logo
How did Google's earthquake warning system fail in 2023?

How did Google's earthquake warning system fail in 2023?

Tahawul Tech2 days ago
Google has admitted to a failure of its earthquake early warning system to accurately alert people during Türkiye's deadly 2023 quake.
Ten million people within 98 miles of the epicentre could have been sent Google's highest level alert – giving up to 35 seconds of warning to find safety.
Instead, only 469 'Take Action' warnings were sent out for the first 7.8 magnitude quake.
Google told the BBC half a million people were sent a lower level warning, which is designed for 'light shaking', and does not alert users in the same prominent way. The tech giant previously told the BBC the system had 'performed well' after an investigation in 2023.
The alerts system is available in just under 100 countries – and is described by Google as a 'global safety net' often operating in countries with no other warning system.
Google's system, named Android Earthquake Alerts (AEA), is run by the Silicon Valley firm – not individual countries. The system works on Android devices, which make up more than 70% of the phones in Türkiye.
More than 55,000 people died when two major earthquakes hit south-east Türkiye on 6 February 2023, more than 100,000 were injured. Many were asleep in buildings that collapsed around them when the tremors hit.
Google's early warning system was in place and live on the day of the quakes – however it underestimated how strong the earthquakes were. 'We continue to improve the system based on what we learn in each earthquake', a Google spokesperson said.
How it works
Google's system, is able to detect shaking from a vast number of mobile phones that use the Android operating system. Because earthquakes move relatively slowly through the earth, a warning can then be sent out.
Google's most serious warning is called 'Take Action', which sets off a loud alarm on a user's phone – overriding a Do Not Disturb setting – and covering their screen. This is the warning that is supposed to be sent to people when stronger shaking is detected that could threaten human life. AEA also has a less serious 'Be Aware' warning, designed to inform users of potential lighter shaking – a warning that does not override a device on Do Not Disturb.
The Take Action alert was especially important in Türkiye due to the catastrophic shaking and because the first earthquake struck at 04:17, when many users would have been asleep. Only the more serious alert would have woken them.
In the months after the earthquake the BBC wanted to speak to users who had been given this warning – initially with aims to showcase the effectiveness of the technology. But despite speaking to people in towns and cities across the zone impacted by the earthquake, over a period of months, we couldn't find anyone who had received a more serious Take Action notification before the quake struck. BBC published their findings later that year.
Google researchers have written in the Science journal details of what went wrong, citing 'limitations to the detection algorithms'.
For the first earthquake, the system estimated the shaking at between 4.5 and 4.9 on the moment magnitude scale (MMS) when it was actually a 7.8. A second large earthquake later that day was also underestimated, with the system this time sending Take Action alerts to 8,158 phones and Be Aware alerts to just under four million users.
After the earthquake Google's researchers changed the algorithm, and simulated the first earthquake again. This time, the system generated 10 million Take Action alerts to those at most risk – and a further 67 million Be Aware alerts to those living further away from the epicentre
'Every earthquake early warning system grapples with the same challenge – tuning algorithms for large magnitude events,' Google told the BBC. But Elizabeth Reddy, assistant professor at Colorado School of Mines, says it is concerning it took more than two years to get this information. 'I'm really frustrated that it took so long,' she said 'We're not talking about a little event – people died – and we didn't see a performance of this warning in the way we would like.'
Google says the system is supposed to be supplementary and is not a replacement for national systems. However some scientists worry countries are placing too much faith in tech that has not been fully tested. 'I think being very transparent about how well it works is absolutely critical,' Harold Tobin, director of the Pacific Northwest Seismic Network, told the BBC. 'Would some places make the calculation that Google's doing it, so we don't have to?'
Google researchers say post-event analysis has better improved the system – and AEA has pushed out alerts in 98 countries. The BBC has asked Google how AEA performed during the 2025 earthquake in Myanmar, but has yet to receive a response.
Source: BBC News
Image Credit: Google
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mercedes adding Microsoft Teams to its cars feels like a meeting invitation nobody asked for
Mercedes adding Microsoft Teams to its cars feels like a meeting invitation nobody asked for

The National

time7 hours ago

  • The National

Mercedes adding Microsoft Teams to its cars feels like a meeting invitation nobody asked for

As if being stuck in traffic or missing an exit wasn't stressful enough, Mercedes-Benz has now decided to add Microsoft Teams to its vehicles, starting with its new CLA model. The collaboration between the German car company and the US tech giant feels not just confusing, but completely unnecessary. After all, nothing screams luxury like the ability to join a meeting mid-commute. But in all seriousness, this seems like a bad idea for many reasons. The most obvious concern is safety. Mercedes insists a camera, which will be built into the screen above the central display, won't distract drivers, but can that be true? When the car is in motion, drivers can't see the meeting but can still hear it, while colleagues and bosses can still see them. But why is that necessary? More importantly, why add another potential distraction to a space where even a momentary lapse in focus can be dangerous? Most road safety experts agree that even small distractions can dramatically increase the risk of accidents, so it doesn't feel right to normalise conference calls while on the go. Then, there's the absurdity of it all. Who asked for this? Did a survey reveal Mercedes owners begging for the ability to hop into a Teams meeting during their commute? Or is this for people so dedicated to their work that they feel the need to always be on call? Unless you're in a life-saving profession, I can't imagine that being necessary. And honestly, what kind of experience does this create? Imagine being stuck in traffic, the AC fighting off the summer heat, when your boss pops up on your car dashboard to ask about an unanswered email. Having a high-end car once meant comfort, freedom and maybe even a little indulgence. Now, apparently, it means bringing the office along for the ride. This leads to another big problem: how much it blurs the line between work and personal life. The pandemic pushed work into our homes. Do we really need it invading our cars, too? In Germany, where Mercedes is based, labour laws acknowledge this issue with measures aimed at protecting employees from the expectation of being constantly available. So it's a bit strange that the company is now designing cars that make it easier to be "always on". Sure, there's something to be said for being successful enough to afford a Mercedes-Benz with Microsoft Teams built in, but if that's the measure of success, I'm not sure I want it. These days, the world already feels hectic and stressful. People need to protect their mental health, and one of the best ways to do that is by setting boundaries to maintain a healthy work-life balance. Cars can be a buffer between work and home. When I'm in mine, it's time to myself, when I can listen to relaxing music or a podcast, or just be alone with my thoughts. If I suddenly heard the Microsoft Teams ringtone go off in my car, whatever Zen mode I was in would immediately be ruined. Psychologists often say that downtime, even the short drive between work and home, is vital for mental decompression. Are we sure we want to get rid of that? This isn't about just a new 'innovative' car feature, but about the start of a slippery slope where tech slowly infiltrates even more aspects of our lives. Today it's Microsoft Teams in the car, maybe tomorrow it's Slack on the bathroom mirror or Zoom on the refrigerator. At what point do we draw the line and say 'enough'? Technology was supposed to make our lives easier, not turn every spare moment into another chance to clock in. Mercedes might believe this is innovation, but it's a mistake. We need to ask: are these features making our lives better or just erasing the last spaces we had left for ourselves?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store