Penang LRT: Compensation quantum pending completion of land acquisition probe
GEORGE TOWN: The exact number of residents affected by the Mutiara Line Light Rail Transit (LRT) project will only be determined once an investigation under Section 12 of the Land Acquisition Act (LAA) 1960 is conducted.
State Infrastructure, Transport and Digital Committee chairman Zairil Khir Johari said the investigation would be conducted soon, as the gazetting of Section 8 of the LAA 1960 was only completed on April 10.
'The quantum of compensation will only be finalised after the investigation process under section 12 of the LAA 1960, on all stakeholders, is completed. As of now, the compensation assessment process has not yet been implemented, and this will be determined by the Land Tribunal,' he said.
He said this in his reply to an oral question from Muhamad Kasim (PN-Telok Bahang) on the progress of site preparation work and the route of the Mutiara Line LRT project, as well as the number of residents affected by land or property acquisition and the compensation involved.
Zairil said the LRT project is currently at the land acquisition stage, which has been gazetted under the LAA 1960 by the State Land and Mines Office, in collaboration with the project owner, Mass Rapid Transit Corp Sdn Bhd (MRT Corp), for the lots involved in Segment 1 of the line, stretching from Komtar to Permatang Damar Laut.
He said permission had been given to MRT Corp to use 86 government land lots so far, while preliminary works are underway following approval under Section 20A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1976.
Zairil added that the Mutiara Line LRT project is currently in the preliminary preparation phase, with a key focus on relocating existing utilities, an essential step that must be completed before the construction of any stations or flyovers can begin.
He also said that the state government is committed to ensuring the project is implemented transparently and efficiently in accordance with the set schedule, and has taken several proactive measures to that end.
Among them is the requirement for MRT Corp to submit monthly progress reports to the State Executive Council (MMK) meetings, chaired by Chief Minister Chow Kon Yeow, to enable periodic monitoring of the project's development.
'In addition, construction activities are being closely monitored by the local authorities (PBT), and a mega project traffic management task force has been established in Penang specifically to oversee and ensure the smooth implementation of the project,' he said.
The physical works for the project, estimated to cost around RM13 billion based on the latest scope and design, are expected to begin in the third quarter of this year, with large-scale construction slated to commence in the fourth quarter of 2026.
The 29.5-kilometre Mutiara Line LRT will feature 21 strategically located stations and is designed to enhance connectivity between Penang Island and the mainland, reduce road congestion, and improve overall accessibility.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
24-05-2025
- The Star
Revitalisation must be for all
MALAYSIA'S proposed Urban Renewal Act has been introduced with a familiar promise: to revitalise ageing cities, improve infrastructure, and 'modernise' neighbourhoods that are said to be falling into decline. On the surface, it sounds like a well-meaning effort to address real urban challenges. But beneath the language of progress lies a deeper concern – that this Act, if passed without serious safeguards, could become a tool for displacing low-income and marginalised communities in the name of development. This concern isn't theoretical. In Malaysia, urban development has long prioritised capital over community. As a friend once put it plainly, that Malaysia is neither a developing nor a developed country – it is a 'developer country.' Residents, especially those who rent, hold no formal title, or live in informal settlements, are consistently sidelined. They are rarely consulted in any real sense, and often find themselves displaced with little notice, little recourse, and little or no compensation. Even when compensation is offered, no matter how generous they may seem on paper, is not a substitute for stability, security, or belonging. In practice, com-pensation rarely translates into improved livelihoods. More often, it severs people from the very networks – jobs, schools, extended family, community support – that made their lives viable in the first place. The money runs out. The rent goes up. The cost of commuting rises. And what's left is not a better life but a more precarious one. Moreover, the promise of returning to improved housing post-redevelopment is fraught with challenges. While new units may be 'better', they often come with increased property taxes and maintenance costs. As property values rise due to redevelopment, so do the asso-ciated costs of living in these areas. For low-income residents, this financial burden can be unsustainable, effectively forcing them to sell their homes and relocate, despite initial assuran-ces of the right to return. The Urban Renewal Act, as it's currently being discussed, risks reinforcing this pattern. By centralising the power to initiate and approve renewal projects, and by opening the door for the Land Acquisition Act to be used more broadly for redevelopment, the government could make it easier to displace entire com-munities under the banner of 'revitalisation'. This is especially troubling given the way redevelopment is typically framed in Malaysia. Older buildings are labelled 'obsolete' or 'unproductive'. Working-class neighbourhoods are described as 'underutilised'. In these narratives, the existing residents are rarely seen as stakeholders with rights. More often, they're treated as obstacles to be removed or relocated to make way for something newer, shinier, and more profitable. But who actually benefits from this kind of renewal? When we strip away the language of 'modernisation' and 'revitalisation', what remains is a pattern of transformation that often prioritises land value over community wellbeing. If the goal is truly to make our cities more liveable and equitable, then we need to reconsider the values driving redevelopment. What is being renewed, and for whom? At the heart of this question is the issue of housing. Urban renewal cannot be reduced to infrastructure upgrades or the repackaging of neighbourhoods for higher returns. It must begin with the recognition that housing is not merely a commodity to be traded or optimised – it is a basic human right. And that right includes more than a roof overhead; it includes the ability to live with dignity, stability, and security in one's own community. The right to housing, as out-lined in international human rights frameworks, includes more than access to a physical unit. It includes legal security of tenure, affordability, habitability, acces-sibility, cultural adequacy, and proximity to work, schools, and healthcare. A policy that does not safeguard these basic elements is not renewal, it's displacement dressed up as progress. To avoid repeating past mistakes, several key safeguards must be built into the Urban Renewal Act. First, residents must be guaranteed the right to remain in or return to their neighbourhoods after redevelopment. This includes legally binding commitments to in-situ upgrades or the construction of affordable replacement housing in the same location, not vague promises or 'temporary' relocation plans that leave families in limbo for years. Second, if we are to treat housing as a fundamental right, then that right must extend beyond formal homeownership to include the many other ways people live and hold land. In Malaysia, entire communities have made homes on land without titles, not out of neglect, but because the legal system has long lagged behind the lived realities of urban growth, migration, and informal settlement. Recognising housing as a right means recognising the legitimacy of diverse forms of tenure – rented flats, ancestral lands for Orang Asli, long-term squatter communities. It means creating legal protections for these residents, and supporting alternative ownership models such as cooperative housing or community land trusts that allow for long-term stability, afford-ability, and collective stewardship. Third, residents must have a real say in how renewal happens. Too often, 'consultations' are performative, held after decisions have already been made. True democratic governance means giving residents decision-making power, not just a seat at the table, but a vote that counts. This could be done through local planning councils, participatory budgeting, or other mechanisms that give communities control over their own futures. Finally, the Act must include strong measures to counter property speculation. Without this, redevelopment will simply drive up land prices, attract speculative investors, and push long-term residents out. Anti-speculation taxes, limits on flipping, and caps on developer profits can help ensure that renewal serves public, not just private, interests. Cities do need to evolve. Infrastructure does need to be maintained. But change must be equitable. It must be rooted in justice. If we allow the same dynamics that have shaped Malaysia's urban landscape for decades to continue unchecked, this new Act will not renew our cities, but instead it will remake them in a way that further concentrates wealth and deepens inequality. Malaysia has a chance to get this right by putting people before profit and making urban renewal a tool for inclusion, not displacement. But without real political will, we risk repeating the same story: development that benefits the few while pushing out the many. Badrul Hisham Ismail is the director of programmes at Iman Research and a member of the Atlantic Fellows for Social and Economic Equity at the London School of Economics and Political Science. The views expressed here are solely the writer's own.
The Star
22-05-2025
- The Star
Making room for Penang tourism
(From left) Penang housing and environment state exco Datuk Seri Sundarajoo Somu, Zairil and Chief Minister Chow Kon Yeow having a discussion during the state assembly sitting. — LIM BENG TATT/The Star Aerial view of the Silicon Island Reclamation project site. — Filepic THIRTEEN new hotels have opened in Penang since August 2023 to meet growing demands of the state's tourism industry, with seven more expected to begin operations soon. Penang tourism and creative economy committee chairman Wong Hon Wai said the 13 hotels had contributed 2,311 rooms to the state's capacity for visitors' accommodation. The new rooms comprise 1,670 at 11 hotels in the northeast district, 298 at a southwest district hotel and 343 at a hotel in north Seberang Perai. An aerial view of the Silicon Island Reclamation project site. Wong was responding to a question from Heng Lee Lee (PH-Berapit) on the increase in hotel developments, at the state assembly sitting in George Town. Meanwhile, state infrastructure, transport and digital committee chairman Zairil Khir Johari said land reclamation of the 930ha Silicon Island, off Penang's southern coast, would take 10 to 15 years. He said reclamation works, which had begun in September 2023, were being carried out in two phases. Phase one involves the reclamation of 510ha while phase two covers 420ha. 'As of April 30 this year, 60ha of land, equivalent to 6.5% of the project, had been reclaimed,' he told the assembly. In response to questions from Muhamad Kasim (PN-Telok Bahang), Zairil (PH-Tanjong Bungah) said no land acquisition was involved. However, he said land acquisitions in Permatang Damar Laut would be needed for construction of phase one of the Pan Island Link 2A (PIL2A) highway connecting Batu Maung to Silicon Island. 'It involves 13 land lots, 17 residential houses, two business premises, one welfare home and one place of worship. 'The land acquisition process was approved by authorities on May 8 last year and gazetted on July 11 last year under Section 8 of Land Acquisition Act 1960,' he said. Zairil disclosed that owners of the premises had received compensation based on valuations by the Valuation and Property Services Department. 'A majority of the stakeholders received compensation of over RM1.5mil for each lot of land. 'Three individuals received ex-gratia payments of RM43,500 each. 'The total compensation for land acquisition under PIL2A amounted to RM24,154,948.73, with ex-gratia payments totalling RM130,500,' he added. Mohamad Kasim had asked about the land reclamation progress of Silicon Island, the number of residents involved in land or property acquisition and the compensation they received. Silicon Island, previously known as Island A, is being developed by Silicon Island Development Sdn Bhd. The developer also oversees the design and management of Phase 1 reclamation works via turnkey contractor SRS TC Sdn Bhd, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Gamuda Bhd.
The Sun
22-05-2025
- The Sun
Penang passes water resources bill for integrated, holistic management
GEORGE TOWN: The Penang Legislative Assembly today passed the Penang Water Resources Bill 2025 to manage the state's water resources in a more integrated, holistic and sustainable manner. The Bill was passed by a majority voice vote after being debated by six assemblymen from the government and opposition blocs. When tabling the Bill earlier, State Infrastructure, Transport and Digital Committee chairman Zairil Khir Johari, said its introduction is a strategic move toward integrated management of water use, development and protection to enhance greater efficiency. He explained that the new enactment is necessary to replace the Water Enactment of 1967, which is outdated and limited in scope, as it only grants authority through district officers and lacks the provisions required to meet current needs. 'In addition, there are gaps in existing federal laws, such as the Environmental Quality Act 1974, that hinder a comprehensive approach to addressing water pollution,' he said. 'With mounting pressure from population growth, rapid development and the effects of climate change, water management requires a more systematic, efficient approach backed by strong legal authority,' said Zairil. He explained that the Bill would provide a solid legal foundation for stricter monitoring and enforcement, the integration of smart technologies in water management, and clearer definitions of the rights and responsibilities of various stakeholders in safeguarding water resources. As such, he said the state government is confident that the Bill, comprising 61 clauses across 10 parts, will offer a clearer legal framework to govern the abstraction, use, conservation and quality of water resources on the island. The assembly also passed the Penang Water Resources Board Bill 2025, along with two motions: the Special Report of the Committee on Standing Orders of the Penang Legislative Assembly, and the activation of the Select Committee on Federal-State Relations. The first meeting of the third session of the 15th Penang State Legislative Assembly, which began on May 19, saw the submission of 75 oral questions, 769 written questions, and the tabling of two Bills and three motions. The sitting was adjourned to a date to be determined later.
