India pauses plans to buy US arms after Trump's tariffs
India had been planning to send Defence Minister Rajnath Singh to Washington in the coming weeks for an announcement on some of the purchases, but that trip has been cancelled, two of the people said. Trump on Aug. 6 imposed an additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods as punishment for Delhi's purchases of Russian oil, which he said meant the country was funding Russia's invasion of Ukraine. That raised the total duty on Indian exports to 50 per cent - among the highest of any US trading partner.
The president has a history of rapidly reversing himself on tariffs and India has said it remains actively engaged in discussions with Washington. One of the people said the defence purchases could go ahead once India had clarity on tariffs and the direction of bilateral ties, but "just not as soon as they were expected to."
Written instructions had not been given to pause the purchases, another official said, indicating that Delhi had the option to quickly reverse course, though there was "no forward movement at least for now."
Post publication of this story, India's government issued a statement it attributed to a Ministry of Defence source describing news reports of a pause in the talks as "false and fabricated." The statement also said procurement was progressing as per "extant procedures."
Delhi, which has forged a close partnership with America in recent years, has said it is being unfairly targetted and that Washington and its European allies continue to trade with Moscow when it is in their interest.
Reuters is reporting for the first time that discussions on India's purchases of Stryker combat vehicles made by General Dynamics Land Systems and Javelin anti-tank missiles developed by Raytheon and Lockheed Martin have been paused due to the tariffs.
Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi had in February announced plans to pursue procurement and joint production of those items. Rajnath had also been planning to announce the purchase of six Boeing P8I reconnaissance aircraft and support systems for the Indian Navy during his now-cancelled trip, two of the people said. Talks over procuring the aircraft in a proposed US$3.6 billion deal were at an advanced stage, according to the officials.
Boeing, Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics referred queries to the Indian and US governments. Raytheon did not return a request for comment.
India's deepening security relationship with the US, which is fuelled by their shared strategic rivalry with China, was heralded by many US analysts as one of the key areas of foreign-policy progress in the first Trump administration.
Delhi is the world's second-largest arms importer and Russia has traditionally been its top supplier. India has in recent years however, shifted to importing from Western powers like France, Israel and the US, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute think-tank.
The shift in suppliers was driven partly by constraints on Russia's ability to export arms, which it is utilising heavily in its invasion of Ukraine. Some Russian weapons have also performed poorly in the battlefield, according to Western analysts.
The broader US-India defence partnership, which includes intelligence sharing and joint military exercises, continues without hiccups, one of the Indian officials said.
India also remains open to scaling back on oil imports from Russia and is open to making deals elsewhere, including the US, if it can get similar prices, according to two other Indian sources. Trump's threats and rising anti-US nationalism in India have "made it politically difficult for Modi to make the shift from Russia to the US," one of the people said. Nonetheless, discounts on the landing cost of Russian oil have shrunk to the lowest since 2022.
India's petroleum ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. While the rupture in US-India ties was abrupt, there have been strains in the relationship. Delhi has repeatedly rebutted Trump's claim that the US brokered a ceasefire between India and Pakistan after four days of fighting between the nuclear-armed neighbours in May. Trump also hosted Pakistan's army chief at the White House in the weeks following the conflict.
In recent months, Moscow has been actively pitching Delhi on buying new defence technologies like its S-500 surface-to-air missile system, according to one of the Indian officials, as well as a Russian source familiar with the talks.
India currently does not see a need for new arms purchases from Moscow, two Indian officials said.
But Delhi is unlikely to wean itself off Russian weapons entirely as the decades-long partnership between the two powers means Indian military systems will continue to require Moscow's support, one of the officials said.
The Russian embassy in Delhi did not immediately respond to a request for comment. - Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
A peace deal or a surrender? Armenians divided over US-backed treaty with Azerbaijan
YEREVAN (Armenia), Aug 10 — The streets were almost deserted in Yerevan Saturday because of the summer heat, but at shaded parks and fountains, Armenians struggled to make sense of what the accord signed a day earlier in Washington means for them. The leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan, two Caucasian countries embroiled in a territorial conflict since the fall of the USSR, met Friday and signed a peace treaty under the watch of US President Donald Trump. In Yerevan, however, few of the people asked by AFP were enthusiastic. 'Acceptable' 'It's a good thing that this document was signed because Armenia has no other choice,' said Asatur Srapyan, an 81-year-old retiree. He believes Armenia hasn't achieved much with this draft agreement, but it's a step in the right direction. 'We are very few in number, we don't have a powerful army, we don't have a powerful ally behind us, unlike Azerbaijan,' he said. 'This accord is a good opportunity for peace.' Maro Huneyan, a 31-year-old aspiring diplomat, also considers the pact 'acceptable', provided it does not contradict her country's constitution. 'If Azerbaijan respects all the agreements, it's very important for us. But I'm not sure it will keep its promises and respect the points of the agreement,' she added. 'Endless concessions' But Anahit Eylasyan, 69, opposes the agreement and, more specifically, the plan to create a transit zone crossing Armenia to connect the Nakhchivan region to the rest of Azerbaijan. 'We are effectively losing control of our territory. It's as if, in my own apartment, I had to ask a stranger if I could go from one room to another,' she explains. She also hopes not to see Russia, an ally of Armenia despite recent tensions, expelled from the region.' Anahit also criticises Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan for 'making decisions for everyone' and for his 'endless concessions to Azerbaijan'. 'We got nothing in exchange, not our prisoners, nor our occupied lands, nothing. It's just a piece of paper to us,' she fumes. Shavarsh Hovhannisyan, a 68-year-old construction engineer, agrees, saying the agreement 'is just an administrative formality that brings nothing to Armenia.' 'We can't trust Azerbaijan,' Hovhannisyan asserted, while accusing Pashinyan of having 'turned his back' on Russia and Iran. 'It's more of a surrender document than a peace treaty, while Trump only thinks about his image, the Nobel Prize.' 'More stability... in the short term' According to President Trump, Armenia and Azerbaijan have committed 'to stop all fighting forever; open up commerce, travel and diplomatic relations; and respect each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity.' For Olesya Vartanyan, an independent researcher specializing in the Caucasus, the Washington agreement 'certainly brings greater stability and more guarantees for the months, if not years, to come.' But given the long-lasting tensions between Armenia and Azerbaijan, 'I fear that we will have to plan only for the very short term,' she said. — AFP
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
China's chipmakers to see small impact from Trump's 100% tariff on imports: CLSA
China's top chipmakers, including Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp (SMIC), are expected to avoid the worst of US President Donald Trump's plan to impose 100 per cent tariffs on imported semiconductors. According to a research note published by CLSA, the potential impact of the proposed US tariffs on imported chips – the details of which are expected as soon as next week – would be small for SMIC and Hua Hong Semiconductor. The two Shanghai-based firms could also benefit from possible countermeasures that China and other countries could pursue, according to CLSA, without elaborating. SMIC's Hong Kong-listed shares closed up nearly 1 per cent on Thursday to HK$53, while Hua Hong's stock rose 2.52 per cent to HK$44.78. On Wednesday in Washington, Trump announced that the US would impose a 100 per cent tariff on imported semiconductors, although companies that were manufacturing in the country or had pledged to invest in new factories would be exempt. Those would include major tech companies such as Nvidia, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co, Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix, Micron Technology and Apple, which committed on Wednesday to invest another US$100 billion into US manufacturing. CLSA's assessment reflected how China managed to increase the share of its integrated circuit (IC) exports, including memory chips, to countries in Southeast Asia, customs data showed. SMIC's sales in the US made up 12.2 per cent of the firm's total revenue in 2024, while about 9.3 per cent of Hua Hong's revenue last year was attributed to sales in North America. China's IC exports to the US last year were valued at US$2.2 billion, a significant portion of which was used in the automotive manufacturing sector, according to customs data. In the first half of this year, the mainland's IC exports to the US reached US$983.7 million, an 11 per cent year-on-year decline, customs data showed. While China is still a net importer of ICs, the country remains a major exporter of so-called legacy chips, which are widely used in cars, home appliances and consumer electronics. According to research firm TrendForce, mainland China's global share of older-generation chips – produced using 28-nanometre or larger wafer-etching technology – is projected to grow from 34 per cent to 47 per cent between 2024 and 2027. That would surpass Taiwan chipmakers' share, which is expected to decline from 43 per cent to 36 per cent over the same period. In the first seven months of this year, China's chip exports reached 199.6 billion units valued at US$108.3 billion. That marked a 20.5 per cent year-on-year increase in value, according to customs data released on Thursday. Despite that growth, China's chip imports still exceeded exports in both quantity and value. The country's IC imports from January to July totalled 337.2 billion units valued at US$228.6 billion. The average price per imported IC was US$0.68, higher than the US$0.54 average price of chips exported. - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Zelenskiy thanks Europe for its support as Kyiv seeks place at table with Trump and Putin
(Reuters) -Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy thanked European leaders on Sunday for backing his demand for a seat at the table as Russia and the United States prepare for a summit this week where Kyiv fears they could seek to dictate terms to it for ending the 3-1/2-year war. U.S. President Donald Trump, who for weeks had been threatening new sanctions against Russia for failing to halt the conflict, announced instead last Friday that he would hold an August 15 summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. A White House official said on Saturday that Trump was open to Zelenskiy attending, but that preparations currently were for a bilateral meeting with Putin. The Kremlin leader last week ruled out meeting Zelenskiy at this point, saying the conditions for such an encounter were "unfortunately still far" from being met. Trump said a potential deal would involve "some swapping of territories to the betterment of both (sides)", a statement that compounded Ukrainian alarm that it may face pressure to surrender more land. Zelenskiy says any decisions taken without Ukraine will be "stillborn" and unworkable. On Saturday the leaders of Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Finland and the European Commission said in a joint statement that any diplomatic solution must protect the vital security interests of Ukraine and Europe. "The path to peace cannot be decided without Ukraine," they said, demanding "robust and credible security guarantees" to allow Ukraine to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity. Zelenskiy said on Sunday: "The end of the war must be fair, and I am grateful to everyone who stands with Ukraine and our people today for the sake of peace in Ukraine, which is defending the vital security interests of our European nations." A European official said Europe had come up with a counter-proposal to Trump's, but declined to provide details. Russian officials accused Europe of trying to thwart Trump's efforts to end the war. "The Euro-imbeciles are trying to prevent American efforts to help resolve the Ukrainian conflict," former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev posted on social media on Sunday. Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said in a vituperative statement that the relationship between Ukraine and the European Union resembled "necrophilia". Roman Alekhin, a Russian war blogger, said Europe had been reduced to the role of a spectator. "If Putin and Trump reach an agreement directly, Europe will be faced with a fait accompli. Kyiv - even more so," he said. CAPTURED TERRITORY No details of the proposed territorial swap that Trump alluded to have been officially announced. Russia, which mounted a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, holds about a fifth of the country and has claimed the regions of Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia as its own, although it controls only about 70% of the last three. Russia has also taken pockets of territory in the Sumy and Kharkiv regions and said in recent weeks it has captured villages in the Dnipropetrovsk region. Ukraine says it holds a sliver of the Kursk region in western Russia. Sergei Markov, a pro-Kremlin analyst, said a swap could entail Russia handing over 1,500 sq km to Ukraine and obtaining 7,000 sq km, which he said Russia would capture anyway within about six months. He provided no evidence to back any of those figures. Russia took only about 500 sq km of territory in July, according to Western military analysts who say its grinding advances have come at the cost of very high casualties. Ukraine and its European allies have been haunted for months by the fear that Trump, keen to claim credit for making peace and hoping to seal lucrative joint business deals between the U.S. and Russia, could align with Putin to cut a deal that would be deeply disadvantageous to Kyiv. They had drawn some encouragement lately as Trump, having piled heavy pressure on Zelenskiy and berated him publicly in the Oval Office in February, began criticising Putin and expressing disgust as Russia pounded Kyiv and other cities with its heaviest air attacks of the war. But the impending Putin-Trump summit, agreed during a trip to Moscow by Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff last week, has revived fears that Kyiv and Europe could be sidelined. "What we will see emerge from Alaska will almost certainly be a catastrophe for Ukraine and Europe," wrote Phillips P. O'Brien, professor of strategic studies at the University of St Andrews in Scotland. "And Ukraine will face the most terrible dilemma. Do they accept this humiliating and destructive deal? Or do they go it alone, unsure of the backing of European states?" (Additional reporting by Moscow bureau, writing by Mark Trevelyan, editing by Christina Fincher)
