logo
Elon Musk's xAI pressed employees to install surveillance software on personal laptops

Elon Musk's xAI pressed employees to install surveillance software on personal laptops

Yahoo13-07-2025
XAI is rolling out employee surveillance software for the workers that train Grok.
Some workers expressed concern after they were told to download it on their personal laptop.
XAI adjusted its policy after an inquiry from Business Insider, allowing delays for those awaiting company devices.
Elon Musk's xAI told workers to download employee tracking software on their personal computers, prompting privacy concerns — and one worker's apparent resignation.
The AI startup told the tutors who train its Grok chatbot earlier this month that they would be expected to download a workforce management system called Hubstaff, according to a document viewed by Business Insider.
The tutors were initially asked to download the software onto their personal computers by July 11 if they did not have a company-issued device, according to the document and sources with knowledge of the issue that asked to speak anonymously as they were not authorized to speak on the company's behalf. They were told to enable access to screen captures, and were also told that using the software was mandatory.
After Business Insider reached out to xAI with questions about Hubstaff, xAI announced tweaks to the policy on Slack: Now, workers who requested company computers could wait to download the software until they receive a company-issued laptop.
It's unclear if employees who downloaded the software ahead of the July 11 deadline or purchased a new device would also be allowed to wait for an xAI computer to be shipped to them.
The company has said it will only use the system to monitor URL and application visits during designated work hours, according to the document. According to its website, Hubstaff can also track mouse movement and keystrokes.
"This new tool serves to streamline work processes, provide clearer insights into daily tutoring activities, and ensure resources align with Human Data priorities," the company's human resources team said in a mass email to employees.
Hubstaff would be used to gauge employee performance and gather data on how tutors perform research, according to the document.
A spokesperson for xAI did not respond to a request for comment.
Some workers spoke up with privacy concerns about the software, according to Slack messages viewed by Business Insider. One worker said they would resign due to the Hubstaff roll-out, according to a Slack message that received dozens of reactions appearing to support the post.
In the message, the worker wrote that it was "surveillance disguised as productivity" and "manipulation masked as culture."
Staff with concerns about data privacy on their personal computers had been told to either purchase a new computer using xAI's $50 per month tech stipend or create a separate log-in and profile on their device that would keep their work separate from any browsing in their personal time, according to the document.
The software, which requires workers to clock in and out, would not track activity on the laptop outside of work hours, the document said.
The company supplies some workers with company-issued Chromebooks, but many workers use their personal devices for the role, BI previously reported. In the lead up to the roll-out, tutors were initially told that the company had run out of Chromebooks, and it was unclear when they would be restocked, people familiar with the guidance told BI.
Other AI companies have used Hubstaff. In an ongoing worker lawsuit filed against Scale AI that alleged the company misclassified workers, a former employee said the company used Hubstaff to monitor data annotators and that they were required to download it onto their personal computers.
A spokesperson for Scale AI said that the company uses Hubstaff "to help contributors track the time they choose to spend on tasks, supporting accurate payment submissions."
David Lowe, an employment attorney who has brought cases against Musk-owned companies Tesla and X, told Business Insider that while worker surveillance tactics can pose some legal risks for the company, the nature of the risk often comes down to the company's reasoning for additional security practices, the amount of notice, and opportunities for reimbursement toward a separate device.
"It's a balancing test," Lowe said.
XAI could make a case that it has "an interest in trade secrets and ensuring employees are not violating privacy obligations," Lowe said. "The next step is to determine if there is a less intrusive way to accomplish that objective."
California, where xAI is headquartered, has some of the most stringent worker-protection laws, but many of the company's tutors are remote and would be governed by their region's labor laws, Camron Dowlatshahi, a Partner at MSD Lawyers in Los Angeles, told BI. He said it's best for the company to ensure the surveillance system is confined to work hours.
In addition to Hubstaff, xAI also uses the HR manager Rippling to clock workers' hours and its in-house system Starfleet, which tracks the amount of time tutors spend on each task and can monitor employees' actions within the site, BI previously reported.
It's been a chaotic week for xAI. It temporarily took its Grok chatbot off X after it posted a series of anti-semitic messages on Tuesday, and tutors took to Slack to respond, BI previously reported.
On Wednesday, Musk unveiled the latest version of Grok and a $300-per-month subscription plan for a more sophisticated version of Grok, called SuperGrok Heavy. Musk also said the company will be adding Grok capabilities to Tesla vehicles.
Do you work for xAI or have a tip? Contact this reporter via email at gkay@businessinsider.com or Signal at 248-894-6012. Use a personal email address, a nonwork device, and nonwork WiFi; here's our guide to sharing information securely.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump officials scramble to justify firing of economic statistician – as critics say ‘scary' move is a sign of ‘authoritiarianism'
Trump officials scramble to justify firing of economic statistician – as critics say ‘scary' move is a sign of ‘authoritiarianism'

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump officials scramble to justify firing of economic statistician – as critics say ‘scary' move is a sign of ‘authoritiarianism'

Members of Donald Trump's team scrambled to provide coherent explanations for the sudden firing of a top official at the Bureau of Labor Statistics on Sunday as Friday's firing resonated throughout Washington and left the White House open to criticism of Trump's 'authoritarian' leanings. The US president directed the firing of Erika McEntarfer on Friday after a jobs report showed private companies adding just 73,000 positions in July, a drop from projections and a further sign that the Trump economy is stalling in the face of growing uncertainty around the president's tariff agenda. McEntarfer's firing was immediately denounced by her Trump-appointed predecessor and numerous others in Washington. Republicans on the Hill struggled to defend it, while members of Donald Trump's team insisted in interviews that the president and the nation needed what he called 'reliable' numbers. Trump accused McEntarfer of cooking the numbers on Kamala Harris's behalf during the 2024 election, and now working to make him look bad, a notion even the president's own advisers wouldn't echo directly. Kevin Hassett, director of the White House economic council, led the efforts to defend the president's decision-making on Sunday. He was joined by Jamieson Greer, the US trade representative. Hassett directly contradicted the president during his interview on Fox News Sunday with Shannon Bream; he argued that it was the formula by which the BLS determined job market gains — not malicious activity by McEntarfer — which needed to be addressed. Pointing to a letter from McEntarfer's predecessors, Bream asked Hassett: 'They're saying it's not good to cast aspersions on what's being done because it's a formula. It's used the same way every single time. So are you saying maybe the formulas, the calculations need to change?' 'That's right. They really need to get back to ground zero and find out why these numbers are so unreliable,' said Hassett.' "The data can't be propaganda. The data has to be something you can trust, because decision-makers throughout the economy trust that these are the data that they can build a factory because they believe, or cut interest rates because they believe. And if the data aren't that good, then it's a real problem for the US,' Hassett continued. He and others pointed to the agency revising totals for May and June as evidence that the BLS required changes: 'We expect more big revisions for the jobs data in September, for example ... we want to know why, we want people to explain it to us.' Greer, during a pre-taped interview with CBS's Face the Nation, backed up Hassett's claims that sharp revisions dating back to 2024 were evidence of the numbers produced by the agency being unreliable. "You want to be able to have somewhat reliable numbers,' he said. 'There are always revisions, but sometimes you see these revisions go in really extreme ways.' But there's still nothing linking McEntarfer to the kind of nefarious activity which Trump alleged she was up to in a Truth Social post. 'I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY. She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' Trump wrote on Friday. He added: 'In my opinion, today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad — Just like when they had three great days around the 2024 Presidential Election, and then, those numbers were 'taken away' on November 15, 2024, right after the Election.' No one on the president's team has attempted to present any evidence backing up Trump's claims. A number of McEntarfer's predecessors and other top officialst at the BLS fired back in a statement from a group called the 'Friends of the BLS': 'The President seeks to blame someone for unwelcome economic news.' The president's critics said that the firing and unsupported explanation meant that future figures released by the agency would be thrown into question and was an example of Trump desiring ability to dictate the creation of phony statistics. 'This is the stuff of democracies giving way to authoritarianism,' warned Larry Summers, former director of the White House economic council under Biden (and Hassett's predecessor), on ABC's This Week. 'This is really scary stuff, and it can hardly be surprising that when the rule of law is in a bit question that there's a big uncertainty premium in the markets.' He went on to argue that Trump's battering of Fed Chair Jerome Powell followed in a similar vein, and was behind much of the uncertainty curbing U.S. investments on Wall Street. Friday marked the resumption of Trump's reciprocal tariffs; enforcement of rates as high as 50% on some U.S. trading partners will resume this week. Economists largely agree that those tariffs are driving up consumer prices and stifling U.S. investment rather than encouraging the return of manufacturing plants to America as companies continue to evaluate new costs stemming from Trump's import duties. The job numbers put out by the BLS on a monthly basis are some of the most important statistics gathered by the U.S. government in terms of their ability to move financial markets around the world. Experts say the sharp revisions are a result of more accurate data collection efforts.

Apple CEO drops bombshell about its future
Apple CEO drops bombshell about its future

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Apple CEO drops bombshell about its future

Apple CEO drops bombshell about its future originally appeared on TheStreet. Apple is notoriously close-to-the-vest when it comes to making announcements, preferring to keep loyal fans and die-hard investors in the dark until the timing is right. The company's "one more thing" mentality, reflected by founder Steve Jobs's surprising product reveals at Apple keynote conferences, appears shared by current CEO Tim Cook. In contrast to other big tech leaders, including Elon Musk, Cook often lets Apple's products do the talking. As a result, investors often look closely at Cook's comments during conference calls, looking for clues to what he may have planned for the company next. During Apple's second-quarter earnings conference call, Cook may have dropped his guard a little when he offered an interesting response about Apple's massive cash stockpile and artificial intelligence ambitions. CEO Tim Cook says Apple is open for business Apple reported a solid June quarter that outpaced analysts' expectations. Revenue was a whopping $94 billion, up 10% year over year, and almost $5 billion better than Wall Street expected. Net income was over $23 billion, resulting in earnings per share, or EPS, of $1.57, up 12% from one year ago, and 14 cents ahead of company's massive profit lifted its cash hoard to about $36 billion from roughly $30 billion last year, giving it plenty of financial firepower to invest in its products and software. And that's precisely what investors want to see happen. While competitors like Google have gone all in on artificial intelligence, developing the AI chatbot Gemini, Apple's AI strategy has been criticized as too little, too late. The company's arguably slow development of AI solutions relative to peers has left many investors wondering if Tim Cook's number-crunching mindset sets Apple on a course of missing out on the most significant opportunity since the dawn of the Internet. However, during Apple's earnings conference call, Cook acknowledged that he'd consider accelerating Apple's AI efforts by using its massive cash war chest. When Citi analyst Atif Malik asked about the prospects of 'big M&A," Cook responded bluntly. 'We've acquired around seven companies this year,' said Cook on the call. 'We're very open to M&A that accelerates our road map… We are not stuck on a certain size company.' Cook said he didn't have anything to announce currently, but his willingness to consider a big deal could mean that reports of interest in Perplexity, a major AI player, may have merit. Buying Perplexity could make sense for Apple Cook aims to accelerate Apple's development timeline, ostensibly via internal research and development and smaller bolt-on deals. However, if he really wanted to, he could do a deal to acquire Perplexity that could, as he put it, 'help us accelerate a road map.'Perplexity provides an AI chatbot similar to Google and OpenAI's ChatGPT, but there are key differences. It has its own in-house model, Sonar, that's built on Meta Platforms' Llama open source code. It's also leaned on rival chatbots, including DeepSeek's R1. Subscribers to its Pro tier can also toggle between other large language models, including OpenAI, Gemini, Anthropic's Claude, and Elon Musk's Grok. Acquiring Perplexity would instantly give Apple an established model for monetizing AI. Perplexity operates on a freemium model, with a no-cost introductory subscription and paid service. Perplexity prioritizes real-time insight with direct responses — a design that arguably matches Apple's deep focus on user experience. In short, Perplexity's desire for a better chatbot user experience aligns nicely with Apple's approach, historically. Perplexity would cost Apple a pretty penny Cook says Apple has acquired seven companies this year, about one 'every several weeks.' Those deals, however, are small and haven't cost the company much of its war chest. Buying Perplexity would be a different story. Perplexity, which launched in 2022 around the same time as ChatGPT, has over 22 million monthly active users. Its annualized revenue could hit $150 million this summer, according to About Chromebooks data, up from an ARR of $63 million exiting last year. The company's rapid user growth translated into Perplexity answering 780 million queries in May, according to which was up from 230 million in August 2024. Also in May, its website recorded 153 million visits, about triple the number from March. Perplexity isn't publicly traded, is currently reportedly valued at $18 billion, and its AI search market share is about 6%.Apple CEO drops bombshell about its future first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 3, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 3, 2025, where it first appeared.

The ABC News host took the administration to task for the president's firing of his stats boss.
The ABC News host took the administration to task for the president's firing of his stats boss.

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The ABC News host took the administration to task for the president's firing of his stats boss.

ABC News host George Stephanopoulos says President Donald Trump's administration resembles the authoritarian regimes in Venezuela and Turkey after the president fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. On Friday, the president fired BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer after the agency released its July jobs report showing that the economy added a mere 73,000 jobs last month—far fewer than the 109,000 jobs the White House forecasted. Trump claimed BLS had 'RIGGED' the numbers 'to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad.' 'Suppressing statisticians is a time-honored tool for leaders trying to solidify their power and stifle dissent,' Stephanopoulos said on Sunday's edition of This Week. 'It's happened throughout history. Most recently in Venezuela and Turkey, where presidents punished officials and economists who do not tow the party line.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store