logo
Kamala Harris sparks backlash over July 4 post — critics slam dark tone and cropped Joe Biden photo

Kamala Harris sparks backlash over July 4 post — critics slam dark tone and cropped Joe Biden photo

Economic Times17 hours ago
Kamala Harris's Independence Day message sparked controversy due to its somber tone and a photo cropping out President Biden, igniting speculation about her 2028 ambitions. Critics found the message inappropriate for the holiday, while others interpreted it as a signal of her future political aspirations. Her declining poll numbers have fueled further discussion about a potential presidential run.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
This Fourth of July, I am taking a moment to reflect. Things are hard right now. They are probably going to get worse before they get better.
But I love our country — and when you love something, you fight for it. Together, we will continue to fight for the ideals of our nation. pic.twitter.com/pYxJVw0fiD undefined Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) July 4, 2025
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
What are critics saying about her holiday message?
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Is Kamala Harris planning a 2028 presidential run?
FAQs
Former Vice President Kamala Harris ' Independence Day message did not meet many Americans' expectations. Her somber demeanor and a photo that appeared to crop out President Joe Biden sparked immediate online outrage, political speculation, and criticism from both sides of the aisle.Critics accused her of making the holiday about herself, which fueled speculation about her 2028 plans. Her declining poll numbers and public profile fueled the growing political chatter.'This Fourth of July, I am taking a moment to reflect. Things are hard right now. They are probably going to get worse before they get better," Harris wrote on X on Friday."'But I love our country — and when you love something, you fight for it. Together, we will continue to fight for the ideals of our nation.'Users of X quickly pointed out that Harris' promoted image, which featured her and first gentleman Doug Emhoff enjoying a July 2024 Independence Day fireworks display, was framed to easily omit Biden and first wife Jill."It's very symbolic that Kamala cropped Joe out," said Link Lauren, a former senior strategist to the presidential campaign of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who posted another photo from the White House balcony showing the first couple a few feet away, as per a report by The NY Post.Others objected to her holiday statement's menacing tone.Another X user teasingly said, 'Whose elbow is that at the right[?]'A third netizen advised her to "just enjoy the day," while another added, "Among other reasons, this is why you're not President."A fourth remarked, using the vice president's favorite motto, "America is unburdened by what has been."'Feeling grateful we didn't end up with a President who posts 'things are gonna get worse' on the 4th of July,' Kiersten Pels, a spokeswoman for the Republican National Committee, added.According to Mark Simone, presenter of 710 WOR radio, Kamala has established a new record for the worst Fourth of July message ever.Others, however, felt that her use of the word "fight" hinted to her future political aspirations.Mike Davis, the founder of the Article III Project and a Trump supporter, made fun of Kamala by saying, "Don't stop fighting." 'And please run again in 2028.''Don't stop fighting, Kamala,' mocked Article III Project founder and Trump ally Mike Davis.One X user pondered, "She's definitely running in 2028."Kamala Harris' popularity and prospects of winning the Democratic presidential nomination in 2028 are deteriorating, according to recent public polling.According to an Emerson College poll, only 13% of respondents would support Harris in the primary, while 16% would support Pete Buttigieg, the former Transportation Secretary who withdrew from the 2020 Democratic race with only 15 delegates before Super Tuesday.She has received far higher ratings in other polls; in the 2028 primary, 36% of Democratic and Democratic-leaning independent voters supported her, according to a Morning Consult poll, as quoted in a report by The NY Post.Many people found her message too depressing for a national holiday, and they criticized the cropped photo that left out Joe and Jill Biden, calling it symbolic and politically insensitive.Although she has not officially said yes or no, her recent statements and political moves have fueled new speculation. Her future plans are expected to be decided by the end of summer.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's MAGA Ally Laura Loomer Predicts These 3 Americans Will Join Musk's New Party
Trump's MAGA Ally Laura Loomer Predicts These 3 Americans Will Join Musk's New Party

NDTV

time43 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Trump's MAGA Ally Laura Loomer Predicts These 3 Americans Will Join Musk's New Party

Washington: US President Donald Trump's MAGA (Make America Great Again) ally Laura Loomer predicted on Sunday that three famous Americans-- including Tucker Carlson, Marjorie Taylor Greene and Thomas Massie-- will join billionaire Elon Musk's new America Party. Following through on his threat, Trump's former presidential advisor and the world's richest person, announced the launch of his new political party in the United States earlier today, just a day after US President Donald Trump signed the Big, Beautiful Bill into law. Taking to X, Loomer wrote, "I predict Tucker Carlson, MTG, and Thomas Massie will join the new 'America Party' to spite President Trump." In the past, Loomer has labelled Carlson, an American conservative political commentator, a "fake Trump supporter." Geene became the MAGA leader's target after he sided with Musk over his criticism of the Big Beautiful legislation. Massie, a Musk-backed legislator, was among two Republicans who voted against Trump's signature spending bill alongside the entire House Democratic Caucus. Trump has previously called him a "pathetic loser." Musk's New Party Musk, who was Trump's biggest political donor in the 2024 election, launched his America Party to challenge what he described as the country's "one-party system." The tech mogul had a bitter falling out with the president after leading the Republicans' effort to slash spending and cut federal jobs as head of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Musk opposed Trump's massive domestic spending plan, saying it would explode the US debt, and vowed to do everything in his power to defeat lawmakers who voted for it. Now, with his own political framework under the so-called America Party, Musk will try and achieve that. "When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy," the SpaceX and Tesla boss posted on X, the social media platform that he owns. "Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom." Musk cited a poll -- uploaded on Friday, US Independence Day -- in which he asked whether respondents "want independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system" that has dominated US politics for some two centuries. The yes-or-no survey earned more than 1.2 million responses. "By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!" he posted on Saturday.

Harvard students push back as over 200 sign open letter against demands from Trump administration
Harvard students push back as over 200 sign open letter against demands from Trump administration

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Harvard students push back as over 200 sign open letter against demands from Trump administration

Over 200 Harvard students have signed an open letter urging the University not to bow to political pressure, as former President Donald Trump claims a 'historic' deal with Harvard is imminent. The letter, circulated by Harvard Students for Freedom —an unrecognized student group—was released on July 4 to emphasize concerns around institutional independence and academic freedom. According to a report by The Harvard Crimson , the letter attracted 197 public signatures and 29 anonymous ones from undergraduate and graduate students alike. It was addressed 'To Harvard from its Students' and expressed unease about potential compromises in ongoing negotiations between the University and the Trump administration. Concerns over academic freedom, student rights The letter outlines several red lines that students believe the University must not cross. These include refraining from altering its curriculum under political pressure, refusing to dismiss faculty members over ideological disagreements, and not disciplining students for exercising peaceful free speech. One of the more pressing concerns involves the possible sharing of disciplinary records of international students, which students believe could open the door to politically motivated deportations. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 새로 나온 '실비보험' 최적가 비교가입! "月 보험료 낮추고, 보장은 든든하게"... 굿리치 [등록번호:제2006038313호] 가입하기 Undo The group stressed that any deal with the federal government should not come at the expense of Harvard's core academic principles, nor should it set a precedent that undermines university autonomy nationwide. Independence Day release marks symbolic resistance The timing of the letter's release, on July 4, was a deliberate choice. The group positioned the move as a show of unity and a reaffirmation of values such as freedom of expression and institutional integrity. By publishing the letter on a national holiday, the students aimed to frame their message as a defense of foundational American principles, according to The Harvard Crimson . University response remains guarded While Trump has publicly claimed that Harvard is close to reaching a deal with his administration, the University has not confirmed those claims. It has only stated that its communications with the White House have focused on efforts to combat antisemitism and support viewpoint diversity. This ambiguity has sparked concern among students, faculty, and alumni about the nature of the negotiations and their potential implications. The student letter argues that Harvard must maintain its stance, guided by legal principles and a commitment to truth. The signatories contend that conceding to political pressure would erode the University's credibility and autonomy, not just for Harvard, but across higher education institutions in the U.S. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!

Trump signs law hiking tax on Harvard's endowment income: Elite universities brace for financial hit
Trump signs law hiking tax on Harvard's endowment income: Elite universities brace for financial hit

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Trump signs law hiking tax on Harvard's endowment income: Elite universities brace for financial hit

Trump signs law hiking tax on Harvard's endowment income: In a major shake-up for higher education funding in the United States, former President Donald Trump has signed into law a sweeping tax and spending bill that sharply increases the federal excise tax on endowment income for wealthy private universities. The law is expected to cost Harvard University over $200 million annually, with immediate effects on its financial operations. The legislation, titled the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' , raises the tax on endowment investment income from 1.4% to 8% for institutions with more than $2 million in endowment assets per domestic, tuition-paying student. With over $2.9 million per student and an endowment exceeding $53 billion, Harvard is firmly in the highest tax bracket. The tax applies only to annual investment income, which for Harvard stood at $2.5 billion in FY2024. This means a potential tax bill of $200 million or more annually — nearly five times its previous tax liability. Elite institutions in top tax slab Harvard is not alone. A handful of elite private universities, including Yale, Stanford, MIT, and Princeton, will also fall under the 8% tax rate. The law applies only to US-based private colleges with at least 3,000 domestic tuition-paying students, at least half of whom must be US residents. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Why seniors are rushing to get this Internet box – here's why! Techno Mag Learn More Undo The bill introduces a tiered system: 8% for endowments above $2 million per student 4% for those between $750,000 and $2 million 1.4% for $500,000 to $750,000 Public institutions and smaller colleges are excluded. Restricted endowment funds limit spending flexibility While Harvard's endowment is vast, nearly 80% of its funds are restricted by donor agreements and legal conditions. That leaves a much smaller portion of flexible, or 'unrestricted,' funds to absorb the tax blow. These unrestricted funds are typically used for financial aid, faculty salaries, research funding, and core operations, all of which could now face cuts. In FY2024, endowment payouts accounted for 37% of Harvard's operating revenue, making them the university's single largest source of funding. Law passes narrowly in Congress The legislation cleared the US House of Representatives by a 218-214 vote, with only two Republicans voting against it. It passed the Senate 51-50, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. Trump signed the bill into law during a July 4 Independence Day ceremony at the White House, calling it a long-overdue measure to hold elite universities accountable. The final 940-page bill is part of a broader conservative agenda, including Medicare cuts, military spending increases, and bans on federal funding for Planned Parenthood and gender-affirming healthcare. Major changes to US student loan system In addition to the endowment tax, the legislation brings significant reforms to federal student aid: Grad PLUS loans have been eliminated Parent PLUS loans are now capped at $65,000 per student Federal repayment plans will be consolidated Key protections, including deferment for unemployment, are being removed A new earnings-linked accountability rule will take effect from July 1, 2026, restricting federal aid to graduate programs whose alumni earn less than the median high school graduate. Critics say these changes could reduce access to higher education, especially for low-income families. Harvard ramps up lobbying amid political heat Harvard has opposed endowment taxation since it was first introduced in 2017. In the first quarter of 2025, the university spent $230,000 on federal lobbying, its highest quarterly total since 2008. According to federal records, lobbying efforts focused heavily on endowment taxes, student aid, and research funding. While university officials have not publicly responded to the new tax, they have warned in the past that such measures could undermine core academic priorities. Conservative push to target elite schools The push to tax elite institutions gained momentum among conservative lawmakers who argue that universities like Harvard benefit from massive, untaxed wealth while receiving federal funding and promoting political views out of step with public values. Trump had campaigned on this issue, even proposing to create a new government-funded online 'American Academy' using proceeds from fines and taxes on wealthy universities. An earlier version of the bill proposed a 21% top tax rate and excluded international students from endowment-per-student calculations — a change that would have pushed more institutions into higher brackets. That provision was dropped in the final Senate version following procedural objections. Implications for Indian students and global education Though the tax directly affects US universities, its indirect effects could ripple across the global education landscape. Harvard and other institutions may need to reassess scholarships, international outreach, and long-term academic investments — areas that have historically benefitted Indian students. Changes to the US loan system may also impact affordability for those considering graduate study in the US As the new fiscal year begins, institutions across the country are now recalibrating their finances. For Harvard and its peers, the road ahead could include budget cuts, reallocation of unrestricted funds, and a shift in funding priorities — with ripple effects in education, research, and global collaboration. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store