logo
#

Latest news with #PeacefulAssemblyAct2012

Moving in the right direction
Moving in the right direction

The Star

time2 days ago

  • Politics
  • The Star

Moving in the right direction

PETALING JAYA: The Federal Court's ruling that it is unconstitutional to criminalise protest organisers for failing to notify the authorities is a vital development for democracy, say activists. Amir Hariri Abd Hadi, who challenged the constitutionality of Section 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 (Act 736) in the apex court, said the landmark decision upheld the spirit of the Federal Constitution. 'It recognises that punishing peaceful organisers just for not giving notice goes against the spirit of the Constitution,' said the executive director of Mandiri, a youth movement working on civil rights and democratic participation. Describing the court's decision as a sign of progress, he said more must be done as far as reforms are concerned, as far as civil society groups are concerned. 'We are very open to working with the government. There are important concerns like the length of notice, how spontaneous assemblies are handled and how the police should facilitate and not obstruct peaceful gatherings. 'The process must be transparent and involve real public input,' said Amir, who resigned as Muda secretary-general in June. On July 1, the Federal Court ruled that Section 9(5) was unconstitutional. The decision was delivered in a constitutional challenge brought by Amir Hadi, who was charged with failing to provide notification to the police ahead of a protest organised in August 2022 in front of the Sogo shopping complex in Kuala Lumpur. The provision criminalised acts of organisers of peaceful assemblies who failed to notify police five days in advance, even if the assembly remained peaceful. The court ruled that such punishment was disproportionate and infringed on the right to peaceful assembly guaranteed under Article 10 of the Federal Constitution. Clause 9(5) stipulates that an organiser can be slapped with a fine of not more than RM10,000 for failure to notify the police, five days before the gathering. The ruling followed years of criticism from civil society and human rights organisations which called for the repeal of Section 9(5) and other restrictive provisions in the Act. Parti Sosialis Malaysia deputy chairman S. Arutchelvan said former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak should be credited for introducing Act 736 and Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad commended for reducing the 10-day notice requirement to five. 'The recent court ruling made it better. The current Madani government has put a moratorium on the requirement to inform premises owners,' he said. However, he said there are still weaknesses in Act 736, such as the right to protest not being accorded to children and foreigners. 'What if migrant workers are exploited?' he said. Former Human Rights Com­mission of Malaysia (Suhakam) commissioner Jerald Joseph said he was satisfied with the government's plans to improve protest rights in Malaysia. 'This is in tandem with minimum universal human rights standards. But it took a long time to get here,' he said, adding that the proposed amendments to the Act will give true meaning to the right of the people to assemble peacefully. In February, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim said the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 will be amended during this parliamentary session. He assured that the government will remove the problematic Section 11 which had been an obstacle to protests as it required the consent of the owner or occupier of the place of assembly. He said the Cabinet had imposed a moratorium on prosecutions under Section 9(5) as an initial step towards comprehensive reform of laws on the right to protest. Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail said earlier this month that the ministry will table amendments to Section 11 of Act 736 in the current parliamentary session.

Striking a proper legal balance
Striking a proper legal balance

The Star

time2 days ago

  • Politics
  • The Star

Striking a proper legal balance

PETALING JAYA: Significant changes to the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 (Act 736) will mark a key test of the government's commitment to upholding civil liberties, say legal experts. With that in mind, some have urged the government to strike a proper balance between the people's right to hold peaceful protests and the authorities' need to maintain public order. All eyes will be on proposed amendments to the Act during the current parliamentary session, with the government having pledged to remove impediments towards the right to peaceful assembly. Act 736 regulates public assemblies, including protests, and outlines the right to assemble peacefully and without arms, while also establishing restrictions deemed necessary for public order and security. Key aspects have included a requirement for organisers to notify the police of an intended assembly, restrictions on street protests and specific rules regarding prohibited places. Lawyer Kokila Vaani Vadiveloo welcomed the proposed removal of Section 11, which requires protest organisers to obtain the consent of the venue owner. She said this is in line with the recent Federal Court ruling that struck down the requirement which penalised organisers who failed to give five days' notice, with the apex court ruling it as unconstitutional. While police notification under Section 9(1) remains a requirement, Kokila said the court ruling makes it no longer criminally enforceable. 'This does not weaken public order. The court acknowledged public order as a legitimate concern but found Section 9(5) to be disproportionate,' said the former Selangor Bar chairman. Kokila said the authorities still hold powers under other parts of the Act and the Penal Code to manage assemblies. 'Public safety can be maintained without criminalising peaceful conduct,' she added. Kokila proposed reframing Section 9(1) as a recommended, not mandatory, requirement and removing Section 11 or replacing it with a presumptive right to public space with limited exceptions. She said the proposed removal of Section 11 does not mean anyone could protest anywhere without permission as it only applies to public spaces, not private property. 'Private venue owners still have the full legal right to deny access to their premises. 'If someone were to hold a protest on private land without the owner's consent, it could amount to trespass and the owner may seek legal remedies, including injunction or removal,' she added. If properly implemented, Kokila said the reforms would better align the country's public law with democratic norms and affirm the judiciary's role in safeguarding rights. Echoing this view, lawyer Lim Wei Jiet said the amendments should move Malaysia away from a system based on 'permission' towards one which facilitates peaceful assemblies. 'We have yet to see the draft, so the devil is in the details,' he added. Senior lawyer Mohamed Haniff Khatri Abdulla, however, cautioned that eliminating the need to notify the police could complicate rally management. He said assemblies held in public spaces still require traffic control and crowd management and without notice, the police will not be able to prepare or even inform the public. He also noted that having a police presence will help assure both rally participants and the public. 'Although the proposed amendments are welcomed, is it not wise for the organisers to still notify the police in advance to ensure the safety and security of those who turn up for the assembly and also bystanders? 'I believe the general public will also want to know earlier as they may have plans to pass by the area or attend an event there,' he said, adding that he agreed with Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail, who had raised these concerns. Mohamed Haniff said police could still seek a court injunction to stop a protest if there are substantial concerns about public safety. Beyond Section 11, several lawyers have called for other changes. Lawyer Andrew Khoo pointed out that since the Act's introduction in 2012, only one designated protest site has been gazetted – Darul Makmur Stadium in Kuantan – under Section 25. 'Every town and city should have such designated places, and a city should have more than one spot where people can gather for peaceful assembly,' he said. Khoo called for the removal of restrictions in Section 4, which bars non-citizens, those under 21 years of age and children from participating in assemblies. 'The age limit is inconsistent with Malaysia's commitments under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child,' he said. Khoo added that Sections 5 and 12, which allow third parties to object to a protest, could unfairly undermine the right to assemble. Association of Women Lawyers vice-president Denise Lim said the recent Federal Court ruling and moratorium on Section 11 investigations are positive developments, but urged close scrutiny on fresh amendments. 'The key is whether other restrictive provisions remain or whether new forms of regulations might replace repealed ones.'Transparency, meaningful stakeholder engagement and rights-based drafting should be made central to this process,' she said. Lim added that legal reforms should be consistently and fairly implemented, as whether an individual is truly able to exercise his or her rights depends on the law being implemented proportionately without fear of retaliation or creating excessive hurdles.

Civil servants warned against joining July 26 rally in KL
Civil servants warned against joining July 26 rally in KL

The Sun

time2 days ago

  • Politics
  • The Sun

Civil servants warned against joining July 26 rally in KL

CHIEF Secretary to the Government Tan Sri Shamsul Azri Abu Bakar has issued a stern reminder to civil servants not to participate in the upcoming rally in Kuala Lumpur on July 26. He stressed that involvement in such gatherings contradicts the principle of 'Loyalty to King and Country' as outlined in the Rukun Negara. 'They shouldn't go. They are civil servants, (so) how can they join? Every day, every week, we recite the Loyalty to King and Country pledge. Have they forgotten? Be grateful to the King and the Country,' he told reporters after launching the Sports Carnival of the MRSM Association of Former Students (ANSARA Malaysia). The rally, dubbed 'Himpunan Turun Anwar,' is expected to draw between 10,000 to 15,000 participants, according to the Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM). Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail confirmed that police would facilitate the event while ensuring security in compliance with the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012. Shamsul Azri's remarks reinforce the government's stance on civil servants maintaining political neutrality. His statement comes amid heightened public interest in the rally, which has sparked discussions on lawful assembly and public sector conduct. - Bernama

2,000 police personnel to manage July 26 public rally
2,000 police personnel to manage July 26 public rally

The Star

time4 days ago

  • Politics
  • The Star

2,000 police personnel to manage July 26 public rally

KUALA LUMPUR: More than 2,000 police officers and personnel will be deployed for the 'Himpunan Turun Anwar' rally on July 26, which is expected to attract 15,000 participants. Acting Kuala Lumpur police chief Deputy Comm Datuk Mohamed Usuf Jan Mohamad said personnel would be stationed at all key gathering points, including Sogo shopping mall, Masjid Jamek, Masjid Negara and Pasar Seni, from 11am. Participants are expected to march to Dataran Merdeka at 2pm. 'We will be there to facilitate the rally and ensure the safety of all involved,' he told reporters at a handover ceremony marking his appointment as acting Kuala Lumpur police chief. DCP Mohamed Usuf said the rally organisers had notified the police of the gathering. 'We respect the public's right to assemble. However, we urge participants to gather peacefully and avoid any acts of provocation,' he said, adding that participants should refrain from burning objects or raising sensitive issues during speeches at Dataran Merdeka. 'Stern action will be taken against any offences,' he said. Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail previously said the police would facilitate the rally despite a Federal Court ruling on July 1 that struck down Section 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 as unconstitutional, meaning organisers are no longer legally required to notify authorities in advance. On another matter, DCP Mohamed Usuf said police are awaiting further instructions from the Attorney General's Chambers (AGC) regarding the investigation into the alleged assault of singer Shila Amzah. He confirmed that the investigation paper had been submitted to the AGC and the police had also received a report from Datuk Amy Search, which had been described as a covering report. On July 10, Shila lodged a police report alleging she was assaulted by a legendary singer, later identified as Amy, father of actress Nabila Huda. Preliminary findings suggest the incident stemmed from Amy's dissatisfaction with Shila's alleged interference in his family affairs. Separately, DCP Mohamed Usuf said police are continuing investigations into the abduction of Datin Seri Pamela Ling Yueh, despite a lack of solid leads. Ling was last seen on April 9, when she was scheduled to appear at the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission headquarters in Putrajaya to assist with an investigation. However, she reportedly vanished on her way there, with CCTV footage later revealing that she was abducted by several men. No ransom demand has been made to date.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store