
SC refuses to entertain petition against Assam ‘pushing' back declared foreigners to Bangladesh
The Supreme Court on Monday refused to entertain a petition challenging the Assam government 'pushing' back to Bangladesh persons who have been declared foreigners by the Foreigners Tribunals in the state, Live Law reported.
A bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and SC Sharma was hearing a petition filed by the All BTC Minority Students Union, which claimed that the Bharatiya Janata Party government in the state was arbitrarily pushing Indian citizens to Bangladesh without following due process under the guise of deporting undocumented migrants.
'Why are you not going to the Gauhati High Court?' PTI quoted the bench as asking advocate Sanjay Hegde, who appeared for the All BTC Minority Students Union. In response, Hegde said that the petition was based on an order passed by the top court earlier.
The advocate also said that the union would withdraw the petition and take recourse before the High Court. The Supreme Court then allowed him to withdraw the petition.
The petition came against the backdrop of a surge in detentions of declared foreigners in Assam since May 23. Families say they have no information on their relatives' whereabouts. Some of them have identified their missing relatives in videos from Bangladesh, alleging they were forcibly sent across the border.
Scroll had earlier reported that a former teacher from Morigaon district, Khairul Islam, whose citizenship case was still being heard in the Supreme Court, had been picked up from the Matia detention centre and forced out along the Bangladesh border near Assam's South Salmara district in the early hours of May 27.
In a video recorded by journalist Mostafuzur Tara from Bangladesh's Rangpur division, Khairul Islam alleged that he was among 14 persons 'pushed' into Bangladesh by India's Border Security Force on the morning of May 27.
Islam and the others were reported to be in no man's land, between the two countries.
Three days later, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma admitted to 'pushing' back persons who were declared foreigners by the Foreigners Tribunals to Bangladesh. Stating that the process to push back foreigners would continue, Sarma claimed that the action was being taken as per the directives issued by the Supreme Court in February.
On February 4, the Supreme Court directed the state government to start the process of deporting foreign nationals being held in the state's detention centres immediately.
It had said that foreign nationals can be deported even without an address. 'You cannot continue to detain them indefinitely...Once they are held to be foreigners, they should be deported immediately.'
Foreigners Tribunals in Assam are quasi-judicial bodies that adjudicate on matters of citizenship. Only those living in the state before March 25, 1971, or their descendants, qualify as Indian citizens in Assam, as per the Assam Accord.
However, these tribunals have been accused of arbitrariness and bias, and of declaring people foreigners on the basis of minor spelling mistakes, a lack of documents or lapses in memory.
In its petition, the All BTC Minority Students Union said that after the February 4 order, the Assam government had 'reportedly launched a sweeping and indiscriminate drive to detain and deport individuals suspected to be foreigners, even in the absence of Foreigners Tribunal declarations, nationality verification, or exhaustion of legal remedies', PTI reported.
Referring to several news reports about persons being 'pushed' into Bangladesh, the petition said that these instances reflected a 'growing pattern of deportations conducted by the Assam Police and administrative machinery through informal 'push back' mechanisms, without any judicial oversight or adherence to the safeguards envisaged by the Constitution of India or this court'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
7 minutes ago
- India.com
YouTube Star-Turned Spy? Meet Another Influencer With 1.1M Fans Nabbed For Spying For Pakistan's ISI
New Delhi: In a dramatic bust that has rocked the digital influencer world, the Punjab Police has arrested Jasbir Singh – the man behind the massively popular YouTube channel Jaan Mahal, boasting over 1.1 million subscribers. His alleged crime? Espionage. According to authorities, Singh was allegedly working with Pakistan's notorious spy agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), apart from filming videos for social media. A resident of Mehli village in Punjab's Rupnagar district, he was nabbed in Mohali by the Special Operations Cell (SSOC) of the Punjab Police. Investigators claim he had been in contact with a known ISI asset, Shakir alias Jatt Randhawa – an Indian-origin alleged operative working for Pakistani intelligence. But the rabbit hole goes deeper. Sources say Singh was also in touch with Danish, aka Ehsan-ur-Rahim – a Pakistani official previously posted at the Pakistan High Commission in Delhi. Danish had been expelled from India over espionage charges. Despite this, Singh allegedly maintained links with him, adding another layer of intrigue to the already explosive case. Even more startling are Singh's repeated visits to Pakistan – not once, but three times – in 2020, 2021 and 2024. He even attended a high-profile "Pakistan Day" event at the country's embassy in Delhi, where he was seen rubbing shoulders with Pakistani military officers and vloggers. The police say Singh was closely connected to Haryana-based YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra, who was also arrested just weeks ago on similar spying charges and accompanied her on some of these trips. Acting swiftly on actionable intelligence, State Special Operations Cell (#SSOC), Mohali has unearthed a critical espionage network linked to Jasbir Singh, a resident of Village Mahlan, #Rupnagar. Jasbir Singh, who operates a #YouTube channel called 'Jaan Mahal,' has been found… — DGP Punjab Police (@DGPPunjabPolice) June 4, 2025 During searches of Singh's digital devices, the police reportedly discovered more than 100 Pakistani phone numbers. Following Malhotra's arrest, Singh allegedly scrambled to delete incriminating chats and contacts linked to ISI handlers but it was too late. The arrests do not stop there. So far, seven people have been taken into custody as part of this deepening ISI-linked espionage network. The accused hail from Amritsar, Malerkotla and Gurdaspur, including individuals like Falaksher Masih, Suraj Masih and Sukpreet Singh. They are accused of leaking sensitive Indian military information to Pakistan. A senior police official confirmed, 'This is a well-coordinated espionage ring. Our investigations are ongoing, and we are closing in on every single individual connected to it.' This sensational case has triggered alarm bells across intelligence agencies, raising concerns over how social media influencers are being lured into high-stakes international spy games.

The Hindu
7 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Trump announces travel ban affecting dozen countries including Afghanistan and Iran
U.S. President Donald Trump is resurrecting the travel ban policy from his first term, signing a proclamation Wednesday (June 5, 2025) night preventing people from a dozen countries from entering the United States. The countries include Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. In addition to the ban, which takes effect at 12.01 a.m. Monday (June 9, 2025), there will be heightened restrictions on visitors from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. 'I must act to protect the national security and national interest of the United States and its people,' Mr. Trump said in his proclamation. The list results from a Jan. 20 executive order Mr. Trump issued requiring the departments of State and Homeland Security and the Director of National Intelligence to compile a report on 'hostile attitudes' toward the U.S. and whether entry from certain countries represented a national security risk. During his first term, Mr. Trump issued an executive order in January 2017 banning travel to the U.S. by citizens of seven predominantly Muslim countries — Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. It was one of the most chaotic and confusing moments of his young presidency. Travelers from those nations were either barred from getting on their flights to the U.S. or detained at U.S. airports after they landed. They included students and faculty as well as businesspeople, tourists and people visiting friends and family. The order, often referred to as the 'Muslim ban' or the 'travel ban,' was retooled amid legal challenges, until a version was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018. The ban affected various categories of travelers and immigrants from Iran, Somalia, Yemen, Syria and Libya, plus North Koreans and some Venezuelan government officials and their families. Trump and others have defended the initial ban on national security grounds, arguing it was aimed at protecting the country and not founded on anti-Muslim bias. However, the president had called for an explicit ban on Muslims during his first campaign for the White House.


Hindustan Times
23 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
HT Interview: India, Aus ties have moved to a higher level, says Marles
Australia backs India's efforts to combat terrorism and the halting of military actions with Pakistan last month was 'an act of Indian leadership', Australian deputy prime minister Richard Marles said on Wednesday, while outlining Canberra's plans to foster closer defence and security ties with New Delhi. In a conversation with HT, Marles, who is also defence minister, spoke about China's backing of Pakistan during recent clashes with India, saying both Delhi and Canberra feel China's massive military build-up has had 'an impact on the strategic landscape of the Indo-Pacific', and expressed hope that am India-Australia comprehensive economic cooperation agreement (CECA) will be concluded soon. Edited excepts: Q: As India and Australia mark five years of their comprehensive strategic partnership, you've said the re-elected Albanese government is going to be more ambitious. How do you look back at these five years and what's next? Marles: India's place in Australia's worldview has grown dramatically under Prime Minister [Narendra] Modi's leadership. The bilateral relationship has gone to a greater level - we're doing more economically together and have never been more strategically aligned. This is reflected in our much greater security and defence relationship, which is not just in terms of how we engage in forums that we meet in, the way in which we speak, but actually at a practical level, we're doing more. [Something] as specific as maritime domain awareness, what we're doing with our Boeing P-8 surveillance aircraft that both countries use. When you're sharing that kind of information, you're only doing that with the closest of friends. This collaboration enormously enhances our ability to see the ocean for both India and Australia. Q: One focus area for Australia is ensuring the Indo-Pacific remains free, open and secure, and you are looking very closely at the Indian Ocean. Australia gifted a patrol boat to the Maldives during your visit. What more would you like do with India in the Indian Ocean? Marles: We want to see a free and open Indian Ocean and work with India as the major player here. From Australia's perspective, 50% of our trade goes past the front door here. We've got a deep national interest in the rules of the road applying in the Indian Ocean, freedom of navigation, the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, freedom of trade. The Maldives patrol boat gift builds on our Pacific Island programme experience. It presents an opportunity for us to cooperate with India in supporting smaller nations' maritime capabilities. Q: There's been a fundamental shift in India-Australia defence ties, including the signing of a logistics support agreement and an air-to-air refuelling agreement. How do you plan to expand interoperability and exercises? Marles: There is a whole lot of ambition that we have. The world's complexity and our strategic alignment make closer cooperation increasingly attractive. There's more we can do in maritime domain awareness and expanding exercises - bilaterally and potentially with other countries. We see opportunities in intelligence-sharing. But the biggest area is maritime domain awareness and activity. We want progress on key agreements and roadmaps leading to this year's 2+2 meeting [of defence and foreign ministers] and leaders' summit. This is a crucial year for advancement. Q: China's military activities across the region are a concern for many countries and there are clear signs China backed Pakistan, in terms of equipment and surveillance, during the recent clashes with India. In that context, how does Australia view the hostilities between India and Pakistan? Marles: Though there's two points [here]. We condemn the Pahalgam terrorist attack. Our sympathies are with the families who lost loved ones. We stand with India and all countries combating terrorism. We acknowledge and welcome the stoppage of military activity - we see that as an act of Indian leadership. We'll continue working with India to combat terrorism in all forms. Regarding China - our relationship is complex. It's our largest trading partner, but we have security concerns we've expressed to China directly. We're watching the world's biggest conventional military buildup since WWII, done without strategic reassurance. China's intent remains unclear, and this impacts the Indo-Pacific's strategic landscape. We feel that, India feels that. Since our last 2+2 meeting in November 2023, these issues have become more complex. The reasons for India-Australia cooperation have only grown. Q: The Economic Cooperation and Trade Agreement (ECTA) changed the economic landscape between India and Australia. How far are we on the path towards the comprehensive economic cooperation agreement (CECA)? Marles: We've seen real progress across the four economic roadmap areas PM Albanese outlined - education, green energy, agriculture and tourism. CECA negotiations continue. We're hopeful for a conclusion in the not-too-distant future, which would elevate our trading arrangements. Over the last five years, India's trade with Australia has grown at double the rate of its trade with the rest of the world. The India-Australia trading relationship, measured against all of India's trading relationships, is a standout. What we've achieved has made a huge difference, and we're excited about the next level. It's a huge opportunity - our economies are complementary. Q: Is there anything in particular holding up negotiations on CECA? Marles: No, negotiations are going well. It's natural that people bring different positions that need working through. We're pleased with progress and hopeful for a near-future conclusion. Q: India is set to host the Quad Summit at a time when the US administration appears to be more inward-looking. What would Australia like to see on the agenda of the Quad Summit? Marles: I don't necessarily accept that assertion. We all want American leadership, but the Quad has always been an opportunity for four like-minded democracies with shared values to cooperate for the Indo-Pacific's benefit. This meeting is important for continuing Quad momentum across current engagement areas. We want to see that expanded. As the first Quad Summit of the Trump administration, it has significance. The Quad is important for our countries' Indo-Pacific leadership, making this meeting crucial. Q: Do you think the Indian government's concerns about activities of Khalistani separatists in Australia have been addressed? Are there still concerns about their activities? Marles: I hope not. People in Australia have the right to their views, but there's no sympathy for the Khalistani movement from the Australian government - none at all. We take our obligations to provide security for India's missions very seriously. Q: How do you plan on building on the role of the Indian diaspora in Australia to further strengthen bilateral relations? Marles: The Indian diaspora is a wonderful asset for Australia. It's our fastest growing community, bringing energy and industry to the Australian economy. We are huge recipients of their contributions.