
Russian mum stabbed after 'breasts cut off' over complaint son was killed in war
A Russian mother horrifically had her lips sewn up and breasts cut off before being brutally killed for reportedly "complaining her son had been killed in the war in Ukraine".
The bloodstained body of the woman with multiple stab wounds was found on a roadside as a suspect allegedly tried to move it to a hiding place, before fleeing the scene. A 52-year-old man has been arrested and detained for two months on suspicion of murder in the Arkhara district of Amur region of eastern Russia.
Macabre footage showed the scene, as someone in the clip claimed "all" the woman's organs removed. It comes after reports of a dad's desperate phone call moments before explosion kills him and his daughters
READ MORE: NATO scrambles warplanes as Russia shoots down West's F-16 fighter jet in Ukraine onslaught
The shocking footage caught a person as they said: "Someone killed her and dumped her on our road. They sewed her mouth shut, cut out all her organs, cut off her breasts, and left her there. We've got forensic experts working on it now."
The victim had reportedly been drinking with a friend when she mentioned her soldier son had died in Vladimir Putin 's war against Ukraine. A local Russian site said a fight then broke out and the man allegedly tied the woman up before the fatal attack.
The woman died at the scene from her horrific injuries. The Russian Investigative Committee said: "Two days later, after waiting until it got dark outside, the suspect decided to get rid of the mutilated body of the deceased to hide traces of the crime.
"He dragged the body along the street to a secluded place to hide it, but his actions were noticed by people passing by, as a result of which he abandoned the body and escaped. After some time, the suspect was detained in the village by police officers, the crime weapon was seized at his place of residence."
The identities of the suspect and victim have not been revealed but the man was pictured in court on Friday. He was remanded in custody for two months pending further investigations.
This comes as the world waits for a face-to-face meeting between Donald Trump and Putin in another attempt to broker a ceasefire in Ukraine. The evil dictator has been largely isolated by Western powers since the 2022 invasion but Trump has repeatedly called Putin on the phone and has sent his special envoy to Moscow.
Yuri Ushakov, the Russian leader's foreign policy adviser, said: "The American side has suggested, and we have agreed in principle, to hold a high-level bilateral meeting, that is, a meeting between presidents Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump."
Ushakov confirmed the meeting it due to happen but has not confirmed where it could take place.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Justice Dept probes New York AG James as it escalates scrutiny of Trump targets
WASHINGTON, Aug 8 (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department has taken steps to investigate several long-running targets of President Donald Trump, escalating his administration's efforts to use government power against those who have pursued their own investigations into him or publicly resisted his agenda. The Justice Department is investigating New York Attorney General Letitia James over her civil fraud case against Trump. Prosecutors have convened a grand jury and subpoenaed James' office for documents about the lawsuit against Trump and a separate case she brought against the National Rifle Association gun rights group, a person familiar with the investigation confirmed to Reuters on Friday. The department has also named Ed Martin, whose nomination to be the top federal prosecutor in Washington, D.C., faltered amid opposition from some Republican senators, a special attorney to investigate allegations of mortgage fraud, according to a separate person familiar with the move. Both James and Democratic Senator Adam Schiff of California, a long-running Trump critic who led his first impeachment in 2020, have faced accusations they made false statements on real estate documents. Both have denied wrongdoing. Reuters could not immediately determine the scope of Martin's investigation. An investigation does not necessarily result in charges. Abbe Lowell, a lawyer representing James, called the reported probe "the most blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president's political retribution campaign" and said the appointment of Martin "makes it crystal clear this is a manufactured investigation to pursue political retribution." 'Any weaponization of the justice system should disturb every American. We stand strongly behind our successful litigation,' James' office said in a statement. A spokesperson for Schiff did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Martin is also leading an effort to review instances of alleged weaponization against Trump and his supporters. He is not a special counsel, a prosecutor with a degree of independence who is appointed to handle politically sensitive investigations, and must work with a U.S. attorney's office to bring any charges, the source knowledgeable about his appointment told Reuters. The investigations relate to officials Trump, who campaigned in part on a vow of retribution, has repeatedly assailed, on social media and at political rallies as partisan enemies. James is one of several Democratic state attorneys general who have repeatedly sued to block Trump administration actions. The civil fraud case, brought forward in 2022, resulted in a $355 million judgment against Trump last year after a judge found he fraudulently overstated his net worth to dupe lenders as he built his real estate empire. Trump is appealing the judgment, which has grown with interest. A New York appeals court signaled skepticism about the case during a court hearing last year. Trump has repeatedly accused prosecutors of bringing the case against him for political reasons. The Trump administration's Justice Department has been scrutinizing the lawsuit as part of its weaponization review. In the NRA case, a New York jury last year found the group's former leader and others liable for years of financial mismanagement. The NRA's lawyers alleged the group was targeted because of its political advocacy. The Justice Department is examining whether the cases brought by James deprived Trump and others of their civil rights, according to the first person knowledgeable about the investigation, who did not provide evidence for the inquiry. The probe was reported earlier by Fox News and The New York Times. Trump faced the same charge as part of a now-dismissed federal case accusing him of plotting to overturn his defeat in the 2020 election. Legal decisions are often appealed, but it is highly unusual for a prosecutor to face a criminal investigation over legal cases, especially those that have gone to trial and been sustained by courts. Reuters reported that prosecutors have been authorized to open a grand jury investigation into the actions of former officials in Democratic President Barack Obama's administration.


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Trump orders seven-day crackdown in Washington DC citing ‘violent crime'
Donald Trump has ordered federal officers to start sweeping the streets of Washington DC, launching what the White House is calling a seven-day crackdown on violent crime just one day after threatening to 'federalize' the city. The mobilization, which began on Thursday night, follows an attempted carjacking that left well-known Trump administration figure Edward 'Big Balls' Coristine bloodied and injured. 'Washington DC is an amazing city, but it has been plagued by violent crime for far too long,' the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, said in a statement. 'President Trump has directed an increased presence of federal law enforcement to protect innocent citizens. Starting tonight, there will be no safe harbor for violent criminals in DC.' The deployments come despite crime statistics showing violent crime in Washington hit a 30-year low in 2024, according to city police data. Crime has continued to decline in the first half of 2025 compared with the previous year. The operation will focus on 'high traffic tourist areas', Leavitt said, and involves multiple federal agencies working alongside local police forces under Trump's March executive order 'Making DC Safe and Beautiful Task Force'. All federal officers are clearly identified in marked vehicles and maintain high visibility, according to the White House statement. The announcement follows Trump's social media threat to take federal control of Washington DC if local authorities failed to address crime. In a Truth Social post, the president called for minors as young as 14 to be prosecuted as adults and declared: 'If this continues, I am going to exert my powers, and FEDERALIZE this City.' Federal officers from the US park police will lead the effort, supported by Immigration and Customs Enforcement's homeland security investigations unit and enforcement and removal operations divisions. The Metropolitan police department, US Capitol police and Metro transit police are also participating. On the first night after the White House announcement, federal agent deployment across the city was reportedly minimal. The Associated Press conducted a two-hour street tour starting at 1am and found little evidence of the promised surge. Just before 2am on Friday, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives posted on social media that federal law enforcement partners were 'out ensuring that the residents of the District of Columbia are safer this evening' while appearing to be near the Petworth metro station in north-west Washington DC. They tagged US park police, the US Marshals Service and local Ice and FBI offices. The Washington Legal Clinic raised concerns about the operation's scope, warning on social media that Trump was planning '7 nights of action, rounding up homeless people and attempting civil commitment or arrests for as many as possible'. The organization noted there was currently no available shelter space. The White House, in their statement, said the seven-day operation could be extended 'as needed'.


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Sheinbaum rejects US ‘invasion' after Trump orders military to target Mexico cartels
Mexico's president, Claudia Sheinbaum, has rejected the idea that the US might invade Mexico after news reports suggested Donald Trump had authorized the use of military force targeting drug cartels deemed terrorist organizations in Latin American countries. 'The United States is not going to come to Mexico with their military,' she said during a daily news conference on Friday. 'We cooperate, we collaborate, but there will be no invasion. It's off the table, absolutely off the table.' The Mexican president said her government had been informed of the executive order but insisted that 'it had nothing to do with the participation of any military or any institution on our territory. There is no risk that they will invade our territory.' News of Trump's secret directive to the Pentagon was first reported by the New York Times, which cited people familiar with the matter, and noted that the order 'provides an official basis for the possibility of direct military operations at sea and on foreign soil against cartels'. The secretary of state, Marco Rubio, said the move would enable the US government to use the military to target trafficking organizations. 'It allows us to now target what they're operating and to use other elements of American power, intelligence agencies, the Department of Defense, whatever … to target these groups if we have an opportunity to do it,' Rubio said. 'We have to start treating them as armed terrorist organizations, not simply drug dealing organizations.' Trump has made going after Latin American drug-trafficking organizations a top priority of his administration: in February, the state department designated seven organized crime groups as foreign terrorist organizations, including five powerful cartels in Mexico. At the time, the White House claimed these groups constituted 'a national security threat beyond that posed by traditional organized crime' with activities including 'infiltration into foreign governments across the Western Hemisphere'. It is unclear how much impact that designation has had, as US agencies already have a range of tools to target transnational organized crime groups by restricting their members' abilities to travel or do business. But the designation would widen the range of potential targets for prosecution to include anyone who provides 'material support' to the cartels. The Trump administration has also deployed thousands of active-duty combat troops, as well as drones and spy planes to the south-west US border in order to crack down on the northward flow of drugs, particularly fentanyl, as well as staunch the flow of immigrants. This latest order would represent a profound and unprecedented escalation of tactics by the US government in Latin America, potentially opening the door for unilateral American military assaults across the region. Jack Riley, former deputy administrator of the Drug Enforcement Agency who helped lead the capture of the drug kingpin Joaquín 'El Chapo' Guzmán, welcomed the Trump administration's directive, having long been a proponent of designating cartels as terrorist organizations. 'This to me is the next logical step,' said Riley. 'It probably opens up avenues for training our counterparts, additional funding obviously, and puts some teeth into the federal agencies that are operating overseas.' Still, Riley cautioned that Trump's order may face obstacles at home before troops can even set foot overseas. 'You're probably going to have some legal challenges in the US to his authority to do this without congressional approval,' he said. 'But that doesn't seem to bother him.' In Mexico, however, security analysts feared the move would not only be ineffective at eliminating drug-trafficking groups but also prove devastating to US-Mexico relations. 'It's not a welcome development,' said Cecilia Farfán-Méndez, head of the North American observatory at the Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime. 'And beyond the narrative, it seems to me that once again there's been a misdiagnosis of these illicit markets and how we can weaken and dismantle them.' The news comes at a delicate time for US-Mexico relations, with Mexico in the midst of negotiating a tariff deal with the Trump administration as well as a new security agreement, which Sheinbaum had said was close to being signed. Mexico and the United States have often cooperated closely on security, including during the Mérida Initiative back under former President Felipe Calderón. But even then, said Farfán-Méndez, US boots on the ground was seen as a red line. This new move by the Trump administration would potentially cross that line – with devastating impacts on the countries' relationship. 'It would have very serious consequences, where Mexico would stop cooperating,' she said. 'This does seem to me like it would lead Mexico to ask, 'what's the incentive to collaborate with you? If you're going to take unilateral action anyway?''