logo
Dating apps face a reckoning as users log off: ‘There's no actual human connection'

Dating apps face a reckoning as users log off: ‘There's no actual human connection'

The Guardian27-04-2025

Sad, dizzyingly over-scheduled and suffering a serious case of 'thumb fatigue', midway through last year, Anne* decided to delete her dating apps.
For the previous four months, the 31-year-old Sydney resident had been attempting to achieve two major adult milestones at once: finding love and finding a place to buy. Every Saturday, it felt as though she was being priced out of another suburb, and at auctions she was mainly surrounded by couples. Then she would come home, open Hinge and experience a crushing sense of rejection 'on such a personal level'.
Worse still, first dates were beginning to feel as transactional as real estate. 'There'd be no attempt to go on a second date or explore any further, which I think is also a bit of an app mentality,' she says. 'No huge sparks to start with, so there's plenty more out there.'
The cost of dating was weighing on her too. 'Going for drinks a couple of times a week … doesn't seem that much until it starts adding up really quickly.' Anne's policy had always been to split bills on first dates, 'But then there were times when I was like, 'Oh, I would just much rather he paid for me, so I can save a little bit,'' she says. 'It's a weird one – I'm normally quite a generous person, but I felt I had to really keep that in check.'
It wasn't just going on dates that took a toll on her finances: her app of choice, Hinge, cost money to use. She would occasionally pay for 'Roses' – a way of showing a potential match your interest. 'There were a few times where I thought, 'Oh, it's only $15, I'll just do that.' And then, again, that very quickly starts adding up.'
Her mental health 'completely destroyed', she realised 'I can't do both of these things' and turned her full focus to house hunting.
'It was so much all at once.'
Anne is not alone in logging off.
Shares in Match Group, the US tech company which operates the world's biggest portfolio of online dating services including Tinder, Hinge, and OKCupid, have fallen by more than two-thirds over the past five years. Shares in rival Bumble Inc are down nearly 95% since their pandemic highs.
Sign up for the fun stuff with our rundown of must-reads, pop culture and tips for the weekend, every Saturday morning
The reason for the steep falls is simple: not enough people are paying for their apps.
While the number of people who paid to use Hinge increased by 290,000 in 2024, according to Match Group's latest financial report, 679,000 people stopped paying for Tinder. The numbers suggest that while some people are migrating to Hinge, it's not nearly enough to offset those who logged off altogether.
There were also steep losses among some of Match's other brands. Overall, Match suffered a net loss of 704,000 paying subscribers over the course of a year, with Meetic, OkCupid, Plenty of Fish, BLK, Chispa and The League among the declining platforms.
Bumble did not respond to Guardian Australia's request for comment. Match Group declined to comment for this story, but referred to an open letter by its chief executive officer, Spencer Rascoff.
'To reach our full potential, we must confront a hard truth: we haven't always met the high standards we set for the user experience,' Rascoff said in the letter, shared on LinkedIn.
'Too often, our apps have felt like a numbers game rather than a place to build real connections, leaving people with the false impression that we prioritise metrics over experience.'
John* has dipped in and out of online dating in various forms over the last seven years. The now 51-year-old met his previous long-term partner at a music festival, and says: 'It's just completely different, connecting with a person face-to-face.'
Although he enjoyed meeting new people, 'nothing ever came out of it', he says. He also found the frequent ghosting frustrating. 'That never feels nice.'
Recently, John decided to try US-based online dating service eHarmony, because its more elaborate, questionnaire-based approach to matchmaking sounded promising.
After spending 'quite a bit of time' on his questionnaire, John discovered the site was 'effectively paywalled' and you 'couldn't even see other people's profiles' without paying a fee.
Sign up to Saved for Later
Catch up on the fun stuff with Guardian Australia's culture and lifestyle rundown of pop culture, trends and tips
after newsletter promotion
Already disheartened by online dating, he didn't want to spend the money. Then he attempted to delete his eHarmony account, but found no clear way to do so. When he contacted the company through its customer service portal, the response sent by eHarmony, seen by Guardian Australia, said: 'Unfortunately we cannot delete your account at this time due to a pending legal matter in Australia. However, we have made your profile inaccessible to any potential new matches. Your account will remain visible to your existing contacts.'
John said he was 'flabbergasted' by the response.
'Especially dating site data, it's pretty vulnerable information,' he says. 'It just felt like such a huge betrayal, because if they couldn't delete it, why didn't they say it at the very beginning?'
A spokesperson for eHarmony said the company was 'deeply committed to providing every member of our community with a best-in-class experience'.
'Everyone who joins eHarmony begins with a free basic membership,' they said. 'Basic Members can view certain primary profile information about their matches, and they can also engage in limited communication with their matches at no charge.'
They said that, for legal reasons, eHarmony was required to retain 'certain relevant information' which included 'user-related data'.
'As this is a pending legal matter, we are unable to comment further at this time,' they said.
John made a complaint to NSW Fair Trading. While the agency determined his complaint did not fall within its jurisdiction, Fair Trading told Guardian Australia that 45 of the 56 complaints about dating services it received since 1 January last year were about eHarmony, mainly in relation to cancellation and cooling-off periods. After John's experience with eHarmony, he decided to 'delete everything'. He likens online dating to a sugar rush, and says the occasional first date just didn't weigh up against the 'emotional cost'.
'It makes you feel like you're connecting with people … you've got all this choice,' he says. 'But it's not nourishing, there's no actual … human connection.'
Dating app users risk more than disappointment. An Australian Institute of Criminology survey of 9,987 web and app dating service users found three quarters had experienced sexual violence while using these platforms, and one third were subjected to in-person sexual violence perpetrated by someone they met online.
On 1 April, the Albanese government's new code of conduct for dating services came into effect. Designed to reduce harm, it covers the most popular dating platforms including Bumble, RSVP, Grindr and the Match Group. Platforms now risk penalties including formal warnings for not complying with the code.
While most of her friends are partnered, Anne says those who are single feel 'quite over' using dating apps. A gay male friend confided his app experiences have been 'really frustrating'. Anne says she found this 'quite reassuring – that it's not just straight men being terrible'.
Eventually, after eight months and 92 apartment viewings, Anne found a flat. When she settled into her new home, after five months away from dating, she decided to go back on the apps. But after months of stress, 'I just had really run down my reserves of resilience.' She tried speed dating, which felt like 'throwing money into a gutter' and soon deleted Hinge again.
Now she's going to take a new approach to meeting people in real life: salsa dancing lessons. 'Worst-case scenario, I'm getting a bit of exercise, learning a new skill,' she says. 'It's not a complete waste of money.'
*Names have been changed

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What has brought Princess Anne and almost 200 Londoners together in Aberdeen?
What has brought Princess Anne and almost 200 Londoners together in Aberdeen?

Press and Journal

time7 hours ago

  • Press and Journal

What has brought Princess Anne and almost 200 Londoners together in Aberdeen?

Trinity Hall has hosted its very first official Royal visit since opening its doors to the public in the 1960s. Despite the downpour, several passers-by stopped to watch the Princess Royal arrive at the imposing building on the corner of Holburn Street and Great Western Road on Friday evening. She was the guest of honour at a dinner hosted by the Seven Incorporated Trades of Aberdeen to mark the beginning of a special weekend. As well as Princess Anne, 196 visitors from London were also welcomed to the modern landmark. The London Livery Companies – England's equivalent to the Trades – spend a weekend in a different city every year. And this year, they are discovering all Aberdeen has to offer. The Liveries are all linked to the Lord Mayor of London who happens to have very strong connections with the north-east. Alastair King hails from the Donside area and still splits his time between London and Strathdon. He first suggested the Liveries should travel north to his hometown for their annual trip two years ago. When he asked Deacon Convener Andy Leiper if he thought the Seven Incorporated Trades would be able to host, he responded: 'Of course we can'. 'The role of the Lord Mayor of London is to get investment for cities,' Andy told The Press and Journal. 'He travels the world as an ambassador for London. 'He wants investment into the city of Aberdeen from the capital.' After many months of planning, the London guests' jam-packed weekend started with a special dinner at Trinity Hall. The Lord Provost and the Lord Dean of Guild were among those greeting the 196 Londoners – as well as their Royal guest. Princess Anne, who has been involved with the Liveries for decades, quickly took cover from the rain but did spend some time outside talking to the welcoming party, and performers from Robert Gordon's College Pipe Band. 'This is the first official Royal visit since the building was built in 1966,' Andy, who was head of Aberdeen's bakers guild, said. 'It's quite an event for me as Deacon Convener and for the Lord Mayor – and the city as well.' Princess Anne's visit also celebrates the Seven Incorporated Trades' charity work. The Trades Widows' Fund has donated more than £1.5 million to local causes since 2017. One of their projects was building Aberdeen Riding Club at Nether Anguston Farm in Peterculter. Here, they have installed a riding simulator so disabled people can experience horse riding. Princess Anne, president of the Riding for the Disabled Association, recognised this work when visiting the club in 2023. The guests from London Livery Companies will continue learning more about the north-east over the weekend. An itinerary of events has been organised for the guests, including excursions to Crathes Castle, Fittie and South Harbour. A civic event will be held at Aberdeen Art Gallery on Saturday, with a ceilidh at Ardoe House to follow. The 196-strong group will attend a service at King's College on Sunday morning before some make their way to Balmoral. 'It's a jam-packed weekend,' Andy said. 'It has taken some organisation over the last year and a half. 'The idea is to give them a taste of Aberdeen so they want to come back.'

Anne hosts charities at forum to mark upcoming 75th birthday
Anne hosts charities at forum to mark upcoming 75th birthday

The Independent

timea day ago

  • The Independent

Anne hosts charities at forum to mark upcoming 75th birthday

The Princess Royal has brought her charities together at a special Buckingham Palace forum after deciding it was the only way she wished to mark her forthcoming 75th birthday. Anne is not expected to carry out any major public celebrations in recognition of her milestone in August and requested to only use the occasion to focus on the work of her patronages. The princess joked about thanking her brother, the King, for use of the Palace ballroom and praised the work of the organisations. Anne said: 'I'm not here because this was my choice. You very kindly asked me to become patron of your organisations, so it's an honour for me to have all of you here. 'I would just like to make the point that we are very fortunate that His Majesty has allowed us to use Buckingham Palace for this event tonight – and I need say that – it does help.' She said in her speech to the charities: 'The responsibility and respect that you give to your own organisations and the people who work for you and your beneficiaries is perhaps the key to what makes you so important. ' Respect and responsibility. Thank you very much for doing what you do.' A Palace source said: 'This personifies what Her Royal Highness cares about. 'She didn't want to do anything for her birthday but bring her charities together to hear more about their work and how she can help them.' The princess convened the forum and a reception in the Palace on Thursday for some 200 people, drawn from more than 100 of the 300-plus charities and organisations she currently supports. The forum was arranged to discuss key topics such as challenges facing the sector, public trust in charities and the opportunities and risks presented by new technologies. Among the charities were nine organisations of which Anne has become patron of in the last year – at an age when many people have already retired – including Friends of the Elderly and Naval Children's Charity. Colonel John Boyd, private secretary to the Princess, addressing guests at the opening of the event, said: 'There has been a significant amount of interest in Her Royal Highness's 75th birthday celebrations. 'As you are aware, the princess has given decades of time and support to more than 400 charities and patronages. 'It probably won't come as a surprise given HRH's commitment to you all, that the way the princess wanted to celebrate this milestone was to replicate what she's done on previous significant birthdays and hold this charities forum to once again understand how she can help you at a time when the third sector is facing unprecedented challenges and transformations.' Professor Lynne Berry, chairwoman of the Human Tissue Authority and pro chancellor of the University of Westminster, who chaired the discussion, told guests: 'Your Royal Highness, I know you have had many great ideas over the years but this one, this charity forum, is one of the best.' Anne heard about the challenges facing organisations in terms of fundraising and also how charities have been experimenting with AI, with research showing 76% of charities used AI in 2025, up from 61% last year. The princess is a key member of the King's slimmed-down working monarchy and played an important role as she stepped up in support of Charles amid his cancer diagnosis in 2024. Anne is also known for her no-nonsense approach and her commitment to royal duty. She carried out her first public engagement in 1969 aged 18 when she opened an educational and training centre in Shropshire, and a year later began her longest association with a charity, becoming president of Save the Children and later patron.

French Senate addresses the challenge of curbing the rise of ‘fast fashion'
French Senate addresses the challenge of curbing the rise of ‘fast fashion'

Fashion United

time5 days ago

  • Fashion United

French Senate addresses the challenge of curbing the rise of ‘fast fashion'

Paris - After considerable time in Parliament, a bill to curb 'fast fashion' was reviewed in the French Senate. The Senate aimed to legislate against this 'short-lived' or 'disposable' fashion shipped at discounted prices from China, with giants Shein and Temu in its sights. Inexpensive, of poor quality, easy to order, often highly polluting and constantly renewed, these garments, which saturate the market and compete with established players in the textile industry, faced potential regulation of their influx into France. This was the subject of the text reviewed in the evening at the upper house. Championed by Horizons MP Anne-Cécile Violland, the bill to 'reduce the environmental impact of the textile industry' had languished for over a year on the Senate's desk, following its adoption in March 2024 by the National Assembly. The phenomenon itself did not stop: between 2010 and 2023, the number of garments placed on the market in France increased from 2.3 billion to 3.2 billion; more than 48 garments per inhabitant were placed on the market each year in France and 35 were discarded every second in the country, according to Ademe, the French Environment and Energy Management Agency. 'Today, these giants of ultra fast fashion are invading the market without any control. We must establish rules, hit them as best as possible and as hard as possible,' Sylvie Valente Le Hir, the Les Républicains senator in charge of reporting the text to the Senate, told AFP. Targeting 'ultra' fast fashion Among the key measures was the establishment in law of a definition of 'fast fashion', with criteria based on the volumes manufactured, the speed of collection renewal, the limited 'lifespan' of products and the 'low incentive' to repair them. The targeted companies would then have obligations such as raising consumer awareness of the 'environmental impact' of their clothing. The bill also provided for enhanced sanctions for these platforms through a revised 'bonus-malus' system taking into account the 'environmental costs' of excessive production. On this mechanism, a divergence seemed to appear between the National Assembly and the Senate. The MPs wished to link these penalties to the 'environmental labelling' of products, a recent rating method. But the Senate, in agreement with the government, removed this reference in committee, preferring criteria related to 'sustainability' and 'commercial practices' specific to these platforms. A new draft aimed to target more specifically the 'ultra fast fashion' of Asian companies Shein and Temu, while preserving other European or French companies that could have been affected by the text voted on in the Assembly. 'The idea is to target outrageous models,' the Ministry of Ecological Transition acknowledged. 'This is the case with ultra fast fashion because the number of references is out of all proportion to what we might call simply fast fashion.' Advertising This refocusing of the text worried the Stop Fast Fashion coalition, which brought together 14 environmental and human rights associations, including Emmaus, France Nature Environnement, Friends of the Earth and Zero Waste. For them, the initiative could therefore 'become nothing more than an empty shell, with no dissuasive effect'. Another sign that the debate would be closely scrutinised was that two associations – Friends of the Earth and the Multinationals Observatory – increased the pressure on Shein in recent days by asking the High Authority for Transparency in Public Life (HATVP) to 'exercise its right of control' over the company's lobbying activities, accusing the giant, founded in China but based in Singapore, of 'irregularities'. 'I hope that my colleagues will have the capacity to push back against the lobbies,' said Socialist senator Nicole Bonnefoy, alarmed by a 'current trend in Parliament which gives pride of place to environmental regressions'. Discussions in the chamber also revolved around the banning of advertising for 'fast fashion' companies. The Senate majority, a right-centrist alliance, opposed it on the grounds that it would restrict the 'freedom to do business'. But the government was in favour and attempted to reinstate this ban, supported by the left. This article was translated to English using an AI tool. FashionUnited uses AI language tools to speed up translating (news) articles and proofread the translations to improve the end result. This saves our human journalists time they can spend doing research and writing original articles. Articles translated with the help of AI are checked and edited by a human desk editor prior to going online. If you have questions or comments about this process email us at info@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store