Who could be California's next governor after Kamala Harris bows out? These contenders are eyeing top job
In a statement, Harris said she had thought seriously about running but finally decided not to after "deep reflection". She said she loves California, its people, and its promise, and called it her home. Harris added that she will not run for any elected office for now and will instead spend time listening to Americans and helping other Democrats win, as per the report by NBC.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Please select course:
Select a Course Category
Others
Degree
Operations Management
Cybersecurity
PGDM
Public Policy
Project Management
Technology
Management
healthcare
others
Data Analytics
Data Science
Design Thinking
Healthcare
Digital Marketing
CXO
Artificial Intelligence
Finance
Data Science
Product Management
Leadership
MCA
MBA
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
9 months
IIM Lucknow
SEPO - IIML CHRO India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
16 Weeks
Indian School of Business
CERT-ISB Transforming HR with Analytics & AI India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
28 Weeks
MICA
CERT-MICA SBMPR Async India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
7 Months
S P Jain Institute of Management and Research
CERT-SPJIMR Exec Cert Prog in AI for Biz India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
She also mentioned that she would share more about her own plans in the coming months. Two people close to her said Harris wants to keep the door open for a possible run for President in 2028. Running for governor wouldn't stop her from running for president, but it would have made things harder, so she took that into account.
ALSO READ:
Sydney Sweeney sparks debate with American Eagle 'great jeans' campaign amid Ted Cruz criticism
One of those people said Harris had many conversations over months before deciding. They said it was a really tough decision and she struggled with it because she wanted to have the biggest impact possible, according to the report by NBC.
Live Events
Another person who knows her plans said she met her advisers about a month ago in Los Angeles to talk it through. At that meeting, her options were: don't run for governor, prepare for 2028, or step away from elected politics altogether.
Why Kamala Harris stepped away from governor race
In the end, she made the decision on her own, that person said. In the short term, she's thinking about working with nonprofits and maybe starting a political action committee (PAC). One source said she's also planning to help campaign for Democrats in the upcoming midterm elections.
A third person who spoke with her on Wednesday said Harris still wants to talk to Californians and others across the U.S. That person also said Harris had a real chance of winning the governor race if she had decided to run, as stated by NBC.
But they added that she wants to stay part of national politics and talk about issues like Donald Trump. Being in California debates and forums would not let her do that at a national level, so she stepped back.
Who is running for California governor now
Harris had 10 years of experience in California statewide roles, first as attorney general and then as U.S. senator. She left the Senate after Joe Biden won the 2020 election and made her Vice President. In the last presidential race, she replaced Biden as the Democratic nominee after he dropped out.
Now that Harris is not running, the race for California's next governor is wide open. Current Governor Gavin Newsom can't run again because of term limits. Several Democrats have already jumped into the race, trying to replace him, as per the NBC report.
ALSO READ:
Karoline Leavitt's 2022 campaign still owes $323,000 — and there's no cash left to pay it back
These candidates include Lt. Gov Eleni Kounalakis, Xavier Becerra (former health secretary and state attorney general), Katie Porter (former congresswoman), Toni Atkins (former state senate president), and Antonio Villaraigosa (former LA mayor).
California is a strongly Democratic state, and most expect the Democratic Party to keep control of the governor's office. In the last presidential race, Harris won California by 20 points, showing how blue the state still is, as mentioned in the report by NBC.
FAQs
Q1. Why did Kamala Harris decide not to run for California governor?
Kamala Harris chose not to run so she can stay active in national politics and possibly prepare for a 2028 presidential run.
Q2. Who are the top candidates for California governor after Kamala Harris dropped out?
Democrats like Eleni Kounalakis, Xavier Becerra, Katie Porter, Toni Atkins, and Antonio Villaraigosa are running to replace Gavin Newsom.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
6 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump fired America's economic data collector. History shows the perils.
When President Trump didn't like the weak jobs numbers that were released on Friday, he fired the person responsible for producing them. It was a move with few precedents in the century-long history of economic statistics in the United States. And for good reason: When political leaders meddle in government data, it rarely ends well. There is the case of Greece, where the government faked deficit numbers for years, contributing to a debilitating debt crisis that required multiple rounds of bailouts. The country then criminally prosecuted the head of the statistical agency when he insisted on reporting the true figures, further eroding the country's international standing. There is the case of China, where earlier this century the local authorities manipulated data to hit growth targets mandated by Beijing, forcing analysts and policymakers to turn to alternative measures to gauge the state of the country's economy. Perhaps most famously, there is the case of Argentina, which in the 2000s and 2010s systematically understated inflation figures to such a degree that the international community eventually stopped relying on the government's data. That loss of faith drove up the country's borrowing costs, worsening a debt crisis that ultimately led to it defaulting on its international obligations. It is too soon to know whether the United States is on a similar path. But economists and other experts said that Mr. Trump's decision on Friday to fire Erika McEntarfer, the Senate-confirmed head of the Bureau of labour Statistics, was a troubling step in that direction. Janet L. Yellen, the former Treasury secretary and chair of the Federal Reserve, said the firing was not what is expected from the most advanced economy in the world. 'This is the kind of thing you would only expect to see in a banana republic,' Ms. Yellen said. Essential data The Bureau of labour Statistics is officially part of the labour Department, whose secretary is a member of the president's cabinet. But the agency operates independently, producing detailed, nonpartisan data on employment, prices, wages and other topics. Economists say that reliable, independently produced statistics are critical to good decision making in both the public and private sector. Officials at the Federal Reserve rely on government-collected data on inflation and unemployment to decide how to set interest rates, which affect how much Americans must pay to get a mortgage or a car loan. 'Good data helps not just the Fed, it helps the government, but it also helps the private sector,' Jerome H. Powell, the Fed chair, said at a recent news conference. 'The United States has been a leader in that for 100 years,' he added, 'and we really need to continue that in my view.' Experts on government statistics say data from the Bureau of labour Statistics and other agencies is unlikely to deteriorate dramatically overnight. The acting commissioner named to replace Dr. McEntarfer on a temporary basis, William J. Wiatrowski, is a longtime employee of the agency who is widely respected by experts inside and outside government. The career employees who collect and analyse the data remain in place, using the same methods and procedures they used before Dr. McEntarfer was pushed out. But experts who just days ago were defending the integrity of the statistical agencies now find themselves asking uncomfortable questions about the trajectory of economic data in the United States. 'If the poverty numbers come in and look great, is the director of the Census going to get a raise?' said Amy O'Hara, a former Census Bureau official who is now a professor at Georgetown University. 'If the household income numbers don't look great what happens then? What about G.D.P.? What about C.P.I.?' Andreas Georgiou knows the challenges of standing up to such political pressure. After he took over Greece's statistical agency in 2010, he found that the country has been severely understating its budget deficits. Those findings ran afoul of the Greek authorities, who spent years trying to prosecute him on a variety of charges related to his work, despite independent reviews that supported his conclusions. (He fared better, though, than Olimpiy Kvitkin, the Soviet census official who was arrested and executed when his population count came in lower than Joseph Stalin had announced.) Mr. Georgiou refused to bend. Reliable statistics are important for policymaking, he said. But they are also essential to democracy. 'Official statistics, government statistics are a mirror that society holds up to itself,' he said. If that mirror is distorted, or broken entirely, then the accountability that is central to a democratic system cannot work. 'If society cannot see itself clearly, then it cannot identify its problems,' he said. 'If it cannot identify its problems, then it cannot find the right solutions. It cannot find the right persons to solve these problems.' Data integrity at risk Mr. Trump said he fired Dr. McEntarfer because the numbers produced by her agency were 'rigged' to hurt him politically. Experts on the government statistics, including former commissioners in both Democratic and Republican administrations, have called foul on that accusation. The commissioner, who is the bureau's sole political appointee, does not control the numbers that the agency publishes, or even see them until they have been finalized by a staff of career technocrats whose careers typically span multiple presidential administrations. Erica Groshen, who led the bureau under President Barack Obama, recalled getting resistance from the agency's staff when she tried to liven up the language of the monthly jobs reports. The bureau's staff insisted that the agency's job wasn't to say whether the glass was half-full or half-empty, only to report that, 'It is an eight-ounce container with four ounces of liquid.' Ms. Groshen relented. That is not to say political interference would be impossible. Government statistics rely on hundreds of methodological decisions, many of them judgment calls with no obviously correct answer. A sufficiently sophisticated agency head might, over time, be able to nudge the data in a politically advantageous direction, without any single decision being so egregious that it led to a mass resignation of career employees. 'I could imagine a new commissioner coming in and trying to make changes to those methods and procedures that try to move those numbers one way or the other,' said Katharine G. Abraham, who led the bureau during the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations. 'They would have to know a lot in terms of where to put the finger on the scale.' Private alternatives There are also blunter approaches. In Argentina in 2007, the government of then-President Néstor Kirchner pushed out the mathematician in charge of the country's consumer price data, then released an inflation figure that was dramatically lower than the one the mathematician had calculated. The public wasn't fooled. Nor were international bond investors, who ultimately turned to alternative sources of inflation data, calculated by researchers outside the government. But such alternative sources are inherently limited, said Alberto Cavallo, a Harvard economist who developed one of the most widely used private inflation indexes in Argentina. 'Private alternatives can complement official statistics, but they are not a substitute,' Mr. Cavallo wrote in an email. 'Government agencies have the resources and scale to conduct nationwide surveys — something no private initiative can fully replicate.' Recently, Mr. Cavallo has been publishing data on consumer prices in the United States, which has shown the impact of Mr. Trump's tariffs more quickly than the government's data. But while such real-time sources are valuable, they don't carry the 'institutional credibility' of government data. The trouble is that once that credibility is eroded, it is hard to repair — particularly at a time when partisans on both sides of the political aisle are skeptical of numbers put out by members of the opposing party. Nancy Potok, a former Census official who served as chief statistician of the United States during the first Trump administration, said that in the past there had been strong bipartisan support for the statistical system in Congress and the business community. But partisanship seems to have eroded that support at a moment when a combination of political pressures and longstanding budget challenges are making it most necessary. 'There were some people who really understood the value of the economic data, and now that's not the conversation and those champions aren't there that were there in the past,' she said. 'There's no one leading the charge to make these kind of investments.'
India.com
6 minutes ago
- India.com
Another bad news for Elon Musk, jury orders to pay Rs 20925732000 in case of…
(File) A Miami jury has ruled that Tesla bears partial responsibility for a fatal crash in Florida involving its Autopilot driver-assistance system and has ordered the company to pay over $240 million in damages to the victims. What Is Tesla Held For? The federal jury held that Tesla bore significant responsibility because its technology failed and that not all the blame can be put on a reckless driver, even one who admitted he was distracted by his cellphone before hitting a young couple out gazing at the stars. The decision comes as Musk seeks to convince Americans his cars are safe enough to drive on their own as he plans to roll out a driverless taxi service in several cities in the coming months. The decision ends a four-year-long case remarkable not just in its outcome, but that it even made it to trial. Many similar cases against Tesla have been dismissed and, when that didn't happen, settled by the company to avoid the spotlight of a trial. 'This will open the floodgates,' said Miguel Custodio, a car crash lawyer not involved in the Tesla case. 'It will embolden a lot of people to come to court.' The case also included startling charges by lawyers for the family of the deceased, 22-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon, and for her injured boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. They claimed Tesla either hid or lost key evidence, including data and video recorded seconds before the accident. Tesla said it made a mistake after being shown the evidence and honestly hadn't thought it was there. 'We finally learned what happened that night, that the car was actually defective,' said Benavides' sister, Neima Benavides. 'Justice was achieved.' Tesla has previously faced criticism that it is slow to cough up crucial data by relatives of other victims in Tesla crashes, accusations that the car company has denied. In this case, the plaintiffs showed Tesla had the evidence all along, despite its repeated denials, by hiring a forensic data expert who dug it up. What Tesla Said On Verdict? 'Today's verdict is wrong,' Tesla said in a statement, 'and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement lifesaving technology,' They said the plaintiffs concocted a story 'blaming the car when the driver – from day one – admitted and accepted responsibility.' In addition to a punitive award of $200 million, the jury said Tesla must also pay $43 million of a total $129 million in compensatory damages for the crash, bringing the total borne by the company to $243 million. 'It's a big number that will send shock waves to others in the industry,' said financial analyst Dan Ives of Wedbush Securities. 'It's not a good day for Tesla.' Tesla said it will appeal. (With Inputs from agencies)
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Adani Power shares rise 2% after board approves 1:5 stock split
Adani Power shares rose nearly 2% to Rs 575 in Monday's trade after the company announced a 1:5 stock split, aimed at improving retail participation . The board has approved subdividing each equity share of face value Rs 10 into five shares of face value Rs 2. "The subdivision of shares is intended to encourage wider retail participation by making the stock more affordable," it said in a regulatory filing. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Others Management Data Science healthcare Leadership Public Policy Operations Management Data Analytics Cybersecurity Data Science Degree PGDM others Digital Marketing Technology Artificial Intelligence Finance Design Thinking Project Management Product Management CXO MBA Healthcare Skills you'll gain: Duration: 9 months IIM Lucknow SEPO - IIML CHRO India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 28 Weeks MICA CERT-MICA SBMPR Async India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 16 Weeks Indian School of Business CERT-ISB Transforming HR with Analytics & AI India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 7 Months S P Jain Institute of Management and Research CERT-SPJIMR Exec Cert Prog in AI for Biz India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 28 Weeks MICA CERT-MICA SBMPR Async India Starts on undefined Get Details by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 21st Century Skills Start with Confident Communication Planet Spark Learn More Undo Also Read: These 10 stocks delivered consistent dividend yields over the last 3 years Adani Power Q1 earnings On Friday, the company also reported a 15.5% year-on-year decline in consolidated net profit to Rs 3,305 crore for the June quarter, compared to Rs 3,913 crore a year ago. Revenue from operations dropped 5.9% to Rs 14,167 crore. Live Events Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) from continuing operations came in at Rs 5,744 crore, down from Rs 6,290 crore last year, due to lower revenue and costs from recent acquisitions. On a sequential basis, however, EBITDA rose 12.7%. Also Read: PNB Housing Finance, RBL Bank among 10 small-cap stocks where FIIs increased stake in Q1 Stock split and record date The company clarified that the stock split will not change the total share capital of Rs 3,856.9 crore. The record date will be announced after shareholder approval . The board also approved changes to the Capital Clause in the Memorandum of Association to reflect the new structure, subject to shareholder and regulatory approvals. Adani Power confirmed that it has only one class of equity shares, and all shareholders will receive split shares proportionately. Adani Power shares price target According to Trendlyne, the average target price for Adani Power shares is Rs 634, suggesting an upside of around 11% from current levels. The consensus rating from three analysts is a 'Strong Buy'. The stock has declined 21% over the past 12 months but delivered a 105% return over the last two years. Adani Power's market capitalisation currently stands at Rs 2.20 lakh crore. ( Disclaimer : Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)
