A Georgia town that solidly backed Trump could fall victim to his tax bill's green energy cuts
The factories promised thousands of new jobs, transforming the manufacturing base in Cartersville, once a cotton mill town before an Anheuser-Busch brewery arrived in the 1990s and a tire plant in 2006.
But now Republicans in Congress want to gut the subsidies for projects across the country in a tax cut bill likely days from final passage. President Donald Trump's signature legislation could harm Cartersville despite it being in overwhelmingly Republican Bartow County, which backed Trump with 75% of the vote all three times he appeared on the ballot.
Both companies say they're continuing their buildout plans. But Steve Taylor, a Republican who is Bartow County's lone elected commissioner, says ending the tax credits would be 'a little concerning.'
'Those companies came and it gave us a completely different type of industry and manufacturing for our community,' Taylor said.
By some measures, no state may have more to lose than Georgia from such cuts in Trump's ' Big Beautiful Bill .' Top Georgia Republicans have been mostly silent, while Georgia's two Democratic U.S. senators are staunchly opposed.
'A vote for this bill is a vote against Georgia's economy and a vote that will put so much of what we've worked so hard to achieve at risk' U.S. Sen. Jon Ossoff told The Associated Press.
And few towns have more to lose than Cartersville, the Bartow County seat about 35 miles (55 kilometers) northwest of Atlanta. As the county transforms from rural to suburban, leaders foresee an economic boost from the $5 billion battery factory that Hyundai Motor Group and SK On are building, as well as the $2.3 billion solar panel plant belonging to Qcells, a unit of Hanwha Solutions. Both plants pledge to pay workers an average of $53,000 a year. Clean energy projects are taking off in Georgia
Georgia's huge inrush of clean energy projects had already begun before 2022, when then-President Joe Biden signed his signature climate law , the Inflation Reduction Act. But if anything, that rush accelerated . The 33 additional projects announced by the end of 2024 were the most nationwide, according to E2 , an environmental business group. Exact figures differ, but projects in Georgia top $20 billion, pledging more than 25,000 jobs.
Buyers of Qcells solar panels get a 40% federal tax credit, including a 10% bonus for domestic content, which would go away under the bill. Qcells itself would still get production tax credits for panels it started producing last year in Cartersville. The bill would also tax companies that buy panels or components from some foreign countries including China. That could help Qcells, but wouldn't aid domestic producers as much as the domestic content bonus.
When the 1,900-job plant is complete, it will take refined polysilicon, cast it into ingots and then thinly slice ingots into the wafers that become solar cells. Qcells says controlling its own supply chain will let it work more efficiently. Those additional steps would earn the company additional tax credits.
Scott Moskowitz, vice president of market strategy and industry affairs for Qcells, said the company built its first American factory up the road in Dalton during the first Trump administration in response to Trump's protectionist trade policy. Moskowitz argues that a quick curtailment of federal subsidies undercuts Trump's goal of bolstering domestic manufacturing, pushing buyers back to Chinese-controlled producers.
Some local Republicans are expressing alarm, with 16 GOP state legislators imploring Congress in a June 17 letter to preserve tax breaks for solar panels.
'We urge you not to weaken the tax credits, as doing so would only harm the manufacturing renaissance in Georgia while creating opportunities for Chinese companies to take over the solar industry,' wrote the Georgia lawmakers, led by Republican state Rep. Matthew Gambill of Cartersville.
Some argue it's unfair for Congress to pull the rug out after companies relied on the promise of federal support to invest huge sums.
'I would like to think that from a business perspective that when you have agreements in place that you carry those out to fulfillment,' Cartersville Mayor Matt Santini said. High-ranking Georgia Republicans have been publicly silent
Clean energy projects have overwhelmingly located in Republican-held congressional districts, with a report by Atlas Public Policy finding GOP districts host 77% of planned spending.
But Republican U.S. Rep. Barry Loudermilk, who lives in Bartow County, praised the cuts when they passed the House in May, saying the bill would 'unleash American energy stifled by the Democrats' Green New scam' and lauding expansion of oil, gas and coal production on federal lands.
Republican Gov. Brian Kemp says he's staying out of the debate.
'Our position is that Congress needs to be the one to decide the future of the IRA,' said Kemp spokesperson Garrison Douglas.
Kemp loves green energy investments and jobs, and even declared that his goal is to make Georgia the 'electric mobility capital of America.' But Kemp and Ossoff clash over who should get credit for Georgia's green energy boom. Kemp sharply disputes that the Biden-era incentives spurred the flood of investment, saying many industries were already on their way before the Inflation Reduction Act was passed.
Unlike his current silence, Kemp vociferously opposed some domestic content requirements that made it hard for Hyundai to access the same tax credits as unionized U.S.-based automakers.
'Just generally speaking, the Inflation Reduction Act picked winners and losers, and we saw that negatively impact our partners,' Douglas said.
All nine of Georgia's Republican House members voted to support the bill, including U.S. Rep Buddy Carter, who earlier signed a letter supporting green energy subsidies. Carter, who is seeking the GOP nomination to oppose Ossoff for Senate in 2026, represents a coastal district that includes a $7.6 billion Hyundai plant in Ellabell that started production last year.
Hyundai wants to make batteries at what would be a 3,500-employee plant near Cartersville so that Hyundai and Kia buyers can fully take advantage of the $7,500 tax credit for electric vehicles. Those credits would end six months after the bill is enacted under the current version.
The company is publicly sidestepping the current legislative fight. But with American demand for electric vehicles slow to take off , Hyundai now says it will also build gas-electric hybrid vehicles in Ellabell, once projected to make only electric vehicles.
'We remain focused on electrification because we believe it represents a significant long-term opportunity,' Hyundai spokesperson Michael Stewart said in a statement. 'At the same time, our business is driven by consumer demand, which is why we continue to offer a full range of powertrains.'
Bartow County leaders say it's in everyone's interest to keep the projects on solid footing and that jobs should outweigh politics.
'I don't know that people are lining up along party lines over this topic,' Santini said.
But Ossoff says partisanship is motivating many Georgia Republicans to turn their backs on the state's economic interests.
'For national Republicans right now, loyalty to Trump is more important than anything else, and this is what Trump says he wants,' Ossoff said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
S.Korea's Yoon 'lay in underwear and refused to talk'
South Korea's ousted and detained president Yoon Suk-yeol lay on the floor of his cell and refused to leave it for questioning, prosecutors say. Yoon is was removed from office in April by the Constitutional Court over his botched attempt in 2024 to declare martial law and is being investigated by a special prosecution team formed under new President Lee Jae-myung. Prosecutors investigating influence-peddling allegations connected to Yoon and his wife had tried to get him to comply with an arrest warrant and attend questioning voluntarily, a spokesperson for the special prosecution said. "But the suspect stubbornly refused to do so, while lying on the ground, not dressed in a prison uniform," Oh Jung-hee told a news briefing on Friday. She said investigators would try again to bring him in, even if they had to use force. Yoon was dressed only in his undershirt and underwear when prosecutors went to his cell, the Yonhap News Agency reported, citing the special prosecution. Yu Jeong-hwa, one of Yoon's lawyers, told Reuters that bringing up what he was wearing in a small space where the temperature was close to 40C was a public insult to his dignity and showed how the state was violating inmates' human rights. The former president was put back in a solitary cell at the Seoul Detention Centre in July as prosecutors investigating his short-lived declaration of martial law in December sought additional charges against him. Yoon is already on trial for insurrection, a charge which is punishable by death or life imprisonment. He also faces a string of other investigations led by special prosecutors including one into scandals surrounding his wife, former first lady Kim Keon-hee, where the couple allegedly exerted inappropriate influence over elections. Yoon has denied any wrongdoing and his lawyers have accused prosecutors of conducting a politically-motivated witch hunt. The former president has repeatedly rejected requests by prosecutors to appear for questioning, citing health issues, including a condition that means there is a risk of him losing his eyesight. In a reference to Yoon's position as a former top prosecutor, Oh, the spokesperson for the special prosecution, said the case was being closely scrutinised by the public, which was watching to see if the law applied equally to everyone. Separately, investigators requested that Yoon's wife Kim, who has also denied any wrongdoing, attend questioning on August 6.


Newsweek
2 minutes ago
- Newsweek
America Needs a Digital Dollar
As China accelerates deployment of its digital yuan, and the European Central Bank advances toward a digital euro, the Republican Party is seeking to prevent the creation of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) in the United States. Their insistence on clinging to an increasingly obsolete financial infrastructure means that Americans will continue to be saddled with billions in unnecessary fees every year and that corporations will be empowered to erode our privacy in Orwellian fashion. What's more, handicapping ourselves in this way will only make it more likely that the dollar's dominance in global finance will come to a premature end. America needs a digital dollar, and we need it now. The Trump administration's recent digital assets report explicitly prohibits federal agencies from establishing or promoting CBDCs, arguing they "threaten the stability of the financial system, individual privacy, and the sovereignty of the United States." This position reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of how digital currencies actually work—and ignores the privacy advantages they could provide over our current system. Consider this analogy: when you send a package through the United States Postal Service, the Fourth Amendment protects its contents from unreasonable government search. That same package sent via FedEx or UPS enjoys no such constitutional protection. Similarly, a government-issued digital currency would operate under constitutional constraints and democratic oversight that private payment systems simply don't face. As such, a government run service inherently offers more privacy protection than its privately run counterpart. A visual representation of digital cryptocurrency coins sit on display in front of a European flag in Paris, France. A visual representation of digital cryptocurrency coins sit on display in front of a European flag in Paris, France. Chesnot/Getty Images Today, every swipe of your credit card, every electronic transfer, and every digital payment flows through private corporations that collect, analyze, and monetize your financial data. Banks routinely share transaction information with third parties, build detailed consumer profiles, and sell insights about your spending habits. In contrast, a properly designed CBDC could implement strong privacy protections by design, limiting data collection to only what's necessary for monetary policy and financial crime prevention. The economic benefits of a digital dollar are even more compelling. Americans currently pay $5-10 billion annually in overdraft fees alone—money that could stay in families' pockets with a CBDC system that allows direct government-to-citizen transfers and eliminates many banking intermediaries. The millions of Americans who remain unbanked or underbanked would finally have access to basic financial services without requiring a traditional bank account. Even for those in the baking system, the benefits of a CBDC are potentially enormous. Wire transfers, which cost $13-$44 each on average and take days to settle, could become nearly instantaneous and free. That speed in payment settlement would also make a huge difference to Americans when they need emergency aid quickly, as a CBDC could allow the government to deliver relief payments in minutes rather than weeks. The urgency in America to adopt a CBDC extends beyond domestic concerns. In an era of growing geopolitical competition, monetary policy has become a tool of statecraft. The country that controls the dominant digital payment infrastructure will wield enormous influence over global commerce. China understands this, which is why it has invested heavily in digital yuan infrastructure and is actively promoting its use. China is creating first-mover advantages that will be difficult or even impossibly to overcome if we continue to stall. The Federal Reserve has spent years studying CBDC technology. We should be encouraging and guiding them on this task rather than holding them back. In doing so, critics should keep in mind that CBDC implementation need not be revolutionary. A digital dollar should complement rather than replace physical currency, giving Americans choice while maintaining familiar monetary arrangements. So too could retailers freely choose whether to accept digital payments, just as they currently decide whether to accept credit cards. Additional privacy protections for all users can also be built into the system's architecture, not added as an afterthought. The real threat to American privacy and financial sovereignty isn't a democratically governed CBDC—it's ceding monetary leadership to authoritarian competitors and unaccountable private corporations that enrich themselves off our data while impoverishing the worst off among us. The question isn't whether digital currencies will reshape global finance, it's whether America will lead this transformation or watch from the sidelines as others determine the future of money. For the sake of American competitiveness, financial inclusion, and yes, even privacy, it's time for a digital dollar. Nicholas Creel is an associate professor of business law at Georgia College & State University. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.


Bloomberg
2 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Tax Plan That Sparked Korea Stock Plunge Forced Into Review
South Korea's plan to hike taxes on companies and investors, which caused a sudden slump in one of the world's hottest markets on Friday, is facing mounting discontent that could spell trouble for President Lee Jae Myung's domestic agenda. A petition to withdraw the capital gains hike proposal received more than 50,000 signatures, surpassing the threshold needed to trigger a standing committee review. Already, the ruling Democratic Party floated a possible revision of the plan and the presidential office said there's a need to study the underlying causes of the stock market decline.