
Trump freezes $6 billion in public school funds right before school year begins
According to ABC News, a terse memo issued on June 30 confirmed that no grant award notifications would be issued 'prior to completing that review.'The delay comes mere days before millions of students return to classrooms, raising fears among educators and policymakers that key services may be cut, scaled back or postponed.LEGAL CHALLENGES AND CRITICISM MOUNTMore than 20 states, led by California and Connecticut, have filed lawsuits against the administration, calling the funding freeze unlawful and warning of grave harm to vulnerable students. Connecticut alone estimates a loss of USD 53.6 million for the 2025-26 academic year.This legal action is taking place amid escalating tensions: a recent Supreme Court decision lifted a block on the administration's plan to cut nearly 1,400 staff positions at the Department of Education.Critics argue this move undermines civil rights enforcement and federal student-aid systems.FROZEN GRANTS PUT PRESSURE ON PROGRAMMESThe frozen funds include those for the 21st Century Community Learning Centers (supporting after-school and summer programmes), adult literacy, English learner instruction, and teacher professional development.Education Week reported that USD 1.4 billion of these funds have since been approved and released, but over USD 5 billion remains frozen.Education advocates and local districts are warning that this sudden withholding could force cutbacks in staffing, early literacy support, and special education services.Mark Lieberman of Education Week observed that an abrupt loss of Title IV-B grants, which provide after-school enrichment, puts around 1.4million children at risk, with some programmes already starting to scale down.CONCERNS ON EQUITY AND OUTCOMESCivil rights groups and educational researchers say the funding cutbacks disproportionately affect rural students, English learners, rural communities, and students with disabilities.Teaching unions fear larger class sizes and stretched resources. As Becky Pringle of the NEA put it, the cuts are a 'slap in the face' for educators and learners.Lawmakers, including ten Republican senators, have urged the administration to restore the withheld funds, sparking a review into after-school programmes. On July 18, funding for these services was partly released, following bipartisan pressure.IS THIS A POLITICAL TARGETING OF BLUE STATES?While the memo issued is national, critics point out that many of the states hardest hit -- like California, New York, Connecticut, and Illinois -- lean Democrat and have traditionally been strong supporters of public education funding.Some lawmakers argue that the freeze may indirectly penalise states that oppose the administration's broader education and civil rights policies, though no official link has been made public.LOOKING AHEADadvertisementWith legal proceedings ongoing and bills pending, the future of the remaining USD 5 billion in frozen grants is uncertain.Districts must decide whether to begin the school year amid funding gaps. Critics warn the cuts could have long-lasting effects on student learning and equity, unless Congress or the courts intervene swiftly.- Ends
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
15 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Brazil's Bolsonaro appeals house arrest order
Lawyers for former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro appealed on Wednesday a house arrest order imposed against him earlier this week, a document sent to the Supreme Court and seen by Reuters showed. Bolsonaro was placed under house arrest on Monday after an order was issued by Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes against him. Moraes' decision cited a failure to comply with restraining orders he had imposed on Bolsonaro for allegedly courting US President Donald Trump's interference in the case. Bolsonaro's lawyers had already said that they would appeal the decision to place him under house arrest. In the document sent on Wednesday, the lawyers said that Bolsonaro did not brech the restraing orders. They also asked for the house arrest order to be voted on by a wider panel of Supreme Court justices.


The Hindu
15 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Stanford University lays off over 360 employees, citing Trump policies
Stanford University said on Tuesday (August 5, 2025) it has laid off over 360 employees, citing budget constraints that it attributed to the federal funding policies of U.S. President Donald Trump. The Trump administration has threatened to cut federal funds for universities over pro-Palestinian protests against U.S. ally Israel's war in Gaza, climate initiatives, transgender policies and diversity, equity and inclusion programs. "Stanford is in the process of making budget reductions," a university spokesperson said in emailed statement in response to media reports on the layoffs. "Last week, many schools and units made staff workforce reductions. In total, 363 layoffs occurred." The Californian university said in June it had made a $140 million reduction in the general funds budget for the upcoming year due to "a challenging fiscal environment shaped in large part by federal policy changes affecting higher education." Last week, the Trump administration froze more than $330 million in funding for the University of California, Los Angeles, after alleging the university failed to prevent a hostile environment for Jewish and Israeli students since campus protests erupted after the start of Israel's war in Gaza. The Los Angeles Times reported on Tuesday (August 5, 2025) that UCLA leaders were preparing to negotiate with the Trump administration over the freeze. The government has recently settled its probes with Columbia University, which agreed to pay over $220 million, and Brown University, which said it will pay $50 million. Both institutions accepted certain demands made by the government. Talks to settle with Harvard University remain ongoing. Rights advocates have raised concerns about academic freedom and free speech over the government's actions. The Trump administration alleges universities allowed antisemitism during pro-Palestinian campus protests. Protesters, including some Jewish groups, say the government wrongly equates their criticism of Israel's military assault in Gaza and its occupation of Palestinian territories with antisemitism, and advocacy for Palestinian rights with support for extremism.


Mint
15 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump was asked about why US singled out India over Russia ties. THIS is what he said
US President Donald Trump was asked on Wednesday: 'Indian officials have said that there are other countries that are buying Russian oil, like China, for instance. So, why are you singling India out for these additional sanctions?' In response, Trump hinted at more "secondary sanctions" . "It's only been 8 hours. So let's see what happens. You're going to see a lot going to see so much secondary sanctions, " Trump said during a press briefing in White House. He also hinted that US administation could impose "more" similar sanctions on China. On being asked, 'On the Indian penalties, do you have any similar plans to enact more tariffs on China', US President Donald Trump said, "Could happen. Depends on how we do. Could happen." Trump's statement came as he signed an Executive Order imposing an additional 25 percent tariff on imports from India. After the order, the total tariff on Indian goods will be 50 per cent. According to the order issued by the White House, Trump cited matters of national security and foreign policy concerns, as well as other relevant trade laws, for the increase. He claimed that India's imports of Russian oil, directly or indirectly, pose an "unusual and extraordinary threat" to the United States. While the initial duty comes into effect on August 7, the additional levy will come into effect after 21 days and will be imposed on all Indian goods imported into the US, except for goods already in transit or those meeting specific exemptions, news agency ANI reported. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) termed the US's move as "unfair, unjustified and unreasonable", declaring that New Delhi will take "all actions necessary to protect its national interests." In an official statement, the MEA said, "The United States has in recent days targeted India's oil imports from Russia. We have already made clear our position on these issues, including the fact that our imports are based on market factors and done with the overall objective of ensuring the energy security of 1.4 billion people of India." "It is therefore extremely unfortunate that the US should choose to impose additional tariffs on India for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest," the statement added."We reiterate that these actions are unfair, unjustified and unreasonable. India will take all actions necessary to protect its national interests," the MEA stressed.