Aus banks slash interest rates early as RBA showdown looms - realestate.com.au
Seven Aussie banks have slashed interest rates early in a race to beat rivals ahead of next week's Reserve Bank decision, as a drop in inflation fuels a rate-cutting competition.
Canstar's database found seven lenders have moved on rates since last Monday, three of whom did so just days after shock CPI figures revealed trimmed mean inflation fell again for the second quarter in a row to well within the RBA's target band (2.7 per cent) – a level considered a key trigger for cheaper lending.
MORE: Aus landlord's epic council battle ends in demolition
Explosive reform of negative gearing, capital gains perks
Current big four bank cash rate forecasts. Source: Canstar
Canstar.com.au data insights director Sally Tindall said that all but confirmed Australia's third official 2025 cash rate cut would happen on August 12.
All four big banks – CBA, Westpac, NAB and ANZ – have predicted that RBA's next move will be August 12 by 0.25 percentage points, but in the days since inflation figures were released a week ago, three lenders have already jumped the gun.
A Canstar spokesperson said between July 30 (when inflation data was released) and yesterday two lenders cut at least one variable home loan rate – Auswide Bank and Up – while 'one lender cut its lowest fixed rate – Bank of China'.
Among the lowest variable rates brought in just before the inflation data was that of Police Credit Union dropping to 4.99pc for owner-occupiers – a shock figure that heralded the start of the lowest variable rate in two years across the country.
All up since last Monday seven lenders have moved rates lower – Auswide Bank and Up for variables, while for fixed it was G & C Mutual Bank, Macquarie Bank, The Mutual Bank, Unity Bank, and Bank of China.
RELATED: Shock as lenders slash rates to lowest level in 2 years
Canstar data insights director Sally Tindall believes inflation figures 'all but confirmed' an August 12 rate cut. Picture: Tim Hunter.
'There were a few other lenders that moved fixed rates in the days prior to CPI figures, including Macquarie Bank and The Mutual Bank, which has the equal-lowest fixed rate at 4.94 per cent for two and three years.'
A 0.25pp drop in interest rates by either their lender or RBA would see a $90 fall in minimum monthly repayments for an owner-occupier with a $600,000 debt and 25 years remaining on their loan (to $3,703/mth).
Someone with a $750,000 loan and 25 years left would drop $113 to $4,628, while a $1m home loan minimum repayment would go to $6,171 off a fall of $150.
The figures assume the borrower is an average variable owner-occupier paying principal and interest.
ABS Quarterly CPI – annual movement – is the final piece in the August puzzle for RBA. Source: Canstar.
'While an RBA cut looks to be a near-certainty, if you've got a mortgage, don't bank on any extra cash until it lands in your bank account,' Ms Tindall said.
'The RBA has shown it doesn't dance to the beat of market expectations — it's the one steering the ship.'
'Banks are also at the helm of your mortgage and while we expect the big banks to step up to the plate and pass the next cut on in full, there's no guarantee every lender will do this.'
MORE REAL ESTATE NEWS
Homeowners are set to see both strong capital gains and mortgage relief this year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
28 minutes ago
- ABC News
Warnings RBA's move to end card surcharges could hike banking costs or lower rewards points
The Reserve Bank's proposal to end card surcharges aims to save consumers money, but experts warn it could have unintended consequences. RMIT finance professor Angel Zhong told ABC News that, in practice, it could increase banking costs and leave Australians footing the bill. The RBA has said scrapping credit and debit card surcharges would save every adult using a card around $60 a year. The proposed changes include a cap on interchange fees, which means banks will miss out on about $900 million in revenue each year, according to Professor Zhong. "Banks will experience a deduction in their banking revenue, so they need to recoup it somewhere," she said. Surcharges are already banned in Europe and the United Kingdom. Professor Zhong said research into the international experience demonstrated a potential for increased costs to be passed on: A surcharge ban could lead to higher payment costs for small businesses, said Matthew Addison, chair of the small business peak body COSBOA. "Each other time [the payment providers] have lowered one fee, another fee has increased or the service package that is provided to the merchant changes," he said. "While one fee comes down, maybe the cost of the terminal will go up." If payments can no longer be passed on to customers, he said, small businesses might have to increase prices. "At the moment, small business is not in a position to absorb any more costs," he said. While the RBA's review found a lower cap on interchange fees would save business $1.2 billion a year and leave 90 per cent better off, industry groups and merchants have continued to express concern. "Big businesses aren't surcharging because their cost structure of merchant fees is less than a quarter of what small businesses are paying," Mr Addison said. ABC News asked ANZ, Westpac, the Commonwealth Bank and NAB how they planned to recoup costs if the proposals went ahead. The banks said they were unable to comment while they worked on submissions for the central bank by a late August deadline. Melanie Evans, deputy chair of the Australian Banking Association and chief executive of ING in Australia, told The Business that delivering more bang for buck to Australians was important. "But if the economics of our payment systems change then, of course, business models will also change accordingly," she said The banks want mobile wallets, such as Apple and Google Pay included in the review. "We would suggest that there's also opportunity to look more broadly at digital wallets and other forms of payments in the system," said Ms Evans. More Australians are using mobile wallets to tap and go, with payments up almost 30 per cent in the past year. Each time a customer pays using a mobile wallet, the banks pay the tech giants a fee. Professor Zhong said that was where banks could offset lost revenue from the cap on interchange fees. "It would require reforms in other areas in terms of fees charged by mobile wallets to Australian banks," she said. Stakeholders have until August 26 to make submissions regarding the RBA's proposals.
The Age
5 hours ago
- The Age
1308msletters2
Bill Widerberg says 'increased (bank) profit is to be lauded, not criticised as obscene' (Letters, August 12). If the profits are derived ethically, I agree. However, if a bank increases borrowing rates promptly to the full RBA increase and increases deposit rates much more slowly, I would suggest they are exploiting and gouging their customers. If that pattern of behaviour and others shown up by a royal commission are still typical of bank behaviour, then my view is that the profits are more obscene than lauded. Bill Irvine, Goulburn Bill Widerberg says 'a business exists for one reason only, to make a profit'. If most people share this belief then it's no wonder so many people are struggling. Whatever happened to a caring society, or doing a job /running a business to enhance life? We all know that a business needs some profit but it is not the motivation to exist. Hopefully, people will realise that money doesn't bring happiness or contentment in life. Jacqui Keats, Black Head It is worse than arrogant for the CBA to be making record profits at the same time as leaving their customers who are scammed to bear their own losses. One of the conditions of being granted a banking licence is the guarantee to protect depositors' assets. Whatever happened to that quaint idea? It appears now if one of their customers is scammed he or she is left to swing in the breeze. Surely, the government that grants these licences has a duty of care to the banking customers to stand by them when the banks fail to do so? Rosemary McDonald, Beecroft According to your correspondent, 'profit comes from thought'. But why should the CBA benefit from Philip Lowe's? John Christie, Oatley There is a social contract at play here. We allow businesses to operate only because on balance they give us a social good. In Australia, we further enable businesses by providing rule of law and a regulated marketplace. When banks make huge profits and the bank's customers are treated so poorly, then it is appropriate to ask if they are upholding their side of the bargain. Tony De Lyall, Bulli Do these banks use any of the profit to improve customer service, reduce lending rates, increase savings rates, create employment, reward employees or invest in a better society? Hardly. As long as they keep using their record profits to close branches, sack people, hike interest rates on loans, and pay a pittance on deposits while generously rewarding executives and shareholders they deserve all the criticism we can muster. David Harrison, Winmalee
SBS Australia
8 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Tech Council of Australia want copyright laws "overhauled" so AI models can mine Aussie data
Tech Council of Australia want copyright laws "overhauled" so AI models can mine Aussie data Published 6 August 2025, 10:02 am The federal Government has been advised against "over-regulating" AI. A new report is talking up significant economic benefit, but also admitting human jobs will be lost. The opposition says there needs to be stronger guardrails for its use, accusing tech companies of stealing Australian content.
