Target cuts annual forecast as tariffs, boycotts weigh on sales
Target has slashed its annual forecasts amid a pullback in discretionary spending due to tariff-driven uncertainty and a backlash against shifts in its diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policy.
The United States big box retailer, which reported its first-quarter earnings on Wednesday, relies on China for 30 percent of its store label goods. While it is on track to reduce its dependency by another 5 percent by the end of the year, tariff-driven uncertainty has caused a slump.
In its forecast, the Minneapolis, Minnesota-based retailer expects a low single-digit decline in annual sales. Wall Street analysts expected a marginal increase of 0.27 percent in annual sales, according to the LSEG. Target previously forecasted net sales growth of about 1 percent.
This comes as Bank of America recently forecasted that consumers have eased up on spending as the most recent report from The Conference Board showed a slowdown in consumer confidence, which hit a 13-year low in April. The US economy also showed the first contraction in three years in the first quarter.
Target's first-quarter comparable sales fell 3.8 percent compared with analysts' estimates of a 1.08 percent decline. It expects annual adjusted earnings of $7 to $9 per share, compared with its prior forecast of $8.80 to $9.80. Analysts were expecting $8.40.
'Expectations were very low for Target's first quarter. Even against that, Target's results came in light,' Michael Baker, a DA Davidson analyst, told the news agency Reuters. Target's stock has performed poorly, down nearly 28 percent this year, in contrast to Walmart's 9 percent gain and Home Depot's 2.3 percent decline.
Target's stock is tumbling on the news of its disappointing earnings report. As of 11am in New York (15:00 GMT), it was down 2.91 percent from the market open although it is up more than 1 percent over the past five days.
Target also said its first-quarter performance was impacted by changes made to its DEI policies in January.
Target ended many of its DEI policies, drawing condemnation as some of its critics noted that its commitment to inclusiveness had helped attract younger, more diverse consumers. The decision generated more attention as it coincided with US President Donald Trump's executive order to eliminate DEI policies in federal agencies and schools.
The backlash led to economic boycotts, notably from Reverend Jamal-Harrison Bryant, a Georgia pastor who organised a 40-day 'fast' of Target stores. He has since called for those efforts to continue in recognition of the fifth anniversary of George Floyd's murder by police in Minneapolis, Target's headquarters.
CEO Brian Cornell said the reversal of some DEI policies played a role in first-quarter performance but he couldn't quantify the impact.
'Target's [results] do nothing to restore confidence in the company. On the contrary, they are emblematic of a business that has made too many mistakes and has lost its way on several fronts,' GlobalData Managing Director Neil Saunders told Reuters, pointing to issues including poor inventory management and a lack of exciting merchandise.
Target's forecast contrasts with its bigger rival Walmart, which maintained its annual forecasts last week but said it would need to pass on higher prices due to tariffs. That has drawn the ire of Trump, who said Walmart should 'eat the tariffs' on imported goods instead of passing on the costs.
Unlike Walmart, which generates the bulk of its revenues by selling groceries like bananas, milk, toilet paper and shampoo, a majority of what Target sells falls in the nonessential category – largely apparel, home furnishings and beauty products, which it sources from China.
TJX, the parent company of retailer TJ Maxx, also reported its earnings on Wednesday, and while tariffs loom, the company is set to maintain its forecasts. The Massachusetts-based big box retailer expects comparable sales to grow 2 percent to 3 percent during the current quarter.
Unlike Target and Walmart, TJ Maxx, relies on expansive sourcing from middlemen in the US, which limits the impact of any new tariffs on China.
On a media call, Target executives declined to provide details on potential price increases due to tariffs. Most tariff-related increases could be offset, they said, but acknowledged that raising prices could be a 'last resort'.
Cornell said pricing decisions will largely depend on ongoing efforts to source more products from the US and reduce reliance on China.
'That is going to play a very important role,' he said.
Rick Gomez, the company's chief commercial officer, said Target is working on negotiating with suppliers, expanding sourcing to other Asian countries beyond China, re-evaluating its product assortment, and adjusting the timing and quantity of orders.
'These efforts are expected to offset the vast majority of the incremental tariff exposure,' Gomez said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Leaders of Canada and Mexico lash out at Trump steel tariff hike
The leaders of Canada and Mexico have criticised the latest hike in steel and aluminium tariffs under United States President Donald Trump, who increased import taxes on the metal from 25 to 50 percent. The international condemnation came just hours after the latest tariff increase went into effect early on Wednesday. Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said the tariff increases were 'unjustified'. 'They're illegal. They're bad for American workers, bad for American industry and, of course, for Canadian industry,' he said. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, meanwhile, pledged to pursue countermeasures if the Trump administration refuses to grant tariff relief. She warned that the tariffs would have a 'huge impact' on Mexico's steel and aluminium industries. 'This isn't about an eye for an eye, but rather about protecting our industry and our jobs,' she added, without specifying what steps her government might take. Wednesday's tariff hike had been unveiled last Friday, when Trump held a rally with steelworkers outside Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. That region of the US is a part of the Rust Belt, an area that has been heavily affected by the decline in US manufacturing. Trump pledged to use tariffs and other measures to bring jobs and investments back to the area. Previously, in March, Trump set tariffs on steel and aluminium at 25 percent. But he threatened to lift that rate to 50 percent specifically for Canadian imports of the metals, a plan he later appeared to walk back. Those threats, however, roiled relations between the US and its northern neighbour in particular. Canada is the top supplier of steel to the US, followed by Brazil and then Mexico. South Korea and China also top the list. Canada is also responsible for about 40 percent of aluminium imports to the US, followed by the UAE, Russia and Mexico. Carney's government has pledged to pursue retaliatory measures so long as Trump's tariffs remain in place. On Wednesday, one of Canada's largest labour unions, Unifor, called on Carney to take immediate action against the latest tariff hike, including by limiting the country's exports of critical metals to the US. 'Unifor is urging the federal government to act without delay to defend Canada's manufacturing sector and counter the escalating trade assault,' the union said in a statement. Premier Doug Ford, who leads the top manufacturing province in Canada, Ontario, also called for Canada to respond in kind and 'slap another 25 percent' on US steel imports. 'It's tariff for tariff, dollar for dollar. We need to tariff the steel coming into Canada an additional 25 percent, totalling 50 percent,' Ford told reporters. 'Everything's on the table right now.' Both Canada and Mexico have been hard hit by Trump's aggressive tariffs, which include a blanket 25-percent tax on all imports not subject to the US-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement (USMCA), as well as a separate 25-percent levy on automobile imports. The three countries have highly integrated economies, with products such as automobiles being built using supplies and factories from multiple locations. The USMCA pact was agreed upon during Trump's first term, from 2017 to 2021. But he has since signalled he hopes to renegotiate the free-trade deal to get more favourable terms for the US. But the doubling of the US steel and aluminium tariffs is expected to have a global impact, well beyond North America. The European Union is also bracing for the increase. The bloc's trade commissioner, Maros Sefcovic, met US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer on the sidelines of a meeting for the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) on Wednesday. 'We're advancing in the right direction at pace – and staying in close contact to maintain the momentum,' Sefcovic wrote on X afterwards. UK Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds also met with Greer, and he said steel and aluminium tariffs would remain at 25 percent for his country. The two countries have been in the process of forging a post-Brexit bilateral trade agreement, announcing a 'breakthrough' last month. 'We're pleased that as a result of our agreement with the US, UK steel will not be subject to these additional tariffs,' a British government spokesperson said. Trump's latest tariff hike comes days after a federal court ruled that his so-called reciprocal tariffs, which imposed customised taxes on nearly all US trading partners, were illegal. Trump had imposed those tariffs in April, only to pause them for 90 days. The court's ruling was quickly paused while legal proceedings continued, and Trump's tariffs have been allowed to remain in place for now. One of the hardest hit countries has been China, which saw US tariffs against its exports skyrocket to 145 percent earlier this year. The Trump administration, however, has since sought to reach a deal with China to end the trade war between the world's two largest economies. The White House said on Monday that Trump would speak to Chinese President Xi Jinping this week, raising hopes the duo could soothe tensions and speed up negotiations. But on Wednesday, Trump appeared to dampen hopes for a quick deal. 'I like President XI of China, always have, and always will, but he is VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!' he posted on his Truth Social platform. When asked about the remarks during a regular news briefing, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said Beijing's 'principles and stance on developing Sino-US relations are consistent'.
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump: Putin says Russia will ‘have to' respond to Ukraine attacks
Russian President Vladimir Putin has told Donald Trump in a telephone conversation that Moscow would have to respond to the recent Ukrainian drone attacks, the US president said. Trump said on Wednesday that the two men 'discussed the attack on Russia's docked airplanes, by Ukraine, and also various other attacks that have been taking place by both sides.' Putin 'did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields', Trump said in a social media post. Al Jazeera's Kimberly Halkett said that Trump described his 85-minute phone call with Putin as 'a good conversation but not one that would lead to immediate peace'. 'You have to remember that Donald Trump, when he came into office, was very confident that he could end this war on day one, but here we are now in June and the fact is … this is far from resolved,' she said from the White House. Moscow said earlier on Wednesday that military options were 'on the table' for its response to Ukrainian attacks deep inside Russia and accused the West of being involved in them. Russia also urged the US and Britain to restrain Kyiv after the attacks, which Ukrainian officials have lauded as showing Kyiv can still fight back after more than three years of war. British and US officials have said they had no prior knowledge of the weekend attacks on Russian nuclear-capable long-range bombers. In his social media post, Trump said he and Putin also discussed Iran. Putin suggested he would participate in talks aimed at reaching a new nuclear deal with Tehran, Trump said. 'I stated to President Putin that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon and, on this, I believe that we were in agreement,' Trump said. He accused Iran of 'slow-walking' decisions regarding the talks. Putin told Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian that Moscow was ready to help advance talks on a nuclear deal, the Kremlin said on Tuesday. But Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said earlier on Wednesday that Washington's proposal was against Tehran's national interests, amid sharp differences over whether Tehran can continue to enrich uranium.
Al Jazeera
6 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
What is the ‘revenge tax' in the US tax bill?
Tucked within the proposed 'Big Beautiful Bill', the more than 1,000-page tax and spending overhaul that United States President Donald Trump wants to see enacted in law, is a provision that is being referred to as a 'revenge tax'. The 'Enforcement of Remedies Against Unfair Foreign Taxes' in Section 899 targets countries that the Trump administration believes impose unfair or discriminatory taxes on US companies and individuals, and will allow the US to impose additional taxes on entities from those countries. The provision calls, for instance, for levies on revenue from digital services, such as data monetisation and online advertising. The proposal also includes a higher minimum tax on the profits of foreign entities, even if those profits are earned outside US borders. This could impact passive income streams, such as interest and dividends, and may discourage international investors from countries flagged as discriminatory. The administration's unpredictable approach to global economic policy has already created uncertainty in international markets. Should this measure be signed into law, it could further erode foreign investor confidence in the US market. 'This revenge tax move will add to economic uncertainty. It will stop foreign CEOs from investing – the very thing President Trump says he wants. It means more wild economic swings, stock market declines, less stability and a greater chance of recession this year,' Stuart Mackintosh, the executive director of the financial think tank Group of Thirty, told Al Jazeera. 'Every few days, we see a destabilising misuse of US power, more self-inflicted wounds, that look set to drive up prices and slow the economy. America has shredded its political and economic alliances. These revenge taxes underscore that America cannot be trusted.' Under the provision, certain foreign governments and international businesses could face an additional 20 percent tax, which would apply to non-US entities earning income from US sources, including interest, dividends and royalties. Taxes would be hiked gradually at the rate of 5 percent annually. It would also affect profits earned at US locations, which are transferred to foreign parent companies, as well as income from the sale of US real estate by designated 'bad actors'. Trusts, global foundations and partnerships with passive income could also be impacted. However, exceptions are built into the legislation for foreign pension funds and charitable organisations. The tax would only apply to countries designated as 'discriminatory' by the US Treasury Department. Countries not flagged would remain unaffected. House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith, a Republican from Missouri, said that while the provision could serve as an effective retaliatory tool, it 'will hopefully never take effect'. According to the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation, the measure could bring in revenue of $116.3bn over the next decade. But it would also lower tax revenue in the long term, by $12.9bn in both 2033 and 2034. The administration's shifting trade strategies have already led to legal battles, policy reversals and a climate of unpredictability that has left companies hesitant to make long-term plans. Companies like toy manufacturer Mattel and automaker Stellantis have suspended financial guidance due to the volatile nature of US tariff policy. These policies have also contributed to swings in consumer confidence. When Trump announced his series of sweeping tariffs against trade partners on April 2, which he dubbed 'Liberation Day', confidence fell to a 13-year low, only to rebound after the administration paused the tariffs' implementation. Analysts warn that provisions like the 'revenge tax' could deter foreign investment and strain developing partnerships. 'If you've got the headwinds of an extra withholding tax that starts at an extra 5 percent [and] moves up to 20 percent over the subsequent four years, I think [investors would] have second thoughts. In terms of optimising your investment strategy, you'd have a slightly smaller allocation to the US,' Chris Turner, the global head of markets and regional head of research for the United Kingdom and Europe at ING, a financial services company, told Al Jazeera. There is already evidence that some economies have started diversifying away from the US. Canada, for example, has increased trade with Europe and Asia. Trump's trade policies have also been cited as a factor in foreign governments divesting from US treasuries, while the European Central Bank continues to promote the euro as a competing global reserve currency. This measure adds another mechanism to the Trump administration's broader trade strategy, which has relied heavily on tariffs even as many face legal scrutiny. Last week, the US Court of International Trade blocked the administration's blanket global tariffs enacted under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act. A federal district court temporarily halted the block's enforcement as legal battles unfold. Experts believe many of these tariffs may not withstand judicial review. 'There's no statute that provides the president that authority', to impose sweeping international tariffs through the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, Greg Shaffer, a law professor at Georgetown University, told Al Jazeera. 'And as the court said, if there were such a statute, it would be unconstitutional because the Constitution provides that responsibility to Congress.' However, the ruling did not address tariffs on aluminium, steel and automobiles, which fall under a different legal basis – the 1962 Trade Expansion Act. Under that statute, Trump recently announced plans to raise those tariffs to 50 percent for most imports.
