California ammunition background checks declared unconstitutional by US appeals court

Straits Times

5 days ago

Find out what's new on ST website and app.
Guns and ammunition for sale in Sacramento, California.
A divided federal appeals court on July 24 said California's first-of-its-kind law requiring firearm owners to undergo background checks to buy ammunition is unconstitutional, violating the Second Amendment right to bear arms.
In a 2-1 vote, the ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals in Pasadena, California upheld a lower court judge's permanent injunction against enforcing the law.
Circuit Judge Sandra Ikuta said the law 'meaningfully constrains' people's right to keep and bear arms.
She also said California failed to show the law was consistent with the country's historical tradition of firearm regulation as required under
a 2022 landmark US Supreme Court decision, New York State Rifle and Pistol Association vs Bruen.
'By subjecting Californians to background checks for all ammunition purchases, California's ammunition background check regime infringes on the fundamental right to keep and bear arms,' Ms Ikuta wrote.
California officials expressed disappointment.
'Today's decision is a slap in the face to the progress California has made in recent years to keep its communities safer from gun violence,' Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom said in a statement.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Business GIC posts 3.8% annualised return over 20 years despite economic uncertainties
Business GIC's focus on long-term value aims to avoid permanent loss amid intensifying economic changes
Opinion No idle punt: Why Singapore called out cyber saboteur UNC3886 by name
Asia Both Cambodia, Thailand willing to consider ceasefire, says Malaysian PM Anwar
Singapore Singapore urges all parties in Thailand-Cambodia border dispute to exercise restraint
Business MAS' measures spark cautious optimism for Singapore stock market revival: Analysts
World Trump, Fed chief Powell bicker during tense central bank visit
Life Hulk Hogan, who helped turn pro wrestling into a billion-dollar spectacle, dies at 71
A spokesperson for state Attorney General Rob Bonta, also a Democrat, said 'our families, schools, and neighborhoods deserve nothing less than the most basic protection against preventable gun violence, and we are looking into our legal options.'
All three judges on July 24's panel were appointed by Republican presidents, though appointees of Democratic presidents hold a 9th Circuit majority.
California can ask an 11-judge appeals court panel or the Supreme Court to review the decision.
The plaintiffs included Ms Kim Rhode, who has won three Olympic gold medals in shooting events, and the California Rifle & Pistol Association.
In a joint statement, the group's president and general counsel Chuck Michel called the decision a victory against 'overreaching government gun control,' while Ms Rhode called it 'a big win for all gun owners in California.'
Many gun rights groups and 24 mostly Republican-led US states submitted briefs supporting the law's opponents, while a few gun safety groups sided with California.
Ms Janet Carter, managing director of Second Amendment litigation at Everytown Law, in a statement said California's law imposed a 'minimal burden,' a US$1 (SS$1.20) fee and one-minute delay, for most firearms owners seeking ammunition.
'Background checks for ammunition sales are common sense,' she said.
Voters had in 2016 approved a California ballot measure requiring gun owners to undergo initial background checks to buy ammunition, and buy four-year ammunition permits.
Legislators later amended the measure to require background checks for each ammunition purchase.
California said it received 191 reports in 2024 of 'armed and prohibited individuals' who were blocked through background checks from buying ammunition.
The injunction was issued by US District Judge Roger Benitez in San Diego, who has ruled in several cases in favour of gun owners.
An appeals court panel put the injunction on hold during California's appeal.
California said several old firearms restrictions supported the background checks.
These included colonial era rules requiring licenses to produce gunpowder, the disarmament around 1776 of people who refused to take 'loyalty oaths,' and late-19th century rules requiring government permission to carry concealed weapons.
Circuit Judge Jay Bybee dissented from the decision.
He accused the majority of flouting Supreme Court guidance by effectively declaring unlawful any limits on ammunition sales, given the unlikelihood a state can point to identical historical analogues.
The law 'is not the kind of heavy-handed regulation that meaningfully constrains the right to keep and bear arms,' Mr Bybee wrote.
President George W. Bush appointed Ms Ikuta and Mr Bybee to the bench, while President Donald Trump appointed Circuit Judge Bridget Bade, who joined the majority. REUTERS