logo
Top court defends right to assembly

Top court defends right to assembly

The Star10 hours ago
PUTRAJAYA: The Federal Court ruled that punishing individuals who failed to notify the police five days in advance before organising a peaceful assembly was in conflict with the Federal Constitution.
Sinar Harian reported that the decision was made unanimously by a panel of five judges led by Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, who ended her public service yesterday.
According to her, Section 9 (5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012, which provides for a fine for failure to give advance notice, was a form of prohibition, rather than a restriction permitted under Article 10 (1) (b) of the Federal Constitution.
'This section is a form of disproportionate interference with the people's right to assemble peacefully,' she said when delivering the decision.
The decision follows a constitutional challenge filed by Mandiri executive director Amir Abdul Hadi, who was charged in 2022 for failing to submit a five-day notice to the police before holding a protest in front of the Sogo shopping complex in Kuala Lumpur.
The protest on Aug 14, 2022, involved about 200 people who demanded that the minister responsible for the failure of the littoral combat ship (LCS) project be fired or prosecuted.
Amir has been charged under Section 9(1) of the same Act, which mandates the provision of advance notice, and faces a maximum fine of RM10,000 in accordance with Section 9(5).
He 'challenged the validity of the provision, and the High Court referred the legal question to the Federal Court for a decision.
In the decision, the Federal Court also ordered the ongoing criminal proceedings against Amir to be returned to the High Court and disposed of following the latest judgment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man claims trial to rape, sexual assault of teenage girl
Man claims trial to rape, sexual assault of teenage girl

New Straits Times

time14 minutes ago

  • New Straits Times

Man claims trial to rape, sexual assault of teenage girl

KUALA LUMPUR: A part-time event management worker claimed trial at the Sessions Court today to three charges of raping, committing carnal intercourse against the order of nature and sexually assaulting a teenage girl last month. The 27-year-old accused entered his plea after the charges were read out to him before judge Tasnim Abu Bakar. On the first charge, he is accused of raping the 14-year-old victim against her will, an offence under Section 375(g) of the Penal Code, punishable under Section 376(2) (d) which provides a jail term not less than 30 years and whipping. On the second count, he was charged with committing carnal intercourse against the order of nature against the victim under Section 377CA of the code which carries an imprisonment not less than five years and not exceeding 20 years and whipping. On the third count, he was charged with sexually assaulting the victim under Section 14(a) of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act which carries a maximum 20-year jail term and whipping. The accused allegedly committed the offences between 3am and 4am at an apartment unit in Ampang on June 21. Deputy public prosecutor Siti Pervinah Mohamad Yusof urged the court to set bail at RM30,000 for all charges, citing the severity of the alleged offences. "It is important that vulnerable children are protected from potential exploitation and sexual harassment. "The gravity of such crimes demands the court's utmost attention," said Siti Pervinah, who appeared with deputy public prosecutor Nur Sakinah Ahmad Sodikin. In mitigation, lawyer Muhammad Amin Abdullah described the bail sum suggested by the prosecution as excessive and pleaded for leniency. "My client takes care of his parents and is responsible for bringing them to the hospital in time of emergency," he said. After hearing the submissions, Tasnim set bail at RM15,000 with one surety. She also barred the accused from harassing the victim, ordered him to surrender his passport to the court and report to the police station monthly. The court set Aug 6 for mention.

MACC probing Singapore tycoon linked to Sabah mining scandal
MACC probing Singapore tycoon linked to Sabah mining scandal

The Star

time25 minutes ago

  • The Star

MACC probing Singapore tycoon linked to Sabah mining scandal

KOTA KINABALU: The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) has launched an investigation into a Singaporean businessman named in a viral article on social media, who is alleged to be the financier behind a Sabah mining corruption scandal involving Datuk Albert Tei Jiann Cheing. A source said the probe follows the article that had gone viral this week, which named the tycoon as the alleged backer of bribes linked to mineral prospecting licences in Sabah. MACC chief commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki confirmed the matter when contacted, adding that the commission will summon several witnesses soon to assist in the investigation. 'We are verifying the information raised in the article and will be recording statements from relevant individuals soon,' Azam added. The article, published on an independent news portal, claimed that the businessman had been bankrolling efforts to secure lucrative mining concessions in Sabah. It alleged that hidden recordings were used during private meetings with political figures, purportedly to exert pressure or obtain favours. It also alleged that multiple companies had been used to channel influence and that the group behind these efforts was gaining ground by aligning itself with key political figures in the state. Several of those mentioned in the report are said to be leaders or associates of Sabah Umno. The report described the group's actions as cartel-like in nature, though no official findings have confirmed this. Tei and two assemblymen—Datuk Dr Yusof Yacob (Sindumin) and Andi Muhammad Suryady Bandy (Tanjung Batu)—were charged in court last Monday with corruption involving RM350,000 in alleged bribes linked to mineral licence approvals. The Sabah mining controversy first emerged in late 2024 after a whistleblower released a series of covert recordings to an independent news portal, allegedly showing conversations between political figures discussing mineral deals.

Tengku Maimun's precious farewell gift to Malaysians: Landmark ruling on the right to dissent
Tengku Maimun's precious farewell gift to Malaysians: Landmark ruling on the right to dissent

Focus Malaysia

time26 minutes ago

  • Focus Malaysia

Tengku Maimun's precious farewell gift to Malaysians: Landmark ruling on the right to dissent

Editor's Note: Rightly condensed by Boo Su-Lyn who is the editor-in-chief of CodeBlue, a website which seeks to promote healthcare as a human right: 'On her last day, Chief Justice (now former) Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat defends our constitutional right to freedom of assembly. The government can no longer require five-day notice to hold peaceful rallies as that has been ruled by the Federal Court to be unconstitutional.' On her last day, Chief Justice Tengku Maimun defends our constitutional right to freedom of assembly. The government can no longer require 5-day notice to hold peaceful rallies, as that has been ruled by the Federal Court to be — Boo Su-Lyn (@boosulyn) July 1, 2025 THE Federal Court had on yesterday (July 1) delivered one of the most important rulings on peaceful assembly in Malaysia. The Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 (PAA) came into force on April 24, 2012 which was just four days before one of the most historic rallies in the country – BERSIH 3.0. The PAA was intended to replace Section 27 of the Police Act and was meant to promote and facilitate peaceful assemblies. However, over the years, it has been used as a tool to criminalise peaceful protesters. Politicians, activists, students, members of the public and many others have been charged under this Act. I have always argued that there's no need for the 10-day advance notification requirement (prior to the amendment) under Section 9(5). This is because enforcement authorities are usually already aware when a rally is being organised. In many cases, no approval is granted even when organisers have complied with all conditions. Often, after submitting a notice, the rally would be declared 'illegal'. Participants of BERSIH 4 rally in September 2015 (Inage credit: Singapore Straits Times ) Precious gift Today's landmark decision is not just any ruling. It marks progress towards one of BERSIH's key demands under BERSIH 4 and 5: the right to dissent. As a former leader of the movement, I applaud the Federal Court's decision. The irony is that this demand was finally achieved through legal reform via the courts. Let us now celebrate what is enshrined in our Federal Constitution which under Article 10(1)(b) guarantees that 'all citizens have the right to assemble peaceably and without arms.' Kudos to all of you who have participated in peaceful gatherings or supported this journey over the years. ' Hak berhimpun, hak anak setiap bangsa (The right to assemble is the rights of every Malaysian).' – July 2, 2025 Mandeep Singh was one of the longest-serving staff at the Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections (BERSIH). He was a key driver of the BERSIH Secretariat during a critical period in the movement's history, especially in the run-up to the BERSIH 3, 4 and 5 rallies. Mandeep Singh (Image credit: Malaysiakini ) During this period, the Hulu Selangor-born political activist was subject to over 30 interrogations, three death threats and five detentions for his involvement in BERSIH. The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store