asking advocate Sanjay Hegde, who appeared for the All BTC Minority Students Union. In response, Hegde said that the petition was based on an order passed by the top court earlier.
The advocate also said that the union would withdraw the petition and take recourse before the High Court. The Supreme Court then allowed him to withdraw the petition.
The petition came against the backdrop of a surge in detentions of declared foreigners in Assam since May 23. Families say they have no information on their relatives' whereabouts. Some of them have identified their missing relatives in videos from Bangladesh, alleging they were forcibly sent across the border.
Scroll had earlier reported that a former teacher from Morigaon district, Khairul Islam, whose citizenship case was still being heard in the Supreme Court, had been picked up from the Matia detention centre and forced out along the Bangladesh border near Assam's South Salmara district in the early hours of May 27.
In a video recorded by journalist Mostafuzur Tara from Bangladesh's Rangpur division, Khairul Islam alleged that he was among 14 persons 'pushed' into Bangladesh by India's Border Security Force on the morning of May 27.
Islam and the others were reported to be in no man's land, between the two countries.
Three days later, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma admitted to 'pushing' back persons who were declared foreigners by the Foreigners Tribunals to Bangladesh. Stating that the process to push back foreigners would continue, Sarma claimed that the action was being taken as per the directives issued by the Supreme Court in February.
On February 4, the Supreme Court directed the state government to start the process of deporting foreign nationals being held in the state's detention centres immediately.
It had said that foreign nationals can be deported even without an address. 'You cannot continue to detain them indefinitely...Once they are held to be foreigners, they should be deported immediately.'
Foreigners Tribunals in Assam are quasi-judicial bodies that adjudicate on matters of citizenship. Only those living in the state before March 25, 1971, or their descendants, qualify as Indian citizens in Assam, as per the Assam Accord.
However, these tribunals have been accused of arbitrariness and bias, and of declaring people foreigners on the basis of minor spelling mistakes, a lack of documents or lapses in memory.
In its petition, the All BTC Minority Students Union said that after the February 4 order, the Assam government had 'reportedly launched a sweeping and indiscriminate drive to detain and deport individuals suspected to be foreigners, even in the absence of Foreigners Tribunal declarations, nationality verification, or exhaustion of legal remedies', PTI reported.
Referring to several news reports about persons being 'pushed' into Bangladesh, the petition said that these instances reflected a 'growing pattern of deportations conducted by the Assam Police and administrative machinery through informal 'push back' mechanisms, without any judicial oversight or adherence to the safeguards envisaged by the Constitution of India or this court'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Days after India tariffs, US cautions against sanctioning China over Russian oil
Days after India tariffs, US cautions against sanctioning China over Russian oil

Hindustan Times

time25 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Days after India tariffs, US cautions against sanctioning China over Russian oil

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has cited "implications" that could play out globally if a country like China is sanctioned for its oil trade with Russia. His remarks come weeks after US President Donald Trump threatened an additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian imports for buying Russian oil. US President Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping.(Reuters/Representative) In an interview with Fox News, Rubio was asked if plans to sanction Europe for buying Russian oil were on the table. Responding to the question, the US official spoke about implications to secondary sanctions, and citing China's example said, "Let's say you were to go after the oil sales oil to China, China just refines that oil, which is sold into the global marketplace and anyone who is buying that oil would be paying more for it or if it doesn't exist, would have to find an alternative source for it." Marco Rubio further spoke about a Senate bill proposing to sanction countries like India and China for buying Russian oil, and said the US did hear from "a number of European countries" regarding some concerns they may have had about it. Rubio's latest remarks on risks to sanctioning China bring focus back on criticism of India being singled out for getting additional tariffs over buying Russian oil. Earlier, when Donald Trump was asked by only India was being targeted over its trade with Russia, he had said, "It's only been 8 hours. So let's see what happens. You're going to see a lot going to see so much secondary sanctions.' After Trump doubled India's duties to 50% earlier this month, New Delhi had issued a strong response, pointing out that the US was targeting India for "actions that several other countries are also taking". However, after his high-stakes meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, Trump seemed to have softened his stance on additional tariffs against countries doing business with Russia. "Well, because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about that (tariffs)," Trump told Fox News' Sean Hannity in an interview after the meeting. Notably, Trump recently extended the tariff deadline for China, which was set to end on August 12, by another 90 days. Presently, US charges 30% tariffs on Chinese imports, including a 10% base rate and 20% in fentanyl-related tariffs imposed by Washington in February and March.

Progress was made in Trump-Putin summit, even as sticking points remain
Progress was made in Trump-Putin summit, even as sticking points remain

Indian Express

time25 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Progress was made in Trump-Putin summit, even as sticking points remain

US President Donald Trump's decision to align with Russian President Vladimir Putin's approach to peace in Ukraine at the Alaska Summit has provoked sharp criticism in Europe and at home. Yet this reaction may be missing the essence of what Trump is trying to do. He has long been indifferent to the censure of the mainstream press and foreign policy establishment that labels him 'soft on Putin.' Trump has endured that line of attack for a decade, including attempts to remove him from the White House during his first term. Across three presidential campaigns — in 2016, 2020, and 2024 — Trump has consistently reaffirmed his conviction that the United States needs better relations with Russia. In his latest campaign, he promised a quick end to the war in Ukraine. The Alaska Summit was the culmination of that commitment. By moving beyond the narrow objective of a ceasefire and pressing for a peace agreement, Trump has signalled recognition of battlefield realities, rather than deference to Putin. Speaking to a television channel after the summit, Trump bluntly stated that Ukraine has little chance of defeating Russia, a far larger power. Both leaders spoke of 'considerable progress' in Alaska. The main sticking point, however, remains the issue of territorial concessions. Putin is pressing for Ukraine to cede parts of the Donbas still under its control in return for Russia freezing the rest of the frontline. For Kyiv, this is a bitter pill to swallow. Trump has said he will urge Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy —due at the White House on Monday — to accept concessions in exchange for the benefits of peace. Europe, briefed by Trump after the summit, has not outrightly rejected the idea of territorial compromise. But European leaders insist on robust security guarantees for Ukraine and the preservation of its freedom to choose its security partners. The reality, however, is stark: Neither Ukraine nor Europe holds a veto over US policy. Should Trump decide to disengage from Ukraine — a move that would resonate strongly with his anti-war MAGA base — Kyiv's resistance would collapse quickly. Europe, for its part, lacks the capacity to replace Washington as Ukraine's security guarantor. This imbalance creates space for Trump's peace diplomacy in the coming weeks. Flexibility in Kyiv and Brussels could open the door for a second Trump-Putin summit to formalise new arrangements for Ukraine. But entrenched resistance to compromise across the Atlantic could still derail the process. India, for its part, welcomed the progress at Alaska. A thaw in US-Russia relations tends to widen India's geopolitical space. Yet Delhi faces an immediate challenge: Trump's threat of secondary tariffs on Indian purchases of Russian oil. These tariffs, set to take effect on August 27, could impose a crippling 50 per cent duty on Indian exports to the US, its most important trading partner. At the summit's close, Trump sent mixed signals by saying he would decide on the tariffs 'in a couple of weeks,' once the Ukraine situation becomes clearer. For India, the moment demands deft diplomacy abroad and a credible economic plan at home to cope with the potential shock of punitive tariffs.

India News Updates: Chinese FM coming to India today, likely to discuss trade issues
India News Updates: Chinese FM coming to India today, likely to discuss trade issues

Time of India

time25 minutes ago

  • Time of India

India News Updates: Chinese FM coming to India today, likely to discuss trade issues

18 Aug 2025 | 06:46:05 AM IST Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi has confirmed his trip to India last week and is expected to arrive in New Delhi today. Earlier this week ET had reported that the two countries are expected commence discussions shortly on a trade package covering supplies of critical rare earth magnets, fertilisers and pharmaceuticals. This would signal a thaw in relations with the neighbour amid heightening tensions with the US and the clamour from Indian industry to expedite imports of essential inputs from China. Show more

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store