Iran's top security body to decide on Hormuz closure, Press TV reports
DUBAI - Iran's Supreme National Security Council must make the final decision on whether to close the Strait of Hormuz following U.S. bombing raids, Iran's Press TV said on Sunday, after parliament was reported to have backed the measure.
Iran has long used the threat of closing the Strait, through which around 20% of global oil and gas demand flows, as a way to ward off Western pressure which is now at its peak after the overnight U.S. strikes on its nuclear facilities.
The decision to close the strait is not yet final and it was not officially reported that parliament had in fact adopted a bill to that effect.
Instead, a member of parliament's national security commission Esmail Kosari was quoted on other Iranian media as saying: "For now, [parliament has] come to the conclusion we should close the Strait of Hormuz, but the final decision in this regard is the responsibility of the Supreme National Security Council."
Kosari, who is also a Revolutionary Guards Commander, had earlier on Sunday told the Young Journalist Club that closing the strait was on the agenda and "will be done whenever necessary".
Asked about whether Tehran would close the waterway, Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi dodged the question on Sunday and replied: "A variety of options are available to Iran."
The strait lies between Oman and Iran and links the Mideast Gulf north of it with the Gulf of Oman to the south and the Arabian Sea beyond.
It is 21 miles (33 km) wide at its narrowest point, with the shipping lane just 2 miles (3 km) wide in either direction. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
11 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Around military bases in the US, unease over what comes next
The past few days have served as a solemn reminder of the unsettling emotions military service can bring. PHOTO: AFP Around military bases in the US, unease over what comes next Follow our live coverage here. WASHINGTON – For some families who gathered this weekend at Fort Benning in Georgia, the past few days have served as a solemn reminder of the unsettling emotions military service can bring. On June 20 , a group of Army enlistees graduated from basic training. On J une 21 , President Donald Trump bombed Iran. On June 22 , service members and their loved ones pondered an uncertain future. 'People can lose their life, so I'm worried,' said Ms Michele Bixby, 24, of upstate New York, whose brother had just graduated. 'But it's what he wanted to do; it's what he loves to do. He's going to move forward with it no matter what.' One day after the administration announced it had carried out airstrikes at three nuclear sites in Iran, the mood in some communities around military bases on US soil varied from firm support to bitter disagreement. But one sentiment stood out among those interviewed: concern for the safety of America's troops everywhere. No one knows how the strikes on Iran could affect service members. Mr Pete Hegseth, the secretary of defense, emphasised on June 22 that the administration did not want an open-ended war. But Iranian leaders have vowed to retaliate, and US military installations in the Middle East, with more than 40,000 active-duty troops and civilians employed by the Pentagon, are already potential targets. That reality, along with the potential repercussions for the entire military, was on the minds of many people around US bases at home, even as service members accepted that reality as part of the job. 'A lot of the families around here are quickly realizing this is a real threat; this is something we need to be worried about,' said Ms Meghan Gilles, 37, a self-described military brat who works in the Army Reserve's human resources division at Fort Campbell in Kentucky, a training site and home to the 101st Airborne Division. At Eglin Air Force Base in Florida, Blake Carlson, a 23-year-old Army National Guard combat medic who was visiting from Austin, Texas, said that he could be deployed. 'It's what I signed up for,' he said. 'If I have to, I'll do it.' But his mother and brother hoped the country would not be dragged into the escalating conflict in the Middle East. Some people who were interviewed stood by Mr Trump and agreed with his assertions that the targeted bombings were unlikely to lead to a wider conflict. Mr Carlson's mother, Ms Tonya Carlson, said she hoped the attack would force Iran to negotiate with the United States. Others stood by Mr Trump's statement that Iran posed an imminent threat – a point that contradicts recent national security assessments. 'Iran doesn't need to have nuclear weapons, for sure,' said Mr Tony Saluzzo, 72, a former combat engineer who served in the US offensive against Iraq and lives near Fort Campbell. Mr James Arthur, a 42-year-old retired Coast Guard captain who lives north of Tampa, Florida, and was visiting the Air Force Armament Museum at the Eglin base, said that the Iran airstrikes happened 'about two decades too late'. Other former service members castigated Trump for bombing Iran without congressional approval. The Constitution's framers included language to ensure that wars would not be entered rashly, said Mr Paul Oyler, a Navy veteran who served in Iraq and Afghanistan and who lives near the Naval Air Station Lemoore in California, where he was based while on active duty. He said he would have agreed with the airstrikes if there were a proven, credible threat to the region, but 'I don't have any reason to believe that Iran was in possession of actual nuclear weapons.' Mr Denver Thiery, 30, who works on military maintenance contracts and lives in Trenton, Kentucky, near Fort Campbell, said he would remain firmly behind Trump. But he also acknowledged that it was difficult to know exactly what capabilities Iran possessed. 'I don't know the truth of what's going on,' he said. 'I don't know if they really have nuclear warheads or not. I don't know what I can support anymore.' Ms Meghan Gilles , the reservist, whose father is a veteran and whose husband is an active-duty serviceman, was troubled by the decision to edge the country to war at the very moment the government was cutting funding for Veterans Affairs. The administration is taking away a lot of benefits for veterans and 'then just sending them off again to be the world police,' Ms Gilles said. If the current conflict worsens, military members and veterans said, they would put aside their disagreements over Mr Trump and support one another. But one veteran lamented what he said such a scenario would ultimately mean. 'I learned from my time on active duty that war is devastating,' Navy veteran Oyler said. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
AsiaOne
18 minutes ago
- AsiaOne
China says US attack on Iran has damaged its credibility, World News
HONG KONG — China said the US attack on Iran's nuclear facilities has damaged Washington's credibility and Beijing was concerned that the situation "may go out of control", its state broadcaster reported, following a UN Security Council meeting on Sunday (June 22). President Donald Trump said the US had "obliterated" Tehran's key nuclear sites, joining Israel in the biggest Western military action against the Islamic Republic since its 1979 revolution. The UN Security Council met on Sunday to discuss US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites as Russia, China and Pakistan proposed the 15-member body adopt a resolution calling for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire in the Middle East. China's UN Ambassador Fu Cong said parties should restrain the "impulse of force, avoid exacerbating conflicts and adding fuel to the fire," according to the state broadcaster CCTV. Fu said parties, especially Israel, "should immediately cease fire to prevent the situation from escalating and avoid the spillover of war." Iran was hurt "but the United States credibility was also damaged- both as a country and as a participant in any international negotiations," Fu said. State media commentary late on Sunday said the US move was extremely dangerous and provocative. The Global Times newspaper in an opinion piece, said external military interference would never bring peace, and only "deepen regional hatred and trauma." Separately China's embassy in Iran said late on Sunday that most Chinese citizens in Iran had been evacuated safely, and those remaining were not in high-risk areas. [[nid:719366]]
Straits Times
22 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Philippine Vice-President Duterte criticises Marcos for leaning towards US
Philippine Vice-President Sara Duterte slammed President Ferdinand Marcos Jr for leaning towards the US, while signaling openness to friendlier ties with China. Ms Duterte particularly criticised Mr Marcos' move to allow an American missile system on Philippine soil that has angered Beijing, saying Manila has nothing to do with tensions between the US and China. 'There is no reason for you to lean towards the US,' she said in a livestreamed speech on June 23 before supporters in Melbourne, Australia. The vice-president also said the tensions between Manila and Beijing in the South China Sea don't make up the entirety of the relations between the two countries. 'You have to always stay in the middle because you are not part of the bigger conflict,' Ms Duterte said. 'You are friends with US, yes. You are friends with China, yes. And why not?' Ms Duterte's statements mark her sharpest criticisms yet of Mr Marcos' US-friendly foreign policy stance, at a time when the administration's allies are pushing for her ouster through impeachment proceedings. Her position also echoes that of her father, Rodrigo, who pivoted towards China during his 2016-2022 presidency. Mr Marcos' office has yet to respond to the vice-president's remarks. Under Mr Marcos, the Philippines has bolstered longstanding defense ties with the US, expanding access to military bases and allowing the deployment of American weapons. His government has also been more assertive in pushing Manila's claims in the South China Sea, often leading to skirmishes with Beijing in disputed waters. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
