Maingear's Retro95 PC blends '90s workstation nostalgia with modern horsepower
That's because you can fit this sucker with up to NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 graphics. It supports Intel and AMD processors, up to the Ryzen 7 9800X3D. You can also customize it with up to 96GB of DDR5 memory, 8TB of Gen4 NVMe storage, Noctua fans and an 850W PSU. It's a ray-traced wolf in pixelated sheep's clothing.
It looks like the Retro95's case is sourced from the Silverstone FLP01. (That makes sense since Maingear is a custom PC builder.) The case is an ode to beige horizontal PC cases, designed to serve as a pedestal for CRT monitors. They were the default from the early 1980s to mid-1990s. (If you prefer the tower design that succeeded it, Silverstone's follow-up to the FLP01 should scratch that itch.)
The Retro95 includes a hidden front-panel I/O array and modern airflow design. And if its exterior has you nostalgic for games you played on similar-looking PCs, you can add a DVD drive. (Who's up for Carmen Sandiego?)
"This one is for the gamers who lugged CRTs to LAN parties, swapped out disks between levels and got their gaming news from magazines," Maingear CEO Wallace Santos wrote in a press release. "The Retro95 drop is our way of honoring the classic era of gaming, with a system that looks like the one you had as a kid but runs like the monster you'd spec from Maingear today."
Unfortunately, the Retro95 is a limited-edition run. Maingear says once it sells out, that's game over. Given its high-powered hardware and special edition status, it's no surprise that this PC ain't cheap. It starts at $1,599. You can order one exclusively from Maingear's website on July 23.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Can AMD Stock Hit $210 in 2025?
Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) has captured investors' attention once again as optimism builds around its potential in the booming artificial intelligence (AI) and data center markets. With shares currently trading around $179, one of the most bullish voices on Wall Street, UBS, has lifted its 12-month price target to $210 from $150 while maintaining a 'Buy' rating. Some analysts believe AMD's expanding AI chip lineup and strengthening position in server solutions could drive significant upside. However, others remain cautious, pointing to stiff competition, macroeconomic uncertainty, and high expectations already priced into the stock. As excitement grows, is AMD stock poised to maintain its momentum and hit the $210 mark in 2025? More News from Barchart Morgan Stanley Says Nvidia Has 'Exceptional' Strength. Should You Buy NVDA Stock Here? Dear MicroStrategy Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for July 31 2 Growth Stocks Wall Street Predicts Will Soar 74% to 159% Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines. About Advanced Micro Devices Stock Based in Santa Clara, California, Advanced Micro Devices is a fabless semiconductor firm known for high-performance computing solutions including its Ryzen, EPYC, Threadripper, Radeon, and Instinct product lines. Since its founding, AMD has evolved into a major player in CPUs, GPUs, adaptive SoCs, FPGAs, and AI accelerators. AMD's market capitalization currently stands at around $291 billion, placing it among the top semiconductor firms globally. AMD has delivered a remarkable price performance through 2025, signaling a powerful comeback. As of the last session, AMD closed at $179.51, after hitting its 52‑week high of $182.31 on July 29, marking an impressive recovery from its April low of $76.48. Its year‑to‑date (YTD) gains stand at 49%, catalyzed by strong AI and data-center demand, particularly surrounding the Instinct MI350/MI355X GPU series and analyst upgrades. AMD stock is currently priced at 56 times forward earnings, trading at a lofty valuation compared to the sector median and its historical average. AMD Delivered Robust Q1 Performance AMD reported its first-quarter 2025 earnings on May 6, delivering a strong start to the year with revenue of $7.4 billion, up 36% year-over-year (YOY), and surpassing expectations. On a non‑GAAP basis, net income rose 55% YOY to $1.6 billion, with EPS of $0.96, also marking a 55% increase. Gross margin expanded to 54%, while operating income on a non-GAAP basis rose 57% to reach $1.8 billion, translating into an operating margin of 24%. The data center segment stood out, generating $3.7 billion in revenue, up 57% YOY, driven by strong demand for EPYC and Instinct. The client and gaming segment delivered $2.9 billion, rising 28% from the year-ago quarter, with client processor demand particularly robust. Finally, the embedded segment experienced a modest 3% decline to $823 million as demand remained mixed. AMD further forecast a revenue impact for the year due to the export license requirement, which could hamper overall results. Yet, management issued optimistic guidance for Q2, which is about to be reported on Tuesday, Aug. 5 after the market close. AMD expects Q2 revenue of $7.4 billion, plus or minus $300 million. Analysts covering AMD predict its EPS to rise by 18% YOY to $3.09 in fiscal 2025, before improving by around 57% annually to reach $4.86 in fiscal 2026. What Do Analysts Expect for AMD Stock? UBS analyst Timothy Arcuri raised his price target from $150 to $210 recently, maintaining a 'Buy' rating, citing growing demand in both PC and data center markets as well as stronger investor sentiment. HSBC also upgraded AMD from 'Hold' to 'Buy,' doubling its price target to $200. The upgrade was prompted by strong performance from the new Instinct MI350 series, which analysts believe rivals Nvidia's (NVDA) Blackwell GPUs and could drive upside. However, some analysts are still preferring the sidelines. Goldman Sachs initiated coverage of AMD earlier this month, assigning a 'Neutral' rating and a $140 price target. While it acknowledged the company's solid execution and substantial gains in server and PC CPU market share, the firm cautioned that AMD's server CPU share gains may decelerate due to rising ARM penetration, and that merchant GPU market share may remain limited amid intense competition. AMD stock has a consensus 'Moderate Buy' rating overall. Out of 44 analysts covering the semiconductor stock, 28 recommend a 'Strong Buy,' two give a 'Moderate Buy,' 13 analysts stay cautious with a 'Hold' rating, and one analyst gives a 'Strong Sell' rating. AMD has already surpassed its average analyst price target of $152.42. However, the Street-high target price of $223 recently set by Arete Research suggests as much as 24% upside ahead. On the date of publication, Subhasree Kar did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Intel Corporation (INTC) Taught Me Not To Trust AI Chatbots, Says Jim Cramer
We recently published . Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC) continues to face troubles in 2025 as new CEO Lip-Bu Tan tries to steady the ship, which has continued to shakily float for years. The firm's latest earnings report was another setback as it saw management warn about potentially writing off the 18A manufacturing process technology, which Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC) has spent billions of dollars to develop. Cramer discussed the firm in detail after its earnings report, and while he was optimistic about Tan, he also admitted that the turnaround is a long-term affair. This time, Cramer shared how AI chatbots failed to deliver when he queried about Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC): 'Intel yesterday, I read one of these and it said that Intel's on the hook for x. And they Intel, have already made it so they're not on the hook. For the debt. They did a program where they don't get paid until they paid until they built something.' Here's what Cramer said about Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC) after the firm's earnings report: 'Okay so the quarter's reported. And, the quarter really didn't have anything. Lip-Bu Tan's just gotten there. But there was a devastating critique of Gelsinger, of the previous regime. Now I think that sometimes you have to do this really important branch. This is something new. And that's what he felt about Gelsinger. So one of the things that really, I think that if you're thinking about the impact, the government gave them 8.5 billion dollars and they also loaned 11 billion. David, this is not coming together for the Biden administration. Meaning that, look, I'm sure Lip-Bu Tan's going to pay, he's the new CEO but it looks like they picked the wrong horse. And it says to people, particularly this government now, that you've got to be very careful when you have a government that is choosing who's going to win. Because they chose a loser. And a big loser. While we acknowledge the potential of INTC as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Miami Herald
3 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Intel used to be the most valuable US chipmaker. How it fell far behind Nvidia
Earlier this year, Intel's new chief executive Lip-Bu Tan made frank remarks about how the Silicon Valley chipmaker keeps coming up short. "For quite a long time for Intel, we fell behind on innovation. As a result, we have been too slow to adapt and to meet your needs," Tan told Intel's customers and partners at a company event in late March. "You deserve better, and we need to improve, and we will." Intel, a Santa Clara, California-based tech behemoth that fueled the rise of personal computers, sits at a major crossroads in the company's 57-year-old history as the competition to dominate artificial intelligence escalates. Known for making the "brains" that power computers, Intel used to be the most valuable U.S. chipmaker before Nvidia claimed the top spot. It's also facing more competition from rivals such as Advanced Micro Devices and Samsung. The AI frenzy has greatly benefited Nvidia, a company that created a specialized computer chip that's proven valuable not only for gaming but also for AI model training, data centers and robotics. While Nvidia's worth ballooned to more than $4 trillion, Intel has seen its market value drop to around $87 billion. "It's going to be tough for them," said Mario Morales, group vice president for enabling technologies and semiconductors at the International Data Corporation. "They missed a very big shift and they don't yet have the products in AI to compete - and that market is growing fast." In the last five years, Intel's stock price has plunged more than 58%. It posted a net loss of $18.8 billion in 2024 and plans to slash roughly 25,000 workers this year. Intel's lengthy history has been filled with highs and lows, but a series of big missed opportunities, manufacturing delays and management missteps hampered the growth of a company long synonymous with Silicon Valley's rise, analysts say. Tan, a 65-year-old tech leader who became Intel's chief executive in March, is trying to steer the company in the right direction. Intel has bet big on its foundry business, taking on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., which makes chips for other companies such as Apple and Nvidia. Reining in costs, Intel has scrapped manufacturing projects in Germany and Poland while slowing construction of its Ohio factories. "There are no more blank checks. Every investment must make economic sense," Tan told employees in a memo last week. Intel's rise and fall Founded in 1968, Intel focused heavily on researching and developing new technologies in its early days. Robert Noyce and Gordon Moore, already well-known tech figures, left their jobs at Fairchild Semiconductor to launch what would become Intel. Noyce co-invented the integrated circuit, laying the foundation for the development of laptops, smartphones and other modern electronics. Moore was known for making an observation that became a guiding principle for the semiconductor industry. The company grew rapidly in its early years. Intel's first engineers worked from a conference room in Mountain View, California, before the company moved to its own facility in Santa Clara. The company released memory chips before creating the world's first commercially available microprocessor and other innovations that made it possible for companies to build more affordable computers. As computer sales from Dell, Microsoft and other tech companies rose, Intel saw its market value reach a record $495 billion in 2000 during the dot-com boom, according to Reuters. But the company also made a series of missteps that would haunt it later, analysts said. Intel declined to comment. "It's been on a weak footing for so long because of those historical poor decisions," said Jacob Bourne, a technology analyst at eMarketer. "Now it's at this point where it has to cut all these costs to try and become profitable." One of Intel's biggest missed opportunities: supplying chips for the first iPhone in 2007. Former Intel Chief Executive Paul Otellini told The Atlantic in 2013 that Apple was interested in paying a certain price for a chip but it was below what Intel forecasted. That prediction turned out to be wrong and Otellini expressed regret for not following his gut. "We ended up not winning it - or passing on it, depending on how you want to view it. And the world would have been a lot different if we'd done it," Otellini said in that interview. But strategic missteps weren't Intel's only problems. The company experienced process technology delays, opening the door for its rivals such as AMD that offered powerful and efficient chips to capture customers. Pat Gelsinger, who served as Intel's chief technology officer before returning to lead the chipmaker in 2021, focused on an ambitious and costly turnaround plan for the company. He set a goal in which Intel would develop five new semiconductor process nodes within four years. The federal government awarded Intel billions of dollars last year to support its semiconductor manufacturing expansion in the United States but the company's net losses were also widening. In 2024, Intel's foundry business reported an operating loss of $13.4 billion, nearly double compared with the previous year's loss, according to its annual report. "Gelsinger threw fuel on the fire, because he started spending money like crazy to build out this massive amount of manufacturing capacity for business that they did not have," said Stacy Rasgon, a senior analyst at Bernstein covering U.S. Semiconductors. Then the board reportedly forced out Gelsinger, who announced his retirement last year before Tan took over as chief executive. Another turnaround plan Intel's new chief executive has been focused on cutting costs including around the company's foundry business. He told employees in a note last week the company invested too much money without enough demand. And Intel said it might pause or discontinue its upcoming chip manufacturing process technology known as 14A if it can't land a "significant" customer. While Intel has been eclipsed by some of its rivals, the company is still a big player in the semiconductor industry. IDC, which analyzed semiconductor revenue, said in 2024 Intel ranked third behind Nvidia and Samsung. It dropped to the fourth spot behind SK Hynix, a South Korean company that supplies memory chips, during the first quarter of this year. Analysts don't see Intel going away anytime soon. And as tech companies work on rolling out new AI-powered hardware, that could also present another opportunity for Intel. Alvin Nguyen, a senior analyst at Forrester, said some of the concerns around Intel being in trouble might be "overstated." "They may not be at the top like they once were, but they are still, ultimately, very important for all industries because their chips are used virtually everywhere," he said. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
