OneMain Holdings Announces Date of Second Quarter 2025 Earnings Release and Conference Call
A conference call to discuss the company's results, outlook and related matters will be held that morning at 9:00 a.m. Eastern. The general public is invited to listen to the call by dialing 800-579-2568 (U.S. domestic) or 785-424-1222 (international), and using conference ID 67083, or via a live audio webcast through our investor relations website. For those unable to listen to the live broadcast, a replay will be available on our website after the event.
About OneMain Holdings, Inc.
OneMain Financial (NYSE: OMF) is the leader in offering nonprime consumers responsible access to credit and is dedicated to improving the financial well-being of hardworking Americans. We empower our customers to solve today's problems and reach a better financial future through personalized solutions across 47 states, available online and in 1,300 locations. OneMain is committed to making a positive impact on the people and the communities we serve. For additional information, please visit www.OneMainFinancial.com.
Contacts
Investor Contact:
Peter R Poillon, 212-359-2432
[email protected]
View original content to download multimedia: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/onemain-holdings-announces-date-of-second-quarter-2025-earnings-release-and-conference-call-302500252.html
SOURCE OneMain Holdings, Inc.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TechCrunch
a minute ago
- TechCrunch
Who really benefits from the AI boom?
If you've been hearing about Trump's AI Action Plan and wondering who it actually benefits, you're not alone. On today's episode of Equity, Rebecca Bellan caught up with Amba Kak and Dr. Sarah Myers West from the AI Now Institute, a think tank focused on the social implications of AI and the consolidation of power in the tech industry. Their recent report, dubbed Artificial Power, lays out the political economy driving today's AI frenzy and what's at stake for everyone else. Artificial Power pushes back on what AI Now calls the 'too big to fail' myth, arguing that AI companies are pouring billions into massive compute infrastructure and foundational models, often with government support, despite shaky business models and limited public accountability. That push to scale and reach AGI, or artificial general intelligence, before 2030 has real-world consequences that don't disappear with the promises that AI will someday solve humanity's hardest problems. In the short term, societies are already facing environmental degradation, discriminatory algorithms, dismantled democratic institutions, lack of data privacy, and national security risk. Kak and West say these outcomes are the result of a series of choices, not an unpreventable reality. 'The future we're being sold is not inevitable,' Kak explained. Listen to the full episode to hear about: AI's growing consolidation and how it mirrors Big Tech's power dynamics. Why Silicon Valley is cheering on Trump's AI agenda, and the challenges of regulating AI. The disconnect between AGI hype and current, real-world harms. What a democratic, just, and accountable AI future could look like. Equity will be back Friday with our weekly news roundup, so stay tuned. Equity is TechCrunch's flagship podcast, produced by Theresa Loconsolo, and posts every Wednesday and Friday. Subscribe to us on Apple Podcasts, Overcast, Spotify and all the casts. You also can follow Equity on X and Threads, at @EquityPod.
Fast Company
a minute ago
- Fast Company
Starbucks was a pioneer of the mobile-first shop. Now its getting rid of them
More than five years after launching a mobile order and pick-up-only store format, Starbucks is abandoning the concept—and it signals a larger strategy for the coffee chain. Starbucks, which announced its sixth consecutive quarter of falling same-store sales on its earnings call Tuesday, opened its first mobile-only location in Manhattan's Penn Plaza in 2019. The store concept centered on a speedy, transactional experience that required consumers to place orders and make payments in advance on their phones. These locations did not have any seating to encourage latte drinkers to stick around, either. In retrospect, the concept foreshadowed an era of mobile-first, quick-service restaurant designs in response to changing consumer habits due to the pandemic and following economic inflation, and that's often meant a de-emphasis on dining rooms. Chipotle's digital-only restaurant to Chick-fil-A's all-mobile pickup restaurant are two such examples. While the idea behind the Starbucks mobile-only stores was well timed to the rise of contactless, takeout, and delivery fast food options, as Starbucks seeks to chart a comeback, the model no longer fits its strategy as it emphasizes its cafe experience. 'We found this format to be overly transactional and lacking the warmth and human connection that defines our brand,' Starbucks CEO Brian Niccol said on the earnings call. Between 80 to 90 of these locations will close by next year while some may be converted to traditional coffeehouses with seating. That doesn't mean Starbucks is moving away from mobile ordering, which accounts for 31% of transactions, but where the coffee shop has a physical presence, it wants somewhere guests can feel welcome. Niccol said a forthcoming prototype of a new small-footprint cafe will have a drive-through, room for 32 seats, and about 30% lower building costs. As Starbucks has brought back details like handwritten notes on coffee cups and an updated barista dress code and plans future store uplifts, a mobile-only storefront isn't the brand experience it's after anymore. It's not just about the coffee, it's about the coffee shop.
Gizmodo
a minute ago
- Gizmodo
Trump's EPA Wants to Pretend That Greenhouse Gases Aren't a Threat to Human Health
In 2009, the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) 'endangerment finding' empowered the U.S. to regulate emissions of greenhouse gases. This scientific and legal determination ruled that planet-warming gases such as carbon dioxide are dangerous to human health and welfare. Now, the Trump administration has moved to rescind that finding. At an auto dealership in Indiana on Tuesday, July 29, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin unveiled the agency's proposal to repeal the finding. The EPA claims this move would save Americans $54 billion in costs annually through the elimination of all greenhouse gas standards for motor vehicles and engines, including Biden's electric vehicle mandate. The rollback marks the most aggressive attempt by President Donald Trump to unravel federal restrictions on fossil fuels. Zeldin called it the 'largest deregulatory action in the history of America' on Tuesday, the Associated Press reports. 'With this proposal, the Trump EPA is proposing to end 16 years of uncertainty for automakers and American consumers,' Zeldin said, according to an agency release. Scientists, climate advocates, environmental policy experts, and former EPA leaders warn the repeal would have severe consequences for American health, well-being, and the climate. 'Abandoning all efforts to address climate change is not in the best interest of anyone but the fossil fuel industry, which has made trillions of dollars over the last 50 years and has shown that if unchecked, it will pursue profits at any cost, even if that destroys the American way of life,' Shannon Baker-Branstetter, senior director of domestic climate at the Center for American Progress, said in a statement. The Clean Air Act requires the EPA to regulate any air pollutant that endangers public health or welfare. In 2007, the Supreme Court ruled that greenhouse gases are subject to this mandate. Two years later, the endangerment finding determined that current and projected atmospheric concentrations of six key greenhouse gases 'threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations.' The simultaneously issued 'cause or contribute finding' pointed to motor vehicles and engines as major sources of hazardous greenhouse gas emissions. These determinations serve as the legal basis for the EPA to regulate planet-warming pollution. In the 16 years since the agency issued the endangerment finding, scientists have found overwhelming evidence to show that greenhouse gases endanger public health and drive global warming. Even under EPA regulation, emissions have led to deadly consequences for countless Americans, driving more frequent and intense extreme weather events and worsening air quality. Despite this, conservatives and some congressional Republicans have argued that the real threat is overregulation and hidden taxes. In March, Zeldin announced a formal reconsideration of the endangerment finding on the grounds that the EPA failed to consider the regulatory fallout back in 2009. That move was part of a series of environmental rollbacks that aimed to eliminate 31 regulations on clean air, clean water, climate change, and more, according to the AP. Trump set the precedent for these actions with a day-one executive order to drastically scale back environmental regulations, which also demanded the EPA submit a report 'on the legality and continuing applicability' of the endangerment finding. Now, Zeldin aims to 'undo the underpinning of $1 trillion in costly regulations' by revoking the finding altogether, according to the EPA release. The proposal must go through a lengthy review process, including public comment, before it's finalized. Environmental groups have voiced strong opposition to the decision and vowed to fight it, including the National Resources Defense Council (NRDC). 'The EPA wants to shirk its responsibility to protect us from climate pollution, but science and the law say otherwise,' Christy Goldfuss, executive director of the NRDC, said in a statement. 'NRDC's lawyers and scientists are not going to let that happen without a fight. If EPA finalizes this illegal and cynical approach, we will see them in court.'
