logo
If Congress doesn't save Social Security, Trump's cuts will cost you: $6,800 a year

If Congress doesn't save Social Security, Trump's cuts will cost you: $6,800 a year

Yahoo21-04-2025

For nearly 100 years, the United States has maintained one of the world's more successful models of social insurance, protecting Americans from the death of a spouse or parent, disability and old age – essentially the risk of outliving one's savings.
These are things most of us fear regardless of our means, and – despite the rhetoric – these are not welfare programs. Americans pay into them, and without Social Security, we all will bear more risks that will directly impact our wallets, and potentially the high quality of life we have become accustomed to since its creation.
This is why touching Social Security has been viewed as a 'third rail' for decades, and it remains a primary point of contention at the charged town halls across the nation recently.
Opinion: If you're not scared about Social Security, you should be
You may not think of it when you look at a paystub, but the Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI) line is doing some serious heavy lifting when it comes to many Americans' financial security. It is a premium that offers coverage from the risks that come from not being able to work.
When we outlive our ability to work, lose a spouse, become disabled or have a dependent with a disability, Social Security programs provide benefits.
Take our poll: It's been nearly 100 days of Trump. Do you think we're better off? | Opinion Forum
Across America, the old age and survivors' insurance programs reduce the Supplemental Poverty Measure among those ages 65 and older by 33 percentage points, meaning without Social Security, more than 19.5 million adults would have to survive on incomes below the poverty line (less than $16,000 for a single person in 2025).
Among all Americans, Social Security lifts 27.6 million people above the poverty line.
Given the decline of defined benefit pensions, most workers today will have to rely on personal savings. With no guarantee of benefits for life, workers face greater risks of outliving their savings or a major downturn in the market. Social Security mitigates these risks.
Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store.
What would the average American need to do to make up for large changes to OASDI?
We offer some estimates below, but the answer is straightforward: Save a whole lot more and spend a whole lot more for private insurance coverage.
We also must prepare for the state to bear more of the costs of having more people in deeper poverty in our communities.
This is how the impact breaks down in specific areas:
Retirement. Without any legislative action by Congress, Social Security will have insufficient funds to provide for retirees by 2033. Based on actuarial projections, benefits will have to be cut by 21% immediately. The program will not be "broke" or have "nothing for future retirees." But benefit amounts will be reduced for current and future retirees. The average worker in the U.S. receives about $1,900 per month. This implies a need for current and future retirees to come up with $4,800 per year to maintain the earning power of today's Social Security benefits. Seniors will have to cut expenses, use up more savings and rely more on financial support from family members.
Disability. For the 161 million workers in the U.S., the chance of developing a disability is not small; in fact, a quarter of today's 20-year-olds will experience a disability before retirement. For an average 40-year-old male, replacing Social Security disability insurance with private coverage would cost roughly $1,200 per year. An estimated 40% of workers have limited disability insurance through an employer, but this coverage offers less protection than Social Security. Moreover, private disability insurers screen applicants, charging some workers more or even denying coverage altogether. Coverage is likely to cost much more than $1,200 per year for some workers – if it is available at all. Social Security provides with the same benefit levels and rules for all workers.
Survivors' benefits. As of December 2023, there were more than 5.7 million Americans (more than enough to be the 23rd largest state) receiving Social Security benefits due to a deceased spouse, child or parent. For an average 40-year-old male to purchase similar life insurance coverage privately, premiums would be over $500 per year. Of course, this private coverage is subject to medical exams, and policy renewals come with premium increases. While some private industry workers have limited access to life insurance benefits at work, Social Security survivors' benefits are especially important for lower-income workers with children who depend on their earnings.
Supplemental Security Income. More than 7.4 million Americans receive more than $63.5 billion in annual payments from SSI. These payments average just over $700 per month for the poorest Americans, including people with disabilities, elderly individuals who had low-paying jobs, and children. If proposals to shift SSI from Social Security to the state occur, the average Wisconsinite would need to contribute $260 per person per year to make up the gap.
In the end, if Social Security retirement benefits are reduced due to legislative inaction, Social Security survivors' and disability benefits are removed, and SSI's support for the poorest seniors and people with lifelong disabilities is terminated or handed off to the state, it will cost the average American more than $6,800 per year in added insurance premiums, increased need for savings and state tax increases.
USA MapInfogram
We estimate that this number is more than $7,000 per year in 12 states (highest in Connecticut at $7,279 per year) and is more than $6,400 in every state (lowest in Montana at $6,474 per year).
This likely far exceeds any reasonable reductions in our payroll taxes, and ignores the costs that family members and communities may take on to support the most economically vulnerable.
The insurance protection that Social Security programs provide has tangible economic benefits. Without these programs, we will all need to reassess our financial plans.
J. Michael Collins is a professor in the School of Human Ecology and the La Follette School of Public Affairs at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He is also an associate director at the Institute for Research on Poverty and a member of the National Academy of Social Insurance. Tyler Q. Welch is a PhD candidate in the Wisconsin School of Business' Risk and Insurance department at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He is also a graduate research fellow at the Institute for Research on Poverty and an associate member of the National Academy of Social Insurance. An earlier version of this column originally appeared in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.
You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Social Security benefits cuts will cost you. Here's how much | Opinion

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Protesters rally against ICE for second day in Los Angeles
Protesters rally against ICE for second day in Los Angeles

CNBC

time24 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Protesters rally against ICE for second day in Los Angeles

Federal agents in Los Angeles on Saturday faced off against demonstrators protesting immigration raids following Friday's protests that senior White House aide Stephen Miller condemned as an "insurrection" against the United States. The security agents on Saturday engaged in a tense confrontation with protesters in the Paramount area in southeast Los Angeles, where one demonstrator was seen waving a Mexican flag and some covered their mouths with respiratory masks. A live video feed showed dozens of green-uniformed security personnel with gas masks lined up on a road strewn with overturned shopping carts as small canisters exploded into gas clouds. A first round of protests kicked off on Friday night after Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents conductedenforcement operationsin the city and arrested at least 44 people on alleged immigration violations. The Department of Homeland Security said in a statement that "1,000 rioters surrounded a federal law enforcement building and assaulted ICE law enforcement officers, slashed tires, defaced buildings, and taxpayer funded property." Reuters was unable to verify DHS's accounts. Miller, an immigration hardliner and the White House deputy chief of staff, wrote on X that Friday's demonstrations were "an insurrection against the laws and sovereignty of the United States." The protests pit Democratic-run Los Angeles, where census data suggests a significant portion of the population is Hispanic and foreign-born, against Trump's Republican White House, which has made cracking down on immigration a hallmark of his second term. Trump has pledged to deport record numbers of people in the country illegally and lock down the U.S.-Mexico border, with the White House setting a goal for ICE to arrest at least 3,000 migrants per day. But the sweeping immigration crackdown has also included people legally residing in the country, including some with permanent residence, and has led to legal challenges. In a statement on Saturday about the protests in Paramount, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Office said: "It appeared that federal law enforcement officers were in the area, and that members of the public were gathering to protest." ICE, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Los Angeles Police Department did not respond to a request for information about the protests or potential immigration sweeps on Saturday. Television news footage earlier on Friday showed unmarked vehicles resembling military transport and vans loaded with uniformed federal agents streaming through Los Angeles streets as part of the immigration enforcement operation. The Democratic mayor of Los Angeles, Karen Bass, in a statement condemned the immigration raids. "I am deeply angered by what has taken place," Bass said. "These tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city. We will not stand for this." The LAPD did not take part in the immigration enforcement. It was deployed to quell civil unrest after crowds protesting the deportation raids spray-painted anti-ICE slogans on the walls of a federal court building and gathered outside a nearby jail where some of the detainees were reportedly being held. In a statement, DHS criticized Democratic politicians including Mayor Bass, saying their anti-ICE rhetoric was contributing to violence against immigration agents. "From comparisons to the modern-day Nazi gestapo to glorifying rioters, the violent rhetoric of these sanctuary politicians is beyond the pale. This violence against ICE must end," said Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin. FBI deputy director Dan Bongino posted on X that they were reviewing evidence from the protests. "We are working with the U.S. Attorney's Office to ensure the perpetrators are brought to justice," Bongino said.

Ted Cruz was with president when Musk's barrage of attacks started: ‘Trump was pissed'
Ted Cruz was with president when Musk's barrage of attacks started: ‘Trump was pissed'

New York Post

time29 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Ted Cruz was with president when Musk's barrage of attacks started: ‘Trump was pissed'

Sen. Ted Cruz was with a fuming President Trump as Elon Musk viciously attacked his former ally online Thursday — with the Texas Republican saying the spat made him feel like he was a kid in the middle of a divorce. 'I was sitting in the Oval as this unfolded. Trump was pissed. He was venting,' the Republican senator revealed on his podcast 'Verdict with Ted Cruz' Friday. 'I was sitting there, and the tweets were coming…. Elon was saying some really harsh things.' The SpaceX and Tesla billionaire went on a multi-day social media offensive against Trump, panning the president's 'big, beautiful' reconciliation bill 'disgusting' and urging Congress to kill it. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk fumed after Trump spoke out about the simmering feud. Cruz, who's friends with both former bros, called their very public break-up this week 'incredibly painful.' 'These are two men whom I know very well, they're both good friends of mine,' he said. 3 President Trump and Tesla billionaire Elon Musk came to blows on social media this week, ending their bromance. AFP via Getty Images 'I feel like the kids of a bitter divorce where you're just saying, 'I really wish mommy and daddy would stop screaming.'' 3 Ted Cruz talked about the break-up this Friday on his podcast 'Verdict with Ted Cruz.' Verdict with Ted Cruz/Facebook Trump and Musk's tiff escalated later in the week — with Trump threatening to cancel billions of dollars in government contracts to Musk's companies and Musk claiming Trump was holding out on making the Jeffrey Epstein files public because he's in them. 3 Trump and Musk's tiff escalated later in the week. Getty Images 'It just went from zero to 11 instantaneously,' said Cruz. 'These are two alpha males who are pissed off. And unfortunately, they're unloading on each other … They're angry, it's not complicated.' Cruz and his co-host commented that they thought both men are right — Trump's big beautiful budget bill has to get passed but the government has to tackle the deficit more as Musk argued. 'Unfortunately, Elon is working under the assumption that Congress actually wants to do the job and save our country,' said podcast co-host Ben Ferguson. 'And I think Trump is working under the reality that there's a lot of people in Congress that actually aren't looking out for the American people.' Musk on Saturday deleted his post about the Epstein files in a sign he was ready to throw in the towel. But Trump made it clear he wasn't interested in kissing and making up anytime soon. 'I have no intention of speaking to him,' he told NBC News.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store