Russian attacks during Easter ceasefire declared by Putin kill three in Ukraine
Oleksandr Prokudin wrote on Telegram that the casualties occurred over the last 24 hours, adding that three other people were injured.
Overall, Russia violated the ceasefire more than 2,900 times, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said in a Telegram statement in the early hours on Monday.
Mr Zelensky said Russian forces carried out 96 assault operations along the front line, shelled Ukrainian positions more than 1,800 times, and used hundreds of drones during the course of the ceasefire.
'The nature of Ukrainian actions will continue to be mirror-like: we will respond to silence with silence, and our blows will be a defence against Russian blows. Actions always speak louder than words,' he said.
Mr Putin announced a temporary Easter truce on Saturday, citing humanitarian reasons.
Ukraine said it would reciprocate any genuine ceasefire by Moscow, but voiced scepticism over the Kremlin's intentions.
Both sides traded accusations of violations shortly afterwards. The ceasefire expired at midnight (2100 GMT) following Easter Sunday.
Overnight into Monday, Russian forces fired three missiles at Ukraine's southern regions of Kherson and Mykolaiv regions, as well as 96 Shahed drones targeting other parts of the country, Ukraine's air force reported.
It said it downed 42 drones, while 47 others were jammed mid-flight.
In the Dnipropetrovsk region, Russian drones sparked a fire at an 'outbuilding' and a 'food enterprise,' Governor Serhii Lysak wrote on Telegram.
No-one was injured in the attack, he added.
A chaplain blesses Ukrainian soldiers marking Easter on the front line in the Zaporizhzhia region (Andriy Andriyenko/Ukraine's 65th Mechanised Brigade/AP)
An unspecified infrastructure object was damaged in the Cherkasy region overnight, Governor Ihor Taburets said on Telegram.
In a statement on Monday, the Russian Defence Ministry maintained that Moscow's forces 'strictly observed the ceasefire and remained at previously occupied lines and positions'.
It accused Ukraine of violating the ceasefire 4,900 times, including six attempts at assault operations, 1,404 attacks from artillery, multiple rocket launchers and mortars, and 3,316 drone strikes targeting Russian troops.
The ministry said that, once the ceasefire expired, the Russian military 'resumed the special military operation' in Ukraine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
39 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Mick Clifford: Is it time to cut Bono a little slack over Gaza?
Here's a line that will most likely elicit some derision: Maybe Bono is entitled to be cut a little slack. Last week, the singer and his U2 bandmates released individual statements about the genocide in Gaza. An ageing rock band collectively making a pronouncement on such a matter at this point in time is highly questionable. That the four members released their own individual statements borders on the ridiculous. Notwithstanding that, the reaction to Bono in particular has been savagely negative. On social media, comments about the singer's statement were was visceral, vitriolic, and here and there even freighted with a form of hatred. The whole farrago spoke volumes, not just about Bono's image in some quarters of this country, but how comments around the attack on Gaza have evolved A few matters require laying out before cutting the singer some slack. The first is that the only people who matter a whit in any discussion on Gaza are those being murdered and starved from the ruins created by the Israeli Defense Forces. The second matter of note is that it could all stop tomorrow if the US — and not just Donald Trump — ceased providing the means to perpetrate the genocide. In previous decades, at various spots around the world, the US did step in the prevent slaughter of innocents. Here, it is enabling such slaughter. That brings us back to Bono. Skill and status Whatever one thinks of the singer, his music, or his musings, there is one incontrovertible fact about the work he has done on Aids, hunger, and debt relief in the developing world: An unaccountable number of people who would otherwise be dead are alive today because of his efforts. This plaudit also applies to thousands of workers on the ground across the globe, but Bono brings a particular skill and status to his work. Those who have benefitted live in the poorest outposts of Africa and Asia, and are probably so preoccupied in trying to stay alive and provide for families that they haven't an iota who he is. But their lives matter as much as any life in Tel Aviv or Gaza, Ireland or the US. Palestinian and Israeli activists take part in a protest against the killing of journalists in the Gaza Strip as they gather in the West Bank town of Beit Jala on Friday. Picture: Mahmoud Illean/AP There has been criticism of his work, particularly along the lines that he represents a white man interfering in the lives of black people, making them dependent rather than minding his own business. Much of this criticism is informed by an ideology that dictates it is preferable to allow people die today in order to contribute towards some abstract form of justice tomorrow. To suggest in some ways that Bono's work and focus has been flawed is entirely justified. To infer that he should therefore have done nothing at all in this area is wantonly misguided — to put it as its most charitable When the October 7 massacre by Hamas on innocent Israelis occurred, U2 were playing a residency in Las Vegas. The following night, during Pride, the band's song about Martin Luther King, Bono took a moment to pay tribute to 'those beautiful kids at that music festival'. It was an appropriate intervention and in keeping with the band's long-standing ethos. Months later, that clip was circulated on social media. By then, Israel's murderously disproportionate response to Hamas was well under way. The Gaza Strip was being laid to ruin, innocents killed by the thousand. Any initial sympathy for Israelis was being ground down by the relentless bombing of a whole people as if they were collectively culpable for Hamas's crimes. At this time of growing anger against the Israeli government and its defence forces, U2 — and Bono in particular — were cast as viewing the whole thing through the lens of the oppressor. It was, like so much on social media, both a gross distortion and most likely highly effective in its aim. Since then, as the genocide has developed, as the forced starvation has begun to kill, Bono's silence has been used as a stick to beat him. The basest of motives — principally concern for his money and celebrity — have been ascribed to him as if the main thrust of his life's work has been all about material acquisition. Focus on catastrophes Last weekend, the long-awaited statement condemning Israel was released and, in addition, Bono penned an opinion piece for the Atlantic magazine. In both, he referenced the work he has done over the last 30-plus years. 'As a co-founder of the One Campaign, which tackles Aids and extreme poverty in Africa, I felt my experience should be focused on the catastrophes facing that work and that part of the world,' he wrote. 'The haemorrhaging of human life in Sudan or Ethiopia hardly makes the news. The civil war in Sudan alone is beyond comprehension, leaving 150,000 dead and 2m people facing famine.' Surely he has a point. If so, his silence up to this juncture makes perfect sense. Along with Bob Geldof, he has a crucial role in getting the US to intervene in the Aids and debt crises in Africa 20 years ago. That has made a difference to the lives of anonymous Africans who exist far from any media focus. Last January, Trump began dismantling foreign aid to the developing world by closing the national agency, USAid. A study published in The Lancet in June estimated that USAid had saved 90m lives over the last 20 years. Mourners sit around the grave of Al Jazeera correspondent Anas al-Sharif, who was killed alongside other journalists in an overnight Israeli strike on their tent in Gaza City. Picture: Omar Al-qatta/AFP The research also concluded that, if the current approach to aid from the Trump administration continues, 14m people will die by 2030. Against such a febrile background, Bono may well have concluded it was best for the sake of the work he has been involved in to keep his own counsel rather than anger Trump's administration. The current US president has a record of lashing out against those who irritate or anger him, and there would be every possibility that he could do so against any of the projects to which Bono has lent his weight. Any high profile intervention on his part would have no effect on the US's enablement of the Gaza genocide, but it may well have had repercussions for the lives of others who are struggling against the ravages of famine and war. On that basis, his silence was not just understandable but morally sound The reality is that the US's moral authority in the world at large has been severely damaged through a combination of Trump's policies and the complete capitulation of the country's power centres to a war criminal such as Benjamin Netanyahu. All sorts of leaders in other countries, in business, in the arts, and in development work are scrambling to come to terms with the current global dispensation. It certainly looks like Bono had some struggles in this regard. For those who revel in casting him as one who is only concerned with his own welfare, such struggles had precious little to do with considerations for the dispossessed. A more nuanced view might concede that his record suggests he has as much social conscience, if not far more, than many of his critics.
RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
Trump says 'great progress' made in meeting with Putin
US President Donald Trump said that he and Russian President Vladimir Putin did not reach an agreement to resolve Russia's war in Ukraine after a nearly three-hour summit in Alaska, though he characterised the meeting as "very productive." "There were many, many points that we agreed on," Mr Trump said at a joint press conference with Mr Putin. "I would say a couple of big ones that we haven't quite got there, but we've made some headway. So there's no deal until there's a deal," he added. Mr Trump and Mr Putin each spoke for a few minutes to reporters and took no questions. It was not clear whether the talks had produced meaningful steps toward a ceasefire in the deadliest conflict in Europe in 80 years, a goal that Mr Trump had set at the outset. In brief remarks, Mr Putin said he expected Ukraine and its European allies to accept the results of the US-Russia negotiation, warning them not to "torpedo" the progress toward a resolution. Mr Trump and Mr Putin, along with top foreign-policy aides, conferred in a room at an Air Force base in Anchorage, Alaska in their first meeting since 2019. A blue backdrop behind them had the words "Pursuing Peace" printed on it. Mr Trump's publicly stated aim for the talks was to secure a halt to the fighting and a commitment by Mr Putin to meet swiftly with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to negotiate an end to the war, which began when Russia invaded its neighbour in February 2022. Mr Zelensky, who was not invited to the summit, and his European allies had feared Mr Trump might sell out Ukraine by essentially freezing the conflict and recognising - if only informally - Russian control over one-fifth of Ukraine. Mr Trump sought to assuage such concerns as he boarded Air Force One, saying he would let Ukraine decide on any possible territorial concessions. "I'm not here to negotiate for Ukraine, I'm here to get them at a table," he said. Asked what would make the meeting a success, he told reporters: "I want to see a ceasefire rapidly. I'm not going to be happy if it's not today. I want the killing to stop." Mr Zelensky has ruled out formally handing Russia any territory and is also seeking a security guarantee backed by the United States. Mr Trump said he would call Mr Zelensky and NATO leaders to update them on the talks with Mr Putin. Rolling out the red carpet Once on the ground in Alaska, Mr Trump greeted Mr Putin on a red carpet on the base's tarmac. The two shook hands warmly before riding in Mr Trump's limo to the summit site nearby. Mr Trump hopes a truce in the three-and-a-half year war that Mr Putin started will bring peace to the region as well as bolster his credentials as a global peacemaker worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize. For Mr Putin, the summit is already a big win that he can portray as evidence that years of Western attempts to isolate Russia have unravelled and that Russia is retaking its rightful place at the high table of international diplomacy. Both Russia and Ukraine deny targeting civilians in the war. But thousands of civilians have died in the conflict, the vast majority Ukrainian. A conservative estimate of dead and injured in the war in Ukraine - from both sides combined - totals 1.2 million people, Mr Trump's envoy to Ukraine, Keith Kellogg, said three months ago. The meeting also included US Secretary of State Marco Rubio; Mr Trump's special envoy to Russia, Steve Witkoff; Russian foreign policy aide Yury Ushakov; and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. Mr Trump, who once said he would end Russia's war in Ukraine within 24 hours, conceded on Thursday it had proven a tougher task than he had expected. He said if yesterday's talks went well, quickly arranging a second, three-way summit with Mr Zelensky would be more important than his encounter with Mr Putin. Mr Zelensky said yesterday's summit should open the way for a "just peace" and three-way talks that included him, but added that Russia was continuing to wage war. A Russian ballistic missile earlier struck Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk region, killing one person and wounding another. "It's time to end the war, and the necessary steps must be taken by Russia. We are counting on America," Mr Zelensky wrote on the Telegram messaging app.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Ukrainians watched in disbelief as America rolled out the red carpet for Vladimir Putin
Donald Trump gave Russian president Vladimir Putin a warm welcome to US soil as they begin a critical summit on the war in Ukraine. Both leaders disembarked their planes at 11.08am local time at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, a cold war-era air force base on the outskirts of Anchorage, Alaska. The friendly, tactile body language that followed offered a stark contrast to Trump's shakedown of the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, in the Oval Office in February. Ukrainians watching from afar immediately noticed that the US had literally rolled out a red carpet for the Russian president, who is an indicted war criminal charged with kidnapping Ukrainian children from Russian-occupied regions of their country. Mustafa Nayyem, a Ukrainian journalist-turned-politician, posted an image of US soldiers kneeling to secure the red carpet laid at the foot of Putin's plane before the Russian president emerged with the caption: 'Make Kneeling Great Again'. US president Donald Trump and Russian president Vladimir Putin stand on a platform announcing their summit in Alaska at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson. Photograph: Gavriil Grigorov/Pool/AFP via Getty Images Presidents Trump and Putin walk down from the 'Alaska 2025' platform towards their waiting car ahead of talks focused on peace in Ukraine. Photograph:Trump and Putin walked down the red carpets, which had been rolled up to their respective planes. Both leaders met where the carpets came to a T, with Trump arriving first and clapping as Putin approached. The men shared a warm handshake and what appeared to be some lighthearted banter. Trump gave Putin a friendly tap on the arm. Putin grinned and pointed skyward while their hands were still clasped. They walked together towards a platform bearing a sign that read 'Alaska 2025″ as B-2s and F-22s – military aircraft designed to oppose Russia during the cold war – flew over to mark the moment. Trump and Putin stood looking towards the media but did not respond to shouted questions including: 'President Putin, will you stop killing civilians?' The Russian president, who is wanted by the international criminal court, appeared to shrug. Putin then joined Trump in the presidential limousine nicknamed 'the Beast' – a rare privilege for allies and adversaries alike – and could be seen laughing with glee. The men then sat together in a conference room with their respective delegations, seated to the side in front of a blue backdrop that had the words 'Pursuing Peace' printed on it several times. Trump was joined by the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, and special envoy Steve Witkoff. Putin was joined by his foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, and foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov. US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin meet during a US-Russia summit on Ukraine at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska. Photograph: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images US president Donald Trump extends his hand to greet Russian president Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Photo: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images The White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, said the previously planned one-on-one meeting between Trump and Putin is now a three-on-three negotiation. That is a shift from a 2018 meeting in Helsinki, when Trump and Putin first met privately just with their interpreters for two hours. It was anticipated that the meeting could reshape the war in Ukraine and relations between Moscow and Washington. Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy and European leaders were not invited. The war has caused heavy losses on both sides since Russia's invasion in February, 2022. Critics say that, by bringing Putin on to US soil for the first time in a decade, the president is giving him the legitimacy he craves after he became a global pariah following his invasion of Ukraine. European allies fear that the notoriously mercurial Trump might sell out Ukraine by essentially freezing the conflict with Russia and recognising – if only informally – Russian control over one-fifth of Ukraine. Trump sought to assuage such concerns earlier, as he boarded Air Force One, saying he would let Ukraine decide on any possible territorial swaps. 'I'm not here to negotiate for Ukraine, I'm here to get them at a table,' he said. Asked what would make the meeting a success, he told reporters: 'I want to see a ceasefire rapidly . . . I'm not going to be happy if it's not today . . . I want the killing to stop.' On his way to Alaska, Trump sat for an interview on Air Force One with Fox News Channel's Bret Baier. In a clip posted online, he said he thought the meeting would 'work out very well – and if it doesn't, I'm going to head back home real fast.' 'I would walk, yeah,' he added, after a follow-up question. Protesters hold up Ukrainian flags outside Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson during a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, Alaska. Photograph: Bastien Inzaurralde/AFP via Getty Images Supporters of US president Donald Trump gather in Anchorage, Alaska, as he meets with Russian president Vladimir Putin. Photograph: Ash Adams/The New York Times Any success is far from assured because Russia and Ukraine remain far apart in their demands for peace. Putin has long resisted any temporary ceasefire, linking it to a halt in eastern arms supplies and a freeze on Ukraine's mobilisation efforts, which are conditions rejected by Kyiv and its western allies. [ Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin meet in Alaska for high-stakes summit on Ukraine Opens in new window ] Trump previously characterised the summit as 'really a feel-out meeting'. But he has also warned of 'very severe consequences' for Russia if Putin does not agree to end the war. The US president said earlier in the week there was a 25 per cent chance that the summit would fail but also floated the idea that, if the meeting succeeds, he could bring Zelenskiy to Alaska for a subsequent three-way meeting. European allies also have concerns that Trump could be tempted by economic incentives and potential deals. On Friday, the Reuters news agency reported that the US has had internal discussions on using Russian nuclear-powered icebreaker vessels to support the development of gas and LNG projects in Alaska.
